SHAPED CHARGE JET STANAG Propositions for an updated edition

Similar documents
Development and Fielding of the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary Warhead

U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions Program. Anthony J. Melita

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

NATO Infantry Weapons Standardization

Advanced Warhead Technologies

A METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING POTENTIAL THREAT HAZARDS TO MILITARY MUNITIONS

Short Learning Programmes in Explosives Science and Engineering THE SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL AND NUCLEAR ENGINEERING RHEINMETALL DENEL MUNITION.

M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round (EPR) Media Day

Development and Fielding of the Excalibur XM982 Warhead

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

49TH ANNUAL FUZE CONFERENCE

IMPROVED INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS PERFORMANCE OF AN HE ROCKET WARHEAD

NATO Small Arms Ammunition Interchangeability via Direct Evidence Testing

APEX Armor Piercing with Explosive The Dual Purpose Round for the F-35. Eva Friis Vegard Sande

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ECONOMIC RELATIONS BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Annual Arms Exports and Imports Report

UNi V K3;TATSBSBL SOT h K HANNOVER TrCMNlSCHE INFCSWA'i ionsbiblio'thek Insensitive Munitions & Energetic Materials Technology Symposium

Precision Fires Rocket and Missile Systems. Brief to PSA. COL David Rice PFRMS, Project Manager. Any Warfighter, Anywhere, All The Time UNCLASSIFIED

European Parliament Nov 30, 2010

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

South African Navy Prioritizing of Munitions for Insensitive Munitions Characterization

The Global Military Ammunition Market The Global Military Ammunition Market

17956 Joint Munitions Safety Testing (JMST)

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

Capabilities Overview

Soldier Division Director David Libersat June 2, 2015

WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM CREDIBLE EVENT FOR HAZARD DIVISION 1.6 EXPLOSIVE ARTICLES?

INFORMATION ON LICENCES ISSUED FOR BROKERING OF ARMS, MILITARY EQUIPMENT AND DUAL-USE PRODUCTS IN 2008

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

NIS technical briefing note

IM Operational Assessment A pillar for weapon & platform survivability

DEZAMET SUPPORTS F-35 [ANALYSIS]

US Army, Technical Manual, TM , AMMUNITION RESTRAINT SYSTEMS FOR COMMERCIAL AND MILITARY INTERMODAL CONTAINERS, (ASSEMBLY, INSTALLATION,

PART I Legislative and regulatory framework of arms and ammunition export and import

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

Joint Service Safety Testing Study Phase II Final Presentation

Technology Demands on the Future Industrial Base

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY PROVISIONAL TEMPLATE

FCT and SOCOM Shoulder Fired Weapons

Modelling Missions of Light Forces

Lightweight Multi-Role Missile Integrated SAFU & Lethal Payload L.J.Turner - Thales LAND DEFENCE

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

High Velocity Penetrating Weapon Program Overview

UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION N 61/66 "THE ILLICIT TRADE IN SMALL ARMS AND LIGHT WEAPONS IN ALL ITS ASPECTS"

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

Precision Strike Winter Roundtable

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD AMMUNITION COLOR CODING

ARDEC Cluster Munition Replacement Technologies (CMRT) S&T Concepts

McAlester Army Ammunition Plant

Joint Insensitive Munitions Technology Program Overview

NDIA Armaments Division 2015 Activity and Status Report. 1-3 June Hanover Marriott Whippany, New Jersey

Lawrence Livermore National Lab Perspective

NIMIC. Pilot MSIAC CHANGES TO ROLES & STRUCTURE OF DEFENCE MATERIEL & LOGISTICS AGENCIES IN AUSTRALIA

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

Project Manager Close Combat Systems 2015 Munitions Executive Summit. PM Panel Brief

System Engineering. Missile Design and. Eugene L Fleeman. Lilburn, Georgia AIM EDUCATION SERIES. Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

ARMY

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

Statistical Analysis of the EPIRARE Survey on Registries Data Elements

Flight Controlled Mortar FCMortar

ARMY OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA JOINT OPERATIONS COMMAND. Sofia May 2014 Bulgaria

Lightweight Small Arms Technologies The Final Installment (or is it?)

This Protocol is organized into ten Parts.

Project Manager Soldier Weapons Ammunition Programs

MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER

NDIA s 54th Annual Fuze Conference NAVY OVERVIEW

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

2018 IM & EM TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM

NATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities

AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System

Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-

Safety Process For Navy Gun and Ammunition Systems

PH: (757) FX: (208) diamond springs rd Suite B Virginia beach, VA 23455

Delivering global protection COUNTERMEASURES EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES FOR SEA AND AIR SYSTEMS. crown copyright.

155 Third Generation Maritime Fire Support (155 TMF) Robert McClure BAE Systems Global Combat Systems

Universal Armament Interface (UAI)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD AMMUNITION COLOR CODING

Joint Munitions Safety Testing (JMST) Tutorial Eric Hawley NOSSA Phone:

Ammunitions and Weapons Surplus Treatment in the Croatian Armed Forces

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

French response to air and ballistic missile threats

HAND-EMPLACED ORDNANCE DESIGN, SAFETY CRITERIA FOR

Chapter I SUBMUNITION UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) HAZARDS

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

Fire Control Systems.

CHEMICALS (Classification, Labelling, Packaging of substances and mixtures -CLP) Screening Meeting EU Serbia June 2013

Analysis of Precision Mortar fires for the IBCT

Fire Support Systems.

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

2007 Insensitive Munitions & Energetic Materials Technology Symposium

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

MARCH Updated Guidance. EPCRA Compliance for Ranges

Montessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Middle School Twelfth Session XX March First Committee Disarmament and International Security

Transcription:

SHAPED CHARGE JET STANAG Propositions for an updated edition IMEMG's Expert Working Group on Hazard Assessment & Classification Presented by Yves GUENGANT www.imemg.org 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 1

INTRODUCTION 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 2

INTRODUCTION European Organisation assembling twenty leading armament groups working with Insensitive Munitions technologies 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 3

INTRODUCTION Express the armament industry's viewpoint with regards to relevant transnational regulations and requirements. Expert Working Groups: Computer Models for IM Performance, Cost & Benefit Analysis, Effects of Ageing, Fast Cook-off Test Procedure, Hazard Assessment & Classification. Hazard Assessment & Classification Expert Working Group to present this analysis 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 4

CONTEXT 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 5

CONTEXT STANAG 4526 ed2 "SHAPED CHARGE JET MUNITIONS TEST PROCEDURE" not a real standardized reference: not ratified by all Nations, 50 mm Rockeye Shaped Charge not readily available, Performance not correctly defined for determination of an equivalent Shaped Charge, test set-up not clearly defined (conditioning plate, target nose,...), each test center to use own Shaped Charge and test procedure. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 6

CONTEXT Recent feedback from Afghanistan and Iraq Threat Hazard Analysis review : Standard Shaped Charges design which would be representative of numerous RPG7 types: USA MIL-STD-2105(D) specifies a standardised LX-14 81mm Shaped Charge. France has designed CCEB 62, Germany is developing PG-7 replica; Presentation to introduce industrial experts points-of-view to the IM community. This paper could feed discussions for the 2014 MSIAC Workshop dedicated to SCJ STANAG. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 7

CURRENT SITUATION 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 8

STANAG 4439 Ed3 & AOP 39 Ed3 STANAG 4439 ed3 Threat : Shaped Charge weapon attack Requirement: Type III, Shaped Charge Jet, Munitions Test Procedure STANAG 4526 Ed2. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 9

STANAG 4439 Ed3 & AOP 39 Ed3 AOP 39 The Baseline Threat Range» shaped charge caliber up to 85 mm diameter (AOP39 table 1). For the purpose of IM:» shaped charge to be "broadly representative of Rocket Propelled Grenades and top attacks bomblets" (AOP39 annex F) Test conditions (AOP39 annex H):» 50mm Rockeye or equivalent v 2 d charge,» Use of conditioning plate not defined. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 10

TEST PROCEDURE STANAG STANAG 4526 ed2 SHAPED CHARGE JET MUNITIONS TEST PROCEDURE» designed for "determining the degree of reaction of a munition when hit by typical top attack bomblet shaped charge jet"» not ratified by all NATO nations» specified charge (50mm Rockeye) not readily available in many countries, therefore not used in IMEMG's Nations 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 11

TEST PROCEDURE STANAG STANAG 4526 (Ed2) SHAPED CHARGE JET MUNITION TEST PROCEDURES (cont'd)» test set-up not precisely defined (potential use of conditioning plate)» inconsistent values about 50mm Rockeye (confirmed during MSIAC IM Technology Gaps Workshop - June 2011)» paper: "Rocket Propelled Grenade Shaped Charge Initiation Test Configuration for IM Threat Testing" by Ernest L. Baker and al. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 12

IMPLEMENTATION DIFFICULTIES The v 2 d values is the link between different shaped charges various shaped charges allowed, if same v 2 d values noted in STANAG 4526 Table 1 much too high by at least a factor of > 2 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 13

IMPLEMENTATION DIFFICULTIES For example RPG-7 typical measured values for the Shaped Charge Jet tip: v ~ 7.5 mm/µs and d ~ 3 mm gives a v 2 d value of ~ 170 mm 3 /µs 2 different from 430 mm 3 /µs 2 as noted in the table 430/170 = 2.5 too large 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 14

IMPLEMENTATION DIFFICULTIES As v 2 d is the link between different shaped charges» very important to define exactly how v and d should be measured as below;» Both numbers v and d are not constant but variably over the Shaped Charge Jet length;» the scattering within the measurements should be taken into account. Shaped Charge Shaped Charge Jet Formation SCJ Tip Velocity: v j0 [mm/µs] SCJ Diameter : d [mm] 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 15

COMPARISON OF IM SIGNATURES Conditioning plate often use to : - adjust v 2 d value according to specific Threat Hazard Analysis, - avoid the rear slug effect discrepancies.» a munition to pass the STANAG 4526 but which is the real stimulus? In-service Shaped Charge are equipped with target nose» i.e. for RPG7, target nose can reduce significantly the v 2 d with the "same" charge 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 16

COMPARISON OF IM SIGNATURES Main parameters to be known Shaped Charges» Diameter from 45 mm to 120 mm,» In-service charge: with or without target nose,» High performance (tapered & fast) jet /// un-optimized and cheap serial charge, Conditioning plate use, Stand-off value, Break-up time, Penetration capability. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 17

COMMENTS ON CURRENT CHANGES 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 18

NEW THREAT DEFINITION Recent feedback from Afghanistan and Iraq led to a Threat Hazard Analysis review» RPG-7 is now the sole considered Shaped Charge Threat,» RPG7-V has been measured at 141 mm 3 /μs 2» Due to lack of RPG-7 reliability across various manufacturers, it is necessary to develop RPG-7 surrogate, 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 19

NEW THREAT DEFINITION Many nations are designing their own RPG-7 surrogate and/or Standardised Shaped Charge USA : LX-14 81mm Shaped Charge (MIL-STD-2105(D) requirement) France : CCEB 62 Germany : 75 mm Shaped Charge "PG-7 German replica" 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 20

CCEB 62» the French Standardized Shaped Charge for IM Signature assessment MoD Instruction N 211893/DEF/DGA/INSP/IPE July 21, 2011 STANAG 4526 implemented with CCEB62 Test Procedure defined in French Standard: NF T70-511 CCEB62 performances characteristics are available FRANCE But these are currently re-checked for new production phase validation CCEB62 manufectured by NEXTER Munitions 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 21

FRANCE Conditioning mild steel plates can be used Critical V 2 d determination: detonation/no detonation for PBXs characterization Adjust V 2 d to specified value (customer requirements) V 2 d (mm 3 /μs 2 ) Steel Plate thickness (mm) 203 103 93 82.5 72 62 41.5 52 31 21 0 20 25 40 60 80 110 150 200 280 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 22

FRANCE CCEB 62 : Example of Free Jet X-Ray pictures (at two successive times) Note straightness diameter X-Ray picture by SAFRAN Herakles 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 23

GERMANY PG-7 replica would become German standard PG-7 replica (75 mm) manufactured by Dynamit Nobel. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 24

USA LX-14 81mm appears as US Standard Shaped Charge MIL-STD-2105(D) requirement Charge design and performances are available (E. L. Baker's Paper) Tests seem to be always carried out with a 4" aluminum conditioning block, in that situation» the v 2 d = 141 mm 3 /μs 2,» tolerance about this value not given 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 25

USA LX-14 81mm appears as US Standard Shaped Charge (cont'd) the LX14 explosive charge characteristics are not precisely defined:» no real guarantee that various LX14 batches if manufactured by different producers will have the same performance,» real performance of each producer would be checked. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 26

IMEMG CONCERNS & COMMENTS 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 27

HARMONISATION NEEDS Concerned by the lack of consistency in various test procedures. Difficult to compare munitions responses to Shaped Charge Jet attack. NATO standards should be agreed and practicable with reproducibility by all member countries. IMEMG experts intend to support current harmonization efforts and wish to highlight the fact that next STANAG 4526 should list a very limited number of approved Shaped Charges types and test set-up to each nation. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 28

STANDARDIZED SHAPED CHARGES Shaped charge jet harmonization has really begun, even if charges are different for each nation: LX-14 81 mm, CCEB 62, PG-7 Replica with v 2 d that could be closed to 141 mm 3 /μs 2 Each Shaped Charge referred to should have an available and comprehensive technical data pack. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 29

SHAPED CHARGES PERFORMANCES CARACTERISATION Shaped Charge Shaped Charge Jet Formation SCJ Tip Velocity: v j0 [mm/µs] SCJ Diameter : d [mm] X-Ray picture by TDA Armaments 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 30

SHAPED CHARGES PERFORMANCES CARACTERISATION Measuring v 2 d not easy or trivial : Diameter to be considered» Tip diameter?» Average diameter between fixed positions? Velocity to be considered Stand-off value V2d tolerance +/- 10 %? 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 31

STANDARDISED TEST PROCEDURES Test set-up may have a real influence on tested munition response : Experiments by MBDA-TDW Gmbh 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 32

STANDARDISED TEST PROCEDURES Same stimulus of v2d around 55 / 60 mm3/µs2 low order burning or "Propulsion" (Explosive Reaction Level ERL = V r VI) is observed if the shoot is done with PG-7 (blue squares), full detonation (ERL = I) is observed if the KB44 (red triangles) is used. Experiments by MBDA-TDW Gmbh 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 33

STANDARDISED TEST PROCEDURES Similar observations were done on propellants. not only v 2 d is important for the reaction level but also v and d themselves. Future standard STANAG Shaped Charge should not vary too much in caliber. Reason why it is necessary to standardize the STANAG shaped charge and also the test set-up in the next STANAG 4526 edition. kind of Round Robin tests should be organized under NATO or MSIAC authority, in order to compare the three described shaped charges against the same target / explosive arrangement. to prove that there is no bias, depending on a given shaped charge and thus would give more reliability in data comparisons. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 34

ALTERNATE v 2 d VALUE v 2 d stimulus of 141 mm 3 /μs 2 would be much too high:» most charges (including insensitive PBX) would detonate, only few EIS would survive (Extremely Insensitive Substance in accordance with UN HD 1.6).» STANAG to define different stimuli according to Life Cycle and Threat Hazard Assessment If standard procedure is defined with the stimulus: v 2 d is 141 mm 3 /μs 2 then, alternative procedure could consider stimulus around 60 to 70 mm 3 /μs 2. 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 35

CONCLUSIONS 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 36

CONCLUSION See you in Brest, France, 12-16 May 2014 MSIAC Workshop!!! 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 37

CEA DAM Frank DAVID-QUILLOT EURENCO Yves GUENGANT MBDA-F Michel VIVES NEXTER Munitions Frederic NOZERES ROXEL Raymond COLENO TDA Armements Carole FOURNIER RWM Italia SpA Massimo CASTIGLIA FRANCE ITALY MBDA TDW Dr Werner ARNOLD RHEINMETALL WM GmbH Dr Gerhard HUBRICHT AWE Plc. Helen FLOWER BAE Systems GCSM Charles MARSHALL CHEMRING ENERGETICS John HAND MBDA-UK Sean RANDALL AUTHORS GERMANY UK 2013 IMEMTS #16206 SHAPED CHARGE JET STANG: PROPOSITION FOR AN UPDATED EDITION 38