Page 1 of 5 Version No: 6 Authorised by: General Counsel

Similar documents
February New Zealand Health and Disability Services National Reportable Events Policy 2012

Root Cause Analysis For Clinical Incidents

INCIDENT POLICY Page 1 of 15 July 2017

Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Adult Safeguarding Partnership Board Safeguarding Adult Reviews (SAR) Protocol

Consumer Complaints Management and Resolution Policy

Sample CHO Primary Care Division Quality and Safety Committee. Terms of Reference

MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION SERVICES

Job Description. Clinical Nurse Coordinator Perioperative Department Acute Theatres

Root Cause Analysis: The NSW Health Incident Management System

MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION SERVICES

Serious Incident Management Policy

GATEWAY ASSESSMENT SERVICE: SERVICE SPECIFICATION

HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS

MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION SERVICES

Operations Director, Specialist Community & Regional Services Clinical Director, Mental Health Director of Nursing

Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols

This policy applies to all employees of Meditech, service users, their families, guardians and advocates.

Guideline on the Role of Directors of Area Addiction Services Appointed under the Substance Addiction (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017

Safeguarding Adults Reviews Protocol

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Appendix Five Decision Pathway Pressure Ulcers and safeguarding Adults (A3 format)

COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure

A guide to the National Adverse Events Reporting Policy 2017

Designated Position: Clinical Nurse Specialist. Positon Title: Clinical Nurse Specialist Head & Neck

PRIVACY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION SERVICES. Position Description. Occupational Therapist Community Outreach Service

Systems Analysis Investigation of Incidents Quick Reference Guide

Quality and Patient Safety Team Leader

The interface between Western Australian Family Support Networks. and. The Department for Child Protection and Family Support

CORPORATE POLICY & PROCEDURE CPP23 No1. Serious Incident Requiring Investigation Policy August 2017

THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORKS. Roles and Responsibilities

COMPLAINTS POLICY Page 1 of 7

Guidelines for District Health Boards Mental Health Quality Monitoring and Audit

Accident Investigation: Root Cause Analysis

Quality Improvement Committee

Duty Nurse Manager Waitemata Central Position Description

SystmOne COMMUNITY OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES

National Patient Safety Agency Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Investigation

Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. On: 30 January Review Date: November Corporate / Directorate. Department Responsible for Review:

BAY-ARENAC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Unique Identifier: Review Date: November Issue Status: Approved Version No: 1.4 Issue Date: November 2017

The Code Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for chiropractors. Effective from 30 June 2016

EQuIPNational Survey Planning Tool NSQHSS and EQuIP Actions 4.

WELCOME TO ELITE PERIO

CARE QUALITY COMMISSION ESSENTIAL STANDARDS OF QUALITY AND SAFETY. Outcome 6 Regulation 7 Co-operating with Other Providers

A Case Review Process for NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts

Job Description Registered Nurse Public Health Nurse (PHN)

Job Description Registered Nurse Preschool & Public Health Nurse (PPHN & PHN)

Guidelines for Peer Assessors

First Steps mapping document 3: UK Health Care Support Worker Standards

PREVENTION OF VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE

National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-funded Nursing Care in England. Core Values and Principles

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Regulatory Authorities

A consultation on the Government's mandate to NHS England to 2020

NHS CHOICES COMPLAINTS POLICY

This policy is intended to ensure that we handle complaints fairly, efficiently and effectively.

SAFEGUARDING ADULTS POLICY

COMPETENCIES FOR HEALTHCARE ASSISTANT IN SEXUAL HEALTH (BAND 3)

Qualification details

[The section is subject to the publication of Scottish Government Guidance and ongoing discussions between the Parties]

Incident and Serious Incident Management Policy

Meeting Joint Commission Standards for Health Literacy. Communication and Health Care. Multiple Players in Communication

INTEGRATION SCHEME (BODY CORPORATE) BETWEEN WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL AND GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD

Incident Management Procedure

Complaints and Concerns Policy

Physiotherapy Portfolio Leader June 2015

6Cs in social care - mapped to the Care Certificate

Australian Medical Council Limited

NHS England (South) Surge Management Framework

VIP Visitors Policy. Purpose of Agreement. Document Type. Policy SOP Guideline. Version Version 1. Operational Date July 2015

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Woodville RN-2C / RN-1

National Health Regulatory Authority Kingdom of Bahrain

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Services

JOB DESCRIPTION. Psychiatrist REPORTING TO: CLINICAL DIRECTOR - FOR ALL CLINICAL MATTERS SERVICE MANAGER FOR ALL ADMIN MATTERS DATE: APRIL 2017

Rapid Intervention Service Kenora (RISK) Table Report May May 2017

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

HIPAA THE PRIVACY RULE

Appendix 5. Safeguarding Adults and Pressure Ulcer Protocol: Deciding whether to refer to the Safeguarding Adults Procedures

New Zealand Farm Data Code of Practice. For organisations involved in collecting, storing, and sharing primary production data in New Zealand

Job Description Registered Nurse Community Ear Nurse

1 P a g e. Newsletter 4 April 2017

Position Description. Clinical Nurse Specialist. Lung Cancer

Learning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care.

Appendix E Checklist for Campus Safety and Security Compliance

LEARNING FROM DEATHS (Mortality Policy)

Clinical Governance Framework

PROJECT CHARTER. Primary Care Programme. Health Quality & Safety Commission

Farm Data Code of Practice Version 1.1. For organisations involved in collecting, storing, and sharing primary production data in New Zealand

Meeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body. Title: Bristol CCG Management of Serious Incidents Agenda Item: 17

Emergency Use of Manual Restraints Policy

MAORI RESPONSIVENESS STRATEGY

PRIVATE PATIENTS IN DHB FACILITIES - PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Clinical Psychologist Paediatric Consult Liaison Psychological Medicine

4LSAB Safeguarding Adults Escalation Protocol

REPORTING ABUSE ACTUAL OR SUSPECTED: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CLINICAL AND CARE GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

ALLIED PHYSICIAN IPA ADVANTAGE HEALTH NETWORK IPA ARROYO VISTA MEDICAL IPA GREATER ORANGE MEDICAL GROUP IPA GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PHYSICIANS IPA

Local Health Integration Network Authorities under the Local Health System Integration Act, 2006

MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY

Team Leader Intake and Emergency Response

Transcription:

Feedback Action Analysis Prioritisation Classificattion Notification Identification INCIDENT MANAGEMENT Patient informed / Family informed if required Event occurs If staff injury form must be printed, signed and sent to Occupational Health & Safety Appropriate immediate actions taken If needlestick / body fluid event then appropriate form to be completed Event entered in Electronic Department manager and other relevant staff notified by Event investigated, actual SAC assigned No Are further actions / feedback required? Yes Quality & Patient Safety Co-ordinator notified by Event closed Actions assigned / feedback requested Event investigation reviewed Actions / feedback entered in Incident investigation Back to event investigation No Was investigation adequate? Yes Event reopened and instructions given to investigator Event closed fully Report to staff and management Response based on SAC Score SAC 1 SAC 2 Extreme risk immediate action required A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) investigation or Systems Analysis of Clinical Incident investigation (the London Protocol) must be completed within 70 calendar days. Reportable Event Brief (REB) must be forwarded to the national central repository High risk senior management attention needed Notification to the national central repository and a detailed investigation must be completed within 70 calendar days SAC 3 / 4 Medium risk All incident forms to be reviewed, review in common incident types may be most appropriate to develop a common action plan. Responsibility for management of these incidents must be assigned SAC 4 Low risk manage through team level review and improvement procedures Page 1 of 5

STANDARD 1. SAC 1 and 2 All SAC 1 and 2 incidents require immediate reporting and escalation, notification via REB (Reportable Event Brief) to a central repository, detailed investigation and monitoring of trend aggregated data. a) Notification i) When an incident occurs it must be reported to the line manager and an electronic incident form is to be completed. ii) The Quality and Patient will receive automatic notification once an incident form is completed however to ensure timely escalation and response, notification should be also be made by phone or email. iii) The Quality and Patient will notify the Patient Safety Intensive Review Group and the Chief Executive Officer s (CEO) office, this does not preclude notifications been made through line managers. iv) The Quality and Patient will make notification to the national central repository, via a REB within 15 working days (unless required earlier by legislation) of notification within the DHB. v) The department who was responsible at the time of the incident will make notifications required under legislation e.g. Coroner, Department of Labour. vi) Patients and or their family / whanau will be advised (using guidelines for open disclosure) as soon as practicable of any incident. The health professional with overall responsibility for the consumer s care should disclose the incident unless this is contraindicated. b) Decision-Making i) Having received notification and confirmed the incident is a SAC 1 or 2, the Quality and Patient confirms the type of investigation required. Most incidents will be investigated using Root Cause Analysis (RCA) or The London Protocol (Mental Health & Addiction Services) focusing on system issues however where the incident is one of the following other processes e.g. performance management will be used - a criminal act, - a deliberately unsafe act, - substance abuse by the provider (includes alcohol) - deliberate patient harm or abuse ii) Where an RCA is appropriate the Quality and Patient will convene an RCA Team within 72 hours. iii) Members of the RCA team will be identified dependent on the situation but will always be multidisciplinary and have no more than five (5) members. iv) Team members must not have been involved in the incident and are chosen for either their specific expertise or experience in RCA. v) A team leader is identified. This person must be someone with experience in the RCA process and will be responsible the overall investigation. This includes: - Co-ordination of meetings - Keeping the team focused - Managing timelines - Ensuring RCA process is followed - Participating in information gathering - Completing the final report Page 2 of 5

c) Investigation i) All SAC 1 incidents will be investigated using root cause analysis. SAC 2 must have a detailed investigation. This should take the form of RCA; however other appropriate and effective investigation methods may be used (e.g. The London Protocol). ii) The investigation team will use the RCA process to identify system vulnerabilities that allowed the incident to occur and identify actions and recommendations to prevent a similar recurrence. iii) The full investigation and required reporting will be completed within 70 days if the incident. iv) The RCA should be finalised within one (1) to three (3) meetings. v) Training and support will be provided to assist the investigation team through the Quality and Patient. vi) Should there be any indication during the investigation reflecting significant poor professional practice requiring attention, the information will be extracted from the process and brought to the attention of the relevant General Manager (GM) and Human Resources. vii) Any staff requested to provide information for the investigation must give exclusive priority to the request and timeframe deliverable. Meeting One Plan process and expected timing and sequence of events. Using a simple flow diagram establish chronology of events which will form a basis for the investigation. Review relevant information incident form, medical record etc) Identify key questions and people to be interviewed. Meeting Two Team member s present information gathered. Develop the final detailed flow diagram Identify relevant actions and / or inactions at each point of the detailed flow diagram Determine the most significant points where barriers might interrupt the flow of events. Identify root causes. Meeting Three Select the significant root causes Describe the causal chain as a statement from the root cause to the problem. Make recommendations and develop a corrective action plan. d) Reporting and Follow-Up i) The draft report will be submitted to the intensive review subcommittee for review and endorsement. ii) The final report will be signed by all members of the RCA team and submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) for final sign off. iii) The final report will be logged in the Quality and Risk Management System (DATIX) and progress with follow up actions will be monitored through this by the Quality and Patient Safety team. iv) Using the principle of open disclosure the findings are fed back to those affected by the incident e.g. patient and / or their family / whānau. Page 3 of 5

v) Recommended actions and solutions must be communicated to employees so that: - The recommended actions are evaluated for their potential impact on other units or operational practices. - Duplication of efforts to resolve closely related problems is prevented. - All of the expertise that needs to be involved in addressing the problem is obtained. - Learning can occur. vi) Examples of feedback forums may include: quality improvement groups, patient care review groups, Audit Finance and Risk Management Committee, Health and Safety Committee, Infection Control Committee, Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, Combined Medicines Review Committee, Theatre Management Group N.B. this list is not exhaustive. vii) Where a causative / contributory factor is identified, and its resolution requires organisation wide changes, it must be referred to the appropriate forum. viii) Wherever possible, staff should be made aware of support services that are available should they choose to use these. 2. SAC 3 and 4 a) Notification i) Any staff member who identifies an incident completes an incident form. ii) The investigator will be automatically identified and will receive the report in their account for action and / or investigation. b) Decision-Making i) The line manager decides on the level of investigation required. This may only require a review to ensure all the controls were in place i.e. falls. c) Investigation i) Each incident form will be investigated by the nominated investigator. ii) The investigator will decide whether the incident requires further investigation or it can be investigated as part of a common incident type. iii) All investigations will be completed within 28 calendar days. d) Reporting and Follow-Up i) All incidents will be reviewed by the Quality & Patient Safety Co-ordinator for each service and forwarded to the Clinical Leader, where appropriate. Additional reviews are undertaken as appropriate by the Pharmacy Manager (for medication related events), service leaders, Director of Nursing and Medical Director. ii) Ongoing monitoring of aggregated incident data will be used to identify and prioritise improvement projects. REFERENCES New Zealand Health and Disability Services. National Reportable Events Policy. March 2012 Reportable Event Brief Form 2012 Guidelines on Open Disclosure Policies, Health and Disability Commissioner, Revised December 2009 Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 and Regulations 2016 Health Privacy Information Act Code 1994 Page 4 of 5

Health and Disability Commission Code of Rights New Zealand Incident management System: A national approach to the management of healthcare incident Training Manual Systems Analysis of Clinical Incidents: The London Protocol Reporting And Reviewing Serious & Sentinel Mental Health Incidents ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 2.1.4 Incident Management Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 2.1.4 protocol 1 Incident Management - Standards and Severity Assessment Codes (SACs) Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 2.1.4 protocol 3 Open Disclosures Principles and Process Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 2.5.1 Health Information Privacy Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 5.3.1 Employee Health and Safety Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 1.3.1 Complaints Management Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 3.50.05 Protected Disclosures Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 6.6.1 Death of a Patient Bay of Plenty District Health Board policy 1.4.4 Cultural Safety - Maori Bay of Plenty District Health Board Incident form Page 5 of 5