Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column

Similar documents
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Enacted February 17, 2009

Stimulus Funding and Transportation

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

Projects from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Enacted February 17, 2009

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Utah s Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Rick Torgerson

Questions & Answers. Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009

ARRA Overview. ATTWG Symposium Anchorage, AK April 7, 2009

Formal STIP Amendment

SECTION 3 POLICY & PROGRAM

Texas Department of Transportation

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator

ARRA REPORTING ( CONSTRUCTION )

Membrane Pre-Selection Request For Proposal

Overview of Recovery Act, Section 1512 Reporting

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Stakeholder Guidance American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 March 3, 2009

MARYLAND STATE MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT

GAO RECOVERY ACT. Project Selection and Starts Are Influenced by Certain Federal Requirements and Other Factors. Report to the Republican Leader

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration. FTA Update. GAMPO Meeting November 30, 2010

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

Counting for Dollars: Polk County, Florida

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

District 8 New Funding Project Selection

Counting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS CAPITAL PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Transportation

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

State Management Plan for Public

Alteration of Bridges

Chapter 3 Preparing Grant Applications and Grants Administration

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 19 Public Transportation. (a) Purpose. Title 49 U.S.C. 5329, authorizes the

SCDOT MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE UTILIZATION PLAN

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

Counting for Dollars: Sedgwick County, Kansas

The Division expects to let the following FTA/ USDOT-assisted projects in FFYs :

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Financial Grants Management. Session Outline. Grants Management Roles 4/19/10

Expenditures by Program Explore Minnesota Tourism 0 9,915 10,626 11,626 22,252. Full-Time Equivalents (FTE)

APTA RAIL CONFERENCE. WORKSHOP The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Counting for Dollars: Fresno County, California

SECTION 3 PROGRAM MANUAL

Counting for Dollars: Broward County, Florida

SENATE, No. 876 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Local Nonprofit Agency Risk Assessments

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

Cambridge Housing Authority Section 3 Policy

Office of Business and Financial Services Procurement and Contracts Division Section SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

Oregon Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. STIP Users Guide

Counting for Dollars: Syracuse, NY

Section 3 Sample Plan Template

KNOXVILLE KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DBE PROGRAM DISADVANTAGE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PLAN FY 2012 FY 2014

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 208th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE 29, 1998

Trail Legacy Grants FY2015 Program Manual

Non-Federal Share Match Program Frequently Asked Questions

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

Below are five basic procurement methods common to most CDBG projects:

STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I

Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Business Participation Plan FY 13/14

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

Overview of Presentation

Office of Community & Economic Development Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Presentation

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Project Selection Advisory Council

Wake Forest University Financial Services: Grants Accounting and Compliance

Counting for Dollars: Sonoma County, California

HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM. N. C. Department of Transportation (Research and Development) (Construction and Maintenance)

Non-Federal Cost Share Match Program Grant Implementation Checklist

Program Management Plan

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

FOR REINVESTMENT ACT. NILAH DEVANEY NWRO, AWARDING OFFICIAL

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION METROPOLITAN PLANNING. U. S. Department of Transportation

Minnesota s Capital Investment Process: What Cities Should Know. Webinar for the League of MN Cities May 2, 2017

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)

Guidelines for the Major Eligible Employer Grant Program

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Department of Commerce

Government Auditing Standards Report

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & REVITALIZATION PROCUREMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUBRECIPIENTS UNDER 2 CFR PART 200 (UNIFORM RULES)

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

Program Management Plan FTA Section 5310

State Management Plan For The Administration Of The Section Nonurbanized Area Formula Grant Program And Rural Transportation Assistance Program

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Fiscal Year 2018 Competitive Funding Opportunity; Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program

FY STIP. Statewide Financials. November Quarterly Revisions TRANSIT STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Please complete your phone connection now:

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

Transcription:

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Recipient name Minnesota Department of Transportation New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (i.e., Highway Infrastructure, Transit Capital, Fixed Guideway Infrastructure, or Clean Water State Revolving Funds) Highway Infrastructure Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Recipient DUNS Number 999999999.9999 607415197 Amount of Recovery Act funds allocated/apportioned to recipient (Transit agencies: please report on the amount of Recovery Act funds available to your agency and not the overall amount apportioned to your urbanized area) 850000 43154000 Amount of Recovery Act funds obligated 690000 0 Amount of Recovery Act funds outlayed 75000 0 1 With regard to each, recipients should report information in each applicable category. For example, if the Minnesota Department of Transportation had begun work on a highway bridge repair, it would likely report the project in each of the following categories: number of projects put out to bid; estimated amount of Recovery Act funds associated with projects put out to bid; number of projects under contract; amount of Recovery Act funds associated with projects under contract; number of projects in which work has begun; and amount of Recovery Act funds associated with projects in which work has begun. With regard to Highway Infrastructure, Governors, in coordination with Metropolitan Planning Organizations ( MPOs ), should submit the following Table 1 forms: (1) aggregate data for the entire State; and (2) a separate copy of Table 1 representing aggregate data for funds suballocated to each MPO serving a Transportation Management Area pursuant to Section 133 of Title 23, United States Code. For example, with regard to Highway Infrastructure, the Governor of Oregon should submit the following forms: Table 1 for the entire State of Oregon; Table 1 for Recovery Act funds suballocated to Eugene, Oregon; Table 1 for Recovery Act funds suballocated to Portland, Oregon; Table 1 for Recovery Act funds suballocated to Salem, Oregon; and Table 2 for each project in the State. 1

Number of projects put out to bid 8 0 (i.e., the project has been advertised) Estimated amount of Recovery Act funds associated with projects put out to bid Number of projects under contract (i.e., the contract has been awarded) Amount of Recovery Act funds associated with projects under contract Number of projects in which work has begun (i.e., the contractor has received a notice to proceed or the work has begun in-house, where applicable) Amount of Recovery Act funds associated with projects in which work has begun Number of projects in which work has been completed (i.e., the work has been completed by a contractor or in-house, where applicable) Amount of Recovery Act funds associated with completed projects Number of direct, on-project jobs created or sustained by Recovery Act funds (i.e., the number of employees created or sustained by Recovery Act funds, including employees of recipient, prime contractors, consultants, and subcontractors) 690000 0 6 0 428000 0 4 0 100000 0 2 0 50000 0 178 0 2

Total job hours created or sustained by Recovery Act funds (i.e., the total job hours for employees cited in above line) 14240 0 Total payroll of job hours created or sustained by Recovery Act funds (i.e., the total dollar amount of wages paid for job hours created or sustained by Recovery Act funds) Aggregate expenditure from State sources for projects eligible for funding under the Federal formula program during the period from 2/17/09 through 3/31/09 Amount of funds that recipient planned to spend as of 2/17/09 from State sources for projects eligible for funding under the during the period from 2/17/09 through 9/30/10 Any decrease (from the amount reported in the line above) in the amount of funds that the recipient now plans to spend from State sources for projects eligible for funding under the during the period from 2/17/09 through 9/30/10 370240 0 50000 0 600000 0 0 0 3

Table 2: PROJECT-SPECIFIC: Please complete for all projects where Recovery Act funds are obligated 2 Project name Highway 1 Recovery Bridge None (Note: To the extent applicable, the project name should be the Replacement in Duluth, same name as the name appears in the Statewide Transportation Minnesota Improvement Program (STIP) and/or Fiscal Management Information System (FMIS).) Highway Infrastructure Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Recipient DUNS Number 999999999.9999 607415197 Federal-aid project number (Note: The Federal-aid project number applies only to Highway Infrastructure.) AAAA111 Not applicable State project number or identification number, where available (Note: The state project or identification number applies only to Highway Infrastructure.) 1000000000000 Not applicable Project purpose (For Highway Infrastructure, please provide a single sentence describing the type of project consistent with the improvement type code in FMIS.) Bridge Replacement-No Added Capacity Not applicable Estimated project total cost 2200000 Not applicable Project rationale (Note: Please provide a short description of how the project will advance the recipient s transportation and infrastructure goals and the reason the recipient selected this particular investment.) Improve bridge safety by replacing an 80-year old bridge Not applicable 2 Please use this table format to add rows to identify additional projects as necessary. 4

Table 2: PROJECT-SPECIFIC: Please complete for all projects where Recovery Act funds are obligated 3 Project name Highway 1 Recovery Bridge (Note: To the extent applicable, the project name should be the Replacement in Duluth, same name as the name appears in the Statewide Transportation Minnesota Improvement Program (STIP) and/or Fiscal Management Information System (FMIS).) Highway Infrastructure Recipient DUNS Number 999999999.9999 Federal-aid project number (Note: The Federal-aid project number applies only to Highway Infrastructure.) State project number or identification number, where available (Note: The state project or identification number applies only to Highway Infrastructure.) Project purpose (For Highway Infrastructure, please provide a single sentence describing the type of project consistent with the improvement type code in FMIS.) AAAA111 1000000000000 Bridge Replacement-No Added Capacity Estimated project total cost 2200000 Project rationale (Note: Please provide a short description of how the project will advance the recipient s transportation and infrastructure goals and the reason the recipient selected this particular investment.) Improve bridge safety by replacing an 80-year old bridge 3 Please use this table format to add rows to identify additional projects as necessary. 5

Table 2: PROJECT-SPECIFIC: Please complete for all projects where Recovery Act funds are obligated 4 Project name Highway 1 Recovery Bridge (Note: To the extent applicable, the project name should be the Replacement in Duluth, same name as the name appears in the Statewide Transportation Minnesota Improvement Program (STIP) and/or Fiscal Management Information System (FMIS).) Highway Infrastructure Recipient DUNS Number 999999999.9999 Federal-aid project number (Note: The Federal-aid project number applies only to Highway Infrastructure.) State project number or identification number, where available (Note: The state project or identification number applies only to Highway Infrastructure.) Project purpose (For Highway Infrastructure, please provide a single sentence describing the type of project consistent with the improvement type code in FMIS.) AAAA111 1000000000000 Bridge Replacement-No Added Capacity Estimated project total cost 2200000 Project rationale (Note: Please provide a short description of how the project will advance the recipient s transportation and infrastructure goals and the reason the recipient selected this particular investment.) Improve bridge safety by replacing an 80-year old bridge 4 Please use this table format to add rows to identify additional projects as necessary. 6

Table 3: CONTACT PERSON Name Jon Smith Stanley V. Cach, Jr Title Director of Federally Assistant Director, MFCE Administered Program Phone number 2025552000 609-292-8961 Fax number 2025553000 609-341-4518 Email address Jon.smith@state.gov Stanley.cach@dep.state.nj.us 7