Health Economics Program

Similar documents
Transitions Through the Care Continuum: Discussions on Barriers to Patient Care, Communications, and Advocacy

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

This profile provides an overview of the services provided at the Royal Inland Hospital in the areas of:

HC 1930 HC 1930 ICD-9-CM III/CPT Coding II

STATISTICAL BRIEF #9. Hospitalizations among Males, Highlights. Introduction. Findings. June 2006

Community Health Needs Assessment Mercy Hospital Ardmore 2012

RE: Two-Midnight Policy and Potential Short Stay Payment Solutions

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Essentials for Clinical Documentation Integrity 2017

DELAWARE FACTBOOK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Bundled Payment Primer

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

Disclosure of Proprietary Interest

Analysis of Final Rule for FY 2007 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

MEDICARE INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM

THE PEPPER AND YOUR CDI PROGRAM. Kat McFarland, RN, MN, ACM Director Care Management Providence Regional Medical Center Everett 9/28/2018

UNMH Family Medicine Clinical Privileges. Name: Effective Dates: From To

Comparing Patient Safety in Rural Hospitals by Bed Count

The Impact of Healthcare-associated Infections in Pennsylvania 2010

Fast Facts 2018 Clinical Integration Performance Measures

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues March 28 30, 2012 Robert A. Pelaia, JD, CPC

UNMH Family Medicine Clinical Privileges

Joseph W. Thompson, MD, MPH Arkansas Surgeon General Director, Arkansas Center for Health Improvement

Medicare Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System

Payment Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System: Update Notice for Federal Fiscal Year 2013

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

The Pain or the Gain?

Linking the Clinical & Business Successes of Patient Blood Management

A preliminary analysis of differences in coded data from Australia and Maryland

CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE/HOSPITAL VALUE TOOL 2011/2012 METHODOLOGY

Proposed Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Prospective Payment System: Federal Fiscal Year 2015

Midwife / Physician Agreement

Issue Brief: Controls on the Premature Discharge By Hospitals to Post-Acute Providers

An Overview of Home Health and Hospice Care Patients: 1996 National Home and Hospice Care Survey

Retrospective Bundles

Policy Brief October 2014

Programs and Procedures for Chronic and High Cost Conditions Related to the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program

SUCCESS IN A VALUE - BASED PAYMENT ARRANGMENT

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

K-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2

Subject: Hospital-Acquired Conditions (Page 1 of 5)

Home Health Agency Partnership Development Guide Overview

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Framework for Post-Acute Care: Current and Future Issues for Providers

Ambulatory-care-sensitive admission rates: A key metric in evaluating health plan medicalmanagement effectiveness

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) Hospital Readmissions: Q Q2 2014

1/14/2013. Emerging Healthcare Issues: How Will They Impact Hospital Reimbursement? EMERGING HEALTHCARE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

Hospice Codes. Table 1 ALS Diagnosis. Table 2 Alzheimer s Disease and Related Disorder Diagnoses. Table 3 Heart Disease Diagnoses

Plant the Seeds of Compliance with PEPPER. Prepared for: WiAHC June 8, Presented by: Caryn Adams, Manager

Optima Health Provider Manual

Using Clinical Criteria for Evaluating Short Stays and Beyond. Georgeann Edford, RN, MBA, CCS-P. The Clinical Face of Medical Necessity

Learning Objectives. CMS Plans to Transform Healthcare. Leveraging CDI to Improve Performance Under Alternative Payment Model (APM) Methodology

implementing a site-neutral PPS

Thank you for joining us!

ICD-10/APR-DRG. HP Provider Relations/September 2015

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

NURSING COMPUTER SOFTWARE. Level 1- Semester 2. Medical Surgical Nursing/ Clinical Lab

For Vanderbilt Medical Center Carolyn Buppert, NP, JD Law Office of Carolyn Buppert

Community Performance Report

RAC Targets, Bullseyes and Near Misses: What Your CDI Program Should Know

INCENTIVE OFDRG S? MARTTI VIRTANEN NORDIC CASEMIX CONFERENCE

NASHP s 30 th Annual State Health Policy Conference. Timeline of Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative

Maximizing Success in a Bundled Payment Environment

North Carolina Inpatient Hospital Discharge Data - Data Dictionary FY2011 Standard Research File Alphabetic List of Variables and Attributes

Hospital Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Measurement Specifications

AHRQ Quality Indicators. Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission October 21, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ

*Your Name *Nursing Facility. radiation therapy. SECTION 2: Acute Change in Condition and Factors that Contributed to the Transfer

USE OF APR-DRG IN 15 ITALIAN HOSPITALS Luca Lorenzoni APR-DRG Project Co-ordinator

Pricing and funding for safety and quality: the Australian approach

Review Process. Introduction. InterQual Level of Care Criteria Acute Criteria. Reference materials

Presented by: Gary Lucas, CPC, CPC-I, AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM & PCS Trainer and Ambassador

TITLE/DESCRIPTION: Admission and Discharge Criteria for Telemetry

Addressing and clarifying 2017 Guideline recommendations

Cigna Centers of Excellence Hospital Value Tool 2016 Methodology

Very large per-capita Medicaid population.

QUALITY INDICATORS ASPECT OF CARE/FUNCTION: MEDICAL STAFF - SURGICAL CARE REVIEW (INCLUDING TISSUE REVIEW)

Questions related to defining a ward, inclusion and exclusion criteria

About the Report. Cardiac Surgery in Pennsylvania

Case-mix Analysis Across Patient Populations and Boundaries: A Refined Classification System

HEDIS Ad-Hoc Public Comment: Table of Contents

Provider Preventable Conditions: Health Care Acquired Conditions and Present on Admission Policy

* HFMA staff and volunteers determined that this product has met specific criteria developed under. endorse or guaranty the use of this product.

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 06/01/12 05/02/16 Administration Policy

Impacting Quality Initiatives through Documentation Improvement. Fran Jurcak, MSN, RN, CCDS Vice President of Clinical Innovation Iodine Software

HomeTown Health HCCS. Hospital Consortium Project: Track 1 Nuts and Bolts of: CDI Proficiencies

Objectives 9/18/2018. Patient Driven Payment Model(PDPM) Janine Finck Boyle, MBA/HCA, LNHA Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Fall 2018

HIMSS ASIAPAC 11 CONFERENCE & LEADERSHIP SUMMIT SEPTEMBER 2011 MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA

Corporate Partners Program

Identifying Potentially Preventable Readmissions

Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) are a type of

Readmissions Moving beyond blame to fill the patient needs. Jackie Conrad RN, MBA, RCC Cynosure Health

3/14/2014. Preventing Rehospitalizations How to Change Your When in Doubt, Send em Out Way of Thinking. Objectives. Background Information

Reimbursement Policy Subject: Present on Admission Indicator for Health Care-Acquired Conditions 01/01/14 Administration 05/02/16

2015 Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data Annual Report

Medicare s Inpatient Final Rule for Claire Kapilow, Director, Regulatory Affairs

User s Guide Tenth Edition

E OR Shutdown Columbus Weekend. OR Scrubs on Marshall Street. Applies to All Downtown Physicians

Transcription:

Health Economics Program Issue Brief 2006-02 February 2006 Health Conditions Associated With Minnesotans Hospital Use Health care spending by Minnesota residents accounts for approximately 12% of the state s economy and about twenty percent of total health care spending goes to purchase hospital inpatient care for state residents. This issue brief broadly describes the mix of health conditions that were associated with Minnesotans hospital use in 2003. Among the primary findings: Eight of the 25 major groups of health conditions, or major diagnostic categories (MDCs), were associated with 76% of hospital claims during 2003 and 73% of all patient days of care provided. The top five MDCs accounted for 50% of all 2003 patient days of care provided to Minnesotans: Diseases and disorders of the circulatory system were associated with 12% of total patient days; Mental diseases and disorders were 10%; Just under 10% of all patient days were provided to newborns and sick neonates; Diseases and disorders of the digestive system were responsible for 9%; 9% of all patient days were associated with musculoskeletal problems. linked to the presence of complicated or preexisting comorbid diagnoses. Average length of stay ranged from 2.6 days for conditions related to pregnancy and childbirth to 7.7 days for those diagnosed with a mental health condition. Patients with complicated diagnoses had longer average lengths of stay than those without them. Methods For this analysis, we used Minnesota resident insurance claims billed by 119 hospitals operating in the state during calendar year 2003. 1 Claims were categorized into major diagnostic categories (MDCs), which is a way of grouping the discrete ICD9-CM diagnosis codes used for hospital billing and utilization analysis that appear upon each claim. The diagnoses in each MDC generally correspond to a single major organ system within the human body. 2 Health Conditions Responsible for Hospital Inpatient Utilization Table 1 ranks the top eight broad medical conditions (MDCs) associated with the bulk of hospital patient days of care used by Minnesota residents during 2003. These eight categories were responsible for 76% of all claims, and 73% of the patient days of care Across all major diagnosis categories, 26% of the total patient days of care provided were h ealth e conomics p rogram Minnesota Department of Health

provided. The first five condition categories alone were responsible for half of the total patient days. Patients with complicated and/or comorbid diagnoses 3 accounted for 26% of all patient days (Table 2) and stayed in the hospital longer, on average, than patients without complex conditions, 4.5 versus 3.7 days (Table 3). Table 1 Number of Inpatient Claims and Patient Days by Major Diagnostic Category, 2003 Major Diagnostic Category Number of Claims Number of Days Claims Days Circulatory System 75,704 245,480 14.1% 11.7% Mental Diseases & Disorders 27,770 214,108 5.2% 10.2% Newborns & Neonates with Problems 63,537 201,931 11.8% 9.6% Digestive System 47,802 196,305 8.9% 9.4% Musculoskeletal & Connective 54,187 195,431 10.1% 9.3% Respiratory System 42,854 184,875 8.0% 8.8% Pregnancy & Childbirth 68,309 180,367 12.7% 8.6% Nervous System 27,005 111,450 5.0% 5.3% All Else (17 categories) 130,295 564,644 24.2% 27.0% Total 537,463 2,094,591 100.0% 100.0% Source: Minnesota Hospital Discharge Dataset of participating hospitals CY 2003, Minnesota residents only Care provided to Minnesota residents with circulatory system conditions accounted for nearly 12% of all patient days and 14% of all claims during 2003, ranking first in Table 1. Average length of stay for Minnesota patients in this MDC without complications or comorbidities was 3.1 days compared to 3.7 days to those with them (Table 3). Table 2 shows that patients with complicating diagnoses and/or comorbidities were associated with 24% of the patient days within this category. Among the numerous surgical services provided within this first ranked MDC were percutaneous cardiovascular interventions, cardiac device implants, coronary artery bypass surgeries, and valve replacements, for example. The most prevalent medical condition (non-surgical) within this MDC was a diagnosis of heart failure and cardiogenic shock, which accounted for 16% of all the circulatory system-related patient days of care. Table 2 Share of Inpatient Claims and Patient Days with Complications and/or Comorbidities, 2003 With Complications and/or Comorbidities Major Diagnostic Category Claims Days Circulatory System 20.5% 23.7% Mental Diseases & Disorders n.a* n.a* Newborns & Neonates with Problems n.a* n.a* Digestive System 58.6% 74.3% Musculoskeletal & Connective 18.8% 22.1% Respiratory System 43.3% 46.2% Pregnancy & Childbirth 5.5% 9.8% Nervous System 25.4% 31.4% All Else (17 categories) 31.0% 29.3% Total 22.9% 26.3% Source: Minnesota Hospital Discharge Dataset of participating hospitals CY 2003, Minnesota residents only * n.a. = not applicable. Some MDCs by definition contain no DRGs with complications and/or comorbidities 2

Table 3 2003 Average Length of Stay (ALOS) by Major Diagnostic Category: Patients With and Without Complications and/or Comorbidities Major Diagnostic Category Complications and/or Comorbidities (CC) ALOS Without CC Source: Minnesota Hospital Discharge Dataset of participating hospitals CY 2003, Minnesota residents only n.a. = not applicable. ALOS With CC Overall ALOS Total Circulatory System 3.1 3.7 3.2 Mental Diseases & Disorders 7.7 n.a 7.7 Newborns & Neonates with Problems 3.2 n.a 3.2 Digestive System 2.6 5.2 4.1 Musculoskeletal & Connective 3.5 4.2 3.6 Respiratory System 4.1 4.6 4.3 Pregnancy & Childbirth 2.5 4.7 2.6 Nervous System 3.8 5.1 4.1 All Else (17 categories) 4.4 4.1 4.3 Total 3.7 4.5 3.9 Mental diseases and disorders, ranked second in Table 1, were associated with slightly over 10% of the patient days provided by Minnesota hospitals to state residents in 2003. While the patient day volume was high, this MDC accounted for only 5% of all claims. The overall average length of stay for the MDC was 7.7 days (Table 3). Psychoses accounted for nearly 79% of total patient days associated within this MDC and lengths of stay averaged around 8.7 days (not shown). Ranking third, Table 1 shows that conditions specific to newborns and neonates with problems were associated with over 9% of all Minnesota resident patient days and nearly 12% of all claims. This category includes all newborns, from normal full-term neonates, to full-term neonates with major problems, and premature neonates as well as those at low birthweight. 5 While the number of patient days ranks high in this category due to the large volume of births within the state, it is also important to recognize that the care provided included some of the most intensive, high tech, and expensive hospital care available, especially at facilities equipped with neonatal intensive care units. It is this combination of the number of births and need for neonatal intensive care that accounts for the patient day volume. Normal newborns accounted for 74% of the claims in this MDC and 49% of patient days. Neonates with various gestational age, respiratory, or delivery-related problems were associated with 26% of claims and 51% of MDC patient days. The average length of stay for normal newborns was 2.1 days in 2003 versus 6.2 days for neonates with problems (not shown). Diseases and disorders of the digestive system ranked fourth in Table 1, accounting for slightly more than 9% of total patient days in 2003, and just under 9% of all claims. Of the patient day total within the category, the largest shares were for major small and large bowel procedures; followed by treatment of esophagitis, gastroenteritis, and other miscellaneous digestive disorders; and gastrointestinal hemorrhage with complications and/or comorbidities. Table 2 shows that cases including complications and/or comorbidities were associated with 74% of the patient days within the category. Average lengths of stay for Minnesota patients without complex diagnoses in this MDC were 2.6 days compared to 5.2 days for those with them (Table 3). 3

In fifth rank on Table 1 were diseases and disorders of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. These conditions were associated with 10% of the claims Minnesota hospitals filed on behalf of state residents and 9% of all patient days. Thirty one percent of the MDC patient day volume was a result of major joint and limb reattachments of the lower extremities (in other words, joint replacements, or revisions, to patients hips, knees, and ankles), a share that was four times higher than the next ranked DRG, medical back problems. According to Table 3, average length of stay for patients in this MDC without complications and/or comorbidities was 3.5 days versus 4.2 days for patients with the complex conditions. Table 2 shows that only 22% of the MDC patient days resulted from patients with complicating diagnoses and/or comorbidities. Nearly 9% of all patient days and 8% of all claims in 2003 were associated with the treatment of respiratory system conditions, the MDC occupying the sixth rank on Table 1. Patients without complications and/or comorbidities in this MDC stayed in the hospital an average of 4.1 days while those with the greater clinical complexity remained 4.6 days (Table 3). Patients with more clinical complexity were responsible for 46% of the patient days consumed within the MDC (Table 2). Two conditions were responsible for the largest shares of the hospital stays in this category. Simple pneumonia and pleurisy among adults was responsible for 25% of category patient days, followed by patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 12%. Services provided to women during pregnancy, childbirth, and recovery ranked seventh in patient day volume during 2003. Table 1 shows that this MDC was associated with just under 9% of all patient days and almost 13% of all claims. The claim and patient day volumes associated with this category are high, not only due to the large number of pregnancies in the state, but also due to the care provided women experiencing high-risk pregnancies, complications of pregnancy (e.g. gestational diabetes or hypertension), those receiving Cesarean sections, and assorted postpartum conditions. Vaginal delivery without a complicating diagnosis accounted for nearly 46% of the patient days in this MDC, followed by C-Sections at over 22% of the MDC volume. Average length of stay displayed in Table 3 for noncomplex cases was 2.5 days compared with 4.7 days for women with complicating diagnoses and/or comorbidities. The average hospital stay for a normal vaginal delivery without complicating diagnoses was 2.1 days while women receiving C-sections without additional complications and/or comorbidities stayed 3.7 days. Complicated and/or comorbid diagnoses accounted for just under 10% of MDC patient days. Nervous system conditions, which included diagnoses of stroke, coma, viral meningitis, headache, and concussion, for example, were ranked eighth in Table 1. They accounted for 5% of the patient days provided to Minnesota residents during 2003 and 5% of all claims. Within this MDC, three more specific conditions were responsible for nearly 39% of the category s patient day count. They were: intracranial hemorrhage and stroke with infarction; craniotomy for persons over age 17 with complications and comorbidities; and degenerative nervous system disorders. The stroke category accounted for 18% of the MDC s patient day total. Table 3 reveals that patients with no complicating diagnoses and/or comorbidities stayed in the hospital an average of 3.8 days while those with the more complex conditions remained an average of 5.1 days. Thirty-one percent of patient days in this category resulted from complex diagnoses (Table 2). Conclusions Overall inpatient hospital utilization and spending are influenced by several factors: The prevalence of common clinical conditions; The length of time patients stay in the hospital; The presence or absence of preexisting comorbid conditions; 4

Unexpected complications that may occur during a hospital stay; The level of technology employed in treatment. The combination of all of these factors determines overall inpatient hospital utilization and spending. Endnotes 1 Admissions to these 119 out of 134 acute care hospitals represent 89% of all patient admissions in the state. Two subacute hospitals, Bethesda and Valley Hospital at Hidden Lakes, all federal hospitals (VA and PHS Indian facilities), the state hospital in St. Peter, state regional treatment centers, and the Shriners Hospital for Children are excluded from the total count. 2 A few MDCs, however, depart from this schema to reflect specific types of injury, multiple significant trauma, burns, HIV infection, substance abuse, miscellaneous contacts with the health care system, and categories for invalid diagnosis codes. 3 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) define comorbidity as a preexisting condition, which because of its presence increases the length of hospital stay by at least one day in approximately 75% of the cases. A complication is a condition that occurs during the hospital stay, adding at least one day in approximately 75% of the cases. 4 All newborns delivered in hospitals are counted as inpatients from delivery until discharged. Insurance claims are generated for each infant and include nursery charges, plus any therapies or procedures performed, such as circumcision or bilirubin light therapy, for example. 5

The Health Economics Program conducts research and applied policy analysis to monitor changes in the health care marketplace; to understand factors influencing health care cost, quality and access; and to provide technical assistance in the development of state health care policy. For more information, contact the Health Economics Program at (651) 282-6367. This issue brief, as well as other Health Economics Program publications, can be found on our website at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpsc/hep/index.html Minnesota Department of Health Health Economics Program 85 East Seventh Place, P.O. Box 64882 St. Paul, MN 55164-0882 (651) 282-6367 Upon request, this information will be made available in alternative format; for example, large print, Braille, or cassette tape. Printed with a minimum of 30% post-consumer materials. Please recycle.