March Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

Similar documents
FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

April Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT AIRPORT TRAINING AREA BOISE, IDAHO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SNAKE CREEK TRAINING SITE MIRAMAR, FLORIDA

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT IDAHO FALLS TRAINING SITE BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT CENTENNIAL TRAINING SITE COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO

July Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT WALLY EAGLE DROP ZONE LOVELAND, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VAIL TREE FARM LOCAL TRAINING AREA CENTRALIA, WASHINGTON

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE - SMYRNA SMYRNA, TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT RAMEY LOCAL TRAINING AREA AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SAN JUAN NATIONAL FOREST TRAINING AREA DOLORES, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT LIEUTENANT COLONEL HERNAN G

Managing Range Condition Assessments: The Army s Operational Range Qualitative Assessment Program

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

Range Environmental Vulnerability Assessment

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

FINAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) LAND USE CONTROLS FORT BLISS, TX MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM

Foreword. Mario P. Fiori Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment)

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 25, 2006

Army. Environmental. Cleanup. Strategy

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

CRS Report for Congress

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

MMRP Site Inspections at FUDS Challenges, Status, and Lessons Learned

DoD and EPA Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferring, and Transferred (CTT) Ranges

FY2016 SIEVERS-SANDBERG USARC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

STATEMENT OF MR. RAYMOND F. DUBOIS, JR. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)

DOD INSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANT LONG-TERM HEALTH RISKS

U.S. ARMY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD. and TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDANCE

Record of Decision Group 3 Del Rey Oaks / Monterey, Laguna Seca Parking, and Military Operations in Urban Terrain Site Munitions Response Areas

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Welcome Thanks for joining us. ITRC s Internet-based Training Program. Site Investigation and Remediation for Munitions Response Projects

Federal Facilities. Restoration and Reuse Office. NGA Working Group on the Cleanup of. 2 October 2008

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

Draft No Further Action Proposed Plan for RVAAP-019-R-01 Landfill North of Winklepeck Munitions Response Site

NDCEE. Hawai i Undersea Military Munitions Assessment (HUMMA) Update. Erika Brandenburg, NDCEE/CTC Sonia Garcia, Environet, Inc.

FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT

DOD MANUAL DOD MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES

Meeting Minutes April 26, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

Defense Environmental Restoration Program Manual

EPA. Used or Fired Munitions and Unexploded Ordnance at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Military Ranges

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Military Munitions Support Services

RANGE CONDITION ASSESSMENT FIVE YEAR REVIEW FOR NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, DAHLGREN RANGES DAHLGREN, VIRGINIA JUNE 2016

DOD INSTRUCTION THE READINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INTEGRATION (REPI) PROGRAM AND ENCROACHMENT MANAGEMENT

PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AN AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR) PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

US Army Corps of Engineers. Section 408 Overview. Regulatory Workshop July 22, Kim Leonard/Kevin Lee BUILDING STRONG

Report for Congress. Defense Cleanup and Environmental Programs: Authorization and Appropriations for FY2003. Updated January 13, 2003

SITE SURVEY SUMMARY SHEET FOR DERP-FUDS SITE NO. J09CAO84400

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES LAND USE CONTROLS TO RESTRICT USE OF GROUNDWATER. For

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

DoD Handbook for Perchlorate Sampling and Testing

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION

Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials State Federal Coordination Focus Group and Removal Action Focus Group

U^J. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prepared by the U.S. Army Environmental Center March 1999

Environmental Baseline Survey for Naval Weapons Station Concord

Final No Further Action Proposed Plan for RVAAP-050-R-01 Atlas Scrap Yard Munitions Response Site

Community Relations Plan

MARCH Updated Guidance. EPCRA Compliance for Ranges

EPA. Used or Fired Munitions and Unexploded Ordnance at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Military Ranges

Los Angeles District

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, Phoenix Office 3636 N. Central Ave., Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85012

Department of the Air Force

State Perspective of DoD MMRP PA/SI Program

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND PROTECTION PROGRAM

Military Munitions Response Program Site Inspection Camp Bullis, Texas. Courtney M.S. Ingersoll

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Final RANGE CONDITION ASSESSMENT (RCA) DECISION POINT 1 RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

WRP Natural Resources Committee s Southeastern Arizona/New Mexico (SoAZ/NM Project)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTSVILLE CENTER, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1600 HUNTSVILLE. ALABAMA 3S

Cleanup Successes and Challenges. James D. Werner Director, Air & Waste Management Division

In God We Trust, All Others Must Bring Data. Installation Geospatial Information and Services in DoD

Department of Defense

Special PUBLIC NOTICE

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD CHARTER

April 24, 2015 FORA ESCA REMEDIATION PROGRAM FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY

Public Lands Committee Briefing

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT (CESAJ-PM M/John Keiser)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

FORA Independent Quality Assurance. FORA Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Template modified: 27 May :30 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE JULY 1994.

Restoration Advisory Board. Tonight s Agenda

Wildland Firefighting

Transcription:

FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report WILCOX TRAINING SITE, ARIZONA U.S. Army Operational Range Assessment Program Qualitative Operational Range Assessments Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District Printed on recycled paper March 2008 Final Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Range Assessment Reports will be released beginning in March 2008 per the Direction of Army Headquarters. The cover page of this Report reflects the official finalization date. The date on subsequent pages/figures reflects the date upon which this document s conclusions are based.

PURPOSE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This qualitative assessment, hereinafter referred to as the Phase I Assessment, evaluates Wilcox Training Site s operational range area to assess whether further investigation is needed to determine if potential munitions constituents of concern (MCOC) are or could be migrating off-range at levels that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. The Phase I Assessment results in the categorization of operational ranges as appropriate, as follows: Referred Refer to Appropriate Cleanup Program: Ranges with compelling evidence (e.g., sampling data) to indicate the presence of an off-range release that potentially poses an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment; Inconclusive Phase II Quantitative Assessment Required: Ranges where existing information either is insufficient to make a source-receptor interaction determination or indicates the potential for such interaction to be occurring; or Unlikely Five-Year Review 1 : Ranges where, based upon a review of readily available information, there is sufficient evidence to show that there are no known releases or sourcereceptor interactions that could present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment based on a review of the information available. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS To facilitate the qualitative analysis, MCOC sources, potential migration pathways from a range, and potential off-range human and/or ecological receptors associated with the range at Wilcox Training Site were evaluated. The range was then placed into one of several descriptive groups that meet the criteria for the Unlikely category. The single operational range at that was included in the qualitative assessment was placed into the following category: Unlikely The single range in this group covers 28,893 acres, the installation footprint. These findings are summarized in Table ES-1. 1 All operational ranges must be periodically re-evaluated to determine if there is a release or substantial threat of release of MCOC from an operational range to an off-range area. Range groups categorized as Unlikely are to be re-evaluated at least every five years. Re-evaluation may occur sooner if significant changes (e.g., changes in range operations, site conditions, and regulatory changes) occur that affect determinations made during the Phase I Assessment. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. ES-1

Wilcox Training Site Table ES-1: Summary of Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations for Category Group Identification Total Number of Ranges and Acreage Source(s) Pathway(s)* Unlikely Munitions used, One operational range; Historic Incomplete pathway unlikely 28,893 acres munitions * Indicates the specific pathways of concern. Human Receptors* Not evaluated Ecological Receptors* Not evaluated Recommendations (Future Steps) Re-evaluate during the fiveyear review. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. ES-2

ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ADWR Arizona Department of Water Resources ARIA Arizona Regional Image Archive ARID-GEO Army Range Inventory Geodatabase ARNG Army National Guard CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CSM Conceptual Site Model DNT Dinitrotoluene DoD Department of Defense DODD Department of Defense Directive DODI Department of Defense Instruction DoE Department of Energy DPTMS Directorate of Plans, Training, Mobilization, and Security EPG Electronic Proving Ground ERIS Environmental Restoration Information System F Degrees Fahrenheit ft Feet H/E Human/Ecological HMX Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine in. Inches ITAM Integrated Training Area Management LS Limited or No Source Munitions MC Munitions Constituents MCOC Munitions Constituents of Concern MGW Munitions/Groundwater/No Receptors mm Millimeter MPU Migration Pathway Unlikely MSW Munitions/Surface Water/No Receptor MSWGW Munitions/Surface Water and Groundwater ORAP Operational Range Assessment Program PETN Pentaerythritoltetranitrate RDT&E Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation RDX Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine RFMSS Range Facility Management Support System TNT Trinitrotoluene U.S. United States USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USACHPPM United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine U.S.C. United States Code USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USGS United States Geological Survey EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. iv

666 A r i z o n a 666 666 186 Willcox 10 186 199 Cochise 191 Installation Data Installation Boundary Operational Area Highways Interstate Highway Highway Major Road Hydrology Rivers/Streams Qualitative Operational Range Phase I Assessment, AZ Figure 1-1 General Location of 181 Data Sources: ARID-GEO 24 Sept. 2001 ESRI StreetMap USA, 2005 0 2 Miles Data: September, 2006 Prepared By: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology Prepared For: U.S. Army Contract Number: W912DR-05-D-0008