RURAL ACTION BRIEF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND RURAL ASSET-BUILDING PROGRAMS PRESIDENT BUSH S FY 2006 BUDGET CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS

Similar documents
DECEMBER Senate Bill 602 sponsored by. Sen. Rockefeller WV

RURAL BRIEF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS. Department of Agriculture

An Analysis of USDA Farm Program Payments and Rural Development Funding In Low Population Growth Rural Counties

THE STATE OF MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT IN NEBRASKA

FACT SHEET SERIES SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDING FOR MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

Office of Community & Economic Development Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Presentation

INTERMEDIARY RELENDING PROGRAM (IRP)

Counting for Dollars: Polk County, Florida

Senate File Enrolled

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT- DISASTER RECOVERY ORIENTATION WEBINAR PRESENTED BY: HEATHER MARTIN

Attracting Federal Funds for Opportunity Finance POLICY OFFENSIVE. January 2009

New Strategy for the War on Poverty

$787 Billion Economic Recovery Package Clears Congress; Focuses On Long- Term Competitiveness, in Addition to Job Creation

Division of Water Infrastructure Funding Programs

Counting for Dollars: Fresno County, California

Public Capital Financing Options for Child Care Facilities Development

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) (Technical Assistance Program)

Northern California Community Loan Fund

Counting for Dollars: Syracuse, NY

COSCDA Federal Advocacy Priorities for Fiscal Year 2008

NCSL believes a vibrant state-federal partnership to strengthen rural America is

Counting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Brian Dabson, May 12, 2009

Counting for Dollars: Pinal County, Arizona

Rural Business Devlopment Grants: This program is a competitive grant designed

Rural Grants Program (

Comparison of Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Programs and other Federal Assistance to Disadvantaged Communities in EPA Region 4

CDBG & HOME Proposed Programming for the FY 2018 Annual Action Plan

Community Recovery. Pat Forbes Louisiana Office of Community Development

AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS CHART FISCAL YEAR 2013 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET REQUEST

Counting for Dollars: Broward County, Florida

AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS CHART FISCAL YEAR 2016 HOUSE AND SENATE COMMITTEES

IEDC State of Federal Economic Development. Jeffrey A. Finkle, CEcD President & CEO International Economic Development Council

Counting for Dollars: Tulare County, California

Florida Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG DR) Hurricane Irma

City of Los Angeles, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, Program

Water Infrastructure. Kim H. Colson, P.E., Director Division of Water Infrastructure. NC Division of. Water Infrastructure

Financing the Future of Water Systems

Counting for Dollars: Sedgwick County, Kansas

Introduction to the Community Development Block Grant Infrastructure Program (CDBG-I) Environmental Finance Center March 12, 2014

FY2016 City Funding Application

Natalie Jaresko Executive Director. Dear Mr. Majority Leader, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Minority Leader, and Ms. Democratic Leader:

Counting for Dollars: Sonoma County, California

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RURAL DEVELOPMENT ADVANCE ( RDA ) URBAN DEVELOPMENT ADVANCE ( UDA ) REQUEST FOR FUNDS

USDA Rural Development

Drive America s Economy Forward by Reinvesting in Municipal Infrastructure

NATIONAL SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE COALITION S AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS CHART FISCAL YEAR 2012 FINAL CONFERENCE REPORT

Performance Indicators

Counting for Dollars: Jefferson County, Alabama

Hurricane Harvey s Fiscal Impact on State Agencies PRESENTED TO HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

How President Trump's First Budget Could Impact Affordable Housing. March 6, 2017

Photo credit: Boston Community Capital

Updated Hurricane Harvey s Fiscal Impact on State Agencies PRESENTED TO SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

Community Development Block Grant Citizen Participation Plan City of Richmond, California

Leveraging Private Investment Capital for Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment

2011 RDO ORGANIZATIONAL DATA PROFILES

Economic & Workforce Development

Microenterprise: Microenterprise has become an increasingly important community. report. Creating Wealth for Individuals and Communities

The Fiscal 2018 Omnibus Spending Bill

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Natural and Economic Resources March 19, 2013

SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

DISASTER PREPARATION & RECOVERY. A Presentation to the Florida Housing Coalition Annual Conference Orlando, FL September 10, 2013

Federal Programs for Heritage and Cultural Tourism

CRS Report for Congress

Organizing a CDFI to Serve Native Communities

Partial Action Plan for New York Business Recovery and Economic Revitalization

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM Program Year 2017 July 1, 2017 June 30, 2018

Counting for Dollars: The Role of the Decennial Census in the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds

Economic Development Toolkit

Florida Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG DR) Hurricane Irma Unmet Needs Assessment

USDA Rural Development

USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

Federal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana

Funding the plan. STBG - This program is designed to address specific issues

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. FY08 Budget Information Session BIS Session April 10, 2007

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

Concept Paper for ANN VISTA Project for FY 2012 Submitted

We are a lending arm of the United States Department of Agriculture. We work to improve the quality of life and. America.

How to Use CDBG for Public Service Activities

The North Carolina Appalachian Regional Commission Program North Carolina Department of Commerce

September 14, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee

CRS Report for Congress

Conservation Security Program: Implementation and Current Issues

Everett Wallace, James Cavallo, Norman Peterson, and Mary Nelson. March, 1997

Subsidy Layering Review

SMALL BuSiNESS AdMiNiSTRATiON

USDA Rural Development WASHINGTON 2015 PROGRESS REPORT

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 12/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Consent Calendar

Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) & Community Foundations Washington Community Foundations Convening October 5, 2016 Sleeping Lady

Final Report. Recommendations for Improved Local Government Capacity for Project Management of State Funded Capital Construction

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BUDGET PRIMER UW Office of Academic Affairs and Budget Office Last update April 2013

Chapter 14 Emergency Projects

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Community Foundations: Key Players in Rural Development

THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION

USDA Rural Development Housing & Infrastructure Programs--101

SCORECARD RESOURCE GUIDE: STATE MICROENTERPRISE SUPPORT 1 OVERVIEW WHAT STATES CAN DO ASSETS & OPPORTUNITY

FRANKLIN COUNTY RETAIL REPORT 2O17. An Analysis of Trends in: SALES TAX REVENUES EMPLOYMENT REAL ESTATE E-COMMERCE TRENDS & IMPACTS

FY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING APPLICATION FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE FISCAL YEAR

Rural Counties in North Carolina. 85 Rural Counties. Rural (density of fewer than 200/sq mile)

Transcription:

CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS RURAL ACTION BRIEF VOLUME 1, ISSUE 3 FEBRUARY 2005 RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND RURAL ASSET-BUILDING PROGRAMS PRESIDENT BUSH S FY 2006 BUDGET Less Rural Economic and Community Rural America will lose more than one-third of its federal resources for rural economic and community development. The proposed new Strengthening America s Communities Initiative would consolidate 18 economic and community development programs into one and provide one-third less funding (from $5.61 billion in FY05 for the 18 programs to $3.71 billion proposed in FY06 for the new initiative). Extrapolating to the new initiative the 29.7 percent non-entitlement community share of the FY05 Community Block Grant (CDBG) program, rural America stands to lose at least one-third of its federal economic and community development resources in the new initiative through the elimination of the CDBG program and other rural development programs (and significant spending cuts in other community and economic development programs). The result would be 1) a shifting of rural economic and community development costs to state and local resources, including an increased property tax burden in many places, and/or 2) rural communities left without the resources for vital projects modernizing their infrastructure, developing their economies for the 21 st century, and enhancing their quality-of-life. The ultimate impact of the President s FY06 budget proposal is to make rural communities less attractive places to live with fewer economic opportunities and potentially higher taxes. Fewer Jobs and Businesses The President s budget proposes to eliminate programs that create jobs and businesses for rural America. The Small Business Administration programs that provide capital and technical assistance for microbusinesses are a major source of businesses and jobs in rural communities. Nearly 17 percent of all private, non-farm jobs in the United States come from microenterprise, and over one in five private, non-farm jobs are attributable to microenterprises in the most rural states in the nation. Inside This Issue We will focus on programs with a mission to build assets in rural communities Value-added Producer Grant Program Rural Community Advancement Program Resource Conservation and Program Rural Small Business Small Business Community and Housing

Page 2 RURAL ACTION BRIEF In addition, several of the economic and community development programs being targeted for elimination or significant cuts create business and job opportunities in rural America (the Rural Business Enterprise Grant program, the Rural Business Opportunity Grant program, the Economic Administration, and the Resource Conservation and program, for example). The President s budget would result in fewer resources and fewer opportunities to create jobs and businesses in rural communities. Less Participatory Community in Rural America One hallmark of the CDBG program was the requirement for public hearings and public input on community and economic development projects for which funding was sought. That may be lost under the proposed Strengthening America s Communities Initiative, which would provide funding only to communities meeting specified criteria with no apparent requirement for public involvement. One such measure is unemployment, which would hurt many rural areas that have low unemployment rates but high rates of multiple jobholding, high poverty rates and low income. Programs such as the Resource Conservation and program (with half its funding proposed for elimination) also directly involves communities and community members in community and economic development projects, with community members participating in governing boards and project committees. The proposed budget also seeks to eliminate programs such as the Northern Great Plains Regional Authority, planning grants from the Economic Administration and the Rural Strategic Investment Program based on a community participation model that many are recommending as a democratic method for rural development on both the community and regional level. Less Asset-Building in Rural Communities The President s budget provides for greater resources for several rural housing programs within USDA, particularly loan programs. However, what the budget gives with one hand, it takes with the other it proposes to eliminate other rural housing programs and programs that provide resources for rural community-based organizations that develop and construct housing. As discussed above, the budget also decreases opportunities for rural people particularly low- and moderate-income rural residents to own their own businesses and provide jobs. Asset-building those investments in one s life or family that will serve to build long-term wealth is an important strategy for the future of rural America. Assets like businesses and houses bond one to a place and help to build strong, more sustainable communities. Commitment to a place is what makes asset-building development an important and viable model for rural people and rural communities. FISCAL YEAR 2006 BUDGET PROPOSAL Below is an examination of the impact of President Bush s Fiscal Year 2006 budget on funding of certain rural development programs and programs with a mission to build assets in rural communities and for rural people (housing and small business development primarily). NOTE: All figures in the following charts are in millions of dollars. Value-Added Producer Grant Program Authorized FY 05 Appropriation FY 06 Proposal Pct. Change $40.0 $15.5 $15.5 (61.2) * In the following tables, the asterisk indicates these are among 18 programs in the Departments of Housing and Urban, Commerce, Agriculture, Treasury and Health and Human Service being consolidated in the proposed Strengthening America s Communities Initiative. In FY 2005, those 18 programs received combined funding of $5.61 billion; the FY 2006 budget proposes $3.71 billion for the Strengthening America s Communities Initiative, a 33 percent reduction.

VOLUME 1, ISSUE 3 Page 3 SBA Microenterprise Programs Microloan Technical Assistance $14.0 $0 (100) Microloan Program $15.0 $0 (100) Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs (PRIME) $5.0 $0 (100) USDA Rural (programs from various USDA agencies) Rural Community Advancement $74.18 $44.22 (40.4) Program: Business-Cooperative Rural Cooperative Dev. Grants $24.0 $21.0 (12.5) Appropriate Technology Transfer $2.0 $0 (100) for Rural Areas (ATTRA) Rural Eco. Dev. Grants $10.0 $10.0 0 Rural Strategic Investment Pro- $100.0 $0 (100) Enterprise Zone/Enterprise Community/Rural Economic Area Partnership Program (EZ/EC/ $22.16 $13.37 (39.7) Rural Community $6.3 $0 (100) Initiative Grants (RCDI) Resource Conservation and $51.64 $25.6 (50.4) Program (RC&D) Rural Bus. Enterprise Grant Pro- $39.68 $0* (100) Rural Bus. Opportunity Grant Program $3.0 $0* (100) (RBOG) Rural Enterprise Zone/Enterprise $12.50 $0* (100) Community Round II Intermediate Re-Lending Program $34.21 $34.0 (0.6) Northern Great Plains Regional Authority $1.49 $0 (100) Community and Social Services Community Services Block Grants $631.0 $0* 100 Rural Community Facilities (HHS) $7.0 $0* 100 Individual Accounts (HHS) $25.0 $25 0

PAGE 4 RURAL ACTION BRIEF The President s budget contains a tax credit to defray costs of administering Individual Account (IDA) programs, account matching fund contributions and account holder financial education. This credit would be available to IDA program sponsors generally, financial institutions and nonprofit organizations. The credit would apply to the first 900,000 IDA accounts opened after December 31, 2006, and before January 1, 2012 (or before January 1, 2014, with respect to credits for matching funds). It is estimated this credit would have a $134 million revenue impact in Fiscal Year 2007 and a total fiscal impact of $1.763 billion by 2015. Community and Housing Programs Community Block Grant (CDBG 29.7% nonentitlement share) $1,2332.559 $0* (100) Rural Housing and Economic $24.0 $0* (100) Program (HUD) Economic $257.42 $26.58 (salaries and expenses (89.7) Administration (Commerce) only)* 502 Single Family Loans $4,459.3 $4,681.03 5.0 504 Repair Loans (USDA) $35.0 $36.0 2.9 515 Rental Loans (USDA) $100.0 $27.0 (73) 523 Land Loans $10.0 $5.0 (50) 524 Site Loans (USDA) $5.05 $5.0 (0.9) 538 Multi-Family Loans $100.0 $200.0 100 (USDA) Rental Assistance Grants (USDA) $592.0 $650.0 9.8 523 Mutual and Self-Help Grants (USDA) Rural Housing Assistance Grants (USDA) 504 Repair Grants and Payments (USDA) $34.0 $34.0 0 $44.0 $41.0 (6.8) $31.0 $30.0 (3.2) The Bottom Line The combination of public resources to modernize and enhance rural community infrastructure and quality-of-life and asset-building strategies can lead to rural community revitalization in the United States and full inclusion of rural Americans in the ownership society. Unfortunately, President Bush s FY06 budget neither recognizes this possibility nor makes it a priority.

VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1 PAGE 5 WHAT CAN I DO? The Congressional Appropriations and Budget Committees will begin action soon, and the President s budget will be the starting point for their deliberations. You can do the following to make the case for funding rural development and rural asset-building programs. BE CAREFUL NOT TO UNDERESTIMATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CALLING ELECTED OFFICIALS. YOUR CALL CAN MAKE ALL THE DIFFERENCE! Contact your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative and educate them on the benefits of federal rural development and rural asset-building programs for your community and your state. Write letters to your local newspapers about federal rural development and rural asset-building programs and their benefits to your community and all rural communities. Speak to local Chambers of Commerce and business associations, local service clubs, and other local groups about federal rural development and rural asset-building programs and their benefits to your community and all rural communities. Contact local economic development and community development groups and organizations and ask them to oppose decreased funding for federal rural development and rural asset-building programs and communicate that support to your U.S. Senators and Representative. Contact your Governor and ask him or her to oppose decreased funding for federal rural development and asset-building programs and to communicate that support to Congress. If you live in a metro area, contact rural people you know for examples of how federal rural development and rural asset-building programs benefit rural communities and then contact your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives. In all your efforts use local examples of how federal rural development and rural asset-building programs have benefited individuals, families and communities in your area.

If you are receiving duplicate copies or have changed your address, please call Amber at the Center, 402.687.2100 Non-Profit Org. US Postage CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS PO Box 136 145 Main Street Lyons NE 68038 PAID Permit #3 Lyons NE 68038 Phone: 402-687-2100 Fax: 402-687-2200 www.cfra.org Return Service Requested February 2005 W E RE ON THE WEB! www.cfra.org The Rural Action Brief is a publication of the Rural Research and Analysis Program of the Center for Rural Affairs. The Rural Action Brief will be published quarterly and on special occasions, and will analyze Federal Executive, Legislative and Administrative action concerning rural development and asset-building programs and initiatives. The Rural Action Brief is made possible by the support of the Ford Foundation. If you or anyone you know wish to receive the Rural Action Brief, please contact Jon Bailey at jonb@cfra.org or Kim Preston at kimp@cfra.org, or the Center for Rural Affairs at the phone number or address above. There is no charge for a subscription to the Rural Action Brief. Past copies of The Rural Action Brief are available on our website, http://www.cfra.org/ This publication is available both electronically and in print. If you d prefer to receive it online, please let us know by calling the Center at 402-687-2100 or email at info@cfra.org. You can correct your mailing address above by calling or sending an email. Established in 1973, the Center for Rural Affairs is a private, non-profit organization working to strengthen rural communities through action oriented programs addressing social, economic, and environmental issues.