NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Similar documents
NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

CMS in the 21 st Century

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

Hospital Compare Quality Measure Results for Oregon CAHs: 2015

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Quality Matters. Quality & Performance Improvement

FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL and TRAUMA CENTER

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

PATIENT SAFETY KNOWLEDGEBASE. How to prepare for a Survey

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)

Value Based Purchasing

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) / PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

Performance Scorecard 2013

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization April 2010

Our Hospital s Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Journey

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization June 2010

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

Person-Centered Care and Population Health

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

WA Flex Program Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Program

Medicare Payment Strategy

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

An Illustration in CLAS Bringing the Cultural and Linguistic Service Standards to Life

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

Coding Implications of Coding Medical Necessity and Core Measures. Medical Necessity. NCHIMA Coding Roundtable Webinar.

Aligning Hospital and Physician P4P The Q-HIP SM /QP-3 SM Model. Rome H. Walker MD February 28, 2008

How the compliance department can support quality of care initiatives

CHAPTER 9 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT HOSPITAL

FACT SHEET Summary of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and Heart Failure (HF) Changes for 1/1/12+ Discharges

SCIP. Surgical Care Improvement Project. Making Surgeries Safer. By: Roshini Mathew, RN

CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE/HOSPITAL VALUE TOOL 2011/2012 METHODOLOGY

Improving Compliance

New Mexico Hospital Association

Is Emergency Department Quality Related to Other Hospital Quality Domains?

The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Monthly Performance Improvement Call

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Quality Guide

Facility State National

Quality and Patient Safety Department

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Care Coordination What Matters

VALUE. Critical Access Hospital QUALITY REPORTING GUIDE

NOTE: New Hampshire rules, to

Performance Scorecard 2009

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

SAMPLE: Peer Review Referral Policy

FFY 2018 IPPS PROPOSED RULE CHA MEMBER FORUM

Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings on Hospital Compare April 2016 Methodology and Specifications Report. January 25, 2016

Overview of Final Rule for FY 2011 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

Transcription:

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES New Jersey Department of Health Health Care Quality Assessment

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES A. Sources of Hospital Recommended Care (Process of Care) Measures and Data... 2 B. Calculation of Hospital Performance Rates... 4 Calculation of individual rates... 4 Calculation of overall scores... 4 Calculation of top 10% and 50% scores... 5 C. Data Validation... 5 D. Measure Definitions... 6 E. Statewide Scores Compared to National Scores... 8 1

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES A. Sources of Hospital Recommended Care (Process of Care) Measures and Data The New Jersey Hospital Performance Report on Recommended Care (Process of Care) Measures uses data and methodology that were developed by The Joint Commission and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for reporting on hospital quality. In addition, this report follows the measure definitions developed by The Joint Commission and the CMS, as presented in Section D of this technical report. The New Jersey Hospital Performance Report on Recommended Care (Process of Care) Measures includes information on hospital discharges for the period of January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Ten recommended care measures on acute myocardial infarction (AMI or heart attack), pneumonia, heart failure, and surgical care improvement (SCIP) are reported. Rates for all hospitals are published, including rates based on fewer than 25 cases. The report and its presentation have been developed with the guidance of the Department s Quality Improvement Advisory Committee (QIAC). Table 1 lists the measures collected by New Jersey Department of Health (Department) and indicates whether each measure is included in the report. All New Jersey general acute care hospitals and one specialized heart hospital were required to submit the information for AMI, pneumonia, heart failure, and SCIP measures to the Department through their Joint Commission vendors on a quarterly basis. Hospitals collected the basic information for each record by abstracting data from patient medical records and administrative databases. The data were transmitted to Joint Commission vendors, who processed the data according to algorithms established by The Joint Commission to produce scores for each measure. Joint Commission vendors then transmitted both the individual patient files and the hospital level information to the Department. The Department summarized the quarterly data and provided a summary report to each hospital for review. The Department also provided each hospital with a summary report for the full twelve months for review. 2

Table 1: Joint Commission Core Performance Measures and Inclusion in Report Joint Commission Core Performance Measures Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Aspirin at arrival Aspirin prescribed at discharge Beta blocker prescribed at discharge ACEI/ARB for LVSD Smoking cessation advice Inpatient mortality Time to fibrinolysis Fibrinolytic agent received within 30 minutes of hospital arrival Time to Primary PCI (median) Primary PCI received within 90 minutes of hospital arrival Statin prescribed at discharge Pneumonia Pneumococcal vaccination Antibiotic timing (median) Initial antibiotic received within 8 hours of arrival Initial antibiotic received within 6 hours of arrival Initial antibiotic selection for PN immunocompetent ICU patient * Initial antibiotic selection for PN immunocompetent non-icu patient * Blood cultures in emergency department Blood cultures within 24 hours Smoking cessation advice Influenza vaccination Surgical Care Improvement Preventive antibiotic started Appropriate antibiotic received Preventive antibiotic stopped Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis ordered VTE prophylaxis received Controlled blood sugar for cardiac surgery patients Surgery patients with safe hair removal Beta Blocker continued Urinary catheter removed Perioperative temperature management Heart Failure LVS assessment ACEI/ARB for LVSD Discharge instructions Smoking cessation advice in Report * Because of small sample sizes for ICU patients, these two measures were combined into one measure following the CMS methodology. 3

B. Calculation of Hospital Performance Rates Calculation of individual rates Each rate was calculated following the Joint Commission methodology described in Section D. The rate for each quality measure represents the proportion of times that the hospital provided the recommended care. Each measure included only those patients who were eligible for that form of care. For example, patients with contraindications for aspirin were excluded from the aspirin prescribed at discharge measures. Calculation of overall scores The overall AMI, pneumonia, SCIP, and heart failure scores for each hospital are summary measures of how frequently the hospital provided recommended care based on three AMI measures, two pneumonia measures, nine SCIP measures, and three heart failure measures, respectively (Table 2). The overall score for each of the four conditions was calculated using the following steps: The numerator was the total number of patients who received care and the denominator was the total number of patients who were eligible for care for the selected quality measures. The overall score was calculated as a percentage by dividing the numerator by the denominator. Overall scores (as well as individual rates) were rounded to the nearest whole numbers. When hospitals were presented from high to low overall scores, a more detailed calculation using six decimal places was used. Because of the inclusion of new measures or changes in measure definitions, overall scores are not necessarily comparable to the overall scores from previous years. 4

Table 2: Measures in the AMI, Pneumonia, SCIP, and Heart Failure Overall Scores Condition Measures in Overall Score AMI Pneumonia SCIP Heart Failure Primary PCI Received Within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival Antibiotic Selection Preventive Antibiotic Started Preventive Antibiotic Stopped Appropriate Antibiotic Received VTE Prophylaxis Received Controlled Blood Sugar for Cardiac Surgery Patients Beta Blocker Continued Urinary Catheter Removed LVS Assessment Calculation of top 10% and 50% scores For each measure, including the overall score, we identified the hospital score that was at the 50 th percentile ( median ), and the 90 th percentile ( top 10 th percentile ). These statistics included all hospitals, including those with fewer than 25 cases for a measure. C. Data Validation Hospitals have internal processes to check the accuracy of their data collection. The Joint Commission has reviewed the accuracy of the vendors systems for processing the data and calculating the rates as well as conducted a limited study of the accuracy of the abstraction process in a small sample from all hospitals. CMS conducts the validation reviews for hospitals participating in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program. CMS verifies, on a quarterly basis, that hospital abstracted data it received is consistent and reproducible. More information regarding CMS data validation process can be found from QualityNet.com: https://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/contentserver?c=page&pagename=qnetpublic%2fpag e%2fqnettier4&cid=1228758581429 5

D. Measure Definitions Tables 3 through 6 describe the individual quality measures reported for the AMI, pneumonia, SCIP, and heart failure conditions. The definitions for these measures follow the Joint Commission/CMS definitions that were in effect for the reporting period. This technical report provides the specifications that were in effect for fourth quarter 2014 discharges. For the complete specification manuals and detailed information on definitional changes that were implemented during 2014, we refer the interested readers to the Joint Commission (www.jointcommission.org) and CMS QualityNet.com (Specifications Manual for National Hospital Quality Measures version 4.3b: https://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/contentserver?c=page&pagename=qnetpublic%2fpag e%2fqnettier4&cid=1228773564870). Table 3: Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) Quality Measures Measure 1. Primary PCI received within 90 minutes of hospital arrival Description Percent of eligible heart attack patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 minutes after they arrived at hospital Detailed Specifications Table 4: Pneumonia Quality Measures Measure Description Detailed Specifications 1. Initial antibiotic selection for immunocompetent patients Percent of immunocompetent patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia who received an initial antibiotic regimen during the first 24 hours that is consistent with current guidelines 6

Table 5: Surgical Care Improvement Quality Measures Measure Description Detailed Specifications 1. Preventive antibiotic started 2. Preventive antibiotic stopped 3. Appropriate antibiotic received 4. VTE prophylaxis received 5. Controlled blood sugar for heart patients 6. Beta Blocker continued 7. Urinary catheter removed Percent of eligible surgery patients who received preventive antibiotics within one hour prior to surgical incision. Percent of eligible surgery patients whose preventive antibiotics were discontinued within 24 hours after surgery end time Percent of eligible surgery patients who received preventive antibiotics recommended for their specific surgical procedure. Percent of eligible surgery patients who received the appropriate treatment to prevent blood clots, as recommended for the specific type of surgery performed Percent of cardiac surgery patients with controlled 6 a.m. blood glucose ( 200 mg/dl) in the two days right after surgery. Surgery patients on Beta-Blocker therapy prior to arrival who received a Beta-Blocker during the perioperative period. Urinary catheter removed on postoperative day one or day two with day of surgery being day zero. Table 6: Heart Failure Quality Measures Measure Description Detailed Specifications 1. LVS assessment Percent of eligible heart failure patients that were given a test to assess the left ventricular systolic (LVS) function of their heart before or during hospitalization, or had a test planned for soon after discharge from the hospital 7

E. Statewide Scores Compared to National Scores The table below compares statewide scores to national scores for Recommended Care Measures. New Jersey scores for the ten recommended care measures are based on data collected from hospital medical records for 2014. The National Scores are from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the same year and from the same database. For 2014, New Jersey performed better than or same as national average on all recommended care measures. Of the 10 recommended care measures, New Jersey hospitals exceeded national norms on five measures and were equal to national norms on five measures. For the first time, New Jersey hospitals performed better than national norm on PCI received within 90 minutes for heart attack patients. There have been major improvements in performance since the first report which covered 2003 performance. Most measures are now close to the expected 100. The difference between low and high performing hospitals continues to decrease. This means better care for all NJ patients. Among measures that we started to track in 2005 and 2006, the percentage of heart attack patients who received PCI within 90 minutes has shown a significant 80% increase from 55 in 2006 to 99 in 2014. 8

Table 7. New Jersey Hospital Quality Scores, 2005 2014 National Hospital Quality Scores, 2014 Condition Quality Measure 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 National 2014 Percent Improvement First Year-2014 AMI PCI within 90 minutes 55 67 78 83 89 91 95 95 99 96 80% PN Antibiotic Selection 82 89 92 92 94 95 97 97 98 98 97 20% HF LVS Assessment 95 97 97 98 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 = 5% SCIP Preventive Antibiotic Started 91 92 95 97 98 99 99 99 99 99 = 9% Preventive Antibiotic Received 95 97 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 = 4% Preventive Antibiotic Stopped 86 90 93 95 96 98 98 98 99 98 15% VTE Prophylaxis Received 82 90 92 95 98 98 99 100 100 = 22% Controlled Blood Sugar 91 92 93 96 97 97 96 95 5% Beta Blocker Continued 94 96 97 97 98 98 98 = 4% Urinary Catheter Removal 93 95 97 99 99 98 6% Better than national norm; = Same as national norm; Below national norm.