STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I

Similar documents
Completing the CoC Program Grant Inventory Worksheet (GIW)

Ekagra Partners, LLC. Contractor Site Rates

$98.22 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ AG02 Business Process Reengineering Specialist Level II HR

CIO SP3 Company Site Rates Contractor Site Hourly Rate Page 1 of 5

HP Attachment_J 1_(Pricing_Tables) Ammendment 0001 rev EN Contractor Site Hourly Rate Page 1 of 4

Formal STIP Amendment

ATIP Template Guidance Part I & II

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement

Overview of Planning & Programming in Minnesota

ATP-7 Operating Procedures/Policies

Var. 19 Fmt: A200 Col: Name: Q2 (S) Please list any other equipment, software or support your organization provides to teleworkers

Nurse Endoscopy: Innovative Workforce. Sylvia Constantinou Program Manager:- State Endoscopy Training Centre Austin Health

Document Number: HITSP 05 N 09 Date: September 17, 2005

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

KUVE-CD, KFTU-DT, KFTU-CD, KUVE-DT. Annual EEO Public File Report

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Federal Funding & Project Administration 101. Presented By: Kyle Johnson, P.E. (Bolton & Menk) Dan Erickson, P.E. (Metro District State Aid Engineer)

District 8 New Funding Project Selection

Transaction Guide Arizona Physicians IPA (APIPA) Eligibility

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

BOND ACCELERATED PROGRAM. Final REPORT TO LEGISLATURE ON TRUNK HIGHWAY BONDING JANUARY 10, 2008

CENTRAL MINNESOTA AREA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP (ATP-3) Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) District 3, Baxter, MN Room 135 April 6, 2017

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column

Centennial Care Reporting Instructions Behavioral Health Member Services/CSA Report #45

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Introduction of an advanced practice nurse endoscopist program to Victoria

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

SECTION 5310 APPLICATION GUIDELINES FOR 2018 PROJECTS:

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

Overview of FCC Forms: Consortia

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Corridor Investment Management Strategy Rochester Meeting Summary 5/22/2012

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

WACOG FY Transportation Improvement Program STP PROJECTS AT A GLANCE

TRANSPORTATION DECISIONMAKING. Information Tools for Tribal Governments. Financial Planning

Sources of Funding Through MDOT Office of Economic Development

Planning Resources - Tribal. Kenneth Petty

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

Module 2 Planning and Programming

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

RESPERSMAN RESERVE UNIT ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENT (RUAD) MANAGEMENT

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

Availability of Draft Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 FTIP for Interagency Consultation and Public Review

This codebook is for 2 data files that have been merged: Employee Baseline Survey (conduced online) and Commute Form (telephone interview)

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Transportation Improvement Program

10A. PUBLIC HEARING PRIORITY LIST SECONDARY AND UNPAVED ROADS

DOT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2014/15

Fargo Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments

Overview...2. Example Grantee...3. Getting Started...4 Registration...4. Create a Scenario... 6 Adding Background Information.. 6 Adding Spending...

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

County of Santa Clara Salary Ordinance

Wisconsin DNR Administered Programs. Aids For The Acquisition And Development Of Local Parks (ADLP)

Virginia Department of Fire Programs

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Mohave County Office of the Public Defender

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

6. HIGHWAY FUNDING Introduction Local Funding Sources Property Tax Revenues valuation County Transportation Excise Tax

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

AREA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

Developmental Disabilities (DD) Waiver Service Standards Effective Date: April 1, 2007

SAFETEA-LU s IMPACTS ON ODOT MARCH 2006

Understanding the. Program

FRESNO UNIFIED School Transportation Schedule COMPUTECH Effective Date 08/14/2018

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

Chapter 4: OVERVIEW OF MAPS, LISTINGS, CODES, AND ABBREVIATIONS

CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION WORKERS COMPENSATION BENEFITS

XII. FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP) - FFY2016 & FFY2017

Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit. State Management Plan

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

ATP Technical Advisory Committee Concept Rollout, Stakeholder Comments, Moving Forward

Transcription:

2015-2018 STIP/ATIP TEMPLATE GUIDANCE PART I ATIP data should be transmitted via a customized Excel template provided by the Office of Transportation System Management (OTSM) in the following format. Please input data using UPPERCASE and round to the nearest dollar (do not round using # format). Please do not use dashes for blank cells, use zero (0) instead. STIP/ATIP Template Sequence # A The column will be assigned by OTSM when the STIP is finalized. ATP B Enter the ATP number from the drop down menu. Metro should use the letter M. District C Enter the MnDOT construction district number from the drop down menu. Metro should use the letter M. Route System D Enter the route system from the drop down menu. See Figure 1 for list of standard route system abbreviations. Route Number E Enter the number associated with the route system. If not applicable, enter 999 for Statewide. (Do not use 999 for Transit Projects (BB), Ped/Bike, Rec Trails, RR, or if not applicable such as intersection improvements, signing, countywide shoulder paving, etc.) Rte_Sys F Automatically calculated by formula (Route System & Route Number). Project number G Enter the project number that identifies the project. See Figure 2 for standard formats for project number. Year H From the drop down menu, enter the state fiscal year in which the District/ATP is requesting the project Rank I Leave Blank (may be used by District, Central Office does not use) Who J From the drop down menu, enter an S to identify MnDOT projects, an L to identify local projects, and an A for all other projects. Transit projects are considered local projects. (See the attached How to Program Centrally Funded Programs or contact Trang Chu/Sue Thompson) 1 of 6 December 2013

Agency K Enter the name of the jurisdiction responsible for implementing the project or for opening bids. If the jurisdiction is the MPO/RDC, use MPO/RDC. For transit projects, this can be either MnDOT or the local transit authority. For 5307 transit projects, the Agency is always the local transit authority. For STP funded transit projects, MnDOT is the agency unless that project is an urban (MPO) project and then it is the local transit authority. For Rail projects enter MnDOT as the agency. See Figure 3 for recommended formats. MPO L From the drop down menu, enter an indicator to identify projects that are located in an MPO. (Leave blank if not in an MPO) 1 = Duluth-Superior 2 = Grand Forks-East Grand Forks 3 = St. Cloud 4 = Fargo-Moorhead 5 = La Crosse-La Crescent 6 = Rochester-Olmsted 7 = Met Council 8 = Mankato Description M Enter a brief description of the project. See Figure 4A, 4B, and 4C for recommended formats and abbreviations. BEG RP N Enter the beginning reference points (xxx+xx.xxx). END RP O Enter the ending reference points (xxx+xx.xxx). Length P Enter the length of the project in miles. Use only one decimal place. Use 0.0 for length of bridges, intersections. NOTE: FHWA will require Beg RF/End RP /Length on all route systems beginning October 1, 2014. City Q From the drop down menu, enter the name of the city when a project is located in a city. County R From the drop down menu, enter the name of the county (or multi-county/districtwide). Program S From the drop down menu, enter the 2 letter category identifier for the project program. See Figures 5A and 5B for the list of Program. Performance T Automatically calculated by formula. Policy Codes 1 and 2 Perf Policy Code 1 U Leave blank 2 of 6 December 2013

Perf Policy V Leave blank Code 2 Primary Type of Work W From the drop down menu, enter the primary type of work. Only one primary code can be used for each project. If a project includes more than one work type, the work type that has the greatest cost associated with it should be used and use the Secondary Type of Work column. Secondary Type of Work X From the drop down menu, enter the secondary type of work. Only one secondary code can be used. Proposed Funds Y Automatically calculated by formula. Fund 1 Z From the drop down menu, enter the anticipated source of funding. See Figure 6 for list of funding sources. Fund 2 AA From the drop down menu, enter the additional sources of anticipated funding for the project. Fund 3 AB From the drop down menu, enter the additional sources of anticipated funding for the project. STIP TOTAL AC Automatically calculated by formula. Equals the sum of HPP, Other FHWA, FHWA, District C FHWA, HPP & Other AC, Target AC, District C AC, FTA, State TH, District C TH, BOND, and Other dollars. FHWA Earmark AD Enter the total federal dollars available to date for all Demo projects Other FHWA AE Enter total FHWA non-formula dollars anticipated to be used. These are Indian Reservation Roads, Forest Highways, TRLF, etc.) Target FHWA AF Enter total federal target highway dollars anticipated to be used. This includes STP funds to be transferred to FTA for Transit projects. District C FHWA AG Enter the total district C federal highway dollars anticipated to be used on the project. Total FHWA AH Automatically calculated by formula. Equal to HPP, Other FHWA, Target FHWA, and District C FHWA. HPP & Other FHWA AC AI The total estimated amount of future Demo & Other FHWA federal funds being committed to the project. Target AC AJ The total estimated amount of future target federal funds being committed to a project, front-ended by local/state funds. 3 of 6 December 2013

District C AC AK The total estimated amount of future District C federal funds being committed to the project, frontended by local/state funds. Total AC AL Automatically calculated by formula. Equal to Target AC and District C AC. HPP & Other FHWA AC Target AC District C AC Total AC AM AN AO AP The total estimated amount of Demo & Other FHWA funds converted to federal funds. The total estimated amount of target funds converted to federal funds. The total estimated amount of district C funds converted to federal funds. Automatically calculated by formula. Equals AC and District C AC. FTA AQ Enter total dollars from the Federal Transit Administration. FTA Earmark AR Enter total dollars from a FTA Earmark STATE TH AS Enter total (SRC) state trunk highway dollars anticipated to be used (either state match or state funds; does not include any state-aid funds). Does not include Bond dollars or non-src state funds. District C TH AT Enter total District C trunk highway funds anticipated to be used on the project. Does not include Bond dollars. Total TH AU Automatically calculated. State TH + Dist C TH. BOND AV Enter total state amount of Trunk Highway bond funds anticipated to be used. OTHER AW Local match, local funds, and misc. funds including DNR recreational trail funds, DPS funds, NHTSA funds, and non-trunk Highway bond funds. Project Total AX Automatically calculated by formula. Equals HPP, Other Federal, Target FHWA, District C FHWA, HPP & Other Target AC, Target AC, District C AC, FTA, State TH, District C TH, BOND, and Other. 4 of 6 December 2013

Running Federal AY For information/analysis only Target $ Total Running State Target $ Total AZ For information/analysis only Year BA For information/analysis only OCPPM Comments District Comments Special Funding Program Local Contribution BB BC BD BE For OCPPM use only Use for additional project information. Note: Bridge Sufficiency Rating is required only for off system bridge replacement. Other funds-please explain LM, LF, Grant, etc From the drop down menu, enter the Special Funding Program (HPP, BR4M, TED, etc.) If there is a Local Contribution, enter the amount. This is the amount of funds outside of matching requirements or if no match is required. Local Match BF If there is a Local Match, enter the amount. This is the amount of local funds used to meet matching requirements. 20 Year Fix BG Enter Yes for projects that have a 20 year life (Note: all bond eligible projects are 20 year fix); otherwise, leave blank. ADA BH Enter Yes if project contains ADA funds (not ADA components); otherwise, leave blank. Alternate Bid BI Enter Yes if project is Alternate Bid; otherwise, leave blank. Congressional District BJ From the drop down menu, enter the Congressional District for this project. ELLA BK Enter Yes if it is an ELLA project; otherwise, leave blank. LGA BL Enter Yes if it is an LGA project; otherwise, leave blank. SRC BM Enter Yes if all or part of the project includes SRC or SRC eligible including Setasides; otherwise, leave blank (Note: 100% bond funded projects are not eligible for SRC). 5 of 6 December 2013

TRLF BN Enter Yes if it is a TRLF project; otherwise, leave blank 10 Year Work Plan BO-DX See 10 Year Work Plan Guidance 6 of 6 December 2013