Appendix F Public Meeting Summaries. F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

Similar documents
STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

Appendix E Major Stakeholder Meeting Summaries. E1: Ash Grove Cement Company E2: Holcim E3: UPRR E3: BNSF E4: IIIPOD E5: Skyline Landfill E6: Oncor

Dallas North Tollway Extension Phase 4B/5A Alignment Presented to: Regional Transportation Council

Appendix A: Public Involvement Plan

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

School Siting and Transportation

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

Nevada Department of Transportation Traffic Operations Policy Memorandum Traffic Signal Warrant Approval Process

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

US 59 Diboll Relief Route (Future I-69) Angelina County Open House Summary and Comment Response Report March 3, 2015

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE US 59/LOOP 20/I-69W PROJECT

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT FY2018 GOALS

IH 20 Ranger Hill Schematic Design and Environmental Documentation CSJ:

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

REGIONAL 10-YEAR PLAN AND NEXT DECADE OF PROJECTS. Regional Transportation Council December 8, 2016

Managing Access along Pennsylvania s Highways in the Delaware Valley

August 2007 Thomas Bohuslav Texas Department of Transportation

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-00/1754-1

REPORT TO THE 2002 HAWAII STATE LEGISLATURE

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

Apologies Michael, but lets work off of the attached update version. James Bass came back with a few additional minor tweaks to the language.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Citizen Information Meeting

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Design-Build Procurement Overview Manual. Alternative Project Delivery

Creating Options and Actions for Making Great Places

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Open House

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Module 3 Advance Funding Agreements between the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and a Local Government (LG) for Transportation Projects

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

I-66 Inside the Beltway Initial Traffic Analysis and Framework Agreement

Engaging Diverse Audiences in Planning for Transportation and Improving Air Quality

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) POLICY

I-69 System (I-369) Harrison County/Marshall Route Study. December Working Group Recommendation Report

2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference

Tower 55 Rail Reliever Study

PROJECT SELECTION Educational Series

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments

HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

MINUTES. Regional Transportation Council PUBLIC MEETING. Kaufman County Regional Toll Revenue Transportation Funding Initiative Recommendations

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

CITY OF LA CENTER PUBLIC WORKS

VALUE ENGINEERING PROGRAM

Streetcar Planning Update Dallas City Council Transportation and Environment Committee November 8, 2010

A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

Transport NI York Street Interchange APPENDIX A PROJECT BRIEF

A G E N D A LEWISVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 2, 2018 LEWISVILLE CITY HALL 151 WEST CHURCH STREET LEWISVILLE, TEXAS 75057

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Guidance for Urban/Metropolitan Area Installation/Bases

MINUTES of the Vernal City PLANNING COMMISSION Vernal City Council Chambers East Main Street, Vernal, Utah February 22, :00 pm

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. February 1, Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

Grow NJ Collaborative Research Agreement Worksheet

Comprehensive Plan 2009

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

Establish a regional entity charged with enhancing the relationship between the military and civilian communities

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS CORRIDOR STUDY

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Dealing for St. Johns Heritage Parkway

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION. Richard L. Caywood, P.E. Robert W. Hofrichter

NEPA PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Project Call

Florida s Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Application

The Town will manage the project, administer funding and review project material.

Strategic Projects Division

MEMORANDUM. AGENDA ITEM #3D December 5, December 1, TO: County Council FROM:

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

FY16 Annual Report WHAT IS GTIB? WHO ADMINSTERS GTIB? Summary of GTIB Funding Through FY16

NORTHWEST SECTOR STUDY PHASE I REPORT. Approved 17 February 2015 (Resolution )

TITLE 16. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 20A. COUNTY LOCAL AID SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 16:20A-1.1 Definitions

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION. Reference No. E-056

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

On Ramps to the Regional Trail System Three Rivers Park District TAP Funding Proposal

Grant Line Road Corridor Study Open House Meeting #2 March 5, :30-7:30PM Mission City Church 5555 W. Grant Line Road, Tracy CA 95304

Urban Planning and Land Use

3 Multi-contract, 38-mile roadway project adapts to face challenges PMC manages 38-mile US 290 Program in Houston US 290 Program Office

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN ACTION

APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

US Army Corps of Engineers Periodic Inspection Report 9 Update. Dallas City Council June 3, 2009

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Transcription:

Loop 9 Southeast Corridor/Feasibility Study Appendix F Public Meeting Summaries F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

Loop 9 Southeast Corridor/Feasibility Study F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary

PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY REPORT LOOP 9 SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR/FEASIBILITY STUDY DALLAS, ELLIS AND KAUFMAN COUNTIES, TEXAS CSJ: 2964-10-002 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SEPTEMBER 2013

CONTENTS 1. PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 2. PUBLIC MEETING PHOTOS

1. PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS FOR: LIMITS: From US 67 to I-20 COUNTY: Dallas, Ellis and Kaufman Proposed Improvements To address the local and regional transportation concerns, a new approach has been identified for the Loop 9 Southeast project that replaces the wide, high-speed toll facility previously planned. In September 2012, a Loop 9 Corridor/Feasibility Study began for the revised Loop 9 project concept from US 67 to I-20. The Corridor/Feasibility Study incorporates more flexible design standards, a reduced right-of-way (350 feet vs. 600 feet), lower design speed (70 mph vs. 85 mph), shorter project length, and phased project development and construction. The proposed Loop 9 minimizes the overall impacts when compared to past studies. Need and Purpose Traveling through the Dallas, Ellis, and Kaufman County study area can be a challenge. I-20, the closest east-west highway, lies miles to the north. There are gaps in the arterial street network that force east-west traffic to take circuitous routes that use I-20 or US 287. In addition, arterial roadways are growing more congested as the area adds residential, commercial, and industrial development. Loop 9 would provide important east-west connectivity, reduce travel times, and support economic development opportunities in the study area. Notices and Articles Notices were published in the following newspapers: - The Dallas Morning News on April 16, 2013 and May 6, 2013. - Al Día on April 13, 2013 and May 4, 2013. - The Focus Daily News on April 16, 2013 and May 5, 2013. - The Suburbia News on April 18, 2013 and May 2, 2013. - The Ellis County Press on April 18, 2013 and May 2, 2013. Full versions of the newspaper advertisements of the Loop 9 Public Meeting notices will be available to view at the TxDOT Dallas District Office located at 4777 E. Highway 80, Mesquite, Texas 75150. Public Meetings Date and Place The first Public Meeting was held at Ferris High School, 1025 E. 8 th Street, Ferris, Texas 75125 on May 16, 2013, inside the school cafeteria. The second Public Meeting was held at Ovilla Road Baptist Church, 3251 Ovilla Road, Ovilla, Texas 75154 on May 23, 2013, inside the school cafeteria/church sanctuary. See Section 2 for representative photographs of the Public Meeting facilities. The meetings were presented in an Open House format held from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. with the proposed corridors shown on aerial maps, explanatory exhibits, and a looping presentation. TxDOT staff and the project consultant team were available to answer questions. The maps, exhibits, and presentation, as well as other May Public Meeting materials (comment forms, fact sheet, etc.) are available to view at www.loop9.org. 1

Attendance The total registered attendance at the May 16, 2013, Public Meeting was 220 people. A total of eight TxDOT project staff, two representatives of the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), and 15 project consultants also attended. The total registered attendance at the May 23, 2013, Public Meeting was 240 people. A total of 15 TxDOT project staff, two representatives of NCTCOG, and 14 project consultants also attended. Sign-in sheets can be viewed at the TxDOT Dallas District Office. Exhibits Plans illustrating the proposed corridor alignments were displayed for public viewing and comments. These included plan and profile drawings and typical sections. Environmental constraints maps were on display as well as project-specific informational boards relating to the current Corridor/Feasibility Study and the future steps in the study. Copies of the TxDOT State Purchase of Right-of-Way booklet were made available. A link to this booklet is available under the Public Involvement section of the www.loop9.org website. Summary of Comments Thirty-one persons submitted comments during the first Public Meeting and 40 persons submitted comments during the second Public Meeting. Following the Public Meetings, fifty-four persons submitted comments via mail and e-mail during the comment period, which ended on June 3, 2013. Of these 54 people, 35 presented the same map and letter to voice their opposition to the Loop 9 project. A total of 125 comments were received at the public meetings and during the 10-day comment period. Copies of the written comments (letters, e-mails and comments forms) can be viewed at the TxDOT Dallas District Office. Many of the people that submitted comments referenced numerous issues, concerns, or ideas via a single comment form, e-mail, or letter. In order to provide a summary of all the comments, the table below identifies the main issues presented by concerned parties, the number of people who voiced the concern, and a response to the general comment. Copies of the individual written comments (letters, e-mails and comments forms) can be viewed at the TxDOT Dallas District Office. Main Issues Commented On Number of Persons Referencing Issue in their Comment* Concerned about Protecting Natural/Historical Resources 6 Frustrated with Lack of Decision by TxDOT and Effect on Property 6 Response During the initial identification of alternative alignments, known ecological and historical resources were identified as no-go areas for the proposed Loop 9 corridor. As the project moves forward into the environmental document phase and additional information is gathered, impacts to these resources will be assessed and avoided and/or mitigated, as necessary. Due to the magnitude of the proposed project, the funding needs, and the numerous entities involved, moving the proposed project forward is a large endeavor to which TxDOT and NCTCOG are committed. TxDOT understands the frustrations of area residents and will strive to keep the public informed at each step of the process. The Program of Projects which will be identified at the end of this study would allow the project to move forward. 2

Main Issues Commented On Concerned about Land Use Change to Commercial Property Potential Noise Impacts to Residents Supports Specific Alignment Against Tolling Loop 9 Funding Should Support Improvements to Other Roadways in the Area Loop 9 Should Follow Existing Roadways Access Concerns Believes Project is Politically Motivated Number of Persons Referencing Issue in their Comment* 37 39 15 5 46 39 4 36 Requests Shift to Proposed Alternatives 12 Impacts to Senior Citizens and Minority Groups Concern About Involvement of Foreign Entities 36 3 Response Land use and zoning are determined by local municipalities. Landowners should discuss their concerns/desires for properties adjacent to the proposed corridor with their local officials. During the development of the environmental document for each section of Loop 9, a noise analysis will be conducted and if it is determined that a noise barrier is reasonable and feasible, a meeting will be held with adjacent property owners to discuss the barrier. TxDOT appreciates your feedback related to the specific corridors and will analyze all comments provided before a determination on the final corridor is made. The final determination of the project alignment will be made during a future environmental study. Due to large state transportation budget needs, tolling is always considered as a source of funding on large roadway projects. No decision has been made on the potential use of tolling on the proposed Loop 9 roadway. The proposed Loop 9 project is included in Mobility 2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas 2013 Update. Currently there is approximately $100 million in funding set aside specifically for the Loop 9 project. Other improvements in the area are ongoing and each have a separate set of funding available for those projects. Because the Loop 9 roadway would require a wider rightof-way than most existing roadways in the area, following these roadways could displace a larger number of homes and businesses. By placing Loop 9 primarily in undeveloped parcels, TxDOT can reduce the impacts to area residents and businesses. Existing local access will be maintained with the proposed project and access to cross streets would be determined based on TxDOT design guidelines. While local cities and counties have been involved in the planning stages of the proposed project, the need for the project stems from increasing populations, congested roadways, and the lack of sufficient east-west corridors in southern Dallas and northern Ellis Counties. The proposed Loop 9 project is included in Mobility 2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas 2013 Update. TxDOT appreciates your feedback related to the proposed corridors and will analyze all comments provided before a determination on the final corridor is made. The proposed Loop 9 project will be subject to all federal laws and regulations which include Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations. TxDOT s goal on every project is to limit impacts to area residents, including senior citizens and minority populations. No foreign entities are involved with the proposed Loop 9 project. If it is determined at a later date that Loop 9 could be constructed as a toll road, the North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) would have the first right of refusal to manage and maintain the roadway. The roadway would be under public ownership. 3

Main Issues Commented On Number of Persons Referencing Issue in their Comment* Response *Note: In many cases, a person referenced multiple issues, concerns, or ideas via a single comment form, letter, or e-mail. Therefore, the values presented in this column do not equate to the total number of comments that were received at the public meetings and during the 10-day comment period. 4

2. PUBLIC MEETING PHOTOS

Loop 9 Corridor/Feasibility Study Public Meeting Photographs May 16, 2013 Public Meeting Ferris High School

Loop 9 Corridor/Feasibility Study Public Meeting Photographs May 23, 2013 Public Meeting Ovilla Road Baptist Church

Loop 9 Southeast Corridor/Feasibility Study F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY REPORT LOOP 9 SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR/FEASIBILITY STUDY DALLAS, ELLIS AND KAUFMAN COUNTIES, TEXAS CSJ: 2964-10-002 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOVEMBER 2013 DRAFT

CONTENTS 1. PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 2. PUBLIC MEETING PHOTOS DRAFT

1. PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS FOR: LIMITS: From US 67 to I-20 COUNTY: Dallas, Ellis and Kaufman Proposed Improvements To address the local and regional transportation concerns, a new approach has been identified for the Loop 9 Southeast project that replaces the wide, high-speed toll facility previously planned. In September 2012, a Loop 9 Corridor/Feasibility Study began for the revised Loop 9 project concept from US 67 to I-20. The Corridor/Feasibility Study incorporates more flexible design standards, a reduced right-of-way (350 feet vs. 600 feet), lower design speed (70 mph vs. 85 mph), shorter project length, and phased project development and construction. The proposed Loop 9 minimizes the overall impacts when compared to past studies. Need and Purpose Traveling through the Dallas, Ellis, and Kaufman County study area can be a challenge. I-20, the closest east-west highway, lies miles to the north. There are gaps in the arterial street network that force east-west traffic to take circuitous routes that use I-20 or US 287. In addition, arterial roadways are growing more congested as the area adds residential, commercial, and industrial development. Loop 9 would provide important east-west connectivity, reduce travel times, and support economic development opportunities in the study area. Notices and Articles Notices were published in the following newspapers: - The Dallas Morning News on September 1, 2013 and September 14, 2013. - Al Día on September 1, 2013 and September 15, 2013. - The Focus Daily News on September 1, 2013 and September 13, 2013. - The Suburbia News on September 5, 2013 and September 12, 2013. - The Ellis County Press on September 5, 2013 and September 12, 2013. DRAFT Full versions of the newspaper advertisements of the Loop 9 Public Meeting notices will be available to view at the TxDOT Dallas District Office located at 4777 E. Highway 80, Mesquite, Texas 75150. Public Meetings Date and Place The first Public Meeting was held at Lancaster Elementary School, 1109 West Main Street, Lancaster, Texas 75146 on September 24, 2013, inside the school cafeteria. The second Public Meeting was held at Red Oak Intermediate School, 401 E. Ovilla Road, Glenn Heights, Texas 75154 on September 26, 2013, inside the school cafeteria. See Section 2 for representative photographs of the Public Meeting facilities. The meetings were presented in an Open House format held from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., a formal presentation held from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., and another Open House held from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. During the Open House sessions, there were explanatory exhibits and aerial maps of the proposed corridors. TxDOT staff and the project consultant team were available to answer questions. The maps, exhibits, and 1

presentation, as well as other September Public Meeting materials (comment forms, fact sheet, etc.) are available to view at www.loop9.org. The formal presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slide show and project discussion conducted by Mr. Bruce Nolley, P.E., TxDOT Loop 9 Project Manager and Mr. Brian Clark, P.E., Atkins Loop 9 Project Manager. Attendance The total registered attendance at the September 24, 2013, Public Meeting was 150 people. A total of eight TxDOT project staff, two representatives of the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), two representatives of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and 17 project consultants also attended. The total registered attendance at the September 26, 2013, Public Meeting was 183 people. A total of 10 TxDOT project staff, two representatives of NCTCOG, and 16 project consultants also attended. Sign-in sheets can be viewed at the TxDOT Dallas District Office. Exhibits Plans illustrating the proposed corridor alignments were displayed for public viewing and comments. These included plan and profile drawings and typical sections. Environmental constraints maps were on display as well as project-specific informational boards relating to the current Corridor/Feasibility Study and the future steps in the study. Copies of the TxDOT State Purchase of Right-of-Way booklet were made available. A link to this booklet is available under the Public Involvement section of the www.loop9.org website. Summary of Comments Fourteen comment forms and two letters were submitted during the first Public Meeting and 10 comment forms were submitted during the second Public Meeting. Following the Public Meetings, five comment forms and three e-mails were submitted during the comment period, which ended on October 7, 2013. A total of 29 comment forms, two letters, and three e-mails were received at the public meetings and during the 10-day comment period. Copies of the written comments (comments forms, letters, and e-mails) can be viewed at the TxDOT Dallas District Office. Many of the people that submitted comments referenced numerous issues, concerns, or ideas via a single comment form, letter, or e-mail. In order to provide a summary of all the comments, the table below identifies the main issues presented by concerned parties, the number of people who voiced the concern, and a response to the general comment. Copies of the individual written comments (comments forms, letters, and e-mails) can be viewed at the TxDOT Dallas District Office. Main Issues Commented On Concerned about Protecting Natural Resources DRAFT Number of Persons Referencing Issue in their Comment* 1 Response During the initial identification of alternative alignments, known ecological resources were identified as no-go areas for the proposed Loop 9 corridor. As the project moves forward into the environmental document phase and additional information is gathered, impacts to these resources will be assessed and avoided and/or mitigated, as necessary. 2

Main Issues Commented On Frustrated with Lack of Decision by TxDOT and Effect on Property Potential Noise Impacts to Residents Number of Persons Referencing Issue in their Comment* Supports Specific Alignment 7 Loop 9 Funding Should Support Improvements to Other Roadways in the Area Access Concerns 2 Believes Project is Politically Motivated Requests Shift to Proposed Alternatives Does Not Support the Project 9 Concerns Regarding Changes in Existing Thoroughfare Designations After Loop 9 Implementation 1 2 2 1 11 Response Due to the magnitude of the proposed project, the funding needs, and the numerous entities involved, moving the proposed project forward is a large endeavor to which TxDOT and NCTCOG are committed. TxDOT understands the frustrations of area residents and will strive to keep the public informed at each step of the process. The Program of Projects which will be identified at the end of this study would allow the project to move forward. During the development of the environmental document for each section of Loop 9, a noise analysis will be conducted and if it is determined that a noise barrier is reasonable and feasible, a meeting will be held with adjacent property owners to discuss the barrier. TxDOT appreciates your feedback related to the specific corridors and will analyze all comments provided before a determination on the final corridor is made. The final determination of the project alignment will be made during a future environmental study. Currently there is approximately $100 million in funding set aside specifically for the Loop 9 project. Other improvements in the area are ongoing and each have a separate set of funding available for those projects. Existing local access will be maintained with the proposed project and access to cross streets would be determined based on TxDOT design guidelines. While local cities and counties have been involved in the planning stages of the proposed project, the need for the project stems from increasing populations, congested roadways, and the lack of sufficient east-west corridors in southern Dallas and northern Ellis Counties. The proposed Loop 9 project is included in Mobility 2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas 2013 Update. TxDOT appreciates your feedback related to the proposed corridors and will analyze all comments provided before a determination on the final corridor is made. TxDOT appreciates your feedback related to the proposed project. The need for the project stems from increasing populations, congested roadways, and the lack of sufficient east-west corridors in southern Dallas and northern Ellis Counties. The proposed Loop 9 project is included in Mobility 2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas 2013 Update. DRAFT 1 TxDOT and NCTCOG will be committed to resolving thoroughfare designation issues on a case by case basis. 3

Main Issues Commented On Commercial/Residential Displacement Concerns Concern About Involvement of Foreign Entities Number of Persons Referencing Issue in their Comment* 4 1 Response All right-of-way acquisitions would be performed according to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended. When acquiring right-of-way, TxDOT compensation is determined based on an independent appraiser and fair market value. Relocation assistance could also be provided. Discussions with property owners concerning the acquisition of their property will not occur until after the environmental document and preliminary schematic are approved and the right-of-way maps have been prepared. No foreign entities are involved with the proposed Loop 9 project. If it is determined at a later date that Loop 9 could be constructed as a toll road, the North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) would have the first right of refusal to manage and maintain the roadway. The roadway would be under public ownership. *Note: In many cases, a person referenced multiple issues, concerns, or ideas via a single comment form, letter, or e-mail. Therefore, the values presented in this column do not equate to the total number of comments that were received at the public meetings and during the 10-day comment period. DRAFT 4

2. PUBLIC MEETING PHOTOS DRAFT

Loop 9 Corridor/Feasibility Study Public Meeting Photographs DRAFT September 24, 2013 Public Meeting Lancaster Elementary School

Loop 9 Corridor/Feasibility Study Public Meeting Photographs DRAFT September 26, 2013 Public Meeting Red Oak Intermediate School