F oreword. Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team.

Similar documents
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

SPECTRUM & SERVICES ENTERPRISE CAPABILITIES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Executing our Maritime Strategy

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Emerging Electromagnetic Spectrum Capabilities

Task Force Innovation Working Groups

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

3 rd Annual Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Summit

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

OPNAVINST DNS-3 22 Dec Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

MARINE CORPS POLICY FOR ASSIGNMENT, MANAGEMENT, AND OPERATIONAL USE OF THE VARIABLE MESSAGE FORMAT UNIT REFERENCE NUMBER

Expeditionary Energy. David P. Karcher Director, Energy Systems SIAT, MCSC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (DON COOP) PROGRAM

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

MCWP Electronic Warfare. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #203

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

MCWP Aviation Logistics. U.S. Marine Corps PCN

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

Subj: SECRETARY OF THE NAVY SAFETY EXCELLENCE AWARDS

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

Guidelines to Design Adaptive Command and Control Structures for Cyberspace Operations

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Management of Space Professional Development

UNCLASSIFIED/ AFCEA Alamo Chapter. MG Garrett S. Yee. Acting Cybersecurity Director Army Chief Information Officer/G-6. June 2017 UNCLASSIFIED

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

Balanced tactical helicopter force

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS FIELD MEDICAL TRAINING BATTALION Camp Lejeune, NC

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

OPNAVINST N46 24 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

Information Technology Expenditure Approval Authority

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

A Ready, Modern Force!

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Program

Sense And Respond: A Paradigm for Future Integration of Information Technology into Command and Control Operations

Joint Spectrum Vision 2010

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE NAVAL SAFETY CENTER

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

GREGORY A. SCOVEL. Work Experience Bent Creek Terrace Leesburg, VA (703)

NAVAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS POLICY AND COORDINATION

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

Chapter III ARMY EOD OPERATIONS

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

Future Force Capabilities

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Tactical Technology Office

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEFENSE STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Reconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development

Transformation of DoD Spectrum Utilization Needed to Ensure Future Access

AUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI. Panel Topic Descriptions

Counter-IED RESPONSE IN THE GWOT Technology Transition for the Current War

MARINE CORPS ORDER C. From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List. Subj: AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY (AIT)

OPNAVINST H N12 3 Sep 2015

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Transcription:

F oreword In today s Global War On Terror (GWOT), our Sailors and Marines are using every available and necessary asset to assure mission success and safety. These assets include cellular tactical satellite radios, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), munitions guided by Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and a myriad of other communications-electronics resources to provide a technological advantage over the enemy. A dependence on the electromagnetic spectrum (spectrum) is common to most systems on the GWOT battlefield. As a result, access to the spectrum is vital to the successful training and combat use of communications, sensors, and weapons systems being employed on terrorist targets. The following spectrum goals will be our focus of effort for the next eighteen months. We will ensure that the Department of the Navy s (DON s) Spectrum priorities are in accordance with those identified in Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) Instruction 2400.1, and fully support the DoD Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Strategic Plan (1), the Joint Staff s Command, Control, Communications and Computers (C4) Campaign Plan (2), and the Marine Corps C4 Campaign Plan (3). Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team. D. M. Wennergren Department of the Navy Chief Information Officer 1

I ntroduction The DON s role in the GWOT highlights the importance of unencumbered access to spectrum to support the full range of United States Navy (USN) and United States Marine Corps (USMC) operations around the world. As enemy tactics evolve, the USMC and USN must create new capabilities through rapidly fielded technologies to overcome developing threats. Many of these new technologies and capabilities increase our spectrum requirement. A critical challenge for the DON is to ensure access to spectrum. The use of UAS, robotics, and a growing list of fielded capabilities, including electronic warfare, will further add to the importance of unencumbered access to Spectrum. The DON s GWOT responsibilities include overseas and homeland defense roles. Significant challenges to federal and non-federal domestic spectrum use are presented through the urban employment of communications equipment generally considered tactical, as well as interoperable, with U.S. federal, state, and local anti-terrorism and force protection authorities. The GWOT is a sustained, worldwide effort. Given the unique physics of the electromagnetic spectrum, the unique legalities associated with it, and that the world s economic climate is increasingly influenced by spectrum use, assuring access to spectrum is no simple task. Success requires consistent, dedicated effort from the strategic to the tactical levels of the DON, the USMC, and the USN. Unconstrained access to the electromagnetic spectrum is the Department s highest spectrum priority. Spectrum management and policy play vital roles in both training exercises and real world operations. Due to spectrum s critical role, it must be a primary consideration in acquisition, operational planning, Command and Control (C2), and personnel training. The Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) recently published SECNAV Instruction 2400.1, Electromagnetic Spectrum Policy and Management, which provides overarching policy for the planning, management, and use of spectrum, as well as the acquisition of spectrum-dependent systems, ensuring the DON appropriately addresses spectrum. SECNAV Instruction 2400.1 establishes and delineates the DON secretariat and service-level spectrum roles and responsibilities. The instruction, while recognizing the changing spectrum landscape in conducting coalition and domestic support operations, provides both strategic and operational focus to fundamental spectrum goals to achieve worldwide spectrum access for the USMC and the USN. 2

G oal 1: Endorse and exploit technology and transformation. Whether through government research or commercial development, new and emerging technologies provide the basis for transformation within the DON. A wide variety of new technologies are being introduced into the USN and USMC. These include: Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), which is redefining logistic operations both ashore and afloat; cellular satellite communications used extensively in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF); and the Marine Corps Rapid Response System (RRS), a transportable Land Mobile Radio (LMR) system that has been successfully employed in Homeland Defense initiatives, a National Special Security Event (4) (NSSE), and natural disaster recovery operations (5). In addition to enhancing our capabilities, spectrum-efficient technologies have proven to effectively reduce the DON s requirement for spectrum, thereby supporting the Secretary of the Navy s policy for efficient spectrum use while enabling spectrum support of legacy applications. Exploitation of new and emerging technologies has and must remain a mainstay in our quest to continually improve Naval operational effectiveness. SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES: Define and comply with DoD and DON RFID implementation and use policy. Replace legacy wide-band LMR with narrow-band LMR in order to comply with the federal narrow-band mandate and provide interoperable communications between DON first responders and federal, state, and local authorities. Streamline the DON equipment certification process to better support dynamic technology acquisition efforts in order to speed equipment delivery to the fleet and operating forces. 3

G oal 2: Influence DoD, federal, national, and international spectrum policies that benefit the Naval services. DoD, federal, national, and international spectrum policy all impact the DON s ashore and afloat operations. The DON Chief Information Officer (DON CIO) develops DON strategic spectrum policy and is the DON s representative to DoD, federal, national, and international spectrum policy bodies, ensuring that appropriate effort is dedicated to this misunderstood (6) resource. In so doing, the DON CIO coordinates with the Chief of Naval Operations and the Commandant of the Marine Corps. Past successes include: the coordinated reissuance of DoD Directive 4650, Policy for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum, which includes specific spectrum certification requirements for equipment acquisition; and influencing past World Radio Conference (WRC) actions that minimized risk to USN and USMC worldwide spectrum use. However, serious new challenges have been identified in the (WRC-07) agenda. The DON CIO, DON Deputy CIO USMC, and DON Deputy CIO USN, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition, (ASN RD&A) continue to address spectrum utilization concerns. Specifically, the DON advocates requirements validated by competent technical support from the USN and USMC and the DON s acquisition community. SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES: Update acquisition guidance documents (DoD 5000 series, Mil HDBK 237C, etc.) to include equipment certification and Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) requirements in the acquisition process. 4 Participate in international deliberations in preparation for WRC-07, to include preparations for, and attending bilateral meetings on WRC issues. Conduct related WRC-07 assessments and engineering analyses on critical DON/DoD issues. Prepare and distribute preparatory WRC-07 position papers and advisories for the DON, USN, and USMC spectrum stakeholders. Actively support DoD / Federal and Mexico / Canada / US spectrum sharing negotiations to ensure Naval spectrum needs are protected.

G oal 3: Increase efficiency through spectrum-related administrative actions. Past spectrum reallocations have highlighted the necessity to not only be a good spectrum administrator, but also ensure that use of radio frequencies is as efficient as possible. Timely and accurate completion of federal spectrum administrative actions, such as frequency assignment modifications and five-year reviews, establish the DON as a premier federal steward of electromagnetic spectrum. In this regard the DON must raise the bar. Spectrum administrative actions contribute to frequency assignment data accuracy within DoD and federal databases. The benefits of detailed and precise spectrum databases include: an ability to accurately identify Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordinance, Personnel, and Fuel (HERO, HERP, and HERF); reducing the potential for harmful radio frequency interference; and increasing savings when fee-based frequency assignments, no longer required by the DON, are released for redistribution to another agency. The timely completion of federal administrative actions helps to ensure the efficient use of a finite resource. SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES: Reduce the requirement for temporary frequency assignments by ensuring all Naval installations within the United States and Possessions (US&P) acquire sufficient permanent frequency assignments. Continue to reduce overdue five and ten year frequency assignment reviews. Eliminate frequency assignments that are no longer required for use by the USMC and USN. Streamline spectrum-related administrative processes and implement actions to enhance the accuracy of organizational data for all DON frequency assignments. 5

G oal 4: Develop and update department and service spectrum publications, directives and policy. Due to the DON s worldwide reliance on spectrum, appropriate service and departmentlevel publications and directives must be continuously updated to ensure DON policies are applicable and synchronized with DoD, federal, national, and international spectrum policies. While the majority of the DON s spectrum use is at the USMC and USN tactical levels, we must ensure installations and ranges providing invaluable day-to-day training have sufficient spectrum to support sustaining operations such as security, medical response, and firefighter capabilities. The Department s spectrum requirements span from the strategic requirements of the DON and the DoD to the tactical service level. Up-to-date and relevant policy ensures the USMC s and USN s use and management of spectrum are effective and efficient. In this regard, SECNAV Instruction 2400.1 supports secretariat and service-level spectrum policy efforts while identifying operational authority and organizational responsibilities. SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES: Review and update SECNAV policies, ensuring that the acquisition and use of spectrum-dependent systems and the use of the electromagnetic spectrum is consistent with SECNAV Instruction 2400.1. 6 Review and update OPNAV Instruction 2400.20E; Navy Management of the Radio Frequency Spectrum. Review and update MCO 2400.2; Marine Corps Management of the Radio Frequency.

G oal 5: Ensure Navy and Marine Corps uniformed personnel are well trained and possess capable automated spectrum tools. The 2004 Joint Staff s C4 Campaign Plan states: Professional spectrum managers are the backbone to successful network operations (7). This statement reinforces the DON s requirement for a well-trained, competent, spectrum management workforce throughout tactical, operational, and strategic levels. Spectrum management requirements exist within nearly all USN and USMC functional areas, and the requirement for spectrum training must be adequate to support each functional area. Personnel in acquisition must possess a keen appreciation of spectrum certification requirements to ensure that USN and USMC equipment is fielded as rapidly as possible with maximum Spectrum Supportability. Personnel involved with fleet or expeditionary force Spectrum Management must have a considerable understanding of the joint processes to coordinate and manage the vast and increasing array of spectrum-dependent systems that support DoD operations around the world. While training is paramount for USN and USMC spectrum personnel, there is also a need for automated spectrum planning and management tools. These must be designed and developed to provide interoperability with legacy systems, as well as new and emerging capabilities such as the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS). Spectrum automation tools must be fielded with pre-planned lifecycle management that is capable of interfacing with the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI). SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES: Create a Departmental Composite Uniformed Spectrum Personnel Plan. Outline a career progression strategy for USN and USMC spectrum management personnel. Monitor joint, allied, and coalition spectrum management personnel assignments. Outline a DON migration strategy for automated spectrum management tools, identifying near-term, mid-term, and far-term requirements. Support the development of programs-of-record for spectrum management automated tools. 7

Reference documents (1) Department of Defense, Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence), Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Strategic Plan, October 2002 (2) Joint Staff, Command, Control, Communications, and Computer Systems Directorate (J-6), Joint C4 Campaign Plan, September 2004 (3) U.S Marine Corps, Command, Control, Communications, and Computers (C4), C4 Campaign Plan, Transforming Marine Corps C4 (4) NSSE event NATO Defense Ministers Conference, October 2003 (5) Natural disaster recovery operations Naval Air Station Pensacola, FL (Hurricane Frances), September 2004; New Orleans, LA and Gulfport, MS (Hurricane Katrina), September 2005 (6) Page 28, Joint Staff, Command, Control, Communications, and Computer Systems Directorate (J-6), Joint C4 Campaign Plan, September 2004 (7) Page 30, Joint Staff, Command, Control, Communications, and Computer Systems Directorate (J-6), Joint C4 Campaign Plan, September 2004 8

N otes

N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 6