Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract

Similar documents
Breast Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract

CANCER LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

Multidisciplinary Cancer Care

Pre-Implementation Provider Survey

Massachusetts Health Connector. Fiscal Year 2011 Commonwealth Care Member Survey

The FOCUS Program: Helping Cancer Patients and Family Their Caregivers. Laurel Northouse PhD, RN, FAAN Professor of Nursing University of Michigan

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary

Consumer perceptions of the effectiveness of a breast care nurse in providing coordinated care to women with breast cancer in Queensland, Australia

Barwon South Western Survivorship Project. Improving outcomes for survivors of cancer

Outcome and Process Evaluation Report: Crisis Residential Programs

Nebraska Lifespan Respite Network

National findings from the 2013 Inpatients survey

TENNESSEE S CRISIS RESPITE SERVICES

Patient Navigation: A Multidisciplinary Team Approach

BMA quarterly tracker survey

DRAFT Optimal Care Pathway

The Schwartz Center Mission

Models for Patient-centered Cancer Care

the nutritional management of adult patients with head and neck cancer

An evaluation of the National Cancer Survivorship Initiative test community projects. Report of the baseline patient experience survey

Deborah Mayer, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN School of Nursing Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS)

COPE Intervention for Cancer Caregivers

Pediatric Psychology

Oncology Nurses: Providing the Support System for Cancer Care

I no longer feel alone with this

National Outcome Measures (NOMs) DISCHARGE INTERVIEW. Grant ID (Grant/Contract/Cooperative Agreement) _

Path to Transformation Concept Paper Comments and Recommendations. Palliative Care Community Partners (PCCP)

Outpatient Quality Reporting Program

History of Patient Navigation 8/26/17. Cancer Navigation September 26, Agenda

Patient and carer experiences: palliative care services national survey report: November 2010

Patients Being Weaned From the Ventilator: Positive Effects of Guided Imagery. Authors McVay, Frank; Spiva, Elizabeth; Hart, Patricia L.

Main Study Informed Consent Form, Version D (Direct)

Renal cancer surgery patient experience February 2014-February 2015

Hospital Outpatient Quality Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: January, 2018

FAMILY MEMBERS % STAFF % PROFESSIONALS % TOTAL %

Tools and Resources for the New and Experienced Oncology Nurse Navigator & Oncology Care Coordinator

THE 3 STEP PROCESS FOR SUCCESSFUL EMPLOYEE GOAL MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE CARE

1/25/15. Equicare Health. Patient Management & Retention: Clinical And Financial Implications. Clinical Implica+ons of Pa+ent Management

In-Home Services Programs

Perceptions of the role of the hospital palliative care team

Chronic Critical Illness Decision Aid

Patient Experience Survey Results

NASW/NKF Clinical Indicators for Social Work and Psychosocial Service in Nephrology Settings

Evidence-Based Education Intervention to Improve Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses' Postoperative Pain Management for Improved Patient Satisfaction

Patient Minor Surgery Satisfaction Outcome Questionnaire 2014/15

Patient experiences of Discharge at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital June 2016

Innovations in Models of Care Delivery

The Hawai i Health Information Exchange Improving the quality of care, increasing efficiency, and reducing costs through effective use of electronic

National Patient Safety Foundation at the AMA

INNOVATIVE TOOLS TO SUPPORT FAMILY CAREGIVERS

Patient Navigation Programs Leveraging Care Pathways. Tina Evans, RN, BS Director of Nursing,Onco-Nav

Complex Cases of Liver and Kidney Disease

Oncology Pharmacy Services

Long Term Care Nurses Feelings on Communication, Teamwork and Stress in Long Term Care

Transitions of Care: The need for collaboration across entire care continuum

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015

The Agency for Co-operative Housing 2015 Client Satisfaction Survey. Prepared by TNS Canada. December 21, 2015

Improving Student Critical Thinking Skills through a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Pilot Project

Understanding and Managing End of Life Symptoms: A Teaching Guide for the Primary Caregiver

Benchmarking across sectors: Comparisons of residential dual diagnosis and mental health programs

Could Helping Parents Achieve Being a Good Parent to My Very Ill Child be Effective Bereavement Care?

03/24/2017. Measuring What Matters to Improve the Patient Experience. Building Compassion Into Everyday Practice

Barb Henry, APRN-BC, MSN

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.

CALIFORNIA Small Group HMO Aetna Health of California, Inc. Plan Effective Date: 04/01/2007. Aetna Value Network* HMO $30/$40

Quality in patient-centred care planning: nursing interventions to alleviate constipation

HOSPITAL DISCHARGE FOLLOW UP REPORT: NOVEMBER 2016

Text-based Document. Implementing Strategies to Improve Patient Perception of Nursing Communication. Dunbar, Ghada; Nagar, Stacey

2011 University Life Survey

April 28, Dear Sir / Madam:

Suburban Cook County Area Hospital DV Protocol (2010)

Alternative Response Research in Missouri, Minnesota, and Virginia

Chronic Pain Management in the Inpatient Care Setting

Usability Testing of an Online Self-Management Program for Adolescents with Cancer

INFORMATION AND FORMS FOR AGENCY SUPERVISORS

09/10/15. By the end of this session, participants will: Compare caregiver and patient perceptions of

Quality Measurement at the Interface of Health Care and Population Health

Title & Subtitle can. accc-cancer.org March April 2017 OI

Optima EAP Clinical Assessment Form

Postdoctoral Fellowship in Pediatric Psychology

Objectives. Brief Review: EBP vs Research. APHON/Mattie Miracle Cancer Foundation EBP Grant Program Webinar 3/5/2018

2016 Community Health Improvement Plan

RULES OF DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

BMT CAREGIVER CHALLENGES. Presented by: Meagan Dwyer, Ph.D., Elizabeth Muenks, Ph.D. and Liliana Delano

THE TRANSFORMATIVE MODEL IN EDUCATION AND CARE DELIVERY

Relationship between Organizational Climate and Nurses Job Satisfaction in Bangladesh

An Assessment Of The Quality Of Life Of HIV/AIDS Patients And Their Families In Ghana During the Scale Up of Delivery of Antiretroviral Treatment

10/3/2014. Problem Identification: Practice Gap. Increasing Satisfaction With the Birth Experience Through a Focused Postpartum Debriefing Session

PSYCHIATRY SERVICES: MD FOCUSED

Psychosocial Oncology Specialization PRACTICUM AGENCY ROSTER

3. Practicing fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in the practice of medicine.

RALF Behavior Management Rules IDAPA

Aurora Behavioral Health System

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Understanding the Relationship Between Nurse Engagement and Patient Experience. Session ID: 467

v Searching NIH award data for a study section and other key information

Hospice Care for the Person with Cancer

The Number of People With Chronic Conditions Is Rapidly Increasing

2016 Smithsonian Employee Perspective Survey Highlights

Transcription:

Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract December 1, 2011 Final

Prepared by Institutional Research MD Anderson Cancer Center

Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract Submitted by: Marilyn J. Greer, Ph.D. Glenda Redworth, M.S. Institutional Research December 1, 2011

Acknowledgements Special thanks to Kathy Denton, Performance Improvement Specialist, Cancer Survivorship, for assisting us with the evaluation questions and evaluation process. In addition, many thanks to Virginia Peters, Administrative Assistant, Institutional Research, for transcribing the comments for the survey. E.1-1

Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract The MD Anderson Cancer Center Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic conducted a follow-up patient satisfaction survey in early 2011 to determine the level of satisfaction with the multidisciplinary care and information patients received from the Survivorship Program. The results of this follow-up survey will be compared with the baseline survey which was conducted in the second half of 2009 with patients who were not in the Survivorship Program. There were 32 responses to the follow-up survey. The results of the survey will be used to increase the survivorship clinic s effectiveness in providing patient care. The majority of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the main reason for their visit was addressed to their satisfaction (96.3%), that they received as much information about their condition and treatment as they wanted from their health care provider (96.6%), and that they spent as much time with their health care team as they wanted (100.0%). Approximately 67.8% of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the staff did everything they could to manage their emotional distress, while 28.6% of the respondents indicated the question was not applicable to them. When the not applicable and don t know responses were removed from the analysis, 95.0% of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the staff did everything they could to manage their emotional distress, compared to 86.2% on the baseline survey. For seventeen of the twenty (85.0%) topics listed on the follow-up survey, over 30% of the respondents indicated that they did not want information about it, compared to for sixteen of the twenty (80.0%) topics listed on the baseline survey. For eighteen of twenty (90.0%) of the topics listed on the follow-up survey when the did not want information responses were removed from the analysis, over 80% of the respondents were either very satisfied or satisfied with the information they received, compared to all twenty (100.0%) of the topics on the baseline survey. Comparing the very satisfied or satisfied percents for the twenty topics after removing the did not want information responses from the analysis, six topics differed by 10% or more from the baseline survey to the follow-up survey: Topics Where the Satisfaction Increased on the Follow-up Survey Topic Baseline Follow-up Difference a. Body image 87.5% 100.0% 12.5% b. Bone health 88.0% 100.0% 12.0% c. Cancer education and recurrences 89.7% 100.0% 10.3% q. Substance abuse 82.4% 93.3% 10.9% Topics where the Satisfaction Decreased on the Follow-up Survey Topic Baseline Follow-up Difference m. Pain 100.0% 77.8% -22.2% o. Relationship health 88.8% 78.6% -10.2% The results of the follow-up survey were favorable for the Head and Neck Center since more than 90% of patients in the Survivorship Program agreed that their main reason for visiting the clinic was addressed to their satisfaction, they received as much information about their condition and treatment as E.1-1

they wanted from their health care provider, and they spent as much time with their health care team as they wanted, and felt the staff did everything they could to manage the patient s emotional distress. In addition, the majority of respondents were satisfied with the information they received on the various topics listed on the survey. However, we recommend that the Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic monitor the satisfaction of pain and relationship health. We recommend that the head and neck patient satisfaction survey be repeated annually to ensure that the Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic routinely assess the effectiveness of the Head and Neck Survivorship Program. E.1-1