US Army Corps of Engineers Update on MILCON Transformation Modular Building Institute s 2007 Government & Military Construction Conference 28 June 2007 Mr. J. Joseph Tyler, PE Deputy Director of Military Programs U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
MILCON & BRAC Projected Funding $14 $12 $10 $8 DOD BRAC DOD MILCON AIR FORCE BRAC AF MILCON Billions $6 $4 $2 Projected Funding FY06-11 = $54.8B $0 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 GROW THE FORCE ARMY BRAC ARMY BRAC IGPBS ARMY MILCON
Army Program (incl. BRAC) by MSC FY07 / FY08-13 POM $871.2m/$3947.2m $909.45m/$3521.6m Alaska (Anchorage) Far East (Korea) Japan Pacific Ocean $420m/$3546m Honolulu Seattle Portland Sacramento San Francisco South Pacific Los Angeles $62m/$615m Albuquerque Northwestern Omaha Kansas City Fort Worth Tulsa Little Rock Southwestern Great Lakes & Ohio River Cincinnati Louisville Atlanta Savannah Mobile North Atlantic New $960m/$6396.81m York Baltimore Norfolk South Atlantic Europe (Germany) LEGEND: LEGEND: Division/Regional HQ location Division/Regional HQ location Division boundary Division boundary District location District location District boundary District boundary State boundary State boundary Note: $1251.25m/$4104.15m $839.43m/$3147.54m Total Army (less Grow the Force): $5,014.2 m/ $25,268.8m ($30,282.2m) Grow the Force: $250m/$7,507m ($7,757m) DOD/AF: $2,460.9m/$12,285m ($14,745.9m) Other: $1,279.1m/$7,230m ($8,509m) Total Programs: $9004.2m/$52,290.8m (FY07-FY13 =$61,294.1)
MILCON/BRAC Program Quarterly Execution 4 $ Billions 3 2 1 0 1st 2nd 3rd 4th FY Quarter FY 06 Awards FY 07 Awards
Private Industry Partnerships 34,000 Corps Employees Construction Contractors: Unlimited Capability Architect-Engineer Firms (5,000 employees) Perform over 65% of planning and design Perform 100% of Civil Works and Military Construction ~300K daily Sponsors, Federal Agencies, Associations
Execution Thru MILCON Transformation How Allow type I -V construction Awarding Army Standard Facilities from eight (8) Centers of Standardization Working from Design-Build toward Adapt-Build Encourage pre-manufactured solutions Use performance type contracts Drive consistency: Process and facilities Capitalize on continuous building concepts Objectives Reduce costs by 15% Reduce time by 30% Meet Army sustainability goals LEED Silver, EPAC 2005, lower lifecycle costs Deliver full project scope within Programmed Amount Provide a complete Brigade Combat Team complex in 15-24 months ($240-300 million) Achieve Small Business goals Quality Facilities for the Soldier and Family
FY2006 Pilot Program - Resource Effectiveness / Lessons Learned 15 percent cost savings w/100 percent scope can be achieved as in the award of the following projects Aviation Barracks, Ft Campbell Permanent Party Barracks, Ft Knox Division HQ & Sustainment Brigade HQ, Ft Riley Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing and Tactical Vehicle Maintenance Facilities, Ft Bliss Company Operations Facility and Barracks, Fort Carson Use of Model RFP can make a difference in achieving full scope (Consistency in acquisition across the Corps) Continue to change culture: Corps, Garrisons and the Contractors Continue to capture Lessons-Learned and adapt as we go Need for reconciliation of standard design and the IDGs Must establish robust site and program integration capability Barracks at Ft. Knox Barracks at Ft Campbell
Army Program By Product Line $1,000,000 $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Barracks CDC & Youth Centers Company Operations Facilities Tactical Equipment Maint. Facilities Headquarters Buildings Dining Facilities $0 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Fort Carson
Conceptual Designs for Ft Bliss
Fort Bliss TEMF and Barracks Initial Site Construction 01 May 2007 TEMF
MT Report Card - Northwestern Division Use of MT Principles: 57% of projects in FY06 / 73% of projects in FY07 COS Involvement in Project Life Cycle: 29% of projects in FY06 / 73% in FY07 Cost Avoidance (after 15% in primary facility cost in PA) 4% in FY06 / 26% in FY07 Full Scope Awards: 57% in FY06 / 73% in FY07 Use of Pre-engineered Solutions: 14% in FY06 / 45% in FY07 Use of Standard Designs: 43% in FY06 / 82% in FY07 Small Business Participation: 14% in FY06 / 27% in FY07
Challenges and Uncertainties Operating under Continuing Resolution Appropriations delays in the FY 07 MILCON budget resulted in compressed timelines and construction challenges Difficult execution in balancing need for fast construction of facilities, real estate issues and environmental permitting requirements Army Modular Force Acceleration Earlier deadlines Dependency on standardization Decisions on what & when to standardize Army Force Growth Proposal Requires additional facilities beyond BRAC and regular MILCON (Approximately $10 Billion from 07-12 )