OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Similar documents
Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

DoD Post Remedy In Place Status

Defense Environmental Restoration Program Manual

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

MMRP Site Inspections at FUDS Challenges, Status, and Lessons Learned

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND PROTECTION PROGRAM

Munitions Response Program. PA/SI Overview

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

Foreword. Mario P. Fiori Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment)

Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress for FY 2015

State Perspective of DoD MMRP PA/SI Program

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 25, 2006

Federal Facilities. Restoration and Reuse Office. NGA Working Group on the Cleanup of. 2 October 2008

Army. Environmental. Cleanup. Strategy

Defense Environmental Restoration Program/Formerly Used Defense Sites Program, NC

FY2016 SIEVERS-SANDBERG USARC

Department of Defense

Defense Environmental Funding

STATEMENT OF MR. RAYMOND F. DUBOIS, JR. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (ODASA) for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) NAOC.

MMRP PA/SI Survey Summary EPA National Site Assessment Conference June 20, 2007 U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response

Introduction DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS. Introduction Funding Conservation Restoration. Compliance. Prevention. Pollution. Forward.

GAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES. DOD's Updated Net Savings Estimate Remains Substantial. Report to the Honorable Vic Snyder House of Representatives

U.S. ARMY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD. and TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDANCE

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

The attached is updated text for incorporation into the subject document. Replace current text pages with the change text pages as described below:

Record of Decision Del Rey Oaks Munitions Response Area Track 2 Munitions Response Site. Former Fort Ord, California

Defense Logistics Agency Instruction

HUNTSVILLE. Chief, Military Munitions Design Center Ordnance and Explosives Directorate. Center, Huntsville 21 November 2013

ASTSWMO POSTION PAPER ON PERFORMANCE-BASED CONTRACTING AT FEDERAL FACILITIES

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTSVILLE CENTER, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1600 HUNTSVILLE. ALABAMA 3S

Los Angeles District

DoD and EPA Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferring, and Transferred (CTT) Ranges

Military Munitions Support Services

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

FY2013 LTA - MARION ENGR DEPOT EAST

Record of Decision Group 3 Del Rey Oaks / Monterey, Laguna Seca Parking, and Military Operations in Urban Terrain Site Munitions Response Areas

Ordnance Holdings, Inc. (OHI)

Unless directly contradicted or superseded by this preamble to the rule or by the rule, the preamble to the proposed rule reflects DoD's intent for th

Joint Services Environmental Management Conference. Transformation of The Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Program Management and Execution

Meeting Minutes April 26, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

FUDS Military Munitions Response Program

FY2016 AFRC FORT WADSWORTH

FINAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) LAND USE CONTROLS FORT BLISS, TX MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

Range Clearance in Contingency

MRP Execution. Navy & Marine Corps Cleanup Conference 2004 Richard Mach

U^J. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prepared by the U.S. Army Environmental Center March 1999

April 24, 2015 FORA ESCA REMEDIATION PROGRAM FORT ORD REUSE AUTHORITY

Advance Questions for Buddie J. Penn Nominee for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Installations and Environment

Updating the BRAC Cleanup Plan:

Ae?r:oo-t)?- Stc/l4. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited

Navy Munitions Response Program Explosives Safety Submissions

U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions Program. Anthony J. Melita

Navy Munitions Response Program Explosives Safety Oversight

Final Environmental Restoration Program Recordkeeping Manual

Background on the Statement of Work Template for Quality Assessment at a Munitions Response Site

CRS Report for Congress

EPA DoD Cleanup Program Measures Harmonization Project. States Perspective

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent for the Unexploded Ordnance Center of Excellence (UXOCOE)

Cleanup Successes and Challenges. James D. Werner Director, Air & Waste Management Division

OPNAVINST N46 24 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

MMRP Sites (Final RIP/RC): Five-Year Review Status:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NA VY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCE 191 S FORREST AL DRIVE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ARMY. Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Budget Estimates JUSTIFICATION DATA SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Programmatic Update to NAOC

Appendix I: Native Americans

SUBJECT: Department of Defense (DoD) Procedures for Settling Financial Accounts Under the Special Temporary Contract Closeout Authority

Report for Congress. Defense Cleanup and Environmental Programs: Authorization and Appropriations for FY2003. Updated January 13, 2003

OPNAVINST E N97 7 Nov 2017

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

FY2016 RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT

JMAC-EST 19 March 2014

FY2016. FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY Base Realignment & Closure Installation Action Plan

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

FORA Independent Quality Assurance. FORA Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Registration and End-Use Monitoring of Defense Articles and/or Defense Services

CLIENT ALERT. FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L ): Impacts on Small Business Government Contracting.

ORDNANCE & EXPLOSIVES DIRECTORATE - HUNTSVILLE

Environmental Program Priorities. Environmental Quality and Cleanup. Plan Do Check Act process Objectives, targets, success indicators Conclusion

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

DOD DIRECTIVE E EXPLOSIVES SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ESM)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Technical Information Paper

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Chemical Biological Defense Materiel Reliability Program

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

Department of Toxic Substances Control

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

APPENDIX I. Explosives Siting Plan

Transcription:

ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3000 NOV 01201' MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH) DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (ENVIRONMENT) DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH) STAFF DIRECTOR, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DS-E) SUBJECT: Revisions to Knowledge-Based Corporate Reporting System (KBCRS) Defense Environmental Restoration Program Data Templates and Site Tracking High quality Defense Environmental Restoration Program data is important to ensure the information we use to support our internal and external reporting requirements is accurate and complete. In addition, we need to collect the appropriate performance and fmancial information needed for program analysis and oversight. To that end, the KBCRS Data Workgroup, which included representatives from your offices, conducted an in depth review data fields and reporting requirements. The purpose ofthe review was to identify data elements that are out of date, are no longer required, or needed clarification to ensure consistent reporting. In addition, the Workgroup identified four special categories ofsites not consistently tracked or reported in KBCRS that affect DoD's reporting ofcleanup progress. The list ofkbcrs data element changes the Workgroup agreed to for the end offiscal Year 2012 KBCRS data submission is provided at Attachment 1. Some of these changes include removing fields and tables related to the Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) from the KBCRS data templates. Even though we are removing many MMRP fields and tables from KBCRS, you need to continue tracking all ofthe data elements listed in Appendix A ofthe Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol Primer, April 2007, in your individual data systems. The Workgroup developed a site tracking methodology for the four special categories of sites, provided at Attachment 2. The approach identifies how to flag and submit your data to ensure an accurate inventory ofsites. We will implement this tracking methodology for the mid-year 2013 KBCRS data submission. We will all benefit from this effort and will be better equipped to report our cleanup progress both internally and externally. I want to thank your staff for their hard work over the last five months to improve our data quality. My points ofcontact are Ms. Deborah Morefield, at (703) 571-9067 or Deborah.Morefield@osd.mil; and Mr. Vic Wieszek, at (703) 571-9061 or Victor.Wieszek@osd.mil. Maureen Sullivan Director, Environmental Management

Changes to KBCRS Data Submission Starting end of Fiscal Year 2012 1. Installation Table (INST, Table 4.5.1): Update the description for the environmentallyaffected acres field (ENV _ AFF_ACRE_QY) to "Represents the acreage associated with the area(s) where cleanup activities (other than long-term management [LTMD are undernray or planned for the future at each site that has not achieved RC. As cleanup is completed, the acreage should decrease. This information supports Section 2831 ofthe National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2006, which amended section 2907 ofthe Base Realignment and Closure Act to report annually on the status of BRAC Round 2005 actions" 2. Munitions Response Area (MRA) Table (MRA_AREA, Table 4.5.5): a. Update the description for the MRA identifier field (MRA_ID) to "The identifier that uniquely identifies an MRA." Note: this change applies to all other data tables that include this field. b. Update the description for the MRA Name field (MRA_NM) to "The name that describes an MRA." Note: the group did not discuss this change but it is necessary for consistency with the MRA identifier field. c. Delete the range status field (RNG_STATUS_CD). d. Delete the field used to indicate whether an MRA is associated with a range that meets the definition ofan "other than operational range" (MRA_RANGE_ CD). 3. Site Table (ENV _REST_SITE, Table 4.5.7): a. Require either an estimated remedy in place (RIP) date (ENVST _EST_RIP _ YMDT) or an actual RIP date (ENVST _RIP _ YMDT) for each site. b. Delete the field used to indicate whether a site is an area of concern (AOC CD). c. Delete the field used to indicate whether natural resources, cultural resources, and/or environmentally-sensitive resources are impacted by a munitions response site (MRS) (MMR_ENV_IMP _CD). d. Update the description for the field used to track the reason for addressing an MRS out ofsequence (MRSPP _SEQUENCE_CD) to indicate that the DoD Components must enter this data, as appropriate, upon completion ofthe site inspection phase, rather than the remedial investigation/feasibility study phase. e. Update the description for the field used to identify the reason for changing an MRS's relative priority based on the Quality Assurance (QA) Panel's recommendation (MRSPP _QA_RSN_CD). The revised description will clarify that the DoD Components should report changes the QA Panel makes to an MRS's relative priority each reporting year. 4. Land Use Control (LUC) Restriction Table (LUC _RESTRICT, Table 4.5.15): Add a systemgenerated sequence number field to this table to allow the DoD Components to report multiple records for the "Other" LUC restriction (LUC_RESTRICT_CD=98). 5. Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) Classification Table (MMR CLASS, Table 4.5.16): Delete this table. 1 Attachment 1

Changes to KBCRS Data Submission Starting end of Fiscal Year 2012 6. MMRP Characteristics Table (MMR_CHAR, Table 4.5.17): Delete all fields in this table except the installation identifier (INS_I D), DoD Component identifier (COMP _ID), site identifier (ENV _SITE_ID), fund source (FUND_SRC_CD), MRA identifier (MRA_ID), and total MRS acreage (MRS_TOT_ACRE_QY). 7. MMRP Ordnance Table (MMR ORD, Table 4.5.18): Delete this table. 8. Media and Contaminant Tables (RR- MEDIA, Table 4.5.25 and RR MEDIA CONT, Table - - 4.5.26): Specific to MRSs, instead ofrequiring media and contaminant data for all MRSs except those with an alternative rating of "Evaluation Pending," require media and contaminant data for all MRSs except those with an alternative rating of"evaluation Pending" or an alternative rating of"no Known or Suspected Hazards." Note: this change was in the mid-year 2012 data templates. 9. Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Cleanup Plan Subordinate Reference Table (BCP _SUB TYPE, Table 7.1): Replace the "UXO" (unexploded ordnance/ordnance or explosives) value with "MEC" (munitions and explosives of concern). 10. Fund Information Appropriation Reference Table (FNDINFO APPR, Table 7.10): Delete the "AMMO" (ammunition procurement) value. 11. Fund Information Budget Activity Reference Table (FNDINFO_BDGACT, Table 7.11): Delete the "UXO" (funding and cost requirements related to UXO) value. 2 Attachment 1

1. Sites that have transferred or that will transfer out of the Department of Defense (DoD) control where DoD no longer conducts cleanup. The DoD Components will not declare response complete (RC) at sites that transfer, along with cleanup responsibility, out ofdod control until the sites achieve the cleanup objectives. For sites on DoD property that have not achieved RC and that have transferred or that will transfer out ofdod control where DoD no longer conducts the cleanup: o The DoD Components will flag each site on property they have already transferred by reporting the date the site transferred, rather than reporting the site at RC. o The DoD Components will flag each site on property that will transfer in the future, prior to achieving RC, by reporting the date the site transfers, rather than reporting the site at RC. The DoD Components will implement this approach upon transfer ofthe property. Until that time, the DoD Components will continue to track the phases each site is in as cleanup progresses. o The DoD Components will report the transfer dates for these sites in all future KBCRS submissions. Once these flagged sites achieve RC, the DoD Components may report the RC dates in addition to the transfer dates; however, the DoD Components will not remove the transfer dates once the sites achieve RC. o The Office ofthe Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations & Environment)/ Environmental Management Directorate (ODUSD(I&E)/EM» will exclude sites flagged with transfer dates, and that do not have RC dates, when calculating progress toward cleanup goals. ODUSD(I&E)/EM will include sites with transfer dates and RC dates when calculating progress toward cleanup goals. For sites that have achieved cleanup objectives on property that has transferred or that will transfer out ofdod control where DoD no longer conducts the cleanup, the DoD Components will continue to report the RC dates in KBCRS. ODUSD(I&E)/EM will include these sites when calculating progress toward cleanup goals. ODUSD(I&E)/EM will modify the KBCRS Site table to include a new field for the transfer date. This field will inform ODUSD(I&E)/EM why sites that have not achieved RC do not have a cost-to-complete (CTC) estimate. 2. Sites cleaned up under performance based contracts (PBCs). The DoD Components will not declare RC at sites being cleaned up under a PBC until the sites achieve the cleanup objectives. The DoD Components will continue to track the phases the sites are in as cleanup progresses, and will not combine the schedules for multiple sites into one "placeholder" site. The DoD Components will also track longterm management (LTM) requirements at each site, as applicable, once the site achieves RC. 1 Attachment 2 10/23/2012

The DoD Components will not create "placeholder" sites to track obligations and CTC estimates for sites being cleaned up under a PBe. The DoD Components will track the obligations and CTC for each site. For PBCs awarded after FY2011, the DoD Components will stop using "placeholder" sites. Instead, the DoD Components will track the schedules, obligations, and CTC estimate for each individual site being cleaned up under a PBC. For PBCs awarded prior to FY2012: o The DoD Components may continue to use "placeholder" sites to track obligations and CTC estimates. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will modify the KBCRS Site table to include a field with pick list options, one option being "Site Cleaned Up Under PBC." The DoD Components will select this option for each site being cleaned up under a PBC. This indicator will inform ODUSD(I&E)IEM why sites with ongoing cleanup do not have a CTC estimate. o The DoD Components will use the "NS" (Site Never Existed) site type code for existing "placeholder" PBC sites that are not actual sites. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will exclude these sites from the inventory for reporting purposes, and will not track them against Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) performance goals. o The DoD Components will reopen sites that have not met the cleanup objectives but were reported as RC because they are tracking the cleanup progress under an existing "placeholder" site. 3. Sites where a DoD Component cannot obtain rights of entry (ROE) that are necessary to complete a phase. The DoD Components will report sites in the current phase at the time ofroe refusal, as well as the entire remaining CTC estimate for the current and future anticipated phases. ODUSD(I&E)/EM will modify the KBCRS Site table to include a field with pick list options, one option being "Right of Entry Refused." The DoD Components will select this option for each site where they cannot obtain ROE to complete a phase to inform ODUSD(I&E)IEM why a phase appears to last for several years. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will exclude sites in KBCRS with the designation "Right of Entry Refused" when calculating progress toward cleanup goals. For sites in KBCRS with the designation "Right ofentry Refused," the DoD Components will contact the property owner(s) at least every five years in an attempt to obtain the ROE necessary to complete the current phase. In the case of Formerly Used Defense Sites, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will request ROE from property owners when conducting interim risk management. If/when a DoD Component obtains the necessary ROE to proceed with the current phase, it will remove the "Right ofentry Refused" designation from KBCRS. 2 Attachment 2 10/23/2012

4. Non-DoD Owned, Non-Operational Defense Sites (NDNODS). The Army's NDNODS fall into three categories: a. NDNODS that will achieve site closeout at the completion ofthe site inspection (SI) phase. The Army will keep these sites in the inventory and report them as having achieved RC, with no L TM requirements and no CTC, in KBCRS. The Army will also report the Quality Assurance (QA) Panel-approved Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) scores in KBCRS. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will track these sites against DERP performance goals. The Army will also continue reporting the completed SI phase, as well as site names that include the "NDNODS" designation, in all future KBCRS submissions. b. NDNODS that will require a remedial investigation and possibly remedial actions upon completion ofthe SI. For NDNODS determined to be DERP eligible, the Army will conduct the appropriate cleanup actions. For those NDNODS determined to be ineligible for the DERP: The Army will continue reporting the NDNODS in KBCRS, and use the "FA" (Site Funded Under Another Program) site type code for these sites. The Army will continue reporting site names that include the "NDNODS" designation in KBCRS. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will exclude these NDNODS from the site inventory for reporting purposes, and will not track them against DERP performance goals. The Army will continue reporting the MRSPP score and the acreage associated with these NDNODS in accordance with DoD Manual 4715.20; however, ODUSD(I&E)/EM will exclude the NDNODS acreage from the total DoD MRS acreage. Ifadditional phases beyond the SI phase become DERP eligible in the future, the Army will change the site type codes from "FA" to the correct site type codes (e.g., "SR" [Small Arms Range D. The Army will also report all required fields for the DERP-eligible MRSs, to include updated QA Panel-approved MRSPP scores. At this point, ODUSD(I&E)/EM will include the NDNODS in the site inventory for reporting purposes. c. NDNODS where the Army cannot obtain ROE to complete the SI. The Army will keep these sites in the SI phase and report the CTC for the SI only. The Army will continue reporting site names that include the "NDNODS" designation in KBCRS. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will modify the KBCRS Site table to include a field with pick list options, one option being "Right ofentry Refused." The Army will select this option for each NDNODS where it cannot obtain ROE to inform ODUSD(I&E)IEM why the SI phase appears to last for several years. ODUSD(I&E)IEM will exclude sites in 3 Attachment 2 10/23/2012

KBCRS with the designation "Right of Entry Refused" when calculating progress toward cleanup goals. The Anny will contact the property owner(s) at least every five years in an attempt to obtain ROE. If/when the Anny obtains ROE, it will remove the "Right of Entry Refused" designation from KBCRS, complete the SI phase, and follow the process in step a or step b above, depending on the results of the SI. Effective Date: ODUSD(I&E)/EM will implement the procedures outlined in this methodology for the mid-year 2013 KBCRS submission. 4 Attachment 2 10/2312012