Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Similar documents
: study utilizing trieib)(4) b)(4) I I""-", _

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 3%3&4

WARNING LETTER. an both of which were sponsored by. (formerly ). The products

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

. s%rwcu ~,+ *+ % %vd3a 7 Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and

WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRES S

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & Hl'NIAfV SERVICES Public Hcaffh Scn-ice WARNING LETTER

Via Federal Express IVARNING LETTER

+.,m 7. yw ~ ~ & DEC FEDERAL EXPRESS

% *++V,m Food and Drug Administration WARNING LETTER

SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS

AMENDED WARNING LETTER CIN

... f%odand DrugAdministration via Federal Express 2098 Gaither Road

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 4Y837cl

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

BE-595M Homework Assignment Due: 3/3/08

Investigator Roles and Responsibilities in Clinical Device Trials

twj arid Cltug AJmiist : a tuxt --.,~ 9200 (:wpcuat : IlkJ Ko:.l, v ille A4Il

WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL -~ Q December 14, 2005

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

Version 1.1, 6/30/2016 Guidance for Abbreviated IDE Requirements

NOTICE OF INITIATION OF DISQUALIFICATION PROCEEDINGS AND OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN (NIDPOE) LETTER

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

c+!!!! # -) NW DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration CBER Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested

WARNING LETTER. the Form FDA-483 Inspectionai Observations. ~ e also presezl during this final discussion.

FDA Inspectional Process in Clinical Research An FDA Perspective. Annette Melendez, MPHsN Investigator Office of Biological Products Operations

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

Session 3 FDA Audits and Findings

Changes to QSR. The table below provides a history of changes to FDA s Quality System Regulation (QSR)

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

Standards and Medical Device Regulation Roundtable. Seoul South Korea. 21 October ASTM International

Chapter 48 - Bioresearch Monitoring

WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: August 5, 2008

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Page 2- Alan Rapoport, M.D.

:,-, WARNING LETTER. Mr. Jean Claude Mas Chief Executive Officer Poly Implants Protheses, Sa 337 Avenue De Bruxelles La Seyne, Sur Mer France

Document issued on: July 8, 2010

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

BIMO Program Update an operational perspective

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations

FDA Inspection Readiness

Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Pharma., Ltd.

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

Notice of Initiation of Disqualification Proceeding And Opportunity to Explai n

4 ( DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Ref: 06-HFD

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Radiation Safety Considerations for X-Ray Equipment Designed for Hand-Held Use

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges. September 23, 2015 Northwestern University IRB Brown Bag Session

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges

*Applicable to: Beaumont Health. Document Type: Policy

FDA Reportable Food Registry. David E. Gombas, Ph.D. United Fresh Produce Association September 21, 2009

WARNING LETTER. Dear Dr. Wright : DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

4.2. Clinical Trial Monitor (or Monitor): The person responsible for monitoring the data on behalf of the sponsor or contract research organization.

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

Postmarketing Drug Safety and Inspection Readiness

Requests for Feedback and Meetings for Medical Device Submissions: The Q-Submission

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

Chapter 21. FDA Inspections

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Medical Device Reporting for Manufacturers

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Hazardous Materials. At the direction of the coordinator, these trained employees will conduct all future inventories.

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Effective Date: 11/09 Policy Chronicle:

University of Maryland Baltimore. Radiation Safety Procedure

Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)

CENTRAL SERVICE (CS) TECHNICIANS PERFORM MANY IMPORTANT

FDA s Office of Regulatory Affairs: Violation Trends & Medical Device Update

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations. Draft Not for Implementation

Complaints Investigation and Review. Dr. Ademola Daramola International Relations Specialist Drugs US FDA India Office New Delhi February 22nd 2018

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Re: Docket No. FDA 2013-N-0500 Proposed Rule: Supplemental Applications Proposing Labeling Changes for Approved Drugs and Biological Products

Standard Operating Procedures

Margaret Huber, RN, CHRC Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance

Institutional Review Board (previously referred to as Human Participants Research Board) Updated January 2004

The Mammography Quality Standards Act Final Regulations Motion of Tube-Image Receptor Assembly

Essential Documents It s Not Just a Binder!

I. Preamble: II. Parties:

Complaint Handling and Medical Device Reporting (MDRs)

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 74-1 Filed: 04/15/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2403 EXHIBIT A

247 CMR: BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY 247 CMR 21.00: REGISTRATION OF OUTSOURCING FACILITIES. Section

Texas Department of State Health Services

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

10/4/12. Controlled Substances Dispensing Issues and Solutions. Objectives. Financial Disclosure

May 12, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Certain provisions of FSMA are already in effect, namely: Mandatory recall authority (FSMA 206).

Successful FDA Inspections at Investigative Sites for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics

Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC

How to Prepare for Federal Inspections and What to Expect

950 t2.d Public Heallh Service

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

EXEMPT RESEARCH. 1. Overview

Interactive Review for Medical Device Submissions: 510(k)s, Original PMAs, PMA Supplements, Original BLAs, and BLA Supplements

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

NAVSEA STANDARD ITEM CFR Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

Transcription:

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Husain, Mustafa M, M.D. 23-Jul-08 Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville, Maryland 20850 JUL 23 2008 WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mustafa M. Husain, M.D. 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard Dallas, Texas 75390 Dear Dr. Husain: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the findings of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspection conducted at your clinical site from March 4, 2008 to March 7, 2008 by an investigator from the FDA Dallas District Office. The purpose of this inspection was to detennine whetheruvoir activities and nrocedt2res related to the clinical study [redacted] Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) [redacted] complied with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) Part 50-Protection of Human Subjects and Part 812 Investigational Device Exemntions. These regulations apply to clinical research of FDA-regulated products. The [redacted] is a device as that term is defined in section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). This letter also acknowledges your April 30, 2008 letter, which addresses the corrective actions you intend to take.

The inspection was conducted under a program designed to ensure that data and information contained in requests for IDE, Premarket Approval (PMA) applications, and Premarket Notification submissions (510(k)) are scientifically valid and accurate. Another objective of the program is to ensure that human subjects are protected from undue hazard or risk during the course of scientific investigations. Our review of the inspection report prepared by the district office revealed serious violations of Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) Part 812 -- Investigational Device Exemptions, and Section 520(g) (21 U.S.C. 3 60j(g)) of the Act. At the close of the inspection, the FDA investigator presented an inspectional observations form FDA 483 for your review and discussed the observations listed on the form with you, Dr. Shawn McClintock, Clinical Study Coordinator, and Dianne Sheppard, Clinical Manager. The deviations noted on the FDA 483, our subsequent review of the inspection report and your written response are discussed below: Failure to ensure an investigation is conducted in accordance with the signed agreement, the investigational plan, and applicable FDA regulations, for protecting the safety of subjects under the investigator's care 121 CFR 812.100 and 21 CFR 812.110(b)]. In order to fulfill the requirements of these regulations, an investigator is responsible for ensuring that an investigation is conducted according to the signed agreement, the investigational plan and applicable FDA regulations. You failed to adhere to the above-stated regulations. An example of this failure includes the following: The study protocol states that [redacted] will be tapered and [redacted] for [redacted] days prior to the start of treatment" Evidence reflects that subjects [redacted] and [redacted] did not complete the protocol required [redacted] period of [redacted] days. The length of the [redacted] period is important, as early termination of the [redacted] peroid may decrease the [redacted] threshold of the subjects if the [redacted] medication is not completely cleared from the body, which may result in prolonged [redacted] In your response, you acknowledge that this was a deviation from the protocol and not a planned protocol change, and that you will ensure that the [redacted] period times are followed in accordance with the protocol in the future. Your response is inadequate in that you did not provide any documentation of corrective or preventative actions to ensure that this deviation does not recur in future FDA regulated studies. Please submit documentation of training and procedures that you have implemented or plan to implement to prevent the above deviation from recurring. Failure to maintain accurate, complete, and current records related to

your activities as a clinical investigator and failure to submit progress reports and a final report to the sponsor and monitor [21 CFR 812.140(a)(1), 812.140(a)(2)(i)(iii), 812.150(a)(3), and 812.150(a)(6)). Pursuant to the above stated regulations, a clinical investigator shall maintain all correspondence with another investigator, an IRB, the sponsor, a monitor, and the FDA, which includes submission of progress reports and a final report to the monitor and the sponsor. In addition, clinical investigators are required to maintain the following device records: receipt, use, and disposition of an investigational device, including the type and quantity of the device, the dates of receipt, and the batch numbers or serial numbers. You failed to adhere to the above stated regulations. Examples of this failure include, but are not limited to the following: Your device receipt and dispositton records were inadequately maintained. For example, the [redacted] Form documents that the [redacted] device with serial numbers [redacted] and [redacted] were received in February 2002 and November 2002; however, there are no records of receipt that correspond with the date on the aforementioned form. In addition, there is no record of receipt for the device with serial number [redacted] and no record of disposition for the device with serial number [redacted] At your site, there were three devices, however there were no records to document which device was used on [redacted] subjects. Though there are [redacted] devices with different serial numbers, there was no documentation as to which device was termed [redacted] and [redacted] subjects were treated with either [redacted] or [redacted] however, there is no documentation as to which serial number is designated as [redacted] or [redacted] On March 22, 2004. you submitted documentation to the IRB that the [redacted] study was voluntarily closing, however, you did not submit a final report to the sponsor within three months of termination or completion of the study as required (21 CFR 812.150(a)(6)). In your written response you stated that there were ongoing study related discussions between you and Dr. Lisanby regarding the conduct, progress, and voluntary closure of the study. You also stated that the devices are kept under triple lock in order to maintain control, and that the devices were only shipped to the sponsor or the device manufacturer for maintenance. Moreover, vou stated that the manufacturer reported that the device with serial number [redacted] was invoiced on March 25, 2002 and replaced the device with serial number [redacted] Your response is inadequate, in that you did not submit any

documentation of your communication with the sponsor, nor did you submit documentation of the device receipts and dispositions as well as information regarding subjects' exposure to each device. Please submit a corrective action plan that documents subjects' case history and exposure to the devices. The violations described above are not intended to be an all inclusive list of problems that may exist with your clinical study. It is your responsibility as a clinical investigator to ensure compliance with the Act and applicable regulations. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving this letter, please provide written documentation of the actions you have taken or will take to correct these violations and prevent the recurrence of similar violations in current or future studies for which you are the clinical investigator. Failure to respond to this letter and take appropriate corrective action could result in the FDA taking regulatory action without further notice to you. In addition, FDA could initiate disqualification proceedings against you in accordance with 21 CFR 812.119. You will find information to assist you in understanding your responsibilities and planning your corrective actions in the FDA Information Sheets Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators, which can be found at http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/. Any submitted corrective action plan must include projected completion dates for each action to be accomplished. Send your response to: Attention: Linda Godfrey, Chief, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance, Division of Bioresearch Monitoring, 9200 Corporate Boulevard, HFZ-310, Rockville, Maryland 20850. A copy of this letter has been sent to Dallas District Office at 4040 North Central Expressway, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75204. Please send a copy of your response to that office. If you have any questions, please contact Linda D. Godfrey, by telephone at (240) 276-0125, or by e-mail at Linda.Godfrey@fda.hhs.gov. Sincerely yours, /S/ Timothy A Ulatowski Director Office of Compliance Center for Devices and Radiological Health