Measure #389: Cataract Surgery: Difference Between Planned and Final Refraction - National Quality Stategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Similar documents
Note: This is an outcome measure and will be calculated solely using registry data.

Note: This is an outcome measure and will be calculated solely using registry data.

Measure #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

2) The percentage of discharges for which the patient received follow-up within 7 days after

2016 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPORTING OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES REGISTRY ONLY

Quality ID #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Quality ID #288: Dementia: Caregiver Education and Support National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

DENOMINATOR: All final reports for patients, regardless of age, undergoing a CT procedure

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Measure #138: Melanoma: Coordination of Care National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #47 (NQF 0326): Care Plan National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Measure #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Quality ID #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #356: Unplanned Hospital Readmission within 30 Days of Principal Procedure National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Quality ID #424 (NQF 2681): Perioperative Temperature Management National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

DENOMINATOR: All final reports for patients, regardless of age, undergoing a CT procedure

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Measure #46 (NQF 0097): Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measure #130 (NQF 0419): Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

Measure #181: Elder Maltreatment Screen and Follow-Up Plan National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

This policy describes the appropriate use of new patient evaluation and management (E/M) codes.

AQI48a: Percentage of patients, aged 18 and older, who were surveyed on their patient experience and satisfaction with anesthesia care

CPT only copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. 12/23/2014 Page 537 of 593

Surgical Assistant DESCRIPTION:

Global Surgery Package

Medicare 2010 Hot Topics. About This Manual. Mary Jean Sage The Sage Associates 1/13/ Oak Park Blvd.

Quality ID #348: HRS-3 Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Complications Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

National Quality Strategy (NQS) Domain: Communication and Care Coordination. Measure Type: Composite; Process

Re: Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule for CY 2014; 78 Fed. Reg. 43,281 (July 19, 2013); CMS-1600; RIN 0938-AR56

Multiple Visit Reduction

ABO SELF-DIRECTED IMPROVEMENT IN MEDICAL PRACTICE ACTIVITY (CLINICAL)

AAO/ASCRS/ASRS/OOSS COMMENTS ON MAP PRE- RULEMAKING REPORT

F. Curtis Smith, President and Joan W. Miller, MD, Chief and Chair of the Department of Ophthalmology

Optum Anesthesia. Completely integrated anesthesia information management system

Payment Policy: Visits On Same Day As Surgery Reference Number: CC.PP.040 Product Types: ALL Effective Date: 03/01/2018

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS REIMBURSEMENT POLICY

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Commercial Professional Reimbursement Policy

Registry General FAQs

Quality Data Model December 2012

WIO 2015 Summer Symposium 08/07/2015. Update on Medicare Quality Reporting Programs and the IRIS Registry

Who am I? Presented by Jeff Grant, President HCMA, Inc.

Same Day/Same Service Policy, Professional

Modifiers 58, 78, and 79 Staged, Related, and Unrelated Procedures

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Payment Policy: Assistant Surgeon Reference Number: CC.PP.029 Product Types: ALL

ESSENTIAL STRATEGIES IN MEDI-CAL PAYMENT REFORM. Richard Popper, Director, Medicaid & Duals Strategy August 3, 2017

QPP in the Real Word: How Your Peers Are Achieving Success. Monday, September 25, :00 4:30 PM ET

KANSAS MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. Fee-for-Service Provider Manual. Podiatry

Medical Practitioner Reimbursement

NACOR BASIC with Benchmarking NACOR STANDARD QUALITY REPORTING. Updated June 22, 2018

UniCare Professional Reimbursement Policy

Calendar Year 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTER WEB-BASED MEASURES: CY 2017 PAYMENT DETERMINATION GUIDELINES

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Correct IOL implantation in cataract surgery

UniCare Professional Reimbursement Policy

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Modern Optometric Staff BILLING & CODING THE MEDICAL EYE EXAMINATION. I m From The Government. The HIPPA Act of And I m Here To Help

Global Days Policy. Approved By 7/12/2017

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Using Centricity Electronic Medical Record Meaningful Use Reports Version 9.5 January 2013

Vision Technician. Allied Health & Paramedics. Vision Technician. Sector Healthcare. Sub-Sector. Occupation

Empire BlueCross BlueShield Professional Reimbursement Policy

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

The Physician Quality Reporting System 2016 By Dr. Ron Short, DC, MCS-P, CPC

An Overview of Eligibility, Registration, and Attestation for the Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Reimbursement Policy. BadgerCare Plus. Subject: Consultations

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS SURGEON SPECIFIC REGISTRY QCDR SURGICAL PHASES OF CARE MEASURES (SPC)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

PAYMENT POLICY. Anesthesia

October 3, Dear Colleague:

EHR/Meaningful Use

Correct IOL implanation in cataract surgery

Empire BlueCross BlueShield Professional Reimbursement Policy

Stage 1. Meaningful Use 2014 Edition User Manual

Global Surgery Fact Sheet

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #5 Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program

The World of Evaluation and Management Services and Supporting Documentation

Empire BlueCross BlueShield Professional Commercial Reimbursement Policy

Postoperative Sinus Endoscopy and/or Debridement Procedures

Re: CMS Patient Relationship Categories and Codes Second Request for Information

Performance Measures Methodology Document Performance Measures Committee March 2018

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise International IHE Eye Care

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Commercial Professional Reimbursement Policy

Payment Policy: Problem Oriented Visits Billed with Preventative Visits

2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Reporting Updates

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

QualityPath Cardiac Bypass (CABG) Maintenance of Designation

Transcription:

Measure #389: Cataract Surgery: Difference Between Planned and Final Refraction - National Quality Stategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY DESCRIPTION: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who had cataract surgery performed and who achieved a final refraction within +/- 1.0 diopters of their planned (target) refraction INSTRUCTIONS: This measure is to be calculated each time a cataract procedure is performed during the reporting period. This measure is intended to reflect the quality of services provided for the patient receiving cataract surgery. Note: This is an outcome measure and will be calculated solely using registry data. For patients who receive the surgical procedures specified in the denominator coding in the sample, it should be reported whether or not the patient had a difference between planned and final refraction. Include only procedures performed through September 30 of the reporting period. This will allow the postoperative period to occur before registries must submit data to CMS. Measure Reporting via Registry: CPT codes and patient demographics are used to identify patients who are included in the measure s denominator. The listed numerator options are used to report the numerator of the measure. The quality-data codes listed do not need to be submitted for registry-based submissions; however, these codes may be submitted for those registries that utilize claims data. There are no allowable performance exclusions for this measure. DENOMINATOR: All patients aged 18 years and older who had cataract surgery Denominator Instructions: Clinicians who indicate modifier 55, postoperative management only OR modifier 56, preoperative management only, will not qualify for this measure. Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patients aged 18 years on date of encounter AND Patient encounter during the reporting period (CPT): 66840, 66850, 66852, 66920, 66930, 66940, 66982, 66983, 66984 WITHOUT Modifier 55 (postoperative management only) OR Modifier 56 (preoperative management only) NUMERATOR: Patients who achieved a final refraction (spherical equivalent) +/- 1.0 diopters of their planned (target) refraction (spherical equivalent) within 90 days following cataract surgery. The refraction planned and final refraction values should correspond to the eye that underwent the cataract procedure Numerator Options: Performance Met: Patient achieves final refraction (spherical equivalent) +/- 1.0 Diopters of their planned refraction within 90 days of surgery (G9519) 11/17/2015 Page 1 of 6

OR Performance Not Met: Patient does not achieve final refraction (spherical equivalent) +/- 1.0 Diopters of their planned refraction within 90 days of surgery (G9520) RATIONALE Refractive Outcome is important to the patient and to the surgeon. Planned refraction is something the surgeon and patient discuss at the time of assessment for cataract surgery and is a way to align patient and surgeon expectations of the outcome. Comparing actual outcome to predicted outcome is a valuable measure of success. Kugelberg and Lundstrom published outcomes data from the Swedish registry and found in routine cataract surgeries 75% to 90% of patients ended up with refraction within 1 Diopter of the target refraction. The study describes factors that influenced refractive outcome as older age and use of a clear corneal incision. High volume ophthalmology departments showed a significant difference in absolute prediction error. Another 2009 study by Gale and colleagues reported outcomes improving from 79.7% to 87% within 3 measurement cycles and the authors suggested that a benchmark standard of 85% be established. References: 1. Kugelberg, M.A. and Lundstrom, M, Refractive Outcome After Cataract Surgery, Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, May 2009: 2. Gale, RP, Johnston, RL, Zuberbuhler, B, McKibbin, M, Benchmark Standards for refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery, Eye (London) 2009 Jan;23 (1) 149-52, Kugelberg M, Lundstrom M. Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery. J Cat Refr Surg 2008;34(11):1935-39., Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School. Ophthalmology Quality & Outcomes Report 2013., Lum F, Schein O, Schachat AP, Abbott RL, Hoskins HD, Steinberg EP. Initial two years of experience with the AAO Nation Eyecare Outcomes Network (NEON) cataract surgery database. Ophthalmology 2000;107:691-97 CLINICAL RECOMMENDATION STATEMENTS: This is an outcome measure. As such, no clinical recommendations are included. COPYRIGHT: The Measures are not clinical guidelines, do not establish a standard of medical care, and have not been tested for all potential applications. The Measures, while copyrighted, can be reproduced and distributed, without modification, for noncommercial purposes, eg, use by health care providers in connection with their practices. Commercial use is defined as the sale, license, or distribution of the Measures for commercial gain, or incorporation of the Measures into a product or service that is sold, licensed or distributed for commercial gain. Commercial uses of the Measures require a license agreement between the user and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). The AAO, nor its members, shall be responsible for any use of the Measures. The American Association of Eye and Ear Centers of Excellence (AAEECE) significant past efforts and contributions to the development and updating of the Measures is acknowledged. AAO is solely responsible for the review and enhancement ( Maintenance ) of the Measures as of June 5, 2015. AAO encourages use of the Measures by other health care professionals, where appropriate. THE MEASURES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE PROVIDED AS IS WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use. Limited proprietary coding is contained in the Measure specifications for convenience. Users of the proprietary code sets should obtain all necessary licenses from the owners of these code sets. The AAOI and its members disclaim all liability for use or accuracy of any Current Procedural Terminology (CPT ) or other coding contained in the specifications. 11/17/2015 Page 2 of 6

CPT contained in the Measures specifications is copyright 2004-2015 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. This material has been reproduced with the kind permission of The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) and is copyrighted to them. It may not be further re-produced without their permission. 11/17/2015 Page 3 of 6

11/17/2015 Page 4 of 6

2016 Registry Individual Measure Flow PQRS #389: Cataract Surgery: Difference Between Planned and Final Refraction Please refer to the specific section of the Measure Specification to identify the denominator and numerator information for use in reporting this Individual Measure. 1. Start with Denominator 2. Check Patient Age: a. If Patient Age is greater than or equal to 18 Years on the Date of Service equals No, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Patient Age is greater than or equal to 18 Years on the Date of Service equals Yes, proceed to check One Month Follow-Up. 3. Check Encounter Performed: a. If Encounter as Listed in the Denominator equals No, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Encounter as Listed in the Denominator equals Yes, proceed to check Without Modifier 55 or 56. 4. Check Modifier 55 or 56: a. If Modifier 55 or 56 (Post or Pre-Operative Only) equals Yes, do not include in Eligible Patient Population. Stop Processing. b. If Modifier 55 or 56 (Post or Pre-Operative Only) equal No, include in Denominator Eligible Population. 5. Denominator Population: a. Denominator population is all Eligible Patients in the denominator. Denominator is represented as Denominator in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter d equals 8 procedures in the sample calculation. 6. Start Numerator 7. Check Patient Achieves Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit: a. If Patient Achieves Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit equals Yes, include in Reporting Met and Performance Met. b. Reporting Met and Performance Met letter is represented in the Reporting Rate and Performance Rate in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter a equals 4 procedures in Sample Calculation. c. If Patient Achieves Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit equals No, proceed to check Patient Does Not Achieve Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit. 11/17/2015 Page 5 of 6

8. Check Patient Does Not Achieve Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit: a. If Patient Does Not Achieve Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit equals Yes, include in Reporting Met and Performance Not Met. b. Reporting Met and Performance Not Met letter is represented in the Reporting Rate in the Sample Calculation listed at the end of this document. Letter c equals 3 procedures in the Sample Calculation. c. If Patient Does Not Achieve Refraction +- 1D for the Eye that Underwent Cataract Surgery, Measured at the One Month Follow-Up Visit equals No, proceed to proceed to Reporting Not Met. 9. Check Reporting Not Met a. If Reporting Not Met equals No, Quality Data Code or equivalent was not reported. 1 procedure has been subtracted from reporting numerator in the sample calculation. 11/17/2015 Page 6 of 6