Building a New Proton Therapy Facility The Roberts Proton Therapy Center

Similar documents
Jean St. Germain, CHP, DABMP, RMP Attending Physicist Radiation Safety Officer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

The West-German Proton Therapy Center Essen. Facility Start up. Dirk Geismar West-German Proton Therapy Center Essen

Penn Specialty Pharmacy Program mypennpharmacy bringing the Pharmacy to Patients

MOSAIQ Evaluate. Integrated plan management and dose review. A new paradigm of treatment planning management

Fundamental Aspects of SBRT

HOWARD UNIVERSITY Position Description. POSITION TITLE: Radiation Safety Officer SALARY GRADE: HU-13. DATE REVISED: December 01, 2014 EEO CODE: 02

UWDRO RESIDENT SUPERVISION POLICY

Patient Care: Case Study in EHR Implementation. With Help From Monkeys, Mice, and Penguins. Tom Goodwin, MHA MIT Medical Cambridge, MA March 2007

Clinical Implementation of Electronic Charting

APEx Program Standards

Monaco treatment planning enhances departmental efficiencies

Ontario Strategy for MRI

Patient Risk (Safety) in Radiation Therapy

Empowering information: the paperless workflow of digital archiving leads to a true single, digital health record

An Update of Radiation Oncology Quality and Safety Initiatives

STRATEGIC ROADMAP FOR Radiation Medicine Program RMP

A GUIDE FOR RESIDENTS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY The University of Pennsylvania Medical Center January 2008

The Practice Standards for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Medical Dosimetry Practice Standards

The ASRT is seeking public comment on proposed revisions to the Practice Standards for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy titled Medical Dosimetry.

3D surface image guided based DIBH clinical implementation

Application of systems and control theory-based hazard analysis to radiation oncology

Create an Evaluation Protocol for Electronic Permit Application Processing

HIMSS Nicholas E. Davies Award of Excellence Case Study Nebraska Medicine October 10, 2017

Transitioning to ICD-10: An Action Plan for Practices

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Translating developed technology oncology platforms from other healthcare contexts to the Australian healthcare environment

Tools for risk assessment in radiation therapy

RADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY SUPERVISION POLICY

Caring for Your Child Radiation Treatment with General Anesthesia

Fast Track to Go-Live Success PennChart ED implementation. Jennifer Manosca, MBA Christopher Edwards, MD

Clinical Implementation of a High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Program. Hania Al Hallaq, Ph.D. Jacqueline Esthappan, Ph.D. Joann Prisciandaro, Ph.D.

From Implementation to Optimization: Moving Beyond Operations

PATIENT CARE SERVICES REPORT Submitted to the Joint Conference Committee, August 2016

How Hospitals Can Implement Health Technology Assessment

Core Item: Hospital. Cover Page. Admissions and Readmissions. Executive Summary

Our MISSION is to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks for all medical radiation exposures in Africa.


TELEHEALTH FOR HEALTH SYSTEMS: GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES

1) What is the Status and Future of proton therapy in the United States

Collaboration Between Radiology and Utilization Management to Reduce Inappropriate MRI Orders and Patient Wait Times. Problem/Goal

INTRODUCTION TO Mobile Diagnostic Imaging. A quick-start guide designed to help you learn the basics of mobile diagnostic imaging

Implementing WorldVistA EHR at a CHC. WorldVistA Community Conference Midland, TX January 10, 2008 By Matthew M. King, MD

Advisory Panel for Health Care Advancing the Academic Health System for the Future: Profiles in Academic Health System Leadership.

Innovation Partnership Procurement by Co-Design. The Shoulder Centre. Challenge Brief. Jesse Alan Slade Shantz September 26, 2016

Meaningful Use: A Practical Approach. CSO HIMSS Spring Conference 2013

AAPM TG-100 : A new paradigm for quality management in radiation therapy

Leveraging the Accountable Care Unit Model to create a culture of Shared Accountability

2003 NASCIO Recognition Awards State of Tennessee Digital Government: Government to Citizen (G to C)

Steven Sutlief, PhD UC San Diego February 13 th, 2015

7/31/2017. SPG: A Practical Subcommittee of the AAPM Professional Council. Origins. Origins

8/2/2017. Strategies for Quality Improvement based on RO-ILS

Streamlining Medical Image Sharing For Continuity of Care

Radiation Oncology Practice Accreditation Program Requirements

Medical Errors in Radiation Therapy

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC

Balanced Scorecard Highlights

GENERAL INFORMATION BROCHURE FOR ACCREDITATION OF MEDICAL IMAGING SERVICES

Ontario s Diagnostic Imaging Appropriateness Pilot Project

Quality Products & Physics Services for Radiation Oncology. 1. Radiation Oncology Performance Enhancement (ROPE) Database. 2. TMA Web Portal Content

Improving Access to Pediatric MR performed under General Anesthesia Benefits of a Rapid Improvement Event (RIE)

HPV Vaccination Quality Improvement: Physician Perspective

Integrating Quality Into Your CDI Program: The Case for All-Payer Review

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Medical Physics Residency Program

10/8/12. Radiation Reduction and Monitoring Program: What the FDA and Other Regulatory Agencies Want. Disclosures. Two Principles of Radiation Safety

FISMA in Federal Contracts: What to do Who can help. Rachel Rice Ackman MGH Research Compliance Office

ATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE GRANTS DIRECTORY FISCAL YEAR 2013 JUNE 30, 2013

Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Part 15 Computed Tomography Installations Guidance for CT Rules

Operator Training in HDR Brachytherapy: Preventing Treatment Errors. Disclosure

Optimizing Workflow with Technology and Design. Ashleigh George RN, BSN Susan Stiles RN, MHA MBA

3/20/2012. Presentation Outline. Objectives Abt Associates Model (2008) Abt-III? What (who) is that?

Let Hospital Workforce Data Talk

Driving the value of health care through integration. Kaiser Permanente All Rights Reserved.

PSI-15 Lafayette General Health 2017 Nicholas E. Davies Enterprise Award of Excellence

Venture Development Fund Request for Proposals

2015 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

Lessons Learned from Experiences in Thailand on: ICD Morbidity Use Cases. Chamaree Chuapetcharasopon, MD

The JWST Director s Discretionary Early Release Science Program (DD ERS)

A Bigger Bang Patient Portal Strategy: How we activated 100K patients in our First Year

Explain how the innovation works and why your organization chose this

Component Description Unit Topics 1. Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the U.S. 2. The Culture of Healthcare

Subj: NAVAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY BOARD

September 5, Dear Administrator Tavenner:

CMS Oncology Care Model s Standards for Patient Navigation

The Telemedicine Referral Case Process

Kentucky Sepsis Summit. August 2016

Oregon Medical Group Team Medicine 3 April 2014

CASE STUDY: PENINSULA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

Massachusetts ICU Acuity Meeting

The California Telehealth Network:

Finding Progress on Timely Access Issues

NOVALIS STANDARD V 1.1

Note: This is an authorized excerpt from 2016 Healthcare Benchmarks: Health Coaching. To download the entire report, go to

Andrew Kirby Director, Healthcare Solutions Microsoft Services

Invivo Expression. MRI Patient Monitoring Systems

- Questioned about whether patients discontinue treatment and stop showing up when the side effects kick in. Surprisingly this is extremely rare.

The Process Innovation Center at CHOP: An Inside View

Recommendations to Health Quality Ontario

How Telemedicine Can Change How You Practice. Edward I. Galaid, MD, MPH ABIM, ABPM Medical Director, Occupational Health Partners Roper St.

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

Plan NK38 PLAN I ;W;'s

Transcription:

Building a New Proton Therapy Facility The Roberts Proton Therapy Center Stephen M. Hahn University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine April 16, 2009

If you would persuade, you must appeal to interest rather than intellect. Benjamin Franklin

Why Proton Therapy at Penn? We believe it will be better for patients Advancing clinical care, education & research is our mission Fits with our strategic objective of offering state of the art tertiary care Our strength has always been in biology & biological approaches to cancer not technology; proton therapy increases our access to cutting edge technology which complements our strengths Proton therapy will provide additional research opportunities in and outside of the department Proton therapy is expanding in the US; our residents need to be prepared for the future of radiotherapy

History First Penn initiative in 1997 got to the point where the vendor was selected, the building was designed and land was acquired. New RFP released in 2003 6 vendors were considered and an external review reduced that to 3 vendors. Business Plan formulated Contract with IBA signed in June 2006, so nearly ten years had elapsed from the first initiative. We expect the first patient treatment to be in the Fall, 2009. Initially, this was a CHOP-led & financed project. For a variety of reasons, this ultimately became a UPHS-led project

Vendor Selection Experience Proton Therapy Equipment Package Long-term future in marketplace and viability Resources to deal with unforeseen issues (both financial and expertise) Collaboration with conventional equipment vendors Financial Package

Basic Equipment 4 Proton gantry rooms Proton fixed beam room 5 Conventional linacs 2 CT-Simulators MR-Simulator PET-CT Simulator 1 conventional Simulator

IBA Proton Therapy System at The University of Pennsylvania Purpose built MLC for proton therapy Cone Beam CT on the gantry Fast beam switching time between T x rooms 13 s average Proton set-up room Advanced beam scheduling

Full Operations 16 Hours of Operations M F 8 Hours of Operations Sat Project Similar Photon Load (150 per day) Project about 200 patients per day on Protons (40 per room) at maximum capacity 1 Gantry dedicated to Pediatric patients

Roberts Proton Therapy Center Fully integrated proton and photon facility Advanced imaging techniques used for treatment planning & target localization MR, CT, PET-CT Will use multi-leaf collimators and developing on board imaging -cone beam CT scanning & passive PET Proton therapy facility fully integrated with all cancer services under one roof

Key Issues in Implementation Form a Core Team Develop Strategic Partners Establish Overall Goals and Objectives Develop a Project Plan Implementation of Plan Focus on Major Issues Technology & Development, Research, Operations

Before we start Senior leadership must be fully invested from the beginning Be prepared to devote a lot of time on the project Be flexible with the implementation plans. Things will go wrong managing expectations Stick to your core principles & beliefs

Core Team of Expertise in Proton Therapy The formation of a Core Proton Therapy Team is critical to the success of the project. Under resourcing this is a mistake This Core Team is responsible for the vision, development of the project plan, and implementation Key interface with the vendor Importance of including physicians, physicists, and administrators/business Importance of including your financial sponsor A cohesive team with a single vision/plan has helped us overcome the inevitable challenges

Penn Core Team in Proton Therapy 2 Medical Physicists with accelerator expertise and extensive clinical experience 2 Physicians who are active clinicians who understand the clinic/work flow Departmental Chief Operating Officer 1 Senior level Health System Administrator 1 Project Manager

Penn Team in Proton Therapy We now have 4 full time physicists working on this project Four Physicians working on various aspects of the project All physicians (15) in the department are working on the research protocols Administrative assistant support Research nurse/data management support IT support CHOP Department of Defense

Strategic Partners University of Pennsylvania Health System School of Medicine Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Defense Walter Reed Army Medical Center Bethesda Naval Hospital Form the basis for our Steering Committee which meets biweekly and provides oversight

Strategic Partners These are the groups that believe proton therapy is an important part of their organizations strategic plan/initiatives Importantly, there is a financial stake in the project Funded without debt UPHS majority owner CHOP The Roberts Family Department of Defense Development funds

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Compelling clinical rationale to treat children with proton therapy CHOP has a strong presence in the region The CHOP partnership Financial CHOP gantry Clinical joint clinical space for pediatric patients Research participation in clinical trials IT EMR, imaging, etc.

Penn-WRAMC Telemedicine Effort The staff at WRAMC will be involved in the care of their patients even when they are at Penn receiving proton treatments. We envision (1) combined tumor boards to select the patients suitable for proton therapy, (2) the possibility to perform the CT-simulation and treatment planning at WRAMC, (3) joint clinical protocols, and (4) combined chart rounds and morbidity-and-mortality conferences. To that end we have combined videoconferencing with the ability to share the treatment planning application. We expect multiple users at each site so we are investigating an economical solution using PVX and Internet2.

Proton Steering Committee Led by Department Chair and Senior VP from the Health System Biweekly meeting at which the Proton Team provides a high level overview of progress & obstacles CHOP & DOD representation The decision-making committee for protons Formal Project Plan

Goals and Principles Develop goals and principles for the University of Pennsylvania Proton Therapy Facility Extensive site visits of existing facilities and time spent by each member of the team in their area of expertise Learn from those that have paved the way Form & maintain internal and external partnerships with resources to ensure the success of the project- CHOP, WRAMC

Goals and Principles Provide the highest quality care to patients of UPHS-affiliated hospitals and of our collaborators: Children s Hospital Of Philadelphia and Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Integrate conventional and proton therapy in one department. Design and construct a center where safety & efficiency of patient care are paramount Apply advanced technology to achieve these goals localization and monitoring of patient position Imaging Informatics

Goals and Principles Recognize that the revolution occurring in several areas of imaging could amplify the benefit of proton therapy. Apply advances in conventional radiation therapy to proton therapy. Vendors should deliver state-of-the-art at the time of delivery, not what is stateof-the-art today. There must be continuous investment into the facility.

Integration Facility will be fully integrated between conventional and proton therapy Same technicians, dosimetrists, nurses and physicians treating all patients regardless of modality Same immobilization devices, couch tops, gating devices, and imaging equipment throughout Patients will be transferred easily between proton and conventional treatment

Integration Single planning session with remote capability Single integrated IT system for entire department connected to both HUP, WRAMC and CHOP information networks Integrated Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Ability to treat with photons at WRAMC, our satellite system and elsewhere the goal of integrating treatment plans

Imaging Imaging is a driving force for future developments in proton therapy Proton therapy cannot have inferior imaging to conventional linear accelerators This facility will incorporate the latest in imaging for proton therapy to realize its full potential Different imaging modalities will be required for different sites of treatment

Imaging On board imaging Orthogonal Flat panel imaging Cone Beam CT in all rooms Passive PET Imaging Calypso system Treatment planning CT MRI PET

Operational Efficiency Integration of every component All components from a single vendor with a single point of responsibility Single internal administrative oversight No incentive to treat patients with a particular modality

Approaches to Increase Efficiency Setup Room Decrease in beam switching time from room to room Multi-leaf collimators on all gantries Image guidance Full electronic integration throughout facility Smart Scheduling

Developed a Formal Project Plan Major milestones established with vendor Timeline established Financial incentives to vendors for on time delivery Biweekly formalized review of progress at Proton Steering Committee Meetings Flexibility & revision needed Ramp up plan

Formal Project Plan Linked to the funding, budget & business plan Funds for hardware & software Working capital Yearly budgetary support for personnel, travel, software development/it infrastructure, ramp up plan Re-investment funding Dollar-Euro exchange rate

Research Establish a research room at the end of the beam line Develop a series of preclinical studies to be performed now and when facility is functioning Partnership with NASA Clinical Research Protocols

Operations Smart Scheduling Work Flow Analysis Integration of Photon operations, hospital, networks, CHOP Standardization of workflow Training of personnel Hiring of new personnel Formation of a Triage Committee

The Hard Stuff Securing the funding Communication among all of the strategic partners Vendor cooperation & collaboration Development obstacles - software Constant attention to the project plan Focus on the goals & principles with flexibility Time commitment

Patient Triage Penn Proton Priority System (PROPS) Executive Summary Major Considerations Domains PROP Score Operationalizing PROPS Reviewed by Penn Medicine Leadership Transparency

Proton Therapy Ramp-up Plan at Accelerated ramp-up plan under negotiation with IBA. Proposed Ramp-up: UPHS Treatment Modalities Acceptance Treatment Room Accepted Date Date 1 SS, DS, US 31-Jul-09 19-Oct-09 4 SS, DS, US 18-Oct-09 1-Jan-10 5 SS, DS, US 31-Jan-10 9-Apr-09. 3 SS, DS, US,PBS 12-Sep-10 31-Jan-11 2 PBS 9-Jan-11 6-Mar-11 1 PBS 6-Mar-11 Sept 11?

Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine Penn Medicine PTCOG Fall 2011 Philadelphia, PA USA