Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E

Similar documents
Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address

DoDI ,Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Change 1 & 2

Overview of the Chemical and Biological Defense Program Requirements Process

Defense Science Board Task Force Developmental Test and Evaluation Study Results

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

I n t r o d u c t i o n

DOD DIRECTIVE E ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM (CBDP)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Transition of DoD Technologies in Support of Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Operations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

UNCLASSIFIED OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

2017 Defense Acquisition Workforce Individual Achievement Award

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

Department of Defense

US Department of Defense Systems Engineering Policy and Guidance

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

10 USC 139b. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Enabling Greater Productivity

DoD Instruction dated 8 December Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Statutory and Regulatory Changes

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

The DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources

SUBJECT: U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Interim Policy Guidance (IPG) 08-1, Test and Evaluation Document Name Changes

DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World

I n t r o d u c t i o n

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference

National Defense Industrial Association. Disruptive Technologies Conference

Air Force Enterprise Corrosion Prevention and Control Strategic Plan

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)

Fiscal Year 2017 President s Budget Request for the DoD Science & Technology Program April 12, 2016

Defense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Engineering Chapter Update

Improving the Department of Defense Services Acquisition Tradecraft What s New in 2017

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

a GAO GAO WEAPONS ACQUISITION DOD Should Strengthen Policies for Assessing Technical Data Needs to Support Weapon Systems

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

DOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) DETERMINATION PROCESS

CONTEXT FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS: WHY DO WE HAVE TO DO VE? WHO HAS AUTHORITY OVER VE? THE CUSTOMER WON T PAY FOR VE!

Prepared for Milestone A Decision

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) (Reference (a)), this Instruction:

US Special Operations Command

Advance Questions for Mr. Kenneth J. Krieg

System Safety in Systems Engineering DAU Continuous Learning Module

Joint Interoperability Certification

In Response to Section 901 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law )

Relationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Management of Space Professional Development

Department of the Navy Annual Review of Acquisition of Services Policy and Oversight

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

Fact Sheet: FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) DOD Reform Proposals

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

SERIES 1300 DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (DDR&E) DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING (NC )

ACQUISITION OF THE ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM. Report No. D February 28, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

DoDI & Implementation of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 & New Changes to Policy

An Independent Perspective From a former PM & PEO. NDIA 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 26 Oct 10

Test and Evaluation (T&E) is essential to successful system

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Development Planning Working Group Update

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Operational Contract Support: Learning from the Past and Preparing for the Future

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Institutionalizing a Culture of Statistical Thinking in DoD Testing

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DOD DIRECTIVE DEFENSE INSTITUTION BUILDING (DIB)

Defense Acquisition Workforce Key Information OVERALL As of FY17Q2 (31 March 2017)

(FOUO) Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System Not Ready for Production Decision

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

REPORT TO CONGRESS ON CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY ACQUISITION AUTHORITIES. March 2016

Developing the US Department of Defense Engineering Workforce

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF NOTICE

Department of Defense

Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

GAO WARFIGHTER SUPPORT. DOD Should Improve Development of Camouflage Uniforms and Enhance Collaboration Among the Services

Transcription:

Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E Chris DiPetto 12 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference

Agenda DT&E Title 10 USC overview Organization DDR&E imperatives What Title 10 means for DT&E within DoD Initial Vectors Challenges Initiatives Summary 2

Our Guidance Defense Budget Recommendation Statement Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, April 06, 2009 reaffirm our commitment to take care of the all-volunteer force rebalance this Department s programs institutionalize and enhance our capabilities to fight the wars we are in today and the scenarios we are most likely to face in the years ahead, provide a hedge against other risks and contingencies fundamental overhaul of our approach to procurement, acquisition, and contracting Economic Club of Chicago Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, July 16, 2009 What is needed is a portfolio of military capabilities with maximum versatility across the widest possible spectrum of conflict 3

DT&E in Title 10, USC DT&E Primary Responsibilities Policy and guidance for the conduct of DT&E in the DoD Defining Performance Criteria DT&E approval of the TEMP for each MDAP Assessing the DT&E activities of each MDAP Advocacy, oversight, and guidance to acquisition DT&E workforce Assessing the DT&E organizations and capabilities of the military departments Annual Report to Congress (with Director, SE) The extent to which MDAPs are meeting test objectives The organizations and capabilities of the DoD for DT&E The DDT&E is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on developmental test and evaluation in the Department of Defense 4

Acquisition Concerns THE USUAL SUSPECTS: Cost, Schedule, Performance Over budget GAO: 96 active MDAPs are $300B over initial estimates Late to need Getting capability to the user to meet urgent needs Programs failing Operational Test Suitability issues Late discovery 5

Weapon Sys Acq Reform Act. the key to successful acquisition programs is getting things right from the start with sound systems engineering, cost-estimating and developmental testing early in the program cycle ". Senator Carl Levin 6

DDR&E Organization Director, Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E) Honorable Zachary J. Lemnios Principal Deputy Mr. Alan R. Shaffer Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Dr. Regina Dugan Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) Mr. Paul Ryan Director, Research Dr. David Honey Director, Systems Engineering Mr. Stephen Welby Director, Rapid Fielding Mr. Earl Wyatt Director, Developmental Test & Evaluation (DT&E) Mr. Chris DiPetto (Acting) Principal Deputy Dr. André van Tilborg Principal Deputy Mr. Terry Jaggers Principal Deputy Mr. Ben Riley Principal Deputy Mr. Chris DiPetto 7

D,DT&E Draft Org Chart Director, Developmental Test & Evaluation Acting DiPetto Front Office Support Deputy Director Planning and Capabilities Principal Deputy Program Engagement Performance Assessment & Reporting DD, Air Warfare Policy and Guidance DD, Land and Expeditionary Warfare Test and Evaluation Capabilities Strategic Initiatives Test/Tool Concepts & Studies DD, Naval Warfare DD, Net Centric and Space Systems DD, Joint and Other Programs 8

DDR&E Imperatives Accelerate delivery of technical capabilities to win the current fight: Rapid Fielding Prepare for an uncertain future. Reduce the cost, acquisition time and risk of our major defense acquisition programs. Develop world class science, technology, engineering, and mathematics capabilities for the DoD and the Nation. One dollar of waste in our defense budget is a dollar we can t spend to support our troops or prepare for future threats or protect the American people. Robert M. Gates Secretary of Defense 9

What this Means for DT&E in DoD 2009 and Beyond: Establish D,DT&E and focus on Programs T&E consideration during program formulation TEMP focus: risk (scope of DT&E etc), assessment criteria Integrated Test Technology Maturity and Integration risk Oversight of program performance relative to TEMP and SEP criteria DT&E-driven Assessment of Operational Test Readiness Independent DT assessment to MDA (read voice at the DAB) Requirements Process Materiel Solution Analysis A B C Engineering and Technology Manufacturing Development Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support 2003 2008: Systems Engineering focus on Program Execution Integrated SE and DT&E TEMP focus on evaluation framework Published AT&L policy letters instantiated in DoDI 5000.02 Overhauled and enriched DAWIA curriculum OSD Systems Engineering T&E assessments 10

Initial Vectors Reconstitute the DT&E Organization Principal advisor to the SecDef and USD(AT&L) on DT&E Build foundations for program engagement Reinstitute meaningful and effective T&E oversight of MDAPs Establish measurable performance criteria (TES & TEMP) Capability assessments Evaluate Component plans How are the components positioned (resource-wise) for DT&E? For contracting, planning, and execution of DT&E Annual report on MDAPs Analogous to D,OT&E annual report Right test, right information, right decision. 11

Challenges Interaction with DT&E organizations within the program management framework No DT&E analog to OTA NAVAIR-like APEO/APM relationships Role of government in DT&E Early DT&E involvement in program formulation to reduce acquisition cost, risk, and cycle time DDR&E assessment of technology readiness Accurate cost and resource estimates Correct staffing, experience, and training Correct T&E capabilities (with TRMC) I reject the notion that we have to waste billions of taxpayer dollars to keep this nation secure. - President Obama 12

Initiatives Collaborative DT&E reviews tailored to program lifecycle phase What information should the DT&E community provide the MDA? Integrated Testing Now DoD policy Reliability Policy changes in 5000 and 3170 series Contract language, assessment scorecards Workforce DDR&E STEM imperative, in-sourcing, 852 T&E integration in DDR&E technology imperatives & rapid fielding DDR&E rapid capability development study What s the goal: Capabilities & limitations Safety 13

Summary The importance of effective DT&E planning, execution, and reporting is recognized, valued and now prescribed in public law The OSD/DT&E has a voice in the acquisition process TEMP review and approval Independent, T&E - based risk assessments to the MDA for each MDAP Annual report OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION 3090 Defense Pentagon Room 5A1076 Washington, DC 20310 TEMP at OSD dot MIL 14

Questions 15

Backup 16

What this Means for DT&E in DoD D,DT&E provides independent risk assessments to the Milestone Decision Authority based on assessments of DT&E planning, resourcing, and execution for each MDAP Policy & Guidance Collaborative development of integrated T&E and Joint T&E policy and guidance Emphasis on development, tracking, and reporting of performance criteria Capability Assessment Functional leader for T&E career field DT&E planning, execution, and reporting Collaboration with TRMC on DT&E capabilities Program Oversight T&E consideration during program formulation Technological maturity and integration risk of critical technologies Scope of DT&E and integrated T&E planning T&E schedule and resource adequacy Program performance relative to TEMP and SEP criteria Assessment of Operational Test Readiness 17

Acquisition Concerns THE USUAL SUSPECTS: Cost, Schedule, Performance Programs failing Operational Test Suitability Late discovery Requirements are they testable, well written? Early involvement Risk Is the T&E planning/resourcing adequate to assess performance? How does the T&E community inform acquisition decisions? Resources Expertise - 18