To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

Similar documents
May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

LIGHT RAIL: IS ORANGE COUNTY ON THE RIGHT TRACK?

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Executive Summary

Members of the Board of Directors. Wendy Knowles, Clerk of the Board. Update on the California High-Speed Rail Program Revised 2012 Business Plan

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Measure M2 Progress Report for January 2012 Through March Staff Report

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement for Construction of the Placentia Avenue Railroad Grade Separation Project.

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Chief Executive Officer Action Plan - End of Year Report. Supplemental Info.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Legislative Priorities

REGIONAL TRANSIT FEASIBILITY PLAN

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal

Central City Line Kick-off and Tour

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Annual Report on Funding Recommendations

~BEVE~Y AGENDA REPORT

Streetcar Planning Update Dallas City Council Transportation and Environment Committee November 8, 2010

The New Incrementalism: Building and Financing US High-Speed Rail

KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

Financing Transit Projects with Traditional and Innovative Sources And Mechanisms

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

Diridon Station Joint Policy Advisory Board MINUTES

TAMPA BAY PUBLIC TRANSIT INITIATIVES: A Response to Questions of the MPO citizens advisory committee

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

VTA s Capital Projects Program & BART Phase II Procurement Opportunities. VTA s Procurement Fair and Workshop. November 1, 2016

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

George Washington Region Scenario Planning Study Phase II

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español

Regional Transit System Plan. Regional Task Force Meeting No. 1

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

Long Range Transportation Plan

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

A. Amend the FY LACMTA Budget to add $3,000,000 from Measure R 3% Commuter Rail funds for the Rancho Vista Grade Separation Project

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

Construction of Peña Bridge - March 2013 Jersey Cutoff Bridge October Eagle Project Update. East Corridor Stakeholder Committee April 23, 2013

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

Construction Careers Policy and Project Labor Agreement. AC Transit s Bus Rapid Transit Project. February 23, 2014

San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) and Early Action Plan

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Technical Advisory Panel Report

Regional Core Circulator Study Final Report

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

The Value of Metrolink in Relieving Peak-Hour Freeway Congestion

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Extension BART Phase II Project Update

Eagle Project Update

Kevin Kidney, Kevin & Jody Sue Zuhke, OCTA Linda Johnson, City of Anaheim Felicia Adams, First Transit Jan Strickland, First Transit

SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING BENCH AND REGIONAL RAlL UPDATE. INITIATE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL RAlL BENCH

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft EIS/EIR Public Hearings

Agenda. 6:00 p.m. - 6:45 p.m. - Registration & Open House. 6:45 p.m. - 6:55 p.m. - Welcome & Opening Remarks

METRO Blue Line LRT & METRO Green Line LRT (Light Rail) Table of Contents. Operating Grant Worksheets Pages 6-17

Fort Meade Regional Growth Management Committee BRAC TDM. Vanpool Boot Camp

STATUS AND KEY ACTIVITIES

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Central City Line Steering Committee

Smart Region Smart Transportation

Regional Transportation Activities Report. VTA Funding Measure

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

PHILLIP A. WASHINGTON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc.

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Part I. Federal Section 5310 Program

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TOLEDO OH - MI URBANIZED AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

RAIL~VOLUTION 2018 CALL FOR SPEAKERS WORKSHEET

Federal Support for Streetcars: Frequently Asked Questions

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal

Metrolink Budget for FY /Additional Service on the Antelope Valley Line

Cal Poly Pomona Request for Clarification for Lanterman Development Center Land Development Consultant RFC

Developing the Pulse Corridor

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project

Early Scoping Report Appendix Attachment B-5:

Coordinated Transit Consultation Meetings SmartTrack, GO RER, Relief Line, Scarborough Subway Extension June 20, 2015 Highlights Report

Gold Rush Circulator Study Charlotte, North Carolina REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Staff Recommendation:

Request for Developer Qualifications-John Deere Commons Development Opportunity

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

CASE STUDY: OVERVIEW OF A UNIVERSITY PROGRAM

Request for Proposals. For NEW HOPE TO WARMINSTER PASSENGER RAIL SHUTTLE FEASIBILITY STUDY

Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Route 3 South Managed Lanes Project DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

APP NVITAT ON LETTERS COOPERATING AGENCY - Agency Categories:

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Lessons Learned for a Transit Public-Private Partnership. Phillip A. Washington, General Manager Regional Transportation District

Special Meeting Agenda

I-225 Light Rail Design/Build/Finance Staff Recommendation. RTD FasTracks Monitoring Committee July 3, 2012

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

SILICON VALLEY RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR BART EXTENSION TO MILPITAS, SAN JOSE AND SANTA CLARA POLICY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

DRAFT METRO TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES POLICY I. POLICY STATEMENT

Urban Partnership Communications Plan

Transcription:

September 8, 2010 To: From: Subject: Transportation 2020 Committee Will Kempton, Chief Executive Officer Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Overview The Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program continues to move forward. As part of Go Local Step Two, the cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana, in partnership with the City of Garden Grove, are underway with project development for each city s respectivee fixed-guideway projects. Staff has prepared an overview of progress made to date and the current status of each project for Board of Directors' review. Recommendation Direct staff to continue monitoring project development activities for the Anaheim Rapid Connection and Santa Ana/ /Garden Grove fixed-guideway as both projects progress through Step Two of the Go Local Program. Background In early 2006, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) initiated the Go Local Program to encourage cities to develop transit extensions to the Metrolink corridor. In 2008, the cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana, in partnership with the City of Garden Grove, each submitted a fixed-guideway project concept as part of the Go Local Program that proposed a connection between the cities respectivee Metrolink stations to nearby destination/activity centers. In May 2008, the OCTA Board of Directors (Board) determined that the project concepts were consistent with the Go Local evaluation criteria and awarded each city $5.9 million for additional planning and project development, including an alternatives analysis (AA), conceptual engineering, and state and federal environmental clearance. In January 2009, the City of Anaheim initiated the AA process for its project concept. The cities of Santaa Ana and Garden Grove began the AA process for their project concept in September 2009. As part of with both the Go Local Step Two, OCTA entered into a cooperative agreement cities that outlined key milestones within the detailed planning effort Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 2 in which the Board would review progress made to date. Prior to the Board s review of the cities first milestone completion, staff has prepared a status update of the Anaheim fixed-guideway (named the Anaheim Rapid Connection) and Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway projects. Consistent with prior Board direction, OCTA has been working closely with both cities to ensure that all planning work is done consistent with federal funding eligibility requirements, specifically the New/Small Starts programs. An update on this coordination effort with Federal Transit Administration is also provided. Discussion Anaheim Rapid Connection (ARC) The City of Anaheim is underway with evaluating a proposed 3.5 mile east-west transit connection between the multi-modal transit station, Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), The Platinum Triangle, and Anaheim Resort. The project is envisioned to operate as a high-capacity system, providing ease of transfer to the Metrolink commuter rail system, Amtrak, local fixed-route bus, future bus rapid transit (BRT), and high-speed train services connecting at ARTIC. This system will provide residents, employees, and visitors a connection between the Metrolink commuter rail system to Anaheim s major employment and activity centers in The Platinum Triangle and Anaheim Resort. Based upon a screening framework developed around the goals of the project and input of the community, the City of Anaheim is evaluating a refined set of alternatives which will advance through the state/federal environmental clearance process. The project alternatives being studied include: No-Build Alternative Includes all planned and programmed transportation improvements in the greater project area through the year 2035 and does not include any elements of the ARC. Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative Focuses on low-cost improvements to the project area s transportation system, such as enhanced local bus service, skip-stop and express service, improved traffic signal timing, and incentivized carpooling. Semi-Exclusive At-Grade BRT Alternative Calls for BRT service operating at-grade on local city streets in exclusive lanes where sufficient right-of-way exists, as well as in mixed-flow traffic where existing right-of-way does not allow for a dedicated lane.

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 3 Elevated Fixed-Guideway Alternative (with alignment variations and technology options) Considers a variety of automated fixed-guideway transit technologies, such as an automated people mover, monorail, and low-speed maglev for use along the alignment. Currently, the City of Anaheim is developing the technical studies and reports required to support the AA and environmental clearance. OCTA staff has been working closely with FTA and the City of Anaheim to ensure that all planning for the ARC project is completed consistent with federal funding eligibility requirements. Specifically, FTA has been engaged in the review and comment of key project deliverables, including the Purpose and Need Statement and the Corridor Mobility Problem Report. OCTA continues to work closely with the City of Anaheim to ensure that all comments from FTA are addressed in the planning process. Also, FTA has been involved in the development of the ARC project s ridership model to ensure that the model accurately captures the unique visitor travel market within the corridor. Key upcoming activities for the project include the comparative analysis of final alternatives, project cost estimates, traffic analysis, refinements to the conceptual engineering alignment plans, as well as refinement to the project schedule to ensure consistency with the FTA approval process for projects to be eligible for New Starts funding. Santa Ana and Garden Grove Fixed-Guideway The cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove are underway with AA and environmental clearance of an approximately 4-mile fixed-guideway transit system that would provide a new east-west transit connection between the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and Harbor Boulevard. Specifically, the cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove are studying the potential for a 2-mile initial operating segment that would run from SARTC to Bristol Street with a couplet in the downtown Santa Ana/Civic Center area. This alignment would provide a linkage between SARTC and key areas along the corridor, including the Station District, Civic Center, historic neighborhoods, and downtown Santa Ana. Consistent with the goals and objectives of the project as well as input from the community, the cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove are currently evaluating the following alternatives: No Build Alternative Consists of existing transit plans and programmed transportation improvements that have already obtained cities project environmental approvals within the project study area.

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 4 TSM Alternative Focuses on relatively inexpensive projects, operational improvements, or policy actions such as increases in existing bus service, improved signal timing, and incentives to carpooling. BRT Alternative Consists of a new BRT route that would provide a travel experience comparable to the fixed-guideway rail alternative. The service would operate in exclusive running lanes where possible without requiring right-of-way takes or causing impacts to existing traffic, as well as in mixed-flow travel lanes where space and traffic constraints do not allow for dedicated running lanes without right-of-way takes. At-Grade Fixed-Guideway Rail Alternative This alternative consists of a fixed-guideway rail system that operates on tracks embedded in the street pavement. The service would operate on tracks within a mixed-traffic street environment typical of urban streetcar systems. In June 2010, the cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove conducted public scoping meetings to satisfy state environmental clearance requirements and to identify federal environmental issues. The scoping meetings included four separate workshops along the corridor where approximately 40 members of the public provided input on the alignments and technologies being evaluated for the project. In addition to the public scoping meetings, city staff also presented project information to several key stakeholders, including the Downtown Santa Ana business association and various neighborhood associations. More than 50 stakeholders provided comments on the project at these meetings. Similar to FTA s involvement with the ARC project, FTA staff has participated in the review and comment of project documents for the Santa Ana/ Garden Grove fixed-guideway project, specifically the purpose and need document, which is a fundamental element of the AA process as it proceeds through the New/Small Starts pipeline. Key upcoming activities for the Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway project include refinements to the reduced set of alternatives, a final purpose and need report and ridership and cost estimates. In late September, the Santa Ana City Council will hold a study session to consider and select a reduced set of alternatives. FTA Coordination Early involvement from FTA has historically proven to be a successful approach for improving the likelihood of receiving federal funds. Consistent with this approach, FTA has accepted OCTA s offer to participate in a workshop hosted

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 5 by OCTA in September that will focus on the ARC and Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway projects. This workshop will be an opportunity for FTA staff from Headquarters in Washington, D.C. and Region IX in San Francisco to get further engaged in the projects as well as to tour both corridors. To assist the cities in preparation for this meeting with FTA next month, OCTA held a pre-workshop in July to continue to refine the projects schedules, purpose and need documents and alternatives definition/screening documents. The meeting served as an opportunity to address questions and comments that may arise from FTA. Summary Project development continues for the Board-approved Anaheim Rapid Connection and Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway projects. Staff has provided an update on both projects for Board review. Attachment None. Prepared by: Approved by: Kelly Hart Senior Transportation Analyst (714) 560-5725 Jim Beil, P.E. Executive Director, Capital Programs (714) 560-5646