SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE FY16 HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS U.S. COAST GUARD As of June 22, 2015

Similar documents
For the purpose of executing the duties and functions of the Coast Guard the Secretary may within the limits of appropriations made therefor:

UAV s And Homeland Defense Now More Critical Than Ever. LCDR Troy Beshears UAV Platform Manager United States Coast Guard

Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

Coast Guard Deepwater Acquisition Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD

Acquisition Insights & Transformation. CG 9 RADM Gary T. Blore 31 October, 2007

CONTENTS. Follow us on

The US Coast Guard. Cognitive Lesson Objective: Know the core missions of the United States Coast Guard (USCG).

Coast Guard Cutter Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

USCG Office of Aviation Forces Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Coast Guard UAS; Opening the Aperture

CRS Report for Congress

GAO. COAST GUARD Status of Efforts to Improve Deepwater Program Management and Address Operational Challenges

Coast Guard Cutter Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

Coast Guard Cutter Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress

Coast Guard Deepwater Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

USN Arctic Roadmap SCICEX SAC meeting. CDR Nick Vincent 21 May 2014

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 113th Cong., 2d Sess. S. 2444

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

FUTURE U.S. NAVY AND USCG OPERATIONS IN THE ARCTIC

The DHS Budget for FY 2008: Time for a Comprehensive Approach to Homeland Security

Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

Office of Inspector General

Marine Emergency Preparedness and Response. Canadian Coast Guard Presentation at the First Nations and Oil Pipeline Development Summit

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

H. R. ll [Report No. 115 ll]

TITLE III OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SUBTITLE A AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS SUBTITLE B ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT

a GAO GAO COAST GUARD Strategy Needed for Setting and Monitoring Levels of Effort for All Missions

S. ll. To provide for the improvement of the capacity of the Navy to conduct surface warfare operations and activities, and for other purposes.

Systems Engineering Analysis of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles for USCG Mission Threads. LT J.B. Zorn, USCG CRUSER Group February 15, 2013

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES Duke Street Alexandria, VA Phone: (703) Fax: (703)

The American Merchant Marine The Missing Link in Cargo Security

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

Ship Systems Overview

A Warming Arctic and National Security

AAPA EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SEMINAR. Port Security: A-Z. Napa, California May 8, 2008

U.S. Coast Guard. America s Maritime Guardian

COAST GUARD. Actions Needed to Improve Strategic Allocation of Assets and Determine Workforce Requirements

Coast Guard Deepwater Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

FY18 SAC-D Defense Appropriations Act

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

USCG Roles Before, During & After a CSZ Event

Lieutenant Commander, thank you so much. And thank you all for being here today. I

FY18 Defense Appropriations Act

MODEL OPERATING PROCEDURES GUIDE FOR COMBINED MARITIME COUNTER DRUG OPERATIONS

By Nina M. Serafino Specialist in International Security Affairs, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division, Congressional Research Service

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (SEC. 933)

Coast Guard Polar Icebreaker Modernization: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Contingency Planning, Emergency Management & Marine Transportation Policy Leader

Northern California Area Maritime Security Committee

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

Use of Mockups to aid design of the USCG SENTINEL Class patrol boat. Office of Human Systems Integration for Acquisitions (CG-1B3)

Signals, Noise & Swans in a Changing Arctic Environment

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

TITLE 14 COAST GUARD This title was enacted by act Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 1, 63 Stat. 495

UNCLASSIFIED. May RDT&E, DW/04 Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P) Date

Presentation 8 UNITED STATES COAST GUARD RADM STEVEN H. RATTI, COMMANDER, FIFTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT

United States Coast Guard Districts Eleven & Thirteen

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

LEGISLATIVE REPORT. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations Fiscal Year 2018 Defense Appropriations (H.R. 3219)

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Missions, People and Equipment

States Pacific Command (USPACOM). Its secondary mission is to transfer the ammunition at sea using the Modular Cargo Delivery System (MCDS).

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

OPERATIONAL PLAN DISTRICT 11N Operational Plan D11N Page 1

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

U.S.- Sweden Defense Industry Conference 8 October 2003

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

INTERNATIONAL NAVAL SHIPS DECEMBER 2014

December 2015 Washington, D.C.

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

This report is submitted in accordance with section 1009 o f the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (P.L ).

2016 PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Component Overview U.S. COAST GUARD

U.S. Coast Guard - Locally Based, Nationally Deployed, Globally Connected; Internationally Prepared.

The Security War. AAPA Security Meeting Jul 18, Jay Grant, Director Port Security Council

Coast Guard Deployable Operations Group

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY REORGANIZATION PLAN November 25, 2002

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

History and Missions. Basic Introduction Course (BIC) Lesson 4. Auxiliary University Programs

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

America s Coast Guard. Commandant s Guiding Principles. U.S. Coast Guard

Revised Deepwater Asset Descriptions National Security Cutter (NSC/WMSL)

CG-9 Internal Controls Program Overview. CG-9 Rory Souther Association of Government Accountants Audio Conference June 8, 2011

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

Federal Funding for Homeland Security. B Border and transportation security Encompasses airline

The Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation. Hearing on. Port Security

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

TITLE II--TRANSPORTATION OF ESPECIALLY HAZARDOUS CARGO

OPNAVINST C N2/N6 31 Mar Subj: UNITED STATES NAVAL COOPERATION AND GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING

Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund Disbursements for FY 2016

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AERONAUTICAL SEARCH AND RESCUE UPDATE TTCAA. Safer Skies 1

Transcription:

Surface Asset Acquisition Programs ($ in thousands) CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROJECT FY 2016 QTY SAC QTY Δ Δ Request MARK (SAC-PB) (QTY) National Security Cutter (NSC) $ 91,400 $ 731,400 1 +$ 640,000 +1 Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) $ 18,500 $ 18,500 Fast Response Cutter (FRC) $ 340,000 6 $ 230,000 4 -$ 110,000-2 Cutter Small Boats $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Polar Icebreaker $ 4,000 $ 4,000 In Service Vessel Sustainment (ISVS) $ 68,000 $ 68,000 Survey and Design Vessels and Boats $ 9,000 $ 15,000 +$ 6,000 TOTAL COAST GUARD VESSELS: $ 533,900 6 $ 1,069,900 5 +$ 536,000-1 The Homeland Security appropriations bill passed by the Senate Appropriations Committee (SAC) on June 18, 2015 provides a total of $1,069.9 million for USCG vessels, $536.0 million above the request and $245.6 million above last year s appropriation. The Committee recommends a total program level of $10,484.8 million for the activities of the Coast Guard for fiscal year 2016, including $160 million in Overseas Contingency Operations funding. Key SAC Vessel Funding Changes from the FY16 Budget Request: An increase of $640 million above the request for an additional (9 th ) NSC. A reduction of $110 million and 2 Fast Response Cutter vessels. An increase of $6 million for survey and design work associated with reactivation of the Polar Sea. BILL FUNDING PRIORITIES As an extension of our border security needs, the Coast Guard s vessel and air fleets are vital. Yet, the age of those fleets and their antiquated capabilities beg recapitalization and modernization. Year after year, the President s budget requests short-change Coast Guard s acquisition needs and year after year, the Coast Guard s Commandants indicate before Congress that their annual acquisition budget is insufficient. As the Coast Guard proceeds towards selecting a final design for the Offshore Patrol Cutter [OPC], the Committee sees an opportunity for a ninth National Security Cutter [NSC] in the interim. The most capable vessel ever commissioned by the Coast Guard, the NSC will replace aging high endurance cutters which were state-of-the-art nearly a half-century ago. In addition to cutter needs, the Committee continues its acquisition and sustainment investments in the Coast Guard s icebreaking fleet, directs further guidance from the Coast Guard on their air fleet mix, and increases investments in critical shore facilities.

TITLE II UNITED STATES COAST GUARD POLAR ICEBREAKER It is obvious that the United States needs another polar icebreaker, yet the administration has offered nothing in the way of a plan to fund and procure this new asset. Furthermore, the administration has not articulated a bridging strategy to demonstrate how legacy assets will be used in the interim to accomplish Coast Guard missions. Even with one operational heavy polar icebreaker, it is unclear how the Coast Guard would perform a rescue operation in the event that the Polar Star were to be in jeopardy. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of the Navy, shall submit to Congress a report on the current ability of the Coast Guard to provide the U.S. Navy with adequate icebreaking capabilities to operate a surface combatant ship in the Arctic year-round. This report shall take into account the current requirements on Coast Guard icebreakers to conduct Operation Deep Freeze as well as regularly scheduled maintenance. This report shall also provide what assets are required to ensure that the Coast Guard can provide the Navy year-round icebreaking capabilities in the Arctic while also completing all current missions through 2030. SMALL BOATS The Committee is aware of an outstanding Coast Guard requirement to replace aging small response boats and notes that the Coast Guard is not procuring enough boats annually to meet its acquisition objective. Not less than $18,100,000 shall be utilized for small response boat purchases in fiscal year 2016. The bill also includes long-standing language to allow funds from the Operating Expenses appropriation to be used for the purchase or lease of small boats for contingent and emergent requirements (at a unit cost of no more than $700,000) and repairs and end-of-service-life replacements. The annual cost of these activities is capped at $31,000,000. Unlike major procurements requested for the Acquisition, Construction, and Improvements appropriation, the Coast Guard s annual request for the Operating Expenses appropriation includes minimal information about the budget for small boat activities. In order to gain more clarity on these matters, the Coast Guard shall report to the Committee no later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this act detailing planned small boat purchases, leases, repairs, and service life replacements for fiscal year 2016. For fiscal year 2017, such information shall be included in the congressional budget justification. SURVEY AND DESIGN The bill includes $15,000,000 in support of survey and design work related to the In-Service Vessel Sustainment [ISVS] project. The fiscal year 2016 request supports the multi-year engineering survey and design efforts for Healy and 175-foot coastal buoy tenders, as well as a Material Condition Assessment [MCA] for the Polar Sea. An additional $6,000,000 is included above the request for survey and design work associated with reactivation of the Polar Sea. The Coast Guard is directed to brief the Committee 2

after completion of the MCA and subsequent analysis of alternatives prior to obligating this additional funding. IN-SERVICE CUTTER SUSTAINMENT The bill includes $68,000,000 to continue in-service sustainment efforts for the 140-foot icebreaking tugs, mid-life service sustainment of the 225-foot ocean-going buoy tender, the third of four phases of the Eagle service life extension, and engineering work on the 47-foot motor life boat. Given the success of the Mission Effectiveness Projects for the medium endurance cutters and the 110-foot patrol boats at the Coast Guard Yard, the Committee expects the Coast Guard to direct sustainment work on all aging vessels there when geographically feasible. NATIONAL SECURITY CUTTER The National Security Cutter [NSC] is the largest and most technologically advanced cutter the Coast Guard has ever placed into service. Built to replace the aging 378-foot high endurance cutters commissioned in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the NSC has no peer within the Coast Guard and is effectively a floating sector, equally capable of search and rescue in the Bering Sea or counternarcotics enforcement in the South Pacific. It is also currently the only vessel within the Coast Guard capable of detecting and defending its crew against chemical, biological and radiological attacks and its suite of sensors and secure communications capabilities make its domain awareness unmatched in the fleet. Since commissioning of the first NSC in 2008 the Legend-class cutters have demonstrated their efficacy continuously. In 2012, a newly commissioned NSC was dispatched to the Arctic tasked with monitoring exploratory drilling and performing domain awareness, operational response, and command and control functions. In subsequent years, the NSC had led multinational coalitions in the biannual Rim of the Pacific Exercise and continues to seize thousands of pounds of illicit drugs bound for the United States. In 2011, a cutter study commissioned by the Coast Guard indicated that the NSC has a mature design, stable requirements, demonstrated operational performance and predictable costs. And given the Coast Guard s experience with its current fleet of high endurance cutters with an average age of 46 years old, it s likely that the Coast Guard will have the NSCs it procures now for decades to come. The Coast Guard has also stated that central to its plan to replace its legacy high endurance cutters is a new crew rotation concept [CRC] which would ultimately increase days away from home port for the new NSCs. Unfortunately, the Coast Guard has yet to fully test the CRC and will not understand its feasibility until 2019 meaning that the Coast Guard s goal of meeting or exceeding operational performance of the legacy high endurance cutters within the NSCs Program of Record may fall well short of mission needs. For these reasons, the Committee recommends $640,000,000 for award and production costs associated with a ninth National Security Cutter, notwithstanding future costs for post-delivery activities. 3

FULL FUNDING POLICY The Committee again directs an exception to the administration s current acquisition policy that requires the Coast Guard to attain total acquisition cost for a vessel, including long lead time materials [LLTM], production costs, and post-production costs, before a production contract can be awarded. This has the potential to create shipbuilding inefficiencies, force delayed obligation of production funds, and require post-production funds far in advance of when they will be used. The Department should be in a position to acquire vessels in the most efficient manner within the guidelines of strict governance measures. The Committee expects the administration to adopt a similar policy for the acquisition of the Offshore Patrol Cutter [OPC]. FAST RESPONSE CUTTER The Committee recommends $230,000,000 for the Coast Guard s Fast Response Cutter [FRC]. This funding will allow the Coast Guard to acquire four FRC hulls (33 36) and supports base award of the phase II re-compete FRC production contract. This contract will allow options for four, five, or six cutters. OFFSHORE PATROL CUTTER The recommendation includes $18,500,000 for the OPC, as requested. Funding is provided to support Preliminary and Contract Design [P&CD] deliverables to complete the P&CD phase and related support for the acquisition. The Committee also includes language whereby the Department may propose a reprogramming or transfer of $70,500,000 to award Detailed Design, should the Coast Guard be prepared to award in fiscal year 2016. POLAR ICEBREAKER ACQUISITION The recommendation includes $4,000,000, as requested, to continue initial acquisition activities for a new Coast Guard polar icebreaker. TITLE II U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION JONES ACT (Report Language) A general provision is continued prohibiting funds from being used to issue future waivers related to a release from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve until the Secretary has consulted with the Departments of Energy and Transportation and representatives of the United States flag maritime industry and taken adequate steps to ensure the use of United States flag vessels. The Secretary shall notify the Congress within two business days of any request for a waiver, not solely waivers requested to transport oil released from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The Committee shall be informed on a timely basis of 4

the disposition of each waiver request. The Committee directs CBP to continue to track Jones Act violations and make information available to the public and the Committees, on a quarterly basis, about specific Jones Act violations, findings of fact, parties determined to be at fault, amount of penalty assessments, and status of collections. JONES ACT (Bill Language) SEC. 522. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds provided in this or any other Act shall be used to approve a waiver of the navigation and vessel-inspection laws pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 501(b) for the transportation of crude oil distributed from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve until the Secretary of Homeland Security, after consultation with the Secretaries of the Departments of Energy and Transportation and representatives from the United States flag maritime industry, takes adequate measures to ensure the use of United States flag vessels: Provided, That the Secretary shall notify the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives within 2 business days of any request for waivers of navigation and vessel-inspection laws pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 501(b). 5