SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

Similar documents
Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Joint Terminal Attack Controller, A Primary MOS For The Future. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain M.J. Carroll to Major P.M.

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Rethinking Tactical HUMINT in a MAGTF World EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Capt M.S. Wilbur To Major Dixon, CG 8 6 January 2006

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

The Shake and Bake Noncommissioned Officer. By the early-1960's, the United States Army was again engaged in conflict, now in

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

The Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test: The Need to Replace it with a Combat Fitness Test EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain E. M.

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Marine Corps Mentoring Program. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. D. Watson to CG #10 FACAD: Major P. J. Nugent 07 February 2006

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Maintaining Tank and Infantry Integration Training EWS Subject Area Training

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

CAAT in Deliberate Urban Attacks

Sustaining the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain G.S. Rooker. Major Gelerter / Major Uecker, CG#3

No Time for Boats EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain P. B. Byrne to Major A. L. Shaw and Major W. C. Stophel, CG 3 7 February 2006

USMC Expeditionary Energy

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

Marine Officer Promotions: Incentivizing and Retaining Top Performers. Captain Michael J. Lorino

Adapting the Fitness Report: Evolving an intangible quality into a tangible evaluation to

Closing the Barn Doors After the Cows Have Left: MCRC s Solution to the Recruiter Shortfall EWS Subject Area Manpower

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Improving ROTC Accessions for Military Intelligence

Wildland Fire Assistance

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

US MARINE CORPS ORIENTATION

From the onset of the global war on

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Engineering the Army s Next Generation Medical Vehicle (MV) for Rapid Responses

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Military Police: The Force of Choice. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain Erinn C. Singman. Major R.F. Revoir, CG 9.

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Grow the U.S. Army, Again EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain Travis Trammell to Major Charles Lynn, CG February 2008

Medical Requirements and Deployments

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Report Documentation Page

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Transcription:

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? EWS 2005 Subject Area Warfighting SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15 To Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2005 to 00-00-2005 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) United States Marine Corps,Command and Staff College, Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Marine Corps University, 2076 South Street,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 11 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

First Sergeant, do any of these platoon sergeants have LAR experience? asked the frustrated company commander as he looked down at his pile of initial counseling s. No Sir, but they are 0369 s, replied the company first sergeant. You mean I have three new second lieutenants fresh out of school with no experience in light armored vehicles and three 0369 s that are supposed to teach them the tricks of the trade, but don t even know the trade? lamented the CO. The 1 st Sgt gave a beleaguered shrug and said, At least they are motivated, Sir. Let me get this straight, said the CO. The senior enlisted Marine in the company with any LAR experience is my chief dismounted scout, Sgt Gomez, and he s an 0311 who doesn t even have a military vehicle license. I have three platoons of four LAVs in each, with a crew of six members in each vehicle. Half the platoon are 0313s, half are 0311s all being led by two men of which only one has even ridden in a LAV. And that was at school! To top it off, we are deploying in seven months. Damn said the tired CO, By then, they may have learned how the maintenance cycle works, much less how to employ the vehicle as a crew. The above conversation between the newly appointed LAR company commander and his first sergeant may have never taken place, but is in danger of doing so in the near future. The Marine Corps needs to change the 0369 MOS designation process in order to prevent the loss of experienced staff noncommissioned officers in the Light Armored Reconnaissance community. Losing the Corporate Knowledge A catch phrase commonly used in the late 1980 s was passing on the corporate knowledge. This meant ensuring the skills learned within a unit were retained, so as to reducing the chance of the same mistakes and the lessons learned from those mistakes having to be repeated each time 2

a unit deployed with new personnel. One of the ways to preserve this corporate knowledge was by placing experienced leaders in key positions. Assigning a man with little to no experience to the senior billet within a LAR platoon is detrimental to both equipment and Marine lives. The Marine Corps is doing itself and its Marines a disservice by not re-assigning staff sergeants who were prior LAR crewman to be platoon sergeants in LAR companies. The current LAV crewman completes the 0311 basic infantry rifleman course and then the 0313 basic LAV Crewman Course at Camp Pendleton, California. 1 And even though the LAV he was assigned to is often older than he is, the Marine stood a very good chance of filling the billet of vehicle commander (VC) before his first reenlistment. A billet, which has him, entrusted with lives of five to six other Marines, a LAV, and its associated equipment totaling over $1 million. After two to four deployments, it is likely the 0313 will move on to his B billet for three years or so, and if he does well he will earn the rank of staff sergeant and the MOS 0369. As a 0369, it is equally as probable that he will end up a platoon sergeant for a weapons platoon in an infantry battalion, instead of a platoon sergeant for a LAR platoon. The Marine will have never been around Mk-19s, M2s, or even 3

mortars, but he will be given the responsibility of training and employing his men with these weapons systems. Conversely, the incoming 0369 assigned to a LAR platoon, who was a mortar man all his career, will not have a clue how to operate, maintain, and employ his LAV-25 and train his crew, much less advise his platoon commander using his vast LAR experience. When asked in an interview if Manpower and Reserve Enlisted Affairs (MMEA) has a policy for assigning 0369 Marines with a 0313 background to LAR battalions, the 0369 Monitor stated that MMEA has no policy concerning the background experience of 0369s; It is mainly concerned with assigning a 0369 to a unit that is in need of that billet MOS. 2 Retaining the Corporate Knowledge The three ways to insure that the LAR battalions do not lose their corporate knowledge at the SNCO ranks are: 1) Change the current 0369 MOS to 0370 LAR Unit Leader for those SNCOs that have a background in LAR and/or attend the LAV Leaders Course, 2) Keep the MOS designation of 0313 from Pvt - MGySgt, or 3) Change the policy for 0313 Marines becoming 0369s to delay until they reach the rank of Gunnery Sergeant. 0370 LAR Unit Leader 4

Upon graduation from the LAV Leaders Course, staff sergeants are presented with a dog tag that has the number 0370 stamped on it. This is a symbolic gesture to recognize achieving the requisite knowledge to employ and train LAR crewmen. This symbolic gesture should be changed into a formal assignment of the MOS of 0370, LAR Unit Leader. Assigning the primary MOS of 0370 to SNCOs upon completion of the LAV Leader s Course is the first way to ensure the LAR battalions do not lose the corporate knowledge at the SNCO ranks. In an interview with Captain McConnell i, he stated that a 0313 who obtains the rank of staff sergeant should remain within the LAR community for his career. He is an advocate of the change to 0370. He believes that a 0369 without prior LAR experience can be integrated into the LAR community, but only after he has successfully completed the LAV Leaders Course. Captain McConnell s reasoning for retaining 0313s within the LAR community is that, much like the Tank and Amphibious Assault community, the LAR community needs to retain Marines with the specialized i Captain Lucas McConnell is a former LAR platoon commander and company executive officer and a former Officer in Charge of the LAV Leaders course: the Marine Corps formal school for LAR platoon commanders and platoon sergeants. 5

technical and logistical skills necessary to maintain and operate the light armored vehicle. 3 0313 Staff Sergeant Many old Corps Marines cannot stand the thought of a infantry SNCO receiving any other MOS but that of 0369. There is some validity to this. A SNCO who has eight to ten years time in service has valuable experience that all infantry units can benefit from. The argument is not against the fact that all 0369s have extremely valuable experience that young platoon commanders and infantry platoons can benefit from. It is instead, arguing that a platoon sergeant with a LAR background has specific technical and tactical experience that cannot be effectively obtained by reading a manual or publication. A platoon commander can read a manual. What a young lieutenant, fresh out of school, needs is a righthand man who can draw on years of experience employing a LAV and its crew to assist the platoon commander in making tactically and technically sound decisions as they relate to the LAV. The second way to keep these experienced staff sergeants in the LAR community is to change when a SNCO obtains the MOS of 0369 should be made. Several technical MOSs in the Marine Corps do not change their SCNO MOS 6

designation at the rank of staff sergeant, due the need for technically-specific staff sergeants. Because working with LAVs involves technically specific knowledge and skills, the light armored vehicle crewman occupational field should reflect the MOS 0313 from the rank of private to the rank of staff sergeant. The current line number for a company gunnery sergeant in a LAR company calls for a 0369 Gunnery Sergeant. The Company Gunny in a LAR company does not directly work with young platoon commanders and, thus, does not have to have the technical skills to advise them with. Instead, like every other Company Gunny in the infantry occupational field, he has to be a master at procurement, stowage, and distribution of all logistical materials for the company. Because of this, once a 0313 reaches the rank of gunnery sergeant, he can then receive the MOS of 0369. Waiting until the rank of gunnery sergeant before Marines change their MOS from 0313 to 0369 will serve the needs of the Marines, the Marine Corps, and the LAR community. 0313 Pvt - MGySgt The third way LAR battalions can ensure they keep experienced SNCOs in their community is to maintain an MOS designation of 0313 from private to master gunnery sergeant. The reconnaissance community has already 7

addressed and responded to the need for retaining Marines with specialized skills. The recent change in the reconnaissance community to permit 0321 Reconnaissance Men to maintain their MOS up to the rank of Master Gunnery Sergeant allows the reconnaissance community to retain the corporate knowledge within its units. The Counter-argument The counter-argument will be made that pigeon-holing or bottle-necking a staff sergeant within the LAR community reduces the Marine s opportunity for a wellrounded education and for promotion. Marines need to be well rounded and exposed to a variety of billets in order to become the complete MAGTF Marine. B billets are for obtaining experiences outside an MOS and LAR Marines get the true MAGTF experience by virtue their missions: Combat Service Support when dealing with ordering and tracking parts for corrective maintenance and planning for re-fueling during operations, not to mention planning for food and water re-supply when conducting operations up to 50 kilometers in front of the main body; Air Combat Element when often beyond the range of artillery and naval surface support and when conducting re-fueling operations; and working for the Command Element, as seen at 8

CAX. Promotional opportunities and billet availabilities are not an issue due to the size of the LAR community and the nature of advancement within the Marine Corps. MSgt Mitchell, the 0321 monitor and draftee of the point paper that was instrumental in the Reconnaissance community s change in its MOS designation, demonstrated on the enlisted grade shaping model (EGSR) that there would be no adverse effects on promotion opportunities within the LAR community if the MOS designator remained 0313 from private to master gunnery sergeant. He explained that with the different year groups and the amount of personnel in the LAR battalions that there would be no stagnation with promotions at the SNCO ranks. 4 Conclusion In an interview with Colonel Powers ii, he stated that LAR units are the most versatile, diverse units in the Corps, they need a high level of expertise, similar to Recon. Colonel Powers believes that the LAR communities needs to retain its experienced SNCOs and that changing the MOS from 0369 to 0370 or keeping it at 0313 from Pvt-MgySgt are ways this could be accomplished. 5 ii Colonel Jeffery Powers is a retired Marine and former Operations Officer for 3 rd LAR Battalion during Desert Storm/Shield and former Battalion Commander for 1 st LAR Battalion. He has extensive experience in leading units, such as, Reconnaissance and LAR that require specialized skill sets. 9

Whichever method is chosen, a change in MOS designation at the SNCO ranks is vital to the LAR battalions in passing on the corporate knowledge to future generations. Not do so is akin to re-inventing the proverbial wheel every time a prior 0313 staff sergeant walks out the door. 10

Bibliography 1 Marine Corps Formal Schools Catalog, Course Title: Light Armored Vehicle Crewman. https://tims.tecom.usmc.mil/pls/public/trrms.main.html. 2 Master Gunnery Sergeant Knox, 0369 Monitor, MMEA-82,USMC, interview by Mark Brown, January 5, 2005. 3 Captain Lucas McConnell, interview by Mark Brown, January 4, 2005. 4 Master Gunnery Sergeant T. G. Mitchell, 0321 monitor, MMEA-82, USMC, interview by Mark Brown, January 5, 2005. 5 Colonel Jeffery Powers, USMC, Ret., interview by Mark Brown 11