Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Metropolitan Alliance Committee (METRO)

ROOM 223 1101 BEACH STREET FLINT, MI 48502-1470 (810) 257-3010 FAX (810) 257-3185 ROBERT JOHNSON 732-9089 CHAIRPERSON ROBERT PLUMB 635-4359 VICE-CHAIRPERSON ROBERT WIDIGAN 569-8296 TREASURER Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Metropolitan Alliance Committee (METRO) Genesee County Administration Building Harris Auditorium 1101 Beach Street, 3 rd Floor Flint, Michigan 48502 TRUSTEES BILL BAIN 659-0001 TOD SORENSEN 640-2000 MATT BACH 874-1073 PAULETTE JOHNSON JOHN GILBERT 635-9762 JOHN WHITESIDE Wednesday, May 16, 2018 7:00 P.M. AGENDA I. Call to Order II. III. IV. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Minutes ***A. Minutes of the April 18, 2018 Regular Meeting (attached) V. Introduction of Guests VI. VII. Public Comment Public Hearing A. FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment #12 VIII. IX. Finances Committee Reports AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ORGANIZATION

X. Old Business ***A. FY 2019 Unified Work Program (UWP) (attached) B. Genesee: Our County, Our Future update (presentation) XI. New Business ***A. FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment #12 (attached) B. Review of Current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Policies, Procedures, and Project Applications (attached) C. 2018 Asset Management PASER Program (attached) D. 2018 Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Road Projects (presentation) XII. XIII. XIV. Other Business Announcements Adjournment ***Action Items NEXT MEETING Wednesday, June 20, 2018, 7:00 P.M. DF:dc K:\trans\METRO\2018\Agendas\May\May.docx

GENESEE COUNTY METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE Regular Meeting Minutes April 18, 2018 The Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance Committee met at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 14, 2018, in the Harris Auditorium of the Genesee County Administration Building, 1101 Beach Street, Third Floor, Flint, Michigan. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Johnson led the Pledge of Allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Members present and absent were noted as follows: UNIT REPRESENTED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Genesee County City of Burton City of Clio City of Davison City of Fenton City of Flint City of Flushing City of Grand Blanc City of Linden City of Montrose City of Mt. Morris Duane Mosher Patricia Lockwood George Gray Chris Douglas John Crawford Commissioner Ted Henry Thomas Martinbianco Danny Wells Eric Wiederhold Reuben Garcia Joan Snyder Mayor Karen Weaver Robert Bincsik Betty Wideman Mayor Susan Soderstrom Ray Culbert Paul Zelenak Mark Richard Duane Dunckel Jr. William Daniels IV A

City of Swartz Creek Argentine Township Atlas Township Clayton Township Davison Township Fenton Township Flint Township Flushing Township Forest Township Gaines Township Genesee Township Grand Blanc Township Montrose Township Mt. Morris Township Mundy Township Richfield Township Thetford Township Vienna Township Goodrich Village John Gilbert Robert Plumb Dennis Cramer Paulette Johnson Shelley Thompson Robert Widigan Andrew Marko John Whiteside Bill Bain Cheryl Woughter Al Mansour Monica Shapiro Robert Johnson Brian Baxter Kay Doerr Matt Bach David Cain Brian Saad Leslie Renckly Katie Vick Tere Onica Chris Gehringer Matthew Karr Rhonda Clark Mark Goupil Robert Kesler Karyn Miller Tracey Tucker Jenifer Almassy Mary Ann Price Linda Smoke Lee Purdy Kenneth Draper Matt Moros Tod Sorensen Tom Tithof Mark Emmendorfer Jacky King Dan Morey Gerry Masters Gary Stevens Rachel Stanke Kerry Paulson Jake Vick IV A

Otisville Village Otter Lake Village Lennon Village Gaines Village Federal Highway Admin Gen Cty Drain Comm Gen Cty Road Comm GCMPC Mass Trans Authority Mich Dept of Trans Doug McAbee Alex Patsy Derek Bradshaw Mark Baldwin Joan Skias Emily Alexander Valerie Delauter Melissa Neal Andrea Dewey Aaron Dawson Jeff Wright Ed Benning Mary Ann Ketels Anita Boughner Jay Reithel Anita Boughner Larry Doyle Jason Nordberg introduced Shawnice Dorsy, of the Mass Transportation Authority (MTA). Ms. Dorsy will take Mary Ann Ketels place when she retires in August. Bob Slattery, DPW Director for the City of Burton introduced himself. OTHERS PRESENT: Commissioner David Martin, Shawnice Dorsy, Robert Slattery, Jason Nordberg, Sharon Gregory, and Debby Compton. IV. Minutes ***A. Minutes of the March 21, 2018 Regular Meeting Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by Robert Widigan, Supported by David Cain, to approve the minutes of the March 21, 2018 regular meeting as presented. Motion passed unanimously. V. Introduction of Guests No one spoke at this time. VI. Public Comment John Whiteside inquired about getting statistics on the roundabout in Grand Blanc Township. Alex Patsy, Genesee County Road Commission, stated that he would meet with John after the meeting to discuss his concerns. Discussion ensued. IV A

VII. Public Hearing A. FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Text Amendment CHAIRPERSON JOHNSON OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING AT 7:08 P.M. Chairperson Johnson provided the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Text Amendment. Chairperson Johnson repeated this opportunity for comment twice more with no comments at this time. CHAIRPERSON JOHNSON CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING AT 7:09 P.M VIII. Finances Robert Widigan stated that as of 3/31/18 the ending balance of the bank account is $4,344.59. Mr. Widigan expressed that all local units of government have paid their 2018 Metro dues. Jason Nordberg stated that we will now move forward and pay the secretarial fee which has already been approved. Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by David Cain, Supported by Robert Plumb, to approve the Financial Report as presented. Motion passed unanimously. IX. Committee Reports A. Nominating Committee Report David Cain stated that the nominated officer for Chair is Robert Johnson. Mr. Cain asked if there were any other nominations from the floor. No one spoke at this time. Mr. Cain stated that the nominated officer for Vice-Chair is Robert Plumb. Mr. Cain asked if there were any other nominations from the floor. No one spoke at this time. Mr. Cain stated that the nominated officer for Treasurer is Robert Widigan. Mr. Cain asked if there were any other nominations from the floor. No one spoke at this time. Mr. Cain identified the Nominated Slate of Officers and asked if there were any other nominations from the floor twice more with no further nominations being made. Mr. Cain closed the nominations for Officers at 7:12 p.m. Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by Bill Bain, Supported by Kay Doerr, to approve the Nominating Committees Slate of Officers by acclimation and to destroy the ballots. Nominated Slate of Officers: Chair; Robert Johnson, Vice-Chair; Robert Plumb, Treasurer; Robert Widigan. Motion passed unanimously. IV A

X. Old Business There was no Old Business. XI. New Business ***A. Election of Officers David Cain stated that there are two (2) open trustee positions. Nomination of trustees are Rhonda Clark, John Gilbert, and John Whiteside. Nominated trustees were asked to stand up and introduce themselves. Mr. Gilbert and Mr. Whiteside stood and introduced themselves. Ms. Clark was unable to attend this meeting. Ballots were handed out for trustee votes. Mr. Cain stated that Robert Johnson and Robert Widigan were listed as running for trustees on the ballot sheets, but since they both were to continue on as the Chair and Treasurer, their names needed to be crossed off the ballots. Mr. Cain asked if there were any other nominations from the floor. No one spoke at this time. Twice more Mr. Cain asked if there were any other nominations from the floor for trustees with no further nominations being made. At this time ballots were collected, and the nominating committee stepped out to count votes. The Nominating Committee returned with the ballot count. Mr. Cain stated that John Whiteside received twenty-four (24) votes, John Gilbert received eighteen (18) votes, and Rhonda Clark received six (6) votes. Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by Bill Bain, Supported by Robert Plumb, to approve the election of John Whiteside and John Gilbert for the two (2) trustee positions. Nominated Trustee one (1): John Whiteside, Nominated Trustee two (2): John Gilbert. Motion passed unanimously. ***B. Transit Asset Management Performance Measures Adoption Sharon Gregory advised that the Mass Transportation Authority has established its Transit Asset Management Performance Measures Targets for 2018/2019 as required by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The Metropolitan Alliance can either adopt the MTA s targets or choose to set its own. Discussion ensued. At this time the Technical Advisory Committee is recommending the Metropolitan Alliance adopt the Mass Transportation Authority s 2018/2019 Transit Asset Management Performance Measures and approve the Chairperson to sign the Resolution of Support. Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by Robert Widigan, Supported by Robert Plumb, to adopt the Flint Mass Transportation Authority s 2018/2019 Transit Asset Management performance measures and to approve the Chairperson signing the Resolution of Support. Motion passed unanimously. IV A

***C. Amending Performance Measure Language into the FY 2017-2020 TIP Document Sharon Gregory stated that staff has been working with MDOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and other Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) around the state regarding FAST Act Performance Measures and the best methods for addressing them in our planning documents. MPOs must explain how project selection will be performance-based going forward and document this information in our Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff has drafted additional language for the project listing chapter and a revised Performance Measures chapter for the FY 2017-2020 TIP to ensure it meets the performance measure requirements of the FAST Act. Ms. Gregory directed the committee member s attention to the draft chapters that were provided to them in their agenda packet for their review. At this time the Technical Advisory Committee is recommending approval to the Metropolitan Alliance to amend the FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program document to incorporate the updated Performance Measures language. Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by Robert Widigan, Supported by Robert Plumb, to approve the adoption of this language into the FY 2017-2020 TIP Document. Motion passed unanimously. D. 2018 Local Traffic Count Program Sharon Gregory advised that it is that time of year when staff asks local units of government to update traffic count information on federal-aid eligible roads under their jurisdiction. Staff will be sending letters to each local road agency with a list of locations requiring traffic counts for 2018. GCMPC has traffic counters and accessory equipment available for rental by local agencies. Damon Fortney is the staff person in our office that can help with traffic counter rentals and set-up training or answer questions. Discussion ensued. E. 2018 MDOT Road Projects MDOT was not available to do their presentation but will present the information at the next meeting. F. 2018 Genesee County Road Commission Road Projects Alex Patsy, Programming & Development Engineer for the Genesee County Road Commission, presented a project update PowerPoint to the committee. Discussion ensued. The committee asked that Mr. Patsy s PowerPoint be e-mailed to them. Staff e-mailed the presentation to committee members in both PowerPoint and pdf formats on 4/19/18. IV A

***G. FY 2018 Unified Work Program (UWP) Amendment #1 Sharon Gregory stated that staff is proposing to shift funding from the Update Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) work item by decreasing it $158,827, and increasing the TSM Activity Coordination work item by $97,740, increasing the Transportation Program Management work item by $18,326, and increasing the Prepare Transportation Improvement Program work item by $42,761. The LRTP is being developed with staff from all GCMPC divisions so the work is being charged as indirect costs to share developmental costs among the various funding sources. There is no change to the total funding for the UWP. At this time, the Technical Advisory Committee has provided a recommendation of approval for Amendment #1 to the UWP to the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance. Motion: Action: Approve, Moved by Robert Widigan, Supported by David Cain, to approve Amendment #1 to the FY 2018 Unified Work Program (UWP). Motion passed unanimously. H. FY 2019 Unified Work Program (UWP) Sharon Gregory stated that the FY 2019 UWP identifies what staff will be working on and requested that committee members let Mr. Nordberg know if they have any ideas for the Unified Work Program. Ms. Gregory advised that some of the major work items will be the development of the Combined Plan (the plan that we are doing with the three divisions) and also the development of the Transportation Improvement Program. Coming up this fall, staff is going to start the Call for Projects for the FY 2020-2023 TIP. Those two items will be the main focus. Staff will still be working on the trail program, and various other programs. Next month staff will bring the Unified Work Program to the committee for approval. I. Genesee: Our County, Our Future Public Involvement Sharon Gregory stated that Genesee: Our County, Our Future is the name of our new plan. Currently GCMPC has three (3) different plans. Now staff is working on one combined plan. Staff will be having three (3) public input sessions coming up next week. The first one will be in Fenton from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The second one will take place in Clio at the Senior Center from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and the third session will be in Flint at the Farmers Market from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The plan is to get public input for about a year and a half. Ms. Gregory stated that staff conducted about one hundred and thirty (130) face-to-face interviews. Staff will use that information to help guide our plan. There is a survey that staff is asking the public to complete. Postcards are available with the link to the survey on our website which is different from our GCMPC website. It is a map-based application, which means comments can be done right on the map. IV A

This is an effort to engage the public and get their comments on how to improve the community. The first Steering Committee meeting was held this past Monday. Everything will go from the Steering Committee to TAC and then to METRO, so this committee will be involved in the process. Advertising banners were placed inside sixteen buses. There is an incentive to the local units to get the people in their community to complete the survey. The community with the highest number of surveys completed will receive a $2,000 beautification grant for their community. David Cain thanked staff for coming out and doing the face-to-face interviews with the stakeholders. He stated that he would like to see it expanded and see more interviews done. Derek Bradshaw reminded the committee about the $2,000 beautification grant and emphasized how important it is to get the community involved in completing the survey. Derek Bradshaw stated that the Steering Committee is still looking for one or two more representatives from the Metropolitan Alliance to be part of the committee. Interested parties should contact the Chair. XII. XIII. Other Business There was no Other Business. Announcements Derek Bradshaw announced that the Regional Prosperity Initiative has a $1,000 grant out right now for local units of government that want to update their websites. There is a one-page application to fill out and return by the end of April. Chairperson Johnson thanked David Cain and Bill Bain for their help on the election. XIV. Adjournment Chairperson Johnson stated that the next meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. Chairperson Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debby Compton, Secretary Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission IV A

ROOM 223 1101 BEACH STREET FLINT, MI 48502-1470 (810) 257-3010 FAX (810) 257-3185 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Members of the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance Jason Nordberg, Principal Planner Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission DATE: May 16, 2018 SUBJECT: FY 2019 Unified Work Program (UWP) The attached Unified Work Program (UWP) describes all transportation planning activities for the upcoming fiscal year and identifies funding sources and agencies involved in these activities. The primary activities for the 2019 fiscal year will focus on the update of the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), development of the 2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the implementation and maintenance of the 2017-2020 TIP and 2040 LRTP, and a roundabout feasibility study. There are requirements of Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) that are being phased in, such as performance measures, that staff will continue to monitor and work to implement. A Federal Certification Review of the transportation planning process in Genesee County will be conducted in FY 2019. Other activities include speed study data collection, building permit collection, safety data analysis, and pavement data analysis to name a few. At this time, the Technical Advisory Committee is recommending approval for the FY 2019 Unified Work Program (UWP) to the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ORGANIZATION K:\trans\METRO\2018\FY 2019 UWP Approval Memo.docx X A

C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc FUNDING SOURCES FISCAL YEAR 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM Activities GCMPC PL PL Transit Carry Over--PL Carry Over Ridesharing* HPP* Subtotal MTF Total PL Transit (GCMPC) (MDOT) III. DATA MANAGEMENT A. Data Management Systems $9,979 $43,377 $1,625 $54,981 $7,593 $62,574 B. Data Inventory and Model Maintenance $15,834 $45,681 $2,432 $23,291 $87,238 $13,324 $100,562 Subtotal $25,813 $89,058 $4,057 $23,291 $142,219 $20,917 $163,136 IV. TSM PLANNING A. TSM Coordination $109,837 $192,356 $19,949 $264,207 $586,349 $30,743 $617,092 B. Transit Planning ** $41,024 $0 $76,595 $108,410 $226,029 $0 $226,029 C. Ridesharing $112,271 $112,271 $0 $112,271 D. Pavement Management $443 $2,000 $2,443 $0 $2,443 E. Safety Planning $1,204 $5,431 $6,635 $0 $6,635 Subtotal $152,509 $199,787 $96,544 $264,207 $108,410 $112,271 $0 $933,728 $30,743 $964,471 V. LONG-RANGE PLANNING A. Update Long Range Transportation Plan $3,827 $14,523 $1,112 $19,462 $3,871 $23,333 Subtotal $3,827 $14,523 $1,112 $0 $0 $19,462 $3,871 $23,333 VI. PLANNING SUPPORT A. Program Management $41,441 $179,115 $11,831 $232,387 $13,101 $245,488 B. Develop Unified Work Program $1,787 $7,578 $480 $9,845 $1,935 $11,780 C. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program $29,801 $109,558 $32,767 $172,126 $3,870 $175,996 Subtotal $73,029 $296,251 $45,078 $0 $0 $414,358 $18,906 $433,264 34 GRAND TOTAL $255,178 $599,619 $146,791 $287,498 $108,410 $112,271 $0 $1,509,767 $74,437 $1,584,204 **$41,024 of match to be provided by the MTA $599,619 $146,791 *Ridesharing Funds are being requested under a separate application. GCMPC-Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Local Match Studies and other contracted services PL-Federal Funds for Planning Activities from the Federal Highway Administration Amounts shown below represent Federal Funds equaling 81.85% of total. PL Transit-Federal funds for Transit Planning from Federal Transit Administration Transportation Model Technical Support $23,291 Ridesharing-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds. TSM Coordination -- Roundabout Location Feasability Study $264,207 MTF-Michigan Transportation Fund Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Study $156,805 HPP-High Priority Projects MTA Transit Planning -- Transit Studies $25,000

FY 2019 Unified Work Program for the Flint/Genesee County Metropolitan Area Draft The preparation of this work program was completed by the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission (GCMPC) and funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors [or agency] expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation.

FY 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. MAJOR TRANSPORTATION ISSUES/PRIORITIES A. System-wide Issues... 4 B. Modal Issues... 8 C. Statewide Model Implementation Process... 11 III. DATA MANAGEMENT A. Data Management Systems... 12 B. Model Maintenance and Analysis... 14 IV. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) PLANNING A. TSM Activity Coordination... 15 B. Transit Planning... 17 C. Ridesharing... 19 D. Pavement Management Program... 20 E. Safety Conscious Planning... 21 V. LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING A. Update Long Range Transportation Plan... 23 VI. PLANNING SUPPORT APPENDICES A. Transportation Program Management... 25 B. Develop Unified Work Program... 27 C. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program... 27 A. Budget Narrative and Indirect Cost Estimates B. FY 2019 Unified Work Program Funding Sources C. FY 2019 UWP Responsible Agencies D. FY 2019 UWP Labor Estimates E. FY 2019 UWP Flow Chart F. Metropolitan Alliance Resolution G. Certifications H. Title VI Certification C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc

I. INTRODUCTION The Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance (Metro) is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Flint/Genesee Metropolitan Area. The Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission (GCMPC) functions as staff to Metro. The transportation planning process is complex, involving several funding sources and many agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. For a more complete description of the planning process in Genesee County, please refer to the Flint-Genesee County Long Range Transportation Plan. Genesee County is situated in the southeastern portion of Michigan's Lower Peninsula, approximately 50 miles northwest of Detroit and northeast of Lansing. The county covers an area of approximately 415,360 acres (649 square miles). The 2010 census counts indicate a population of 425,790 persons for Genesee County, distributed among eleven cities, seventeen townships, and five villages. The City of Flint is the largest political jurisdiction in Genesee County, with a 2010 census count of 102,434 persons. It is the population and geographic center of the county. The major transportation elements in Genesee County include highway systems, local and interregional bus systems, railroad systems, air transportation systems; and pedestrian and bikeway systems. Part of the planning process in Genesee County involves a Public Participation Plan (PPP). The PPP that addresses transportation planning activities for Metro was developed in cooperation with GCMPC and is identified as the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Public Participation Plan. Work items and activities that address the issue of Environmental Justice are identified through the PPP and the Metro Unified Work Program (UWP). As this issue is addressed, changes will continue to be made to both documents based on internal and external evaluations of how effective our activities have been. The purpose of this Unified Work Program (UWP) is to describe, in a single document, all transportation planning activities for the upcoming year. The UWP also identifies funding sources, the agencies involved in these activities and an estimated timeline for completion of activities. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 2

UWP Amendments and Administrative Modifications Administrative Modification An administrative modification to the UWP will be defined as follows: 1. A change that does not modify the FWHA-approved final total budget 2. An Increase or reduction of funds in a category less than 25% An administrative modification can be made by staff and does not require formal approval by Metro. Amendment Policy An amendment to the UWP will be defined as follows: 1. An addition or deletion of a work item 2. Change in the scope of a work item 3. Increase or reduction of funds in a category greater than or equal to 25% 4. A change that will modify the FHWA approved final total budget An amendment to the UWP will be brought to Metro for approval. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 3

II. MAJOR TRANSPORTATION ISSUES/PRIORITIES The FY 2019 UWP has been formulated to address the major transportation issues and problems facing the Flint-Genesee County area. The identified issues establish the priorities for the UWP. Work activities are identified throughout the plan that address the identified issues/priorities. The amount of staff hours and funding will vary each fiscal year depending on the priority of the activity for the identified fiscal year. A. SYSTEM-WIDE ISSUES 1. Air Quality In November of 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments were signed into law. These amendments substantially revise the federal-aid highway program in non-attainment areas (areas that are above the minimum threshold for a pollutant) due to its provisions for highway sanctions. The act requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set, review, and revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) periodically. There are six NAAQS pollutants: ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM). PM is subdivided into particulate sizes, less than 10 micrometer in diameter (PM10) and less than 2.5 micrometer in diameter (PM2.5). The sanctions can be imposed statewide if those areas that are in non-attainment do not make adequate revisions to change their status. On April 15, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated Genesee County and Lapeer County as being in basic non-attainment and assigned a maximum attainment date of June 2009. This area was identified as the Flint Michigan Non-attainment Area. An Interagency Work Group (IAWG) was established to review federally funded transportation projects to ensure that new transportation projects will improve or at least not degrade current air quality levels. In 2007 the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) re-designated the Flint Non-attainment Area to attainment status. On May 16, 2007 the EPA provided notice in the Federal Register that the Flint Non-attainment Area was re-designated to be in attainment as a maintenance area. April 30, 2012 the EPA announced that Genesee County is in attainment. On April 6, 2015 the EPA completely revoked the 1997 ozone standard, so all requirements related to this standard were removed. Prior to the October 1, 2016 deadline the Michigan Department of C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 4

Environmental Quality (DEQ) submitted non-attainment boundary recommendations to the EPA (based on the most current three year period of data) and recommended that Genesee County remain in attainment. The EPA is in the process of reviewing air quality designations for Michigan communities. Work items related to air quality that were required while the area was designated as a nonattainment will continue to be addressed while in attainment to prepare for potential changes to air quality standards. 2. Energy Energy availability has a significant impact on the amount and mode of travel, as well as the overall economy of the area. Although energy supplies have remained relatively stable fluctuating costs in recent years have made energy much more of a concern. In the TSM Coordination activity, the status of energy availability will be monitored. 3. Transportation Revenue Always an issue in transportation is whether or not adequate funding will be available to meet the needs of both maintenance and expansion of transportation facilities and services in a community. On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed the Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (Pub. L. No. 114-94) into law the first federal law in over a decade to provide long-term funding certainty for surface transportation infrastructure planning and investment. The FAST Act authorizes $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs. The FAST Act maintains our focus on safety, keeps intact the established structure of the various highway-related programs, continues efforts to streamline project delivery and, for the first time, provides a dedicated source of federal dollars for freight projects. The FAST Act builds on and refines many of the highway, transit, bike, and pedestrian programs and policies established in 1991 with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) legislation. ISTEA was replaced with Transportation Equity Act of the Twenty-first Century (TEA-21), the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 5

and most recently Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21). The primary revenue sources for this legislation are the 18.4 cent per gallon tax on gasoline and a 24.4 cent per gallon tax on diesel fuel. Public Act 51 of 1951 is the state law that covers many transportation funding issues in the state. Act 51 has not changed much since its original approval however a series of laws enacted in November 2015 increased state funding for transportation. The Michigan House Fiscal Agency estimates that, starting in FY 2016, an additional $455 million will be raised, increasing each year until FY 2020, when it s expected that the increase will stabilize at an additional $1.2 billion per year. The current gross receipts to the Michigan Transportation Fund (MTF) are approximately $1.95 billion annually. Currently, state motor fuel taxes are set at 19 cents per gallon on gasoline and 15 cents per gallon on diesel. The state also levies a six percent sales tax on the wholesale and federal tax portion of each gallon of motor fuel. Virtually none of this sales tax revenue goes to transportation. Funding from motor fuel taxes and registration fees (but not the sales tax) is deposited in the MTF Through activities described in the UWP, including: TSM Coordination, Transit Planning, Pavement Management Program, Update Long Range Multi-Modal Plan, Transportation Program Management, and Prepare Transportation Improvement Program, any changes in federal or state transportation legislation will be evaluated. Coordination of both highway improvement projects and transit services will be undertaken. 4. Environmental Justice Federal Highways and Federal Transit have adopted a proactive goal of addressing social and neighborhood issues throughout the planning process. Genesee County continues to implement more outreach into our planning process and will implement the Public Participation Plan (PPP) as required by the MAP-21 legislation or any new federal transportation legislation. Staff has also identified several work items in the UWP to address this. These work items can be found primarily under the Program Management, although there are additional elements in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and in TSM and Transit Planning. Staff follows the PPP when working on the UWP, the LRTP, the TIP, and any specific studies such as corridor and trail plans. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 6

5. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Genesee County has developed a county-wide ITS Architecture and is now working toward a coordinated approach to implementing various forms of ITS. Staff has worked with the Mass Transportation Authority to develop and implement a Transit ITS deployment plan built off of the county-wide ITS Architecture. The MTA is continuing to build their ITS which includes a central ITS monitoring center including a 900 megahertz transmitter and receiver, automated vehicle locator (AVL) systems installed in fleet vehicles, computers and software to monitor and report the status of vehicles along their routes, and a computerized scheduling system for Your Ride services. The MTA has offered the use of the ITS infrastructure to other road agencies in Genesee County. Road agencies have started to implement ITS technologies to help reduce congestion such as connecting and optimizing signals to improve traffic flow. The City of Flint, using recommendations from the Downtown Flint Parking and One-Way Street Study, conducted by staff and a consultant, has switched many of the downtown one-way streets to a two-way system and has upgraded traffic signal hardware allowing the system to be connected and optimized. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has implemented an ITS system along I-69 to monitor traffic along the I- 69, I-75, and I-475 corridors. The system monitors traffic and provide information to travelers along the corridors such as current conditions and alternative routes. 6. Safety This is a system-wide issue affecting all modes of transportation. Genesee County agencies, while always integrating safety into the planning process, are now placing an emphasis on Safety Planning. Staff is doing this through several different avenues that include analyses of crash data for trends, a mix of fixes for problem areas, incorporating safety as a factor in TIP project selection, and more awareness of safety planning for local road agencies. Staff is working with local road agencies to implement a regional safety study of select Genesee County corridors completed in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and a consultant. For the FY 2019 MDOT Call for Safety Projects, it was stated that the focus of the program was to fund road segments with fatal and serious injury crashes. Staff put C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 7

B. MODAL ISSUES together a call for projects packet for local road agencies. The packet included information from the safety study and staff encouraged locals to select projects that addressed areas with fatal and/or serious injuries and/or sites that were included in the safety study. Staff met individually with local road agencies to discuss potential projects. Safety projects submitted to MDOT were prioritized locally using these factors. The study was also included as an element in the 2017-2020 TIP call for projects. 1. Highways The Flint-Genesee County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan was completed and approved in January 2015. It serves as the foundation for many of the transportation planning and improvement activities undertaken in the area. Genesee County's economy is still strongly tied to the success or failure of General Motors. Staff will continue to identify land use changes as part of the process to update the Long Range Transportation Plan. The 2040 LRTP document will be updated to include any new transportation legislation requirements including performance measures. During the highway construction boom, interest focused on longterm projects. As a result, maintenance of the existing road network has generally been neglected. Most of the pavements built during the highway construction boom have either exceeded or are nearing their 20-year life expectancy. Maintenance activities used generally do not improve the longevity of the roadway. This method was sufficient when dealing with a limited number of roads which would receive major rehabilitation on a scheduled basis. However, the method is no longer adequate or efficient to handle the number of roads in need of attention. Through activities described in the Pavement Management Program, a consistent evaluation process has been developed for the roads that qualify for federal aid in the county. This system assists in targeting necessary improvements and maintenance of the roads through continual monitoring of their surface conditions. PAVER was the pavement evaluation system used to evaluate the condition of the Genesee County Road network until 2007. In 2007 the PASER pavement evaluation system, after several years of evaluation, was selected as the system to be used for pavement C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 8

evaluation and in the criteria for TIP project selection. Staff will continue to keep historic PAVER information and will continue to update PASER data in the County s GIS system. Transportation legislation may require changes to the way pavement data is collected. Staff will continue to monitor this issue. 2. Transit Routes The Flint Mass Transportation Authority (MTA) provides over 5.6 million public transit trips annually through six types of service. The MTA currently operates primary routes, senior shopper service, Rides to Groceries, peak routes, regional routes, and paratransit service. There are fourteen primary routes. Thirteen (13) of the primary routes depart from the terminal located at the Inter-modal Transportation Center in downtown Flint. These routes radiate out into the City of Flint and selected locations in Genesee County. The primary fixed routes operate from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on thirty (30) minute intervals and on one (1) hour intervals until 9:30 p.m. Saturday service operates from 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. on one (1) hour intervals and on Sunday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on one (1) hour intervals. The peak routes provide commuter service during peak periods with selected stops, providing service to the general public, workers and student populations. These routes operate weekdays, morning and afternoon. The MTA also provides a demand response paratransit service known as "Your Ride". This service supplements fixed routes and serves those sectors of the public who cannot effectively use the regular fixed route services, due to disability or lack of access to a nearby fixed route. Within the City of Flint, eligibility is limited to persons who have mobility restrictions. Outside the fixed route area, any Genesee County resident can use the Your Ride service. The MTA has eleven (11) Your Ride Service Centers with locations in Burton, East Flint, West Flint, Grand Blanc, Fenton, Flushing, Mt. Morris, Swartz Creek, Clio, Otisville and Davison. Through a State of Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Specialized Services grant program, the MTA provides various community agencies with funding assistance for those populations with specialized transportation needs, such as the elderly and C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 9

3. Air persons with disabilities. The availability of these specialized services makes daily activities possible for many elderly and disabled citizens in various communities throughout Genesee County. Regional Transportation was implemented in September 1997. Regional service routes originate at the MTA Customer Service Center at Harrison and Second Street in Downtown Flint and provide regular scheduled service to adjoining counties. Service is open to the general public but scheduled to meet the needs of Genesee County residents who need transportation to a work site outside of Genesee County. Regional routes are provided for five (5) counties surrounding Genesee County and some routes connect with suburban Detroit transit routes. This service is provided seven (7) days a week to meet the transportation needs of Genesee County residents. Through Transit Planning, staff will continue to address transit needs within Genesee County especially those related to Ladders of Opportunity. Bishop International Airport, dedicated in 1934, serves around 800,000 passengers each year through five (5) commercial airlines and handles more than 23 million pounds of cargo and freight annually. The airport, with a staff of approximately 60 full- and parttime employees, is managed by a nine-member authority appointed by the mayor of Flint and the Genesee County Board of Commissioners. Bishop International Airport finished the first phase of an intermodal expansion project that will capitalize on the Flint area's strategic location along national and international trade corridors. Bishop has direct access to interstates I-69 and I-75 as well as two major railroad systems and also connects to US-23. The first phase of the expansion cost approximately $37 million and was a combination of local and High Priority (HPP) funding. Bishop will continue to work on funding and implementing the remaining phases of the project. Staff will continue to monitor activities involving Bishop Airport through the TSM Coordination activity. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 10

4. Rail Railroad grade crossings have been the major issues in rail transportation. Staff will continue to work with local road agencies to identify and evaluate railroad grade crossings in Genesee County. Grant and earmark funds have provided funding for many railroad improvements in the county and will continue to be pursued. Other important issues include the impact of federal cuts on local AMTRAK service and track improvements. Despite repeated attempts by various administrations to reduce or eliminate federal financial support, there is still a clear Congressional mandate to continue operating a national system of rail passenger service. The Flint AMTRAK terminal is located at the Dort Highway MTA Administration Building. 5. Non-motorized Staff will continue to integrate non motorized transportation into transportation planning in Genesee County. Through activities described in the Update Long-Range Transportation Plan, Transportation System Management, and the Transportation Improvement Program sections of the UWP, staff will address nonmotorized needs and assist local jurisdictions with non-motorized project requests. In 2006 and 2007 staff inventoried the Genesee County non-motorized transportation system, identified a series of potential connecters to create a regional non-motorized transportation system, and completed work on the Genesee County Regional Transportation Plan. Staff, through a local grant awarded to our office, contracted consultants to complete preliminary engineering on the top five priority trails from the plan and is working with local agencies to fund trail construction. Major sections of these top priority trails have been constructed or have received funding commitments since the plan was developed. The trail plan was updated in the 2014 fiscal year as part of the 2040 LRTP update. Staff will continue to work with local road agencies and trail groups to implement the plan. C. STATEWIDE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Genesee County staff was involved in the development of the statewide planning process and uses this model to initiate changes throughout our county planning process. The implementation of the statewide planning process has created additional linkages as C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 11

well as strengthened existing ties with the state in all forms of transportation. As a result of the statewide planning process, staff has been implementing changes in the UWP. Staff will continue to make changes and improvements that are consistent with the statewide planning process in the FY 2019 work program. In the following work elements, staff has indicated how the UWP elements are related to elements in the statewide process. This highlights the coordination and shared data gathering inherent in the planning process. One area of key importance to staff is the opportunity for more coordination on a local, regional and state level. Better coordination through these work items will help to provide ladders of opportunity by working to address gaps in essential services related to transportation connectivity. Please note that GCMPC is identified in the Funding Sources and Funding Use by Agency tables on the following pages rather than Metro. This correctly identifies GCMPC as the entity that provides the match for federal funds and as the entity that is reimbursed for work performed for the identified work items. Additional details regarding funding, hours, and a generalized timeline for each work item can be found in Appendix B, C, D and E. IIIA. DATA MANAGEMENT: DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Objective To collect and process land development, socioeconomic, and transportation data, which will be incorporated into an information management system. This information will be utilized to support all phases of the transportation planning process, including long range transportation planning, congestion management, and the transportation model, and other activities of Metro. Major Work Elements The major work elements can be categorized into the collection, maintenance and processing of land use, socioeconomic, transportation, and geographic information systems (GIS) data. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 12

Land Use Data: The maintenance of a zoning and building permit information file will be continued, with major zoning changes being monitored. The Genesee County Land Use inventory will also be maintained. Socioeconomic Data: This item includes the maintenance, development, and processing of socioeconomic (employment and population) data including CENSUS, REMI, and Woods & Poole databases. Other databases will be evaluated and incorporated into the management system as necessary. The SE projections are the main input into the updated transportation model for the 2045 Long range Transportation Plan update. Transportation Data: Staff will work with other transportation agencies, such as MDOT and the MTA, to develop and maintain transportation related databases and incorporate this information into the management system. Transportation data includes information for automobiles, transit, rail, air, and freight/congestion (RITIS and HERE) and is related to service type, quality, use (counts and speed study), safety, and inventory. Nonmotorized data will be collected on select non-motorized networks such as facility condition and counts. Work items related to Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) data collection for Genesee County are outlined in the Genesee-Lapeer-Shiawassee Region V Planning and Development Commission work program. Staff will also work with MDOT in the formation of a plan regarding the collection of MIRE data. Geographic Information Systems: Staff will continue to transfer and update transportation, socioeconomic and land use data into a GIS format. As more details are released regarding performance measure requirements, staff will work with MDOT, FHWA, and our local units of government to inventory what data is currently being collected and what data needs to be collected. Any new data collection resulting from this effort, or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place, will be conducted under this work item. Products Products will include a maintained database and GIS management system for Genesee County. Reports and graphics illustrating data analysis will be developed as necessary. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 13

Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $9,979 GCMPC $54,981 960 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $45,002 MDOT $7,593 240 MDOT (MTF) $7,593 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $62,574 TOTAL $62,574 1,200 IIIB. DATA MANAGEMENT: MODEL MAINTENANCE AND ANALYSIS Objective To implement, maintain and update the Flint-Genesee County transportation system model (TRANSCAD). This model will be used as the basis for developing current and future transportation plan updates. Model data will be exported to the current version of the air quality emissions model being used to evaluate air quality conformity of the LRTP and TIP, and amendments to each document as necessary and according to what our air quality conformity status dictates. The model may also be used to create sub-area models, information for corridor studies, and alternative analysis, for local units of government or other agencies. Major Work Elements MDOT will update files, as needed, utilizing census data and other data sources and will conduct traffic counts at external stations in Genesee County. The calibrated transportation model, which is a component of the CMP, will be used for the development of the TIP and LRTP, and amendments to each. This includes model exports for air quality analysis for the plans and amendments as necessary and according to what our air quality conformity status dictates. Under this work item staff will attend training related to the air quality emissions model and will work to fully integrate it into the planning process in Genesee County. This includes model updates, testing of the model, potential air quality budget revisions, and analysis for updates or amendments to the TIP and LRTP as needed. Staff will work to better integrate congestion management into the transportation model improving the CMP. Staff will also work to better integrate non-recurring congestion in the CMP. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 14

Staff with the assistance of MDOT and a modeling consultant will use the model for data analysis related to the 2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update. Staff will also work with MDOT to run and update the current transportation model for various transportation studies. Staff will attend trainings in relation to transportation modeling. Products Updates to the model will include changes resulting from amendments to TIP and LRTP projects, and the release of updated transportation and/or socio-economic related data. Staff will run the model for alternative analysis and scenarios as necessary. A fully incorporated emissions model is in place to run conformity analysis as necessary and according to what our air quality conformity status dictates. Updates to the model will be documented and the calibration report will be kept up to date with any new procedures. Staff used model outputs, existing and projected levels of congestion, to identify congested corridors as part of the CMP. Staff will continue to use the model and its outputs for the CMP, and will improve and monitor this process. A modeling consultant will be under contract to assist staff with running the model. The majority of the model analysis for the 2045 LRTP will be in FY 2019. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $15,834 GCMPC $63,947 1,120 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $71,404 MDOT $13,324 400 MDOT (MTF) $13,324 Consultant $23,291 400 TOTAL $100,562 TOTAL $100,562 1,920 IVA. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) PLANNING: TSM ACTIVITY COORDINATION Objective To coordinate a short-range program intended to identify feasible traffic engineering, regulatory, public transportation, and various other measures that would provide for a more efficient utilization of existing transportation facilities. This activity will also enhance and complement the ridesharing C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 15

activity to decrease the number of vehicles on the roadway and the long range transportation planning activity to improve the air quality and decrease energy use in Genesee County. Major Work Elements Staff will prepare for and conduct meetings related to transportation planning such as the Technical Advisory Committee and its subcommittees. Staff will monitor and perform work related to nonmotorized and intermodal transportation, congestion management, access management, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), traffic flow, parking and other transportation system-related elements. This includes work items such as workshops, reports and/or plan development. Staff will continue to evaluate and incorporate transportation related software into the Flint-Genesee County system and evaluate and maintain technologies, such as the GCMPC website, to publish and host work products and information related to transportation planning. Working through the TSM, TAC, and the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance, staff will begin to discuss and evaluate issues related to livability, climate change, tourism, natural disaster threats, and performance measures with the goal of inventorying activities that are already in place to address these issues and to develop a plan for improvement. When developing transportation-related studies and reports staff will be conscious of how the data collected may be beneficial to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to help facilitate Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL). Staff will perform any anticipated and/or unanticipated work including activities resulting from the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically this could include activities related to working cooperatively and collaboratively with MDOT and statewide committees, such as the Statewide Congestion Management Group (SCMG), in the review and development of performance targets and/or activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. The 2045 LRTP includes a preliminary analysis of the Genesee County road network identifying potential locations that may be good candidates for future roundabouts. Staff will work with local units of governments and a consultant to conduct a more detailed study of potential roundabout locations to better assess the feasibility of specific locations. The C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 16

consultant will provide planning level computer simulations, renderings, and other aids for a select number of locations. This will help to identify and prioritize good locations for future roundabouts and will give local units of government planning tools and analysis to use to help gain support for projects. Products Attendance of transportation related meetings including meeting preparation and work requested as staff of these meetings. Maintenance, update, and implementation of plans prepared under this work item including the Regional Trail Plan and I-475 extension feasibility study. A consultant will be contracted to conduct a roundabout study of select locations in Genesee County. Any unanticipated products including those related to FAST Act implementation as described above. Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $109,837 GCMPC $322,142 5,680 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $476,512 MDOT $30,743 920 MDOT (MTF) $30,743 Consultant $264,207 4,680 TOTAL $617,092 TOTAL $617,092 11,280 IVB. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) PLANNING: TRANSIT PLANNING Objective Funding Sources To enhance and continue the development of an efficient and effective transit service in the Flint-Genesee County area. This activity will provide the avenue to perform in-depth studies of transit-related problems in operations/management, service planning, and energy contingency planning. Major Work Elements Funding Use by Agency Staff will be in attendance at MTA meetings including Local Advisory Council meetings. Staff will assist the MTA in the determination of new fixed routes, transit related surveys, ITS integration plan, and the development and update of transit related plans such as the coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan. MTA staff will continue C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 17

to collect information regarding the Your Ride Program and a survey of public and user opinion of the public transit system will be completed. Staff will work with the MTA to ensure transit projects in the TIP and LRTP demonstrate fiscal constraint. Metro will also coordinate with the MTA on matters related to land use issues for the region so that access to public transportation will be a consideration as new developments are planned. Better coordination through this work element will help to provide ladders of opportunity by working to address gaps in essential services related to transportation connectivity. Staff will continue to work with the MTA on implementing recommendations from the recent Transit Asset Management Plan and the I-69, I-75 transit needs studies. Staff will also continue to work with the MTA and consultants on new studies for FY 2019 that include a study to assess electric powered vehicle infrastructure needs in Genesee County to support electric vehicles/busses throughout the county. Staff will perform any unanticipated work including activities resulting from the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA/FTA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically this could include activities related to working with MDOT and the MTA in the review and development of performance targets and/or activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA/FTA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. Products Staff will work with the MTA, MTA consultants, and other planning agencies to develop, update, and implement transit related studies and surveys such as the coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan, transit use and needs survey and study, ridership surveys and ITS Integration Plan as needed. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $0 GCMPC $0 0 MTA $41,024 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $185,005 MDOT $0 0 MDOT (MTF) $0 Consultant $226,029 4,000 TOTAL $226,029 TOTAL $226,029 4,000 *$108,410 is carryover from previous years. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 18

IVC. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) PLANNING: RIDESHARING Objective To continue implementation of an area-wide ridesharing program involving carpools, vanpools and public transportation information services. Promote and implement ridesharing programs within public and private sector organizations; assist individuals in making ridesharing arrangements; and coordinate ridesharing programs with public transportation, energy conservation, air quality and park-and-ride programs. Major Work Elements Staff will maintain a Local Ridesharing Office (LRO) within the offices of the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission (GCMPC), and develop and implement appropriate ridesharing programs to meet the needs of Genesee and Lapeer Counties. Because the Flint-Genesee County area is the employment/service center, the major focus of the ridesharing program will be in the Flint-Genesee County area. Staff will, however, provide a complete program of information and assistance to Lapeer County. Also, staff will maintain and implement a participant match website/database for these areas. Additional services to be provided include the identification of strategic locations for transit friendly car pool lots. Staff will evaluate and implement various promotional/marketing materials and methods for the Rideshare program such as billboard style advertisements, commercials, press releases, informational tables at events, and promotional giveaways such as pens, cups, etc. Products Products for this work item include a maintained Rideshare participant match website/database and marketing materials. Other items will be developed for the Rideshare program as needed. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 19

Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $0 GCMPC $112,271 2,000 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $0 MDOT $0 0 MDOT (MTF) $0 Consultant $0 0 CMAQ $112,271 TOTAL $112,271 2,000 TOTAL $112,271 IVD. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) PLANNING: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Objective To operate a Pavement Management Program for all roads in Genesee County. Major Work Elements Staff will continue to evaluate and monitor ongoing maintenance and reconstruction projects within the pavement management network as to their relationship to the pavement management program. Assistance will be provided to local road agencies for data collection procedures and project selection, implementing maintenance procedures and showing the results of maintenance efforts, data collection as needed, and other pavement management related requests. Staff will continue to integrate pavement management data into the County GIS system. Products Staff will prepare a PASER condition summary for Metro and detailed reports as requested by the local units of government or agencies responsible for roads in Genesee County. Staff will continue to maintain the pavement management system, including software updates, and evaluate and implement new technologies and software as necessary. The main Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council (TAMC) data collection efforts and reports related to pavement management for Genesee County are conducted as part of the Genesee-Lapeer- Shiawassee Region V work program. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 20

Products for this work item include updates to the plan due to changes in projects or requirements that may result from the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically this could include activities related to working with MDOT in the review and development of performance targets and/or activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $443 GCMPC $2,443 40 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $2,000 MDOT $0 0 MDOT (MTF) $0 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $2,443 TOTAL $2,443 40 IVE. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) PLANNING: SAFETY CONSCIOUS PLANNING Objective The FAST Act requires that the metropolitan planning process shall provide for the consideration of projects and strategies that will increase the safety and security of the transportation system for the motorized and non-motorized users. Safety Conscious Planning (SCP) implies a proactive approach to the prevention of accidents and unsafe transportation conditions by establishing an inherently safe transportation network. SCP achieves road safety improvements through small, but measurable, changes targeted at the whole network. The objective is to integrate safety considerations into the core activities of the transportation planning process. Major Work Elements Staff will work to keep the safety website and website links up to date and will work to educate locals on how to use these internet resources to create county and local level safety profiles in real-time. Staff will work with local road agencies to conduct corridor studies on select road segments in Genesee County identifying multimodal safety issues and potential mitigating strategies. Staff will also provide assistance with analysis and studies of high crash corridors and intersections as requested outside of the specified study previously mentioned. The evaluation and C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 21

implementation of safety analysis software will be continued. All safety planning activities will be documented in relevant plans and the GCMPC website. GCMPC will continue to work with the County Management of Information Systems (MIS) Department and potential consultants to improve the security of the data and operation systems. Staff will continue to explore partnerships with other organizations, such as our partnership with the Michigan State Police and Wayne State University for the intersection safety study, to help improve safety and leverage additional safety money for the region. Future partnerships may include organizations such as the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, insurance agencies, and continued partnerships with the Michigan State Police and Wayne State University. In FY 2016 staff began working with MDOT and a consultant on a regional safety study for Genesee, Lapeer, and Shiawassee Counties. Now that the study is complete staff will continue to work with local road agencies on implementation of the study. Staff will perform any unanticipated work including activities resulting from the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically this could include activities related to working with MDOT in the review and development of performance targets and/or activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. Products Products for this work item include analysis and studies of high crash corridors and intersections as requested, updated website with links and instructions to safety analysis tools to create real-time safety profiles, and other transportation safety related work items as needed. Staff will document all safety planning activities on the GCMPC website. Staff will continue to provide local road agencies with safety information and analysis on their road network as part of TIP project selection and also the annual MDOT call for safety projects. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 22

Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $1,204 GCMPC $6,635 120 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $5,431 MDOT $0 0 MDOT (MTF) $0 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $6,635 TOTAL $6,635 120 VA. LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAM: UPDATE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Objective To efficiently maintain and update a compliant multi-modal long range transportation plan. The long range transportation planning program involves the compilation of all the tools for analysis, evaluation and needs identification. These sections contribute the framework, along with a transparent public participation process on which staff develops the long range transportation plan (LRTP). Major Work Elements Staff will monitor and update the 2040 LRTP as needed. Updates will include administrative modifications or amendments due to changes in projects or requirements that may result from the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically for the LRTP this could include activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. Staff will work with MDOT and local road agencies in the development of statewide and local performance measures. Goals and objectives will also be looked at as a starting point for the identification of possible performance measures. The majority of work for the Transportation Model was completed in the 2016 fiscal year as a start to the 2045 LRTP update. LRTP work for the model update will continue in FY 2019 under the Model Maintenance and Analysis work item. The steering committee for the long range transportation plan (LRTP) will continue to meet throughout FY 2019 to guide development of the plan. A major update for the LRTP will be improved integration of performance measures and the development of a mechanism to evaluate and publish C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 23

progress towards meeting performance measure targets. The plan update will need to be approved by January 2020 so the majority of the work on the update will be in FY 2019. When developing the LRTP staff will be conscious of how the data collected may be beneficial to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to help facilitate Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL). Staff will also evaluate how Ladders of Opportunity can best be integrated into the LRTP and improve environmental justice, environmental consultation, and environmental mitigation methodology and documentation. As freight issues and freight planning take on more significance at a national level MPO s have been asked to identify specific tasks in their UWP s to better identify freight planning activities. The following is a listing of activities that outline freight planning in regards to the development and maintenance of the LRTP. MPO staff will work closely with state and federal transportation partners to further integrate freight planning into the transportation planning process including the State Freight Plan. This includes monitoring funding opportunities for regional freight related projects. MPO staff will work closely with local officials and interests to inventory and monitor freight routes and intermodal facilities within the metropolitan area. MPO staff will work closely with local officials and stakeholders to monitor freight related issues within the metropolitan area. Input from freight stakeholders will be sought by MPO staff and considered to successfully integrate freight planning into existing transportation planning processes. Products Products for this work item include updates to the plan due to changes in projects or requirements that may result from the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically, this could include activities related to working with MDOT in the review and development of performance targets and/or activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. Items specific C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 24

to the LRTP update include LRTP Steering Committee meetings, various reports on data collected, and draft plan chapters resulting from changes at the local, state and/or federal level. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $3,827 GCMPC $19,462 360 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $15,635 MDOT $3,871 120 MDOT (MTF) $3,871 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $23,333 TOTAL $23,333 480 Work on the LRTP will be accounted for through indirect staff costs. VIA. PLANNING SUPPORT: TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Objective To provide for administration of the 3-C transportation planning process and provide for the cooperative, continuing, comprehensive and intermodal nature of the entire planning program. Major Work Elements Staff will prepare and process monthly progress reports on the UWP, prepare programs/agendas for policy meetings, prepare the Final Acceptance Report, and attend MTPA Transportation Directors meetings. There will be a review of FAST Act, ACT 51 funding, and Economic Development Fund Programs for updates and to address any required changes as necessary including new legislation. Staff will implement the statewide planning process and work with the MTPA Directors to set priorities and policies such as a uniform financial plan for the various Michigan MPO LRTPs and TIPs. Through this activity, staff will document the evaluation of public outreach efforts of Metro plans, programs, and other work activities as outlined in the PPP. This information will be used to update the PPP and to improve outreach efforts of the various programs administered by the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission. To help incorporate public comment received regarding Metro documents and programs, there will be at least a two-week period between the end of a comment period and committee action following PPP requirements. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 25

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA and FTA) will conduct a federal certification review of the transportation planning process in Genesee County in the 2019 FY. Preparation for the certification review will be conducted under this work item. MDOT activities are related to the administration and review of the PL program. MDOT efforts will focus on the preparation of the Final Acceptance Report, State Review Committee Coordination, MTPA committee meeting attendance, contract administration related to the UWP and overall program administration. MDOT staff will provide for general departmental liaison and coordination with local and regional agencies and the general public. Other MDOT costs involving the more technical activities are indicated under the appropriate work activities. Staff will also continue to maintain formal agreements and work cooperatively with surrounding counties on parts of the Flint/Genesee urbanized area that fall outside the metro planning area (SEMCOG Region). GCMPC will continue efforts for cooperation and coordination across MPO boundaries where appropriate to ensure a regional approach to transportation planning. Products Products for this work item include programs/agendas for policy and committee meetings, Final Acceptance Report for the most recently completed fiscal year, a transportation planning process summary for use by the public, an updated PPP, newsletters and presentations at public meetings as necessary. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $41,441 GCMPC $232,387 4,120 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $190,946 MDOT $13,101 400 MDOT (MTF) $13,101 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $245,488 TOTAL $245,488 4,520 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 26

VIB. PLANNING SUPPORT: DEVELOP UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM (UWP) Purpose To prepare the Unified Work Program (UWP). Major Work Elements Specifically included under this work element is the preparation of the UWP. All work conducted regarding the UWP will be on a cooperative basis involving all local agencies, transportation providers, the general public, and targeting groups that have historically been underserved, who have an interest in transportation planning. Staff will be responsible for outreach, coordination and final preparation of the work program. Any amendments required will be prepared by staff. Products Staff will complete a UWP for FY 2020 and, if required, amendments to the FY 2019 UWP. In addition, changes will be made to the UWP as a result of any new planning regulations. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $1,787 GCMPC $9,845 160 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $8,058 MDOT $1,935 40 MDOT (MTF) $1,935 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $11,780 TOTAL $11,780 200 VIC. PLANNING SUPPORT: PREPARE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) Purpose To efficiently prepare a multi-modal TIP outlining the projects being proposed, justification, type of improvement, priority rating, and respective costs through a transparent public process meeting the federal guidelines established for a TIP. In addition, this work element includes the maintenance of the TIP through amendments and administrative modifications as required. Changes to the TIP will also be made as a result of the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 27

requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Major Work Elements The FY 2017-2020 TIP document was developed and approved in FY 2016. FY 2019 work items for the FY 2017-2020 TIP will focus on maintenance of the TIP, which include working with TIP project agencies to monitor project status, preparation of status reports, preparation of amendments and administrative modifications to the TIP as requested by the TIP project agencies, air quality analysis related to TIP amendments as need/required, preparation and publication of an annual report as outlined in FAST Act, and public participation and documentation of public participation for the previously identified work items following the Public Participation Plan requirements. Changes will also be made to the TIP as a result of the interpretation and/or implementation of certain FAST Act requirements by FHWA and/or MDOT or any new state or federal transportation legislation that may be put in place. Specifically for the TIP this could include working with MDOT in the development of performance targets and/or activities resulting from new guidance released from FHWA or development of specific performance measures by MDOT. The integration of standardized General Program Accounts (GPA s) will help to streamline the TIP process including reducing the amount and frequency of amendments. Staff will continue to use and update the Excel based TIP spreadsheet as the official TIP listing of projects until JobNet is approved for use. Staff will continue to work with agencies statewide to make the TIP process more uniform statewide. The FY 2020-2023 TIP will be developed during the 2019 fiscal year. FY2020-2023 TIP work items will include a call for projects, project site visits, project analysis, project selection, public participation, fiscal constraint demonstration, and the development of the TIP document. A major update for the TIP will be improved integration of performance measures and the development of a mechanism to evaluate and publish progress towards meeting performance measure targets. As freight issues and freight planning take on more significance at a national level MPO s have been asked to identify specific tasks in their UWP s to better identify freight planning activities. The following is a listing of activities that outline freight planning in regards to the development and maintenance of the TIP. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 28

MPO staff will work closely with state and federal transportation partners to further integrate freight planning into the transportation planning process including the State Freight Plan. This includes monitoring funding opportunities for regional freight related projects. MPO staff will work closely with local officials and interests to inventory and monitor freight routes and intermodal facilities within the metropolitan area. MPO staff will work closely with local officials and stakeholders to monitor freight related issues within the metropolitan area. Improving the coordination between transit, non-motorized interests and road agencies during project development and selection through this work element will help to provide ladders of opportunity by working to address gaps in essential services related to transportation connectivity. Staff will continue to improve environmental justice, environmental consultation, and environmental mitigation methodology and documentation for the TIP. Products Products for this work item include amendments and administrative modifications to the FY 2017-2020 TIP as necessary, an updated TIP database, TIP project status reports, and documentation of TIP public participation/outreach efforts. The FY 2020-2023 TIP will be developed and approved in FY 2019. Staff will also publish, in accordance with the TIP notice requirements as identified in the PPP, an annual listing of projects that were obligated, let for bid, under construction and/or completed during the previous fiscal year no more than 90 calendar days following the end of the represented fiscal year. Funding Sources Funding Use by Agency Agency Cost Agency Cost Hours GCMPC $29,801 GCMPC $172,126 3,040 MTA $0 MTA $0 0 FHWA (PL) $142,325 MDOT $3,870 120 MDOT (MTF) $3,870 Consultant $0 0 TOTAL $175,996 TOTAL $175,996 3,160 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 29

APPENDICES Please note that the represented numbers in the following charts may vary slightly from the real numbers as they have been rounded through Excel and/or by a conversion formula. C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 30

APPENDIX A BUDGET NARRATIVE AND INDIRECT COST ESTIMATES C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 31

BUDGET NARRATIVE Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2019 will begin on October 1, 2018 and end on September 30, 2019. Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission and Mass Transportation Contractual Relationship The FTA funds shown in this UWP will be applied for by staff. The MTA will contract with the staff to carry out a portion of the work. Each agency will provide its own local match for the federal funds it receives. GCMPC GCMPC will provide its own cash match for FHWA funding. The match (18.15% for FHWA) will be shown in the funding source table next to the agency participating. MDOT Match Local match for MTF funds will be shown in the UWP for fiscal year 2019. MDOT (MTF, 20%) will be shown separately from SPR (federal share, 80%). Cost Estimation Methodology The dollar amounts shown in the responsible agency table are based on weekly cost estimates to finance a professional planner with support services. The dollar amount estimates include all fringes and support services. Estimates for labor are as follows: Agency Labor Cost/Week GCMPC $2,267 MDOT $1,349 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 32

APPENDIX B FISCAL YEAR 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM FUNDING SOURCES C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 33

C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc FUNDING SOURCES FISCAL YEAR 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM Activities GCMPC PL PL Transit Carry Over--PL Carry Over Ridesharing* HPP* Subtotal MTF Total PL Transit (GCMPC) (MDOT) III. DATA MANAGEMENT A. Data Management Systems $9,979 $43,377 $1,625 $54,981 $7,593 $62,574 B. Data Inventory and Model Maintenance $15,834 $45,681 $2,432 $23,291 $87,238 $13,324 $100,562 Subtotal $25,813 $89,058 $4,057 $23,291 $142,219 $20,917 $163,136 IV. TSM PLANNING A. TSM Coordination $109,837 $192,356 $19,949 $264,207 $586,349 $30,743 $617,092 B. Transit Planning ** $41,024 $0 $76,595 $108,410 $226,029 $0 $226,029 C. Ridesharing $112,271 $112,271 $0 $112,271 D. Pavement Management $443 $2,000 $2,443 $0 $2,443 E. Safety Planning $1,204 $5,431 $6,635 $0 $6,635 Subtotal $152,509 $199,787 $96,544 $264,207 $108,410 $112,271 $0 $933,728 $30,743 $964,471 V. LONG-RANGE PLANNING A. Update Long Range Transportation Plan $3,827 $14,523 $1,112 $19,462 $3,871 $23,333 Subtotal $3,827 $14,523 $1,112 $0 $0 $19,462 $3,871 $23,333 VI. PLANNING SUPPORT A. Program Management $41,441 $179,115 $11,831 $232,387 $13,101 $245,488 B. Develop Unified Work Program $1,787 $7,578 $480 $9,845 $1,935 $11,780 C. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program $29,801 $109,558 $32,767 $172,126 $3,870 $175,996 Subtotal $73,029 $296,251 $45,078 $0 $0 $414,358 $18,906 $433,264 34 GRAND TOTAL $255,178 $599,619 $146,791 $287,498 $108,410 $112,271 $0 $1,509,767 $74,437 $1,584,204 **$41,024 of match to be provided by the MTA $599,619 $146,791 *Ridesharing Funds are being requested under a separate application. GCMPC-Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Local Match Studies and other contracted services PL-Federal Funds for Planning Activities from the Federal Highway Administration Amounts shown below represent Federal Funds equaling 81.85% of total. PL Transit-Federal funds for Transit Planning from Federal Transit Administration Transportation Model Technical Support $23,291 Ridesharing-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds. TSM Coordination -- Roundabout Location Feasability Study $264,207 MTF-Michigan Transportation Fund Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Study $156,805 HPP-High Priority Projects MTA Transit Planning -- Transit Studies $25,000

Funding Sources - Transportation Planning Funds and GCMPC Match Activities GCMPC PL Total A. DATA MANAGEMENT 1. Data Management Systems $9,979 $45,002 $54,981 2. Data Inventory and Model Maintenance $15,834 $71,404 $87,238 Subtotal $25,813 $116,406 $142,219 II. TSM Planning 1. TSM Coordination $105,665 $476,512 $582,177 2. Transit Planning $41,024.32 $185,005 $226,029 3. Ridesharing $0 $0 $0 4. Pavement Management $443 $2,000 $2,443 5. Safety Planning $1,204 $5,431 $6,635 Subtotal $148,337 $668,948 $817,285 C. LONG-RANGE PLANNING 1. Update Long Range Transportation Plan $3,467 $15,635 $19,102 Subtotal $3,467 $15,635 $19,102 D. PLANNING SUPPORT 1. Program Management $42,342 $190,946 $233,288 2. Develop Unified Work Program $1,787 $8,058 $9,845 3. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program $31,560 $142,325 $173,885 Subtotal $75,689 $341,329 $417,018 GRAND TOTAL $253,306 $1,142,318 $1,395,624 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 35

APPENDIX C FISCAL YEAR 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 36

RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM Activities GCMPC MDOT MTA CONSULTANT TOTAL I. DATA MANAGEMENT A. Data Management Systems $54,981 $7,593 $0 $0 $62,574 B. Data Inventory and Model Maintenance $63,947 $13,324 $0 $23,291 $100,562 Subtotal $118,928 $20,917 $23,291 $163,136 II. TSM PLANNING A. TSM Coordination $322,142 $30,743 $0 $264,207 $617,092 B. Transit Planning $0 $0 $0 $226,029 $226,029 C. Ridesharing $112,271 $0 $0 $0 $112,271 D. Pavement Management $2,443 $0 $0 $0 $2,443 E. Safety Planning $6,635 $0 $0 $0 $6,635 Subtotal $443,492 $30,743 $0 $490,236 $964,471 III. LONG-RANGE PLANNING A. Update Long RangeTransportation Plan $19,462 $3,871 $0 $0 $23,333 IV. PLANNING SUPPORT A. Program Management $232,387 $13,101 $0 $0 $245,488 B. Develop Unified Work Program $9,845 $1,935 $0 $0 $11,780 C. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program $172,126 $3,870 $0 $0 $175,996 Subtotal $414,358 $18,906 $433,264 GRAND TOTAL $996,240 $74,437 $0 $513,527 $1,584,204 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 37

APPENDIX D FISCAL YEAR 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM - LABOR ESTIMATES C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 38

LABOR ESTIMATES UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM GCMPC MDOT MTA CONSULTANTS TOTAL Activities HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS I. DATA MANAGEMENT A. Data Management Systems 960 240 0 0 1200 B. Data Inventory and Model Maintenance 1120 400 0 400 1920 Subtotal 2080 640 0 400 3120 II. TSM PLANNING A. TSM Coordination 5680 920 0 4,680 11280 B. Transit Planning 0 0 0 4,000 4000 C. Ridesharing 2000 0 0 0 2000 D. Pavement Management 40 0 0 0 40 E. Safety Planning 120 0 0 0 120 Subtotal 7840 920 0.0 8680 17440 III. LONG-RANGE PLANNING A. Update Long RangeTransportation Plan 360 120 0 0 480 Subtotal 360 120 0 0 480 IV. PLANNING SUPPORT A. Program Management 4120 400 0 0 4520 B. Develop Unified Work Program 160 40 0 0 200 C. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program 3040 120 0 0 3160 Subtotal 7320 560 0 0 7880 GRAND TOTAL 17600 2240 0 9080 28920 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 39

APPENDIX E FISCAL YEAR 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM - FLOW CHART C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 40

C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc FLOW CHART UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM Activities Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. I. DATA MANAGEMENT A. Data Management Systems B. Data Inventory and Model Maintenance II. TSM PLANNING A. TSM Coordination B. Transit Planning Release of RFP for Electronic Vehicle Infrastructure Needs Study Electronic Vehicle Infrastructure Needs Study consultant selected Electronic Vehicle Infrastructure Needs Study Development of Draft Electronic Vehicle Infrastructure Needs Study Final Report C. Ridesharing D. Pavement Management III. LONG-RANGE PLANNING A. Update Long RangeTransportation Plan Data collection complete, data analysis, draft technical reports, goals, objectives, p. measures draft technical reports, goals, objectives, p. measures, call for projects Project level analysis (model/cmp) and public participation and begin final plan draft Final draft of the plan ready for committee review IV. PLANNING SUPPORT A. Program Management B. Develop Unified Work Program C. Prepare Transportation Improvement Program 41

APPENDIX F Resolution C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 42

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FY 2019 UNIFIED WORK PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance (Metro) is the designated policy committee and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Flint-Genesee County Transportation Planning Study Area, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning Organization is responsible for the development of a Unified Work Program (UWP) which is required by both the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration, and WHEREAS, the Flint-Genesee County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan and the FY 2019 Unified Work Program have been developed pursuant to Section 134 of Title 23 as amended, United States Code and Section 8(f) of the Federal Transit Act, and WHEREAS, the FY 2019 Unified Work Program includes an analysis that identifies sources of anticipated revenue, responsible agencies and demonstrates how identified projects will be funded, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, it is the finding by the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance that the FY 2019 Unified Work Program is consistent with the Flint-Genesee County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance approves the FY 2019 Unified Work Program, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the current FY 2018 Unified Work Program remain in effect until the FY 2019 Unified Work Program has been approved by the Michigan Department of Transportation and the Governor, and has been found acceptable by the Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration. Robert Johnson, Chairperson Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance DATE: C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 43

APPENDIX G Certification C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 44

CERTIFICATE OF INDIRECT COSTS This is to certify that I have reviewed the indirect cost rate proposal submitted herewith and to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) All costs included in this proposal June 22, 2018 to establish billing or final indirect costs rates for October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019 are allowable in accordance with the requirements of the Federal award(s) to which they apply and 2 CFR part 225, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments. Unallowable costs have been adjusted for in allocating costs as indicated in the cost allocation plan. (2) All costs included in this proposal are properly allocable to Federal awards on the basis of a beneficial or causal relationship between the expenses incurred and the agreements to which they are allocated in accordance with applicable requirements. Further, the same costs that have been treated as indirect costs have not been claimed as direct costs. Similar types of costs have been accounted for consistently and the Federal Government will be notified of any accounting changes that would affect the predetermined rate. I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. Governmental Unit: Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Signature: Name of Official: Derek Bradshaw Title: Director Coordinator Date of Execution: June 22, 2018 C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 45

APPENDIX H Title VI Certification C:\Users\nordbe1j\Desktop\Pre-UWP\uwp19DraftBlackText.doc 46

ROOM 223 1101 BEACH STREET FLINT, MI 48502-1470 (810) 257-3010 FAX (810) 257-3185 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Members of the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance Sharon Gregory, Planner III Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission DATE: May 16, 2018 SUBJECT: FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment # 12 Attached is the description of proposed projects in the FY 2017-2020 TIP Amendment # 12. This amendment adds eight (8) projects and changes one (1) project. This amendment meets the financial constraints of the TIP and will have no disproportionately high or adverse impacts to any of the identified Environmental Justice (EJ) populations in Genesee County. The projects that are being amended are eligible for the funding programmed, and they meet the intended state (including State TEDF Category C) and federal goals and objectives identified for the funding. The projects in this amendment do not require Air Quality Conformity Analysis. At this time, the Technical Advisory Committee is recommending approval of the attached Amendment #12 to the FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program to the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ORGANIZATION K:\trans\TIP\2017-2020\Amendments\Amendment_12\TIP amend 12 memo Metro.docx XI A

FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program Proposed Amendment # 12 Projects proposed to be added with a TIP Amendment Year Agency Project Length Limits Description Phase Fund Type Federal State Local Total Cost Comments 2018 MDOT M-54 n/a M-54 north of Saginaw St. Culvert Replacement CON ST $ 135,683 $ 30,087 $ - $ 165,770 New project 2018 MDOT I-75 15.7 I-75 and US-23 in Genesee County Median and Wrong Way Delineation CON HSIP $ 196,238 $ 21,804 $ - $ 218,042 New project 2018 MDOT Railroad Grade Crossing n/a Emily Street at Huron and Eastern Railway in the City of Flushing Install Flashing-light signals and half-roadway gates CON STRP $ 225,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 250,000 New project Potter Road at Huron and Eastern Install Flashing-light signals and 2018 MDOT Railroad Grade Crossing n/a CON STRP $ 180,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ 200,000 New project Railway in Flushing Township half-roadway gates 2019 MDOT I-69 W 65.5 I-69, I-75/US-23 Delineator Installation CON HSIP $ 504,926 $ 56,103 $ - $ 561,029 New project 2019 MDOT M-54 n/a M-54 signals from Court St. to Leith St. Signal Modernization and Synchronization CON CMG $ 814,787 $ - $ - $ 814,787 New project 2019 MDOT M-57 0.2 M-57 at Irish Rd. Roundabout Installation PE HSIP $ 208,356 $ 22,701 $ - $ 231,507 New project 2018 Genesee County Road Commission Potter Rd. at the Huron & Eastern Railroad (HESR) 0.15 At grade RR crossing to.15 mi East Vertical Grade Correction CON STRH $ 169,000 $ 19,000 $ - $ 188,000 New project Project proposed to be changed with a TIP Amendment Year Agency Project Length Limits Description Phase Fund Type Federal State Local Total Cost Comments 2020 GCRC Argentine LAFF Pathway (LAFF is Linden, Argentine, Fenton, Fenton Twp.) 1.40 Chestnut Way to Haviland Beach Drive Construct Non-Motorized Path CON TAU and TA $432,810 $1,008,276 $ - $110,000 $108,203 $542,810 $1,116,479 TA funding of $575,466 added to project CMG--Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality - 100% Federal HSIP--Highway Safety Improvement Program - SAFETEA-LU ST--Surface Transportation Program (STP) - Any Area STRP--Surface Transportation Safety Highway Crossing Protection Devices TA--Transportation Alternatives Program Flex TAU--Transportation Alternatives Urban Areas > 200K Population STRH--Surface Transportation Safety Highway Crossing Hazard Elimination

ROOM 223 1101 BEACH STREET FLINT, MI 48502-1470 (810) 257-3010 FAX (810) 257-3185 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Members of the Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance Sharon Gregory, Planner III Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission DATE: May 16, 2018 SUBJECT: Review of Current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Policies, Procedures, and Project Applications The Call for Projects for the FY 2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) will be released this fall, however, policies, procedures, and project applications must be put in place prior to the release of the call. Attached you will find the current policies, procedures, and applications for the FY 2017-2020 TIP. Staff will be setting up Transportation System Management (TSM) Subcommittee meetings over the next several months to finalize the policies, procedures, and project applications for the FY 2020-2023 TIP Call for Projects, so please begin to review this information. Past discussion items related to TIP policies and procedures have included the use of federal funds for engineering, capped vs. uncapped funding, changing the points available for application items such as road condition and traffic, and setasides for preservation and reconstruction projects. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ORGANIZATION K:\trans\Metro\2018\Review of TIP Policies Procedures and applications.docx XI B

Section 7: TIP Assurances, Procedures, and Policies 54

Project Selection and Prioritization Policy The following policy has been drafted to establish an objective method of selecting Federal Transportation projects on the basis of local priorities. The selection process shall be a natural progression of projects from the current Flint- Genesee County Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), the Congestion Management Plan, the Transit Long Range Transportation Plan and the MDOT 5 Year Plan. The oversight of this process shall be through a Transportation System Management (TSM) task force. The designated task force shall be a subcommittee of the Technical Advisory Committee organized under Section 143 of Title 23. Local project selection shall be done on a point rating system as identified in the TIP application. In order to objectively evaluate the project proposals, they must contain the following information: 1. The scope of the project, including termini, where applicable 2. A description of work 3. A realistic estimate of costs 4. Match The project prioritization process shall be done by fiscal year and by funding category. These funding categories include the following: STU (Surface Transportation Urban (also includes Flex funding) eligible activities include; preserve, expand, improve, transit, safety, bridge, enhancement, and studies. NH (National Highway System) for projects located on the National Highway System STL (Surface Transportation Local) eligible activities include; preserve, expand, improve, transit, safety, bridge, enhancement, and studies in areas outside of the urban boundary. TAU Transportation Alternatives Program Non-motorized forms of transportation including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals Economic Development Category C (EDC) State expand projects Section 5307 urbanized transit program Section 5310 Transit Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Section 5311 Transit Formula Grants for Rural Areas Section 5339 Transit Bus and Bus Facilities Flex Funds FAST Act allows for the flexing of funds between highway and transit projects. If the MPO decides that it is in its best interest to shift dollars to either transit or highway interests, an application to flex funds will be submitted to FTA and FHWA for their approval prior to obligating these funds. CM/CMG Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) Financial Constraint Projects to be included in the TIP shall be consistent with the Federal, State, and Local allocations or fund balance. Funds and funding sources must be reasonably available. Although projects may be moved between years within the TIP, the funding must remain in the year it was programmed. Implementation of projects from the TIP will be on a first-come, first-served basis within each funding source until obligational authority is expended. 55

Plan Preparation Guidelines It will be the policy of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to direct all agencies submitting projects for consideration to include the items listed below as part of the Preserve, Safety and Expand applications, and that the associated costs be submitted in the application and considered in the evaluation. - Drainage structures (curb and gutter or shoulders and ditches), - Signs and markings, - Traffic signals, - Base improvements, - Guardrail, - Provision of adequate lateral clearance, - Safety Improvements - ADA Accessibility - Access Management - Any other items that are needed to complete a properly designed highway project Preliminary and Construction Engineering Guidelines Construction engineering costs up to 15% (of the construction cost) and preliminary engineering cost up to 10% (of the construction cost) will be allowed as part of the application for TIP projects, and are therefore eligible for federal funds. If preliminary and/or construction engineering is applied for, construction must be scheduled within the next three (3) years of the TIP. Applicants using federal funds for engineering services should be aware that potential Conflict of Interest issues could arise when obtaining engineering services. Please refer to MDOT for detailed guidelines on Conflict of Interest concerning engineering services. The request for either of these funds must be identified in the application, and can t have already taken place. The agency will not be reimbursed for work that has already taken place prior to the approval of the current TIP. All work must follow the MDOT Engineering Procurement Procedures. Project Construction Guidelines The project construction costs are pro-rata (not capped) at the funding levels as identified in the approved TIP for any projects using local federal funds (STU, Flex, STL, NH and EDC-State). Administrative Modification An administrative modification to the TIP will be defined as: 1. Change in the project year 2. Change in funding type 3. Change in the terminus less than ¼ mile (1,320 feet) 3. Cost of the project increases or decreases less than 25% An administrative modification does not require formal approval by TAC or GCMA. 56

Amendment Policy An amendment to the TIP will be defined as: 1. Project added or deleted 2. Change in the scope 3. Change in the terminus more than ¼ mile (1,320 feet) 4. Cost of the project increases or decreases by 25% or more An amendment to the TIP will be brought to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Metropolitan Alliance. An amendment will require action by both TAC and GCMA following the requirements established in the Public Participation Plan (PPP). The MPO must approve the TIP and TIP amendments as being in compliance with the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) as stated in 40 CFR part 51 of the Transportation Conformity Air Quality Rule. Reprogramming Policy The following policy shall apply to reprogramming existing funds within the current TIP. A. If the project has not held a grade inspection by March 1 st of the assigned fiscal year, the funds will be recaptured and distributed to any project in the current TIP that has the ability to obligate the funds in the current fiscal year. B. If the project has not been obligated by MDOT by May 15 th of the assigned fiscal year, the funds will be recaptured and distributed to any project in the current TIP that has the ability to obligate the funds in the current fiscal year. C. If the federal funds being obligated are below the original estimate, the additional funds will be recaptured and distributed to any project in the current TIP that has the ability to obligate the funds in the current fiscal year. D. In the event additional funds become available, projects in the succeeding year will be eligible based on available funding and their ability to meet deadlines for obligation. E. Withdrawn or rescheduled TIP projects will be eligible for reinstatement after 2 years. F. All reprogramming recommendations shall be completed under the established process for amending the TIP. 57

Expand Projects U.C. ACT 231 OF 1987 As part of the ongoing transportation planning process in Genesee County, GCMPC staff developed a Congestion Management Process (CMP) in conjunction with MDOT, local jurisdictions and road agencies along with Mass Transportation Authority. The CMP identifies congested road segments and intersections in Genesee County. Road agencies seeking funding for road expansion must consult the CMP, which is integrated into the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, as all expand projects must be part of the CMP to be eligible for funding. In order to submit an expand application, a project for through capacity must qualify for urban congestion funding and meet the following criteria: a) If the segment of the roadway is two-lane, it must have an average daily traffic (ADT) count of at least 10,000 vehicles, or an ADT of 25,000 vehicles for a four lane segment of roadway as of July 1, 1993. b) The segment of roadway must have the functional classification above local road and/or rural minor collector. c) The road must be Federal Aid Eligible d) Improvements must be of a lasting nature (not maintenance improvements) e) Local road agencies that are seeking to make capacity improvements must provide documentation that Strategies #1 through #4 from the CMP toolbox have been used, and they must identify those results. If the LRA has exhausted all appropriate strategies for their corridor, then adding capacity may be considered as a final step. All reconstruction and expansion projects require non-motorized improvements where feasible. 58

Congestion Management Process (CMP) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN System Identification Genesee County Congestion Management Process Process Products Through a CMP literature review during the last LRTP update, it was found that most other MPOs use the federal-aid road network to define the CMP network. The CMP network was expanded from the select group of corridors used in the previous CMP to include the entire federal-aid road network. This network was used to evaluate congestion on a system-wide basis for the base year and horizon year of the Long Range Transportation Plan. In the future, staff may identify specific corridors within the network for further analysis. System Identification Develop Performance Measures Monitor & Evaluate Performance Strategy Identification Strategy Selection Project Implementation Policy, Planning, Project Selection Transportation Plan Transportation Improvement Program Performance Evaluation Develop Performance Measures GCMA uses Level of Service (LOS) as a performance measure for congestion in the CMP. The LOS is derived from volume to capacity ratios as illustrated in the following table. A grade of A through F is assigned to all roadways in the CMP network. Roadways assigned a LOS A demonstrate free-flow traffic while LOS F, being the worst rating, signifies a system failure where the roadway is completely shut down with congestion. The LOS on any given roadway in the CMP network was calculated through the use of the Genesee County Urban Travel Demand Model. Staff will continue the use of this performance measure to evaluate congestion on Genesee County roadways in future analysis. 59

Volume to Capacity Severity Ranges Volume to Capacity Severity Ranges Volume to Capacity Ratio Operating Conditions Severity Level of Service (LOS) 0 to 0.84 0.85 to 0.99 Traffic at free to stable flow High density of traffic, but stable flow (Approaching Congestion) A-C D STABLE FLOW 1.00 to 1.24 1.25 and greater Unstable flow lower speed some stops Forced or breakdown traffic flow many stops E F CONGESTED 60

Monitor and Evaluate Performance An inventory identifying the current performance of the roadway was built to begin to properly monitor the roadway performance within the CMP network. The LOS on any given roadway in the CMP network is calculated through the use of the Genesee County Urban Travel Demand Model. LOS grades of A, B, and C are considered congestion-free. An LOS grade of D is considered to be approaching congestion along a roadway. A roadway receiving an LOS grade of E or F is considered congested. Most of the efforts of the GCMA CMP are aimed at relieving congested segments (LOS E or F ), while some proactive efforts will be investigated to mitigate future congestion along those roadways approaching congestion (LOS D ). A Speed Study Performance Program was implemented in 2008 and concentrated on select roadways and corridors that are slated for improvement projects in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to help evaluate roadway performance. To build an adequate inventory of data, staff included a survey of select high-volume, congested corridors in Genesee County. To monitor the future performance on a system-wide basis, LOS grades will be re-determined during every Long Range Transportation Plan update. As a system-wide benchmark for the CMP, the GCMA will manage the network to operate at a LOS D or better. Strategy Identification The GCMA CMP includes 5 different strategy categories that could be used to manage congestion in Genesee County. The structure of the CMP toolbox has the strategies assembled for use in a top-down approach. This approach ensures that solutions that reduce or shift auto trips or improve roadway operations are evaluated before adding roadway capacity. Congestion Management solutions will include the implementation of Transportation System Management (TSM), Travel Demand Management (TDM), and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improvements. Staff used the toolbox to determine if the strategies presented in the proposed projects were indeed suitable to help manage congestion in Genesee County. 61

The FAST Act allows for the flexibility of funds to be shifted between highway and transit projects. If the MPO decides that it is in its best interest to shift dollars to either transit or highway interests, applications to transfer funds must be submitted to FTA for their approval prior to obligating these funds. The FTA must determine that all Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements are met by the local transit authority before transit funds can be flexed. Citizen input shall be obtained during the call for project period and through a public hearing process that shall be held prior to the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) finalizing the TIP. Initiation of projects shall be the responsibility of the appropriate implementing agency having jurisdiction of the facility. All projects to be funded with Federal Transportation funds must be in conformance with Section 8 of the Federal Transit Act and Section 134 and Section 135 of Title 23 United States Code. Implementation of projects from the TIP will be on a first-come, first-served basis within each funding source until the funds are exhausted. Projects to be included in the TIP shall be consistent with the Federal, State, and Local allocations or fund balance. Funds and funding sources must be reasonably available. Although projects may be moved between years within the TIP, the funding must remain in the year it was programmed. The MPO must approve the TIP and TIP amendments as being in compliance with the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and the CAAA less than 40 CFR parts 51 of the Transportation Conformity Air Quality Rule. Local projects that are withdrawn or rescheduled from the TIP by the local jurisdiction must receive MPO approval to avoid a two-year reinstatement restriction. In the event that project costs exceed those stated in the TIP, the following procedures will be taken by the MPO: 1. Money shall be taken from another uncommitted project of the local unit irrespective of fiscal year. There is also the option to do an Advance Construct project using future funds awarded to that local unit. The project losing funding may need to be revised to accommodate new funding levels. If the project can t be revised due to the updated funding levels, the project will need to be withdrawn and reinstated after two years. 2. If the local jurisdiction has no other project in that year from which to draw funds, money can be taken from the project with the lowest TIP score (which is not committed to contract). The project losing funding will be moved to the succeeding year's TIP. 3. If cost overruns occur on the final eligible project, the project will be moved to the succeeding TIP year. If funding remains, the succeeding year s projects will then be available based on remaining funding. In the event additional funds become available, the current year's projects will have priority. 62

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Local Funding Priorities The Federal CMAQ Program was created to provide a link between TEA-21, now FAST, and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA). The primary purpose of the CMAQ program is to fund projects and programs in non-attainment areas that reduce transportation related emissions and contribute to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Individual projects must show emission reductions in order to be eligible for CMAQ Program funds. CMAQ Program funds may not be used as replacement funding for transportation activities that would normally be undertaken. The Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance (GCMA) is given the authority by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) to allocate the local portion of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program approximately $1.6 million dollars in funding for projects that reduce congestion and provide benefits to air quality. The following scoring system is recommended for awarding CMAQ funds to local projects in Genesee County. Fiscal Year (FY) 2017-2020 CMAQ Funding Priorities Projects must be from eligible local road agencies, transit agencies, and planning agencies for FY 2017-2020 CMAQ Program Projects must meet all existing criteria for eligibility determination Small variations on the targets (+/- 5%) may be needed to balance out the total CMAQ funds for the entire non-attainment area Lapeer County and MDOT funds are chosen separately from this process. This process applies to Genesee County local projects only Projects will be scored against one another in each specific funding category as follows: Category 1--Intersection Improvements Corridor improvements can be funded at up to 100% federal funds; 0% local match. Single intersection projects will be funded at 80% federal funds, 20% local match. Roundabouts are funded at 100% federal funds; 0% local match. Intersection improvements can account for up to 40% of the total project funding available for local Genesee County CMAQ projects when combined with all four years of funding or as one individual year s worth of projects Estimated funding for FY 2017 is $641,556 or $2,566,224 for FY 2017-2020 If the corridor involves signal timing of MDOT intersections, it is recommended to request a partnership project with MDOT participation from the MDOT available CMAQ funds Priority will also be given to corridors that have not received CMAQ funding in the past or need additional funding in order to complete a previously awarded CMAQ project 63

Category 2--Transit Projects Funded at 80% federal funds; 20% local match Transit projects can account for up to 40% of the total project funding available for local Genesee County CMAQ projects when combined with all four years of funding or as one individual year s worth of projects Estimated funding for FY 2017 is $641,556 or $2,566,224 for FY 2017-2020 Projects for low emission vehicles and diesel retrofits will be given priority Category 3--Non-Motorized Transportation Projects Funded at 80% federal funds; 20% local match Non-motorized transportation projects can account for up to 13% of the total project funding available for local Genesee County CMAQ projects when combined with all four years of funding or as one individual year s worth of projects Estimated funding for FY 2017 is $208,506 or $834,024 for FY 2017-2020 Projects that do not require right-of-way acquisition will be given priority, as will projects being constructed in conjunction with a road project, and projects connecting to an existing non-motorized facility Project can include bike lanes and 10-foot non-motorized paths Project must provide a transportation benefit, not for recreational purposes only Scoring Criteria (100 points total) A. 80 points - VOC ranking best air quality benefit project receives most points (Top VOC ranking receives 80 points, second project receives 75 points, third VOC ranking project, receives 70 points, and so on in 5 point intervals B. 10 points - constructed in conjunction with a road project C. 10 points - projects connecting to an existing non-motorized facility D. Projects that require right-of-way acquisition will automatically move to the bottom of the prioritized list Category 4--Ridesharing, Vanpooling and Carpooling Programs Funded at 100% federal funds; 0% local match Ridesharing, vanpooling, and carpooling programs can account for up to 7% of the total project funding available for local Genesee County CMAQ projects when combined with all four years of funding or as one individual year s worth of projects Estimated funding for FY 2017 is $112,271 or $449,084 for FY 2017-2020. Must be an area-wide program Category Percentage of Funding Estimated Funding for FY 2017 Estimated Funding FY 2017 2020 Intersection Improvements 40% $641,556 $2,566,224 Transit 40% $641,556 $2,566,224 Non Motorized 13% $208,506 $834,024 Rideshare, Vanpooling, Carpooling 7% $112,271 $449,084 100% $1,603,889 $6,415,556 64

FY 2017-2020 TIP Application Packet 292

Preservation/Reconstruction Application Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 Prepared by the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission staff. 1 293

Preservation/Reconstruction Project Application Please Complete and Attach as a Front Cover to your Application TO: Sharon Gregory, Planner III Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Please indicate application type: Preservation Application (73% of funds in this category are reserved for preservation projects) Reconstruction Application (27% of funds in this category are reserved for reconstruction projects) Application Agency: Contact Person: Phone/E-Mail: Proposed Project Information (Please attach commitment from local funding agency in the form of a Resolution of Support. This is required for eligibility) Road Name Point of Beginning Point of End Project length in Miles Current Number of Lanes Number of Lane Feet in Project Current Pavement Width Current ADT MDOT Project Description: (Please refer to list provided) NOTE: Please provide a narrative describing the details of the project on the following page. Please be specific and feel free to attach additional pages. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 2 294

Detailed Project Description K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 3 295

Please provide a list of any alternatives to the proposed improvement and a brief explanation as to their shortcomings. Alt #1 Alt #2 K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 4 296

Diagrams of the existing segment, intersection, or area drawn at an appropriate scale and in sufficient detail to describe the existing situation and proposed improvement. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 5 297

Estimated Project Cost Item Total Cost Federal Funds Requested Local Match Other Source of Funds R.O.W $ (100%) (Y/N) Preliminary $ (80%)Max (20%) Min (Y/N) Engineering $ $ Construction $ (80%)Max (20%) Min (Y/N) Engineering $ $ Construction $ (80%) Max (20%) Min (Y/N) $ $ Total Project cost $ $ $ (Y/N) Funds Type & Amount NOTE: The PE and CE must be identified above to be eligible for funding. Proposed Implementation Schedule (Indicate beginning month / year and ending month/year for each activity) Circle as many as needed Preferred Fiscal Year =1 Second Preferred year = 2 2017 2018 2019 2020 Item Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept R.O.W Acquisition Preliminary Engineering Construction Engineering Grade Inspection Bid Letting Construction K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 6 298

PAVEMENT CONDITION (65 Points Available) 2015 PASER Rating: (From GCMPC 2015 PASER Map) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (17 Points Available) PASER RATING POINTS 1-2 65 3 60 4 50 5 35 6 10 7-10 0 What is the ADT for this road segment? Per Thru Lane ADT Points 7,000 and Above 17 6,999 to 6,000 15 5,999 to 5,000 12 4,900 to 2,000 7 1,999 or less 5 SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES (18 Points Available) 1. COMPLETE STREETS (5 Points Available) Which of the complete streets design elements are planned as part of this project? (ie: bike lanes, sidewalks, ADA accessible crosswalks, pedestrian crossings, etc.) If none, please explain. 2. SAFETY - (5 Points Available) Points will be given to projects that implement safety improvements in conjunction with normal roadway improvements. Safety improvements such as 4-to-3 lane conversions, signage and/or signal upgrades, lane re-striping, access management, turn lane additions, etc. all qualify. Please describe below the safety improvements proposed for this project. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 7 299

3. AREA-WIDE IMPACT - (8 Points Available) Agency judgment shall be considered for but is not limited to certain important and significant criteria which do not fit any of the above categories but which, nevertheless, should be included in establishing priorities. This criteria includes the following: 1. Is this project located in an Environmental Justice (EJ) Zone identified in the Genesee County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan? If so, what are the effects of the project, both positive and negative, and how do you plan to mitigate the negative effects? 2. Are other transportation-related improvements taking place in the area? Y/N If yes, what/where? 3. Is the project documented as a significant project in a local plan, such as your Comprehensive/Master Plan, Corridor Plan, DDA Plan, etc.? Please identify which plan it is in, and explain why it is considered to be significant to your area. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Preservation_Reconstruction App 9_3_15_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 8 300

Roadway Expand Application Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 Prepared TSM by Meetings\Sept. the Genesee County 3, 2015\Updated Metropolitan Applications, Planning Policies, Commission and Procedures\Roadway staff. Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 1 301

Roadway Expand Application Please complete and attach as a front cover to your application. Note: Roadway Expand projects must be identified in the LRTP as having capacity deficiencies in the year the project is proposed. TO: Sharon Gregory, Planner III Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Road Agency: Contact Person: Phone/E-mail: Proposed Project Information (Please attach commitment from local funding agency in the form of a Resolution of Support. This is required for eligibility) Road Name Point of Beginning Point of End Project Length in Feet If the geometrics of the intersection are being reconfigured this also needs to be indicated in the narrative and on the project diagram. MDOT Project Description: (Please refer to list provided) NOTE: Please provide a narrative describing the details of the project on the following page. Please be specific and feel free to attach additional pages. Existing Number of Lanes Existing Pavement Width Proposed Number of Lanes Proposed Pavement Width Proposed Length of Right Turn Bay Proposed Length of Left Turn Bay K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 2 302

Detailed Project Description K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 3 303

Please provide a list of any alternatives to the proposed improvement and a brief explanation as to their shortcomings. (Please refer to the Congestion Management Document and indicate which strategies from the tool box have been tried.) Alt #1 Alt #2 K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 4 304

Diagram 1 Diagrams of the existing segment, intersection, or area drawn at an appropriate scale and in sufficient detail to describe the existing situation and proposed improvement. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 5 305

Diagram 2 Identify in Diagram: 1. Volumes 2. Lanes, lane widths 3. Movement by lane 4. Parking locations 5. Bay lengths Approach 2 North / South Street name Approach 3 East / West Street Name Approach 1 Approach 4 K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 6 306

Item Total Cost Federal Funds Requested Estimated Project Cost Local Match Other Source of Funds R.O.W $ (100%) (Y/N) Preliminary $ (80%)Max (20%) Min (Y/N) Engineering $ $ Construction $ (80%)Max (20%) Min (Y/N) Engineering $ $ Construction $ (80%) Max (20%) Min (Y/N) $ $ Total Project cost $ $ $ (Y/N) *NOTE: The PE and CE costs must be identified above to be eligible for funding. Funds Type & Amount Proposed Implementation Schedule (Indicate beginning month/year and ending month/year for each activity) Circle as many as needed Preferred Fiscal Year =1 Second Preferred year = 2 2017 2018 2019 2020 Item Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept R.O.W Acquisition Preliminary Engineering Construction Engineering Grade Inspection Bid Letting Construction K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 7 307

A total of 65 points is available for either segment or intersection capacity. II. Capacity Capacity will be rated in terms of the ability of the segment under consideration to carry existing traffic volumes without undue delay and interruption of smooth flow. Please provide the 1993 traffic count for the project. Please provide the current traffic count for the project. Project Year: Level of Service information will be filled out by GCMPC staff after the project has been submitted using data from the transportation model. Segment Capacity Information: LOS Intersection Capacity Information for the: North and South Legs: LOS East and West Legs: LOS Segment Points Level of Service A = 0 points Level of Service B = 0 points Level of Service C = 0 points Level of Service D = 40 points Level of Service E = 50 points Level of Service F = 65 points Intersection Points Per Leg Level of Service A = 0 points Level of Service B = 0 points Level of Service C = 0 points Level of Service D = 20 points Level of Service E = 25 points Level of Service F = 32.5 points III. PAVEMENT CONDITION (15 Points Available) 2015 PASER Rating: (From Attached GCMPC 2015 PASER Map) PASER Points Rating 1-4 15 5-6 8 7-10 0 K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 8 308

SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES (20 Points Available) 1. SAFETY - (5 Points Available) Points will be given to projects that implement safety improvements in conjunction with normal roadway improvements. Safety improvements such as signage and/or signal upgrades, lane restriping, turn lane additions, etc. all qualify. Please describe below the safety improvements proposed for this project. 2. ACCESS MANAGEMENT (5 Points Available) Points will be given to projects that employ access management techniques as the use of these techniques can help reduce traffic congestion, preserve the flow of traffic, improve traffic safety, prevent crashes and preserve existing road capacity. Does this project address access management? If yes how? If not, why not? Please be specific in identifying access management strategies used, such as describing the proposed number and location of driveway closures and the average driveway spacing. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 9 309

3. AREA-WIDE IMPACT - (5 Points Available) Agency judgment shall be considered for but is not limited to certain important and significant criteria which do not fit any of the above categories but which, nevertheless, should be included in establishing priorities. This criteria includes the following: 1. Is this project located in an Environmental Justice (EJ) Zone identified in the Genesee County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan? If so, what are the effects of the project, both positive and negative, and how do you plan to mitigate the negative effects? (2 Points) 2. Please identify and explain any additional transportation-related improvements taking place in the area? Y / N, If yes, what/where? (1 Point) 3. Please identify any capacity-related bridge improvements that will need to be made in conjunction with this project. Please include information on current bridge condition and capacity. (2 Points) 4. COMPLETE STREETS (5 Points) Which of the complete streets design elements are planned as part of this project? (ie: bike lanes, sidewalks, ADA accessible crosswalks, pedestrian crossings, etc) If none, please explain. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Roadway Expand Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 10 310

Transit Application Genesee County Metropolitan Alliance FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program Prepared by the Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission staff. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 1 311

TRANSIT APPLICATION Please Complete and Attach as a Front Cover to Your Transit Application To: Sharon Gregory, Planner III Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Agency: Contact Person: Phone/E-Mail: Proposed Project Information (Please attach commitment from local funding agency in the form minutes and a Resolution of Support. This is required for eligibility) Location of project Street Address Project Total Cost MDOT Project Description: (Please refer to list provided) NOTE: Please provide a narrative describing the details of the project on the following page. Please be specific and feel free to attach additional pages. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 2 312

Detailed Project Description K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 3 313

Estimated Project Cost Item Total Cost Federal Funds Requested Transit Capital Transit Operations Transportation Enhancement Transportation Demand Management Total Project cost Local Match Other Source of Funds $ (80%) Max (20%) Min (Y/N) $ (50%) Max $ $ (80%) Max $ $ (80%) Max $ (50%) Min $ (20%) Min $ (20%) Min $ (Y/N) (Y/N) (Y/N) $ $ $ (Y/N) Funds Type & Amount Proposed Implementation Schedule (Indicate beginning month/year and ending month/year for each activity) Circle as many as needed Preferred Fiscal Year =1 Second Preferred year = 2 2017 2018 2019 2020 Item Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept R.O.W Acquisition Preliminary Engineering Construction Engineering Grade Inspection Bid Letting Construction K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 4 314

II. MAINTAIN/SUSTAIN A METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (MTS) (0-25 Points Available) Please describe the proposed project s effect on the existing transit system. (Points are awarded if existing service will be negatively affected without the project) Meets minimum age criteria for replacement items. (5 points) Exceeds minimum age criteria for replacement by 1 or 2 years. (10 points) Exceeds minimum age criteria for replacement by 3 + years. (15 points) Project is essential to daily provisions of public transportation services. (10 points) III. IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OR EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MTS (0-10 Points Available) Points will be given if improvement will increase ridership - 1 point for every 2% that peak use meets or exceeds 80% capacity. Project meets standard service or performance criteria: 10 points if standards are exceeded; 8 points if standards are met; 5 points if project addresses but does not completely meet need. Please describe how the efficiency or effectiveness of the MTS will be improved by this project: K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 5 315

IV. SAFETY (10 POINTS) Does project correct documented major safety problems (# of accidents; injuries/fatalities). Y / N If yes, how V. IMPROVE SERVICE UTILIZATION (10 POINTS) Please explain how project will improve service utilization using the criteria listed below: 1. Increase in alternative commuting options (i.e. HOV lanes, transit friendly carpool lots, ITS improvements) - 3 points 2. Increase in passengers per vehicle hour - 3 points per 1% increase. 3. Quality improvements, e.g., passenger amenities such as passenger shelters, signage, etc. 2 points 1. Projects are identified in Congestion Management Areas. (see Congestion Management Document) 2 points K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 6 316

VI. EXPAND TO MEET DEMAND ON THE MTS - (15 Points) Please describe how this project will expand the services of the MTS: VII. SHIFTING OF SOCIAL-ECONOMIC BASES (10 POINTS) If project is needed to address social or economic development issues, projects, or changes in ridership composition, please explain: K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 7 317

VIII. AREA-WIDE JUDGMENT AND IMPACT - (0-20 Points Available) Area-wide judgment shall be considered for certain important and significant criteria which do not fit any of the above categories but which, nevertheless, should be included in establishing priorities. This criteria includes the following: 1. Please provide a list of any alternatives to the proposed improvement and a brief explanation as to their shortcomings. (Please refer to the Congestion Management Document and indicate which strategies from the tool box have been tried.) (5 Points) Alt #1 Alt #2 2. Is this project located in an Environmental Justice (EJ) Zone identified in the Genesee County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan? If so, what are the effects of the project, both positive and negative, and how do you plan to mitigate the negative effects? (5 Points) 3. Who benefits from this project? (5 Point) K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 8 318

4. Does the project address access management? Y / N, If yes how? Please be specific in identifying access management strategies used such as identifying the proposed number and location of driveway closures. (3 Points) 5. Are other transportation-related improvements taking place in the area? Y / N, If yes, what/where? (2 Point) K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 9 319

DEPRECIATION SCHEDULE FOR TRANSIT AGENCIES CAPITAL ITEMS Depreciable Life Buildings - new Office furniture, fixtures, and equipment (not structural components of the buildings) such as desks, files, safes, communication equipment (radios and telephones) Information systems - computers and their components. Data handling equipment, typewriters, calculators, copiers Cars, taxi Buses - small (up to 22 passengers) body on van cutaway (includes Carpenter and Wheel Coach for replacement) Buses - medium (from 23 to 30 passengers) body on truck chassis Buses - large (over 30 passengers) Trucks - light duty (under 13,000 lb. g.v.w.) Trucks - heavy duty (over 13,000 lb. g.v.w.) Bus radios, base stations, remotes 20 years 10 years 6 years 3 years 7 years 7 years 12 years 4 years 6 years 10 years Maintenance garage items: Roller cabinets, portable tool stands, portable compressors, portable hoists, diagnostic equipment Lift trucks, engine and transmission stands, brake lathes Power hand tools, portable bus washers, power (hydraulic) jacks, cherry pickers, parts cleaners, grease guns and pumps, power floor cleaners, lawn mowers, snow blowers, and precision hand tools Hand tools, oil pumps, fuel pumps, portable lighting equipment, and grinders Creepers, wheeled stools 10 years 8 years 5 years 3 years 2 years K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 10 320

CAPITAL FUNDING CRITERIA 1. Replacement buses and rehab. of existing buses are the first priorities for state matching funds. 2. Urban Section 9 Program - Provide state match for all items requested unless they did not meet the definition of essential. 3. Section 3 Program - Provide state match for transit agency priorities #1 and #2, unless an item did not meet the definition of Essential, in which case, a lower priority essential items was moved up. 4. Definition of essential - Those capital items directly needed to maintain service. a. Communication Equipment - Replacement only. b. Maintenance Equipment and Parts c. Operational Support Equipment and Services - Equipment and services directly involving the daily provision of service, such as continuation of the capital cost of contracting, tire leases, bus leases, computers and computer leases and operational support vehicles. d. Expansion buses for ADA if included in the transit agency Para transit plan. 5. Definition of Nonessential - Items which are not needed to maintain daily service. For example: * Office furniture and equipment * Computer tables and chairs * Training equipment * Shelters and pads * Expansion buses * Signage * Administrative vehicles * Facility equipment (flagpole, lawn irrigation system, utility tractor, etc.) 6. New Facilities or Facility Renovations - These items are not eligible for inclusion in the Section 3 application, as FTA is interpreting the reauthorization language which states the grant is for the... purchase of buses and bus related equipment to mean no facility work is eligible. K:\trans\TSM\2015-2016 TSM Meetings\Sept. 3, 2015\Updated Applications, Policies, and Procedures\Transit Application JN_LogoUp.doc FY 2017-2020 11 321

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Application Date: 10/16/2013 Page: 1 of 4 Applicant Information Application Number: Section: Applicant Agency: Grant Applicant: Project Description Project Name: Type of Work: Length (miles): Project Location County: Region: City/Village or Township: Zip Code: 2014004 01 City/Village Enter Grant Applicant Here Enter Project Name Here Enter Type of Work Here 0.0 Genesee Bay Flint 48504 Route/Street Name/Facility Name: Project Limits (use nearest cross streets): Physical Reference: MPO (Metropolitan Plannning Organization): TMA (Transportation Management Area): Legislative Information State Senator: State Representative: U.S. Representative: Project Category Contacts Prefix Contact Type 1st District 1st District 1st District Enter Street Name Here Enter Nearest Crossroads Here 634515 Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission Not in TMA area Facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists, including traffic calming and other safety improvements Name Title Phone Organization Cell Email Other Contact Person (555) 555-5555 email@address.com Contact Person.. Other Contact Person (555) 555-5111 contact@person.com Chief Elected Official.. Other Contact Person (555) 511-1111 contact@email.com Chief Administrative.. Official Narrative 1. In a brief narrative, describe the proposed work and how the project will benefit the affected community(ies): Enter text here. 322

Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Application Date: 10/16/2013 Page: 2 of 4 2. Describe how this project is competitive for funding: Review the competitiveness details document located at www.michigan.gov/tap, by clicking on "Project Competitiveness Details". Describe in this space how this project meets the TAP competitiveness criteria. Documents Document Document Type Description User Date Budget 1 Map Add document here mitchellm13 10/08/2013 2 Site Plan Site Plan mitchellm13 10/08/2013 3 Completion Photograph Photos mitchellm13 10/08/2013 4 Cross Section Cross Section mitchellm13 10/08/2013 Participating Items of Work: Item of Work Quantity Unit Unit Cost Item Cost Add items here 10.00 10 $1.00 $10.00 Total: $10.00 Non-Participating Items of Work: Item of Work Quantity Unit Unit Cost Item Cost Add items here 10.00 10 $10.00 $100.00 Total: $100.00 Participating Match Details: Match Source Type Amount Percentage Total: Source of Non-Participating Funds: Project Summary Participating Items: Non-Participating Items: $10.00 $100.00 Request Summary Grant Funds: Match: $10.00 $0.00 100.00% 0.00% Project Total: $110.00 Participating Costs: $10.00 100.00% Schedule Project Type: Construction 1. Milestones Date Plans and Estimate Complete: Grade Inspection Package submitted to MDOT: Right of Way Cetified: Matching Funds Certified: 12/15/2013 10/25/2013 12/01/2013 12/01/2013 323

Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Application Date: 10/16/2013 Page: 3 of 4 Project Listed on Approved TIP/STIP: 10/01/2013 Advertisement Start Date: 01/30/2014 Construction Letting Date: 03/07/2014 Construction Start Date: 06/01/2014 Construction End Date: 08/30/2014 2. Will this project be paired with any future construction projects? No 3. Additional comments about the project schedule: If yes, please explain. Environment/Community 1. Check all that apply: X ROW/Construction Access Permit X Recreational Lands X State Historic Preservation Office Clearance X Inland Lakes or Streams Permit X Tree Removal X Contaminated Sites X Wetlands Permit X Endangered Species Other X Floodplains Permit X Coastal Zone Other Please describe: Add text here if needed. 2a. Describe the anticipated impact of the project on adjacent property owners, your efforts to inform them of the project, and responses to these efforts: Add text here 2b. Is property acquisition necessary? No (Select all that apply and describe below.) Donation Willing Seller Appraisal Completed Purchase Option Purchase Agreement Please describe: 3a. How did you facilitate stakeholder engagement in the development of this project concept and what stakeholders were invloved? Add text here. 3b. Describe the stakeholder input you received. How did this input help shape this project concept? Add text here. 4. If this project is identified in an adopted community, county, and/or region-wide plan, please describe (such as master plan, comprehensive plan, trail plan, downtown development plan, etc.): Add text here. 5. Has your community adopted a Complete Streets policy? No 324

Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Application Date: 10/16/2013 Page: 4 of 4 a. What type of document is your policy? (Select all that apply.) Policy Ordinance Capital Improvement Program Resolution Master Plan Other b. How does this project support this policy? c. Describe what investment your community has made and/or activities you conducted to support your complete Streets policy. Maintenance 1. What agency is responsible for operation and maintenance of the completed project and what source of funds will be used? Add text here. 2. Describe anticipated maintenance needs by task. (Indicate frequency of maintenance and estimated annual cost.) Add text here. Summary of Points for the Non-Motorized Application Score Type: Non-Motorized Indicator Points Available Priority on Statewide, Regional, or Local trail plans 50 Supports Connections to Local & Regional Trails 15 Completed in conjunction with another transportation project 5 Local Match Identified 5 Facility addresses a documented safety deficiency 5 Preliminary Design Completed 5 Other Funding Sources Identified 5 Right-of-Way 5 Operations & Maintenance 5 Total 100 325