August 30, [Contact Name] SNF Name, [Address Line 1] [Address Line 2] [City], B8 [ZIP]

Similar documents
Skilled Nursing Facility Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Sixth Edition. Prepared by

Reading and Using the PEPPER Report

PEPPER for Home Health Agencies and Skilled Nursing Facilities: Practical Applications for Compliance

Thank you for joining us!

What Did Your PEPPER Tell CMS?

PEPPER and Data Analytics for Skilled Nursing Facilities, Hospices and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities. April 19, 2015 Kimberly Hrehor

2/18/2015. The Journey Begins. PEPPER and OSCAR/CASPER Reports. Objectives. Preparation for Change

CHAPTER 6: MEDICARE SKILLED NURSING FACILITY PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (SNF PPS)

Patient-Driven Payment Model

Discharge to Community Measure

Clinical RUG-IV. RUG Qualifiers & Length of Stay. Part 1. for clients of: Content developed and presented by:

Plant the Seeds of Compliance with PEPPER. Prepared for: WiAHC June 8, Presented by: Caryn Adams, Manager

MEDICARE PART A SNF PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM

Using the Hospice PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts: Session 1

Using the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts: Session 1

Thank you for joining us!

Housekeeping. Harmony Healthcare International, Inc. The Devils in The Details: RUG Intimacy. Objectives. Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

Using the New Home Health Agency (HHA) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts

CMS Proposed SNF Payment System -- Resident Classification System: Version I (RCS-1)

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. February 2015

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled

Thank you for joining us!

Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled

Resource Utilization Group - IV (RUG-IV) SNF Consolidated Billing for Clinicians & Intro to Resident Classification System 1 (RCS-1)

THE PEPPER AND YOUR CDI PROGRAM. Kat McFarland, RN, MN, ACM Director Care Management Providence Regional Medical Center Everett 9/28/2018

User s Guide Tenth Edition

Surviving Targeted Probe & Educate

Home Health Targeted Probe & Educate

This educational presentation is provided by. The software that powers post-acute care. HOME HEALTH. HOSPICE. THERAPY.

HOSPICE TARGETED PROBE & EDUCATE Melinda A. Gaboury, COS C Healthcare Provider Solutions, Inc.

2014 AANAC 9_30_ AANA C AANA

OFFICIAL NOTICE AND AGENDA

MDS Accuracy and Compliance: Where There s Smoke

The OIG Report: Audits are Here! About Kris. Harmony Healthcare International, Inc. Copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved 1. OIG Audits.

Using SNF Data to Manage Federal & State Audit Initiatives

Understanding the PEPPER

01-10 FORM CMS (Cont.)

Using PEPPER and CERT Reports to Reduce Improper Payment Vulnerability

Medicare Program Integrity Manual Chapter 6 - Intermediary MR Guidelines for Specific Services

SNF Compliance: What s at Stake?

Develop a Taste for PEPPER: Interpreting

OFFICIAL NOTICE AND AGENDA

The Prospective Payment System

Equalizing Medicare Payments for Select Patients in IRFs and SNFs

* HFMA staff and volunteers determined that this product has met specific criteria developed under. endorse or guaranty the use of this product.

2/20/2018. Resident Classification System RCS-1. CMS Proposal

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AND MYERS AND STAUFFER LC PRESENT MDS CODING AND INTERPRETATION ANSWER SLIDES

Indiana Medicaid Reimbursement Update Tysen Adams, CPA Deborah Lake, RN, RAC-CT Senior Managing Consultants BKD, LLP

11/23/2011. Proactive vs. Reactive Relationship

Proposed RCS-1 & It s Impact on Therapy Services- Will it Happen? Krista Olson, MS,CCC-SLP

The Shift is ON! Goodbye PPS, Hello RCS

Goodbye PPS: Hello RCS!

06-01 FORM HCFA WORKSHEET S - HOME HEALTH AGENCY COST REPORT The intermediary indicates in the appropriate box whether this is the

Riding Herd on Fraud, Waste and Abuse

The following is a summary of each of the updates from the meeting.

CMS Announces Targeted Probe and Educate

SNF Compliance Programs: What s at Stake?

RCS-1. (Resident Classification System-Version 1) New Medicare payment system: What to Expect!

All Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs), PACE Organizations, Cost Plans, and certain Demonstrations

OASIS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORTS

Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) and the MDS: A Total Evolution of the SNF Payment Model

CMS s RAI Version 3.0 Manual October 2016

Report to Congress: Appropriateness of Minimum Nurse Staffing Ratios In Nursing Homes

Comparison of Bundled Payment Models. Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4. hospitals, physicians, and post-acute care where

August 25, Dear Ms. Verma:

Personal Attendant Service Rates Effective 9/1/14 1 unit= 1 HOUR

RUG-III V ERSION 5.20 CALCULATION WORKSH E E T 34 GROUP MOD E L F OR MDS 3.0

Uniform Data System. The Functional Assessment Specialists. June 21, 2011

Changes to the RAI manual effective October 1, 2013

Complex Challenges/Financial Impact Medical Necessity Compliance Role of the Physician Advisor. NJHFMA Finance for Clinicians Session March 24, 2016

08-16 FORM CMS

Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) and Medicare. The Who, What, When, Where, How and Why?

A View From the Top: Risk, Compliance and Financial Management Opportunities

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

All Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs), PACE Organizations, Cost Plans, and certain Demonstrations

CAH SWING BED BILLING, CODING AND DOCUMENTATION. Lisa Pando, Sr. Consultant GPS Healthcare Consultants

New in Current payment risks. Tips & strategies. Revenue Cycle: The Ca$h Connection. CPAs & ADVISORS

Development of Updated Models of Non-Therapy Ancillary Costs

6/12/2017. The Rumor is True: A New PPS Payment System is on the Horizon Presented by: RKL, LLP Senior Living Services Consulting Group

Aging in Place What s in Store for Family Caregiving and Home-Based Care?

Dual eligible beneficiaries and care coordination. Mark E. Miller, Ph. D.

5/11/2017. Carol Maher, RN-BC, RAC-CT, RAC-MT, CPC. It s official!

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

RAPID RUG GUIDE RUG-III, VERSION GROUPER Effective for Assessments With an ARD on or After 10/1/2013

MDS 3.0/RUG IV Distance Learning Series January-June 2014

Troubleshooting Audio

Maximizing the Power of Your Data. Peggy Connorton, MS, LNFA AHCA Director, Quality and LTC Trend Tracker

Florida Health Care Association 2013 Annual Conference

UnitedHealthcare Medicare Readmission Review Program for Medicare Advantage Plans General Clinical Guidelines for Payment Review

CMS -1599F. The 2 Midnight Rule Effective October 1, 2013

Recovery Audit Contractors: AHA Perspective. Elizabeth Baskett, Policy, AHA February 23, 2012

CMS Proposed Payment Rule FY Cheryl Phillips, MD Evvie Munley

CH. Sect. Pg. March 2007 Revision NA Title Page NA Change the revised date to March 2007 CH 3 H3a Revise the definition of Any Scheduled

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

paymentbasics Defining the inpatient acute care products Medicare buys Under the IPPS, Medicare sets perdischarge

RUG-III VERSION 5.2 CALCULATION WORKSHEET 34 GROUP MODEL

Hospice Billing: Two Tier and SIA Payments

Medicare Part A Update

Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017

Transcription:

Bridgepoint 1, Suite 300 5918 West Courtyard Drive, Austin TX 78730-5036 August 30, 2013 [Contact Name] SNF Name, 009168 [Address Line 1] [Address Line 2] [City], B8 [ZIP] RE: Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER) Dear Chief Executive Officer/Administrator, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is pleased to provide this provider-specific comparative data report, known as PEPPER, for Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs). PEPPER can be used to support internal auditing and monitoring activities with the goal of preventing improper Medicare payments and protecting the Medicare Trust Fund. CMS has contracted with TMF Health Quality Institute to develop and distribute PEPPER and to support facilities with its use. Please share your SNF PEPPER with those in your organization who would most benefit from the data provided in the report. What is PEPPER? It is a report containing provider-specific data statistics for episodes of care identified as potentially vulnerable to improper Medicare payments. It identifies where the SNF is at greatest risk for improper payments as compared to all other SNFs in the nation. This is SNF PEPPER version Q4FY12, containing statistics for episodes of care ending between October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2012. Interpreting PEPPER: SNFs are encouraged to review the reports and focus on areas in which they are an outlier, meaning they are at greatest risk for improper payments (at or above the 80th percentile, or at or below the 20th percentile for areas at risk for undercoding). PEPPER cannot identify the presence of improper payments. These can only be confirmed through a review of medical record documentation, although outlier status identifies where billing practices differ from the majority of other SNFs in the nation. Training and Support: At PEPPERresources.org, access the SNF PEPPER User s Guide and a recorded SNF PEPPER training session, located on the Training and Resources page in the Skilled Nursing Facility section. Questions regarding the SNF PEPPER may be submitted at any time through the website Help Desk (Help/Contact Us tab). Sincerely, Kimberly Hrehor, MHA, RHIA, CHC Project Director

Definitions for Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) PEPPER Target Areas SNF Target Area Therapy s With High ADLs (Therapy Hi ADL) SNF Target Area Definition Numerator (N): count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to RUX (Rehabilitation ultra high & extensive services w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RVX (Rehabilitation very high & extensive services w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RHX (Rehabilitation high & extensive services w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RMX (Rehabilitation medium & extensive services w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RUC (Rehabilitation ultra high w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RVC (Rehabilitation very high w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RHC (Rehabilitation high w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RMC (Rehabilitation medium w/ ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)), RLB (Rehabilitation low with ADL 11-16 (16-18 in version III)) Denominator (D): count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all therapy s (see Appendix 1 in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide) Nontherapy s With High ADLs (Nontherapy Hi ADL) Note: An episode of care is defined as a series of claims from a SNF for a beneficiary where the difference between the Through Date of one claim and the From Date of the subsequent claim is less than or equal to thirty days. The From and Through dates in form locator 6 (statement covers period) on the claim identify the span of service dates included in a particular bill; the From date is the earliest date of service on the claim. N: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to SSC (Special care w/ ADL 17-18), CC2 (Clinically complex w/ depression & ADL 17-18), CC1 (Clinically complex w/o depression & ADL 17-18), BB2 (Behavioral w/ 2+ restorative nursing & ADL 6-10), BB1 (Behavioral w/ <=1 restorative nursing & ADL 6-10), PE2 (Physical function w/ 2+ restorative nursing & ADL 16-18), PE1 (Physical function w/ <=1 restorative nursing & ADL 16-18), IB2 (Impaired cognition w/ 2+ restorative nursing & ADL 6-10), IB1 (Impaired cognition w/ <=1 restorative nursing & ADL 6-10) in III; HE2 (Special care high w/ depression & ADL 15-16), HE1 (Special care high w/o depression & ADL 15-16), LE2 (Special care low w/ depression & ADL 15-16), LE1 (Special care low w/o depression & ADL 15-16), CE2 (Clinically complex w/ depression & ADL 15-16), CE1 (Clinically complex w/o depression & ADL 15-16), BB2 (Behavior/cognitive w/ 2+ restorative nursing & ADL 2-5), BB1 (Behavior/cognitive w/ <=1 restorative nursing & ADL 2-5), PE2 (Physical function w/ 2+ restorative nursing & ADL 11-14), PE1 (Physical function w/ <=1 restorative nursing & ADL 15-16) in IV Change of Therapy Assessment (COT Assmnt) Ultrahigh Therapy s (Ultrahigh) D: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all nontherapy s (see Appendix 2 in SNF PEPPER User's Guide) N: count of assessments with AI second digit equal to D within episodes of care ending in the report period D: count of all assessments within episodes of care ending in the report period N: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to RUX, RUL (Rehabilitation ultra high & extensive services w/ ADL 2-10 (9-15 in version III)), RUC, RUB (Rehabilitation ultra high w/ ADL 6-10 (9-15 in version III)), RUA (Rehabilitation ultra high w/ ADL 0-5 (4-8 in version III)) Therapy s (Therapy) 90+ Day Episodes of Care (90+ Days) D: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all therapy s (see Appendix 1 in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide) N: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for therapy s (see Appendix 1 in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide) D: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for therapy and nontherapy s (see Appendices 1 and 2 in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide) N: count of episodes of care ending in the report period with a length of stay of 90+ days D: count of all episodes of care ending in the report period Worksheet: Definitions Page: 2

Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER Compare Targets Report, Four Quarters Ending Q4 FY 2012 The Compare Targets Report displays statistics for target areas that have reportable data (11+ target numerator count) in the most recent time period. Percentiles indicate how a Skilled Nursing Facility's (SNFs) target area percent compares to the target area percents for all SNFs in the respective comparison group. For example, if a SNF's national percentile (see below) is 80.0, 80% of the SNFs in the nation have a lower percent value than that SNF. The SNF's state percentile (if displayed) and the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdiction percentile values should be interpreted in the same manner. Percentiles at or above the 80th percentile for any target areas, or at or below the 20th percentile for areas at risk for undercoding, indicate that the SNF may be at a higher risk for improper Medicare payments. The greater (or smaller, for areas at risk for undercoding) the percentile value, in particular the national and/or jurisdiction percentile, the greater consideration should be given to that target area. Target Therapy High ADL Nontherapy High ADL Change of Therapy Assessment Ultrahigh Therapy s Therapy s 90+ Day Episodes of Care Description Proportion of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to RUX, RVX, RHX, RMX, RUC, RVC, RHC, RMC, RLB, to days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all therapy s Proportion of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to SSC, CC2, CC1, BB2, BB1, PE2, PE1, IB2, IB1 in III; HE2, HE1, LE2, LE1, CE2, CE1, BB2, BB1, PE2, PE1 in IV, to days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all nontherapy s Proportion of assessments with AI second digit equal to D within episodes of care ending in the report period, to all assessments within episodes of care ending in the report period Proportion of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to RUX, RUL, RUC, RUB, RUA, to days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all therapy s Proportion of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for therapy s, to days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all therapy and nontherapy s Proportion of episodes of care ending in the report period at the SNF with a length of stay of 90+ days, to all episodes of care ending in the report period at the SNF Target Count Percent SNF National %ile SNF State %ile SNF Jursidict. %ile 2,481 35.9% 58.7 52.3 52.9 1,485 44.4% 83.8 73.8 78.3 41 4.1% 6.9 17.2 13.5 5,911 85.6% 96.3 97.2 97.8 6,904 67.4% 6.3 11.2 9.7 34 15.7% 54.6 63.6 67.3 Note: State and Jurisdiction %tiles are not reported when there are fewer than 11 SNFs Worksheet: Compare or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target episodes of care. Page: 3

Need to audit? When reviewing this information, you may want to consider auditing a sample of records if you identify: Increasing or decreasing Target Percents over time resulting in outlier status Your Target Percent (first row in the table below) is above the national 80th percentile Your Target Percent is below the national 20th percentile Therapy s With High ADLs Target Percent 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 SNF Juris: 80th %ile State: 80th %ile Natl: 80th %ile Juris: 20th %ile State: 20th %ile Natl: 20th %ile YOUR SNF 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 Target Area Percent 44.7% 38.8% 35.9% Target Count (Numerator: see Definitions worksheet) 3,351 2,299 2,481 Denominator Count (see Definitions worksheet) 7,489 5,930 6,904 Target (Numerator) Average Length of Stay 23.9 26.4 29.5 Denominator Average Length of Stay 26.6 28.0 29.1 *Data not available when target count less than 11. COMPARATIVE DATA Note: State Percentiles are zero when there are fewer than 11 SNFs in the jurisdiction's state or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target discharges. National 80th Percentile 52.5% 46.3% 47.6% Jurisdiction 80th Percentile 56.4% 48.1% 49.3% State 80th Percentile 57.8% 48.2% 49.3% National 20th Percentile 21.8% 18.3% 19.2% Jurisdiction 20th Percentile 28.4% 22.7% 22.8% State 20th Percentile 29.0% 23.0% 23.3% SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGH OUTLIERS: This could indicate a risk of potential overcoding of beneficiaries' activities of daily living (ADL) status. The SNF should determine whether the amount of assistance beneficiaries need with ADLs as reported on the MDS is supported and consistent with medical record documentation. SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR LOW OUTLIERS: This could indicate a risk of potential undercoding of beneficiaries' ADL status. The SNF should determine whether the amount of assistance beneficiaries need with ADLs as reported on the MDS is supported and consistent with medical record documentation.

Need to audit? When reviewing this information, you may want to consider auditing a sample of records if you identify: Nontherapy s With High ADLs 60% 50% Increasing or decreasing Target Percents over time resulting in outlier status Your Target Percent (first row in the table below) is above the national 80th percentile Your Target Percent is below the national 20th percentile Target Percent 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 SNF Juris: 80th %ile State: 80th %ile Natl: 80th %ile Juris: 20th %ile State: 20th %ile Natl: 20th %ile YOUR SNF 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 Target Area Percent 15.1% 18.8% 44.4% Target Count (Numerator: see Definitions worksheet) 420 542 1,485 Denominator Count (see Definitions worksheet) 2,790 2,889 3,345 Target (Numerator) Average Length of Stay 26.3 21.7 25.2 Denominator Average Length of Stay 19.2 21.9 22.0 *Data not available when target count less than 11. COMPARATIVE DATA Note: State Percentiles are zero when there are fewer than 11 SNFs in the jurisdiction's state or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target discharges. National 80th Percentile 36.2% 36.3% 40.7% Jurisdiction 80th Percentile 34.0% 40.9% 46.5% State 80th Percentile 36.7% 46.0% 50.8% National 20th Percentile 10.2% 9.9% 11.2% Jurisdiction 20th Percentile 9.6% 11.7% 14.8% State 20th Percentile 10.5% 13.3% 16.5% SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGH OUTLIERS: This could indicate a risk of potential overcoding of beneficiaries' activities of daily living (ADL) status. The SNF should determine whether the amount of assistance beneficiaries need with ADLs as reported on the MDS is supported and consistent with medical record documentation. SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR LOW OUTLIERS: This could indicate a risk of potential undercoding of beneficiaries' ADL status. The SNF should determine whether the amount of assistance beneficiaries need with ADLs as reported on the MDS is supported and consistent with medical record documentation.

Need to audit? When reviewing this information, you may want to consider auditing a sample of records if you identify: Change of Therapy Assessment 18% 16% 14% Increasing Target Percents over time resulting in outlier status Your Target Percent (first row in the table below) is above the national 80th percentile Target Percent 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 SNF Natl: 80th %ile Juris: 80th %ile State: 80th %ile YOUR SNF 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 Target Area Percent 4.1% Target Count (Numerator: count of assessments with AI second digit equal to D within episodes of care ending in the report period) Note: the COT Assessment became 41 Denominator Count (count of all assessments within episodes of care ending in the report period) effective Oct. 1, 2011; statistics are not available for FYs 2010 and 2011 1,004 *Data not available when target count less than 11. COMPARATIVE DATA Note: State Percentiles are zero when there are fewer than 11 SNFs in the jurisdiction's state or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target discharges. National 80th Percentile 17.0% Jurisdiction 80th Percentile 14.3% State 80th Percentile 0.0% 13.4% SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGH OUTLIERS: This could indicate that the SNF is experiencing challenges with delivering services to the beneficiary as anticipated. The SNF may look into factors that lead to the need for the COT assessment (e.g., can care planning be improved? Are there issues with completing therapy as scheduled?) Note: SNFs that are using the COT assessment infrequently or not at all may be targeted by MACs or RACs for review to establish whether therapy assessments are being completed as required (see https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-09-00200.asp, page 15).

Need to audit? When reviewing this information, you may want to consider auditing a sample of records if you identify: Ultrahigh Therapy s 90% 80% 70% Increasing Target Percents over time resulting in outlier status Your Target Percent (first row in the table below) is above the national 80th percentile Target Percent 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 SNF Natl: 80th %ile Juris: 80th %ile State: 80th %ile YOUR SNF 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 Target Area Percent 33.6% 44.1% 85.6% Target Count (Numerator: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period with equal to RUX, RUL (Rehabilitation ultra high & extensive services w/ ADL 2-10 (9-15 in version III)), RUC, RUB (Rehabilitation ultra high w/ ADL 6-10 (9-15 in version III)), RUA (Rehabilitation ultra high w/ ADL 0-5 (4-8 in version III)) 2,518 2,614 5,911 Denominator Count (count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for all therapy s (see Appendix 1in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide)) 7,489 5,930 6,904 Target (Numerator) Average Length of Stay 36.0 33.9 34.6 Denominator Average Length of Stay 26.6 28.0 29.1 *Data not available when target count less than 11. COMPARATIVE DATA Note: State Percentiles are zero when there are fewer than 11 SNFs in the jurisdiction's state or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target discharges. National 80th Percentile 65.1% 67.7% 69.2% Jurisdiction 80th Percentile 54.4% 57.5% 65.4% State 80th Percentile 53.3% 57.4% 66.6% SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGH OUTLIERS: This could indicate that the SNF is improperly billing for therapy services. The SNF should determine whether therapy provided was reasonable and medically necessary, and that the amount of therapy reported on the MDS is supported by documentation in the medical record.

Need to audit? When reviewing this information, you may want to consider auditing a sample of records if you identify: Therapy s 120% 100% Increasing Target Percents over time resulting in outlier status Your Target Percent (first row in the table below) is above the national 80th percentile Target Percent 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 SNF Natl: 80th %ile Juris: 80th %ile State: 80th %ile YOUR SNF 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 Target Area Percent 72.9% 67.2% 67.4% Target Count (Numerator: count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for therapy s (see Appendix 1 in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide)) 7,489 5,930 6,904 Denominator Count (count of days billed within episodes of care ending in the report period for therapy and nontherapy s (see Appendices 1 and 2 in Skilled Nursing Facility PEPPER User's Guide)) 10,279 8,819 10,249 Target (Numerator) Average Length of Stay 26.6 28.0 29.1 Denominator Average Length of Stay 24.1 25.6 26.3 *Data not available when target count less than 11. COMPARATIVE DATA Note: State Percentiles are zero when there are fewer than 11 SNFs in the jurisdiction's state or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target discharges. National 80th Percentile 97.5% 96.7% 96.7% Jurisdiction 80th Percentile 93.9% 93.4% 93.5% State 80th Percentile 94.2% 93.5% 93.4% SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGH OUTLIERS: This could indicate that the SNF is improperly billing for therapy services. The SNF should determine whether therapy provided was reasonable and medically necessary, and that the amount of therapy reported on the MDS is supported by documentation in the medical record.

Need to audit? When reviewing this information, you may want to consider auditing a sample of records if you identify: 90+ Day Episodes of Care 30% 25% Increasing Target Percents over time resulting in outlier status Your Target Percent (first row in the table below) is above the national 80th percentile Target Percent 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 SNF Natl: 80th %ile Juris: 80th %ile State: 80th %ile YOUR SNF 10/1/09-9/30/10 10/1/10-9/30/11 10/1/11 9/30/12 Target Area Percent 24.5% 19.2% 15.7% Target Count (Numerator: count of episodes of care ending in the report period with a length of stay of 90+ days) 50 37 34 Denominator Count (count of all episodes of care ending in the report period) 204 193 217 Target (Numerator) Average Length of Stay 98.9 98.9 98.6 Denominator Average Length of Stay 50.4 45.7 47.2 Target (Numerator) Average Payment $35,778 $44,266 $46,697 Target (Numerator) Sum of Payments $1,788,893 $1,637,825 $1,587,711 *Data not available when target count less than 11. COMPARATIVE DATA Note: State Percentiles are zero when there are fewer than 11 SNFs in the jurisdiction's state or when there are no SNFs with at least 11 target discharges. National 80th Percentile 26.8% 25.9% 25.4% Jurisdiction 80th Percentile 20.7% 19.6% 21.3% State 80th Percentile 22.5% 21.4% 21.9% SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR HIGH OUTLIERS:. This could indicate that the SNF is continuing treatment beyond the point where those services are necessary. The SNF should review documentation for beneficiary episodes of care with a length of stay of 90+ days to ensure that beneficiaries' continued care is appropriate and that they received a skilled level of care. The SNF should review plans of care for appropriateness and assess appropriateness of discharge plans.

SNF Top s 009168, SSNF Name SNF Top s for All Episodes of Care* (EOC), Most Recent 4 Qtrs. In Descending Order by Number of Days Billed Total SNF EOC: 217 Code Number of Days Billed % of Days to Total Days % of EOC with the Billed to Total EOC Average Length of Stay By Description RUB Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 6-10 3,304 32.2% 41.0% 37.1 RUC Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 11-16 1,840 18.0% 23.0% 36.8 LE2 Special Care Low with Depression and ADL 15-16 622 6.1% 6.5% 44.4 ES3 Extensive Services Tracheostomy Care and Ventilator/respirator and ADL 2-1 622 6.1% 10.1% 28.3 RUA Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 0-5 566 5.5% 12.0% 21.8 HE2 Special Care High with Depression and ADL 15-16 391 3.8% 6.9% 26.1 RMC Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 11-16 250 2.4% 6.9% 16.7 HC2 Special Care High with Depression and ADL 6-10 237 2.3% 3.7% 29.6 RHC Rehabilitation High with ADL 11-16 210 2.1% 3.7% 26.3 RMB Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 6-10 184 1.8% 5.1% 16.7 HE1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 15-16 181 1.8% 7.4% 11.3 HD1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 11-14 160 1.6% 5.1% 14.5 LE1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 15-16 152 1.5% 3.7% 19.0 LD1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 11-14 134 1.3% 3.2% 19.1 ES2 Extensive Services Tracheostomy Care or Ventilator/respirator and ADL 2-16 134 1.3% 1.8% 33.5 HC1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 6-10 130 1.3% 5.1% 11.8 RUX Rehabilitation Ultra High And Extensive Services with ADL 11-16 127 1.2% 2.3% 25.4 RVB Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 6-10 123 1.2% 5.5% 10.3 CE1 Clinically Complex with No Depression and ADL 15-16 108 1.1% 2.3% 21.6 RUL Rehabilitation Ultra High And Extensive Services with ADL 2-10 74 0.7% 0.5% 74.0 Top s 9,549 93.2% 28.3 All s 10,249 100.0% 26.3 * An episode of care (EOC) is defined as a series of claims from a SNF for a beneficiary where the difference between the "Through Date" of one claim and the "From Date" of the subsequent claim is less than or equal to thirty days. The "From" and "Through" dates in form locator 6 (statement covers period) on the claim identify the span of service dates included in a particular bill; the "From" date is the earliest date of service on the claim. Note: s will display for which there are a total of at least 11 days billed to the respective during the most recent fiscal year. Worksheet: SNF Top s Page: 10

SNF Top s With 90+ Days 009168 SNF Name SNF Top s for All Episodes of Care* (EOC) with 90+ Days, Most Recent 4 Qtrs. In Descending Order by Number of Days Billed Total SNF EOC: 34 Code Number of Days Billed % of Days to Total Days % of EOC with the Billed to Total EOC Average Length of Stay By Description RUB Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 6-10 860 25.7% 44.1% 57.3 RUC Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 11-16 595 17.8% 38.2% 45.8 LE2 Special Care Low with Depression and ADL 15-16 450 13.4% 23.5% 56.3 HE2 Special Care High with Depression and ADL 15-16 164 4.9% 11.8% 41.0 HC2 Special Care High with Depression and ADL 6-10 133 4.0% 5.9% 66.5 ES2 Extensive Services Tracheostomy Care or Ventilator/respirator and ADL 2-16 119 3.6% 5.9% 59.5 RHC Rehabilitation High with ADL 11-16 112 3.3% 5.9% 56.0 ES3 Extensive Services Tracheostomy Care and Ventilator/respirator and ADL 2-1 110 3.3% 5.9% 55.0 LE1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 15-16 88 2.6% 8.8% 29.3 RUA Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 0-5 78 2.3% 5.9% 39.0 RUL Rehabilitation Ultra High And Extensive Services with ADL 2-10 74 2.2% 2.9% 74.0 LB1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 2-5 66 2.0% 2.9% 66.0 RVB Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 6-10 59 1.8% 11.8% 14.8 RMB Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 6-10 57 1.7% 5.9% 28.5 HE1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 15-16 51 1.5% 8.8% 17.0 LD1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 11-14 50 1.5% 5.9% 25.0 RUX Rehabilitation Ultra High And Extensive Services with ADL 11-16 41 1.2% 5.9% 20.5 CC1 Clinically Complex with No Depression and ADL 6-10 37 1.1% 2.9% 37.0 LC1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 6-10 30 0.9% 2.9% 30.0 RHB Rehabilitation High with ADL 6-10 30 0.9% 2.9% 30.0 Top s 3,204 95.6% 45.1 All s 3,351 100.0% 39.4 * An episode of care (EOC) is defined as a series of claims from a SNF for a beneficiary where the difference between the "Through Date" of one claim and the "From Date" of the subsequent claim is less than or equal to thirty days. The "From" and "Through" dates in form locator 6 (statement covers period) on the claim identify the span of service dates included in a particular bill; the "From" date is the earliest date of service on the claim. Note: s will display for which there are a total of at least 11 days billed to the respective during the most recent fiscal year.

SNFs For Demo Jurisdiction (DMSTR) Jurisdiction Top s for All Episodes of Care* (EOC), Most Recent 4 Qtrs. In Descending Order by Number of Days Billed Total SNF EOC: 149,396 Code Number of Days Billed % of Days to Total Days % of EOC with the Billed to Total EOC Average Length of Stay By Description RUB Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 6-10 1,032,802 20.8% 29.5% 23.4 RUC Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 11-16 671,832 13.6% 17.1% 26.2 RVB Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 6-10 479,945 9.7% 17.6% 18.2 RVC Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 11-16 399,226 8.1% 13.2% 20.3 RUA Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 0-5 340,519 6.9% 13.3% 17.1 RHC Rehabilitation High with ADL 11-16 275,840 5.6% 9.3% 19.9 RVA Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 0-5 254,962 5.2% 10.9% 15.7 RHB Rehabilitation High with ADL 6-10 236,971 4.8% 9.1% 17.4 RMC Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 11-16 184,860 3.7% 7.5% 16.6 RMB Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 6-10 137,686 2.8% 6.5% 14.3 RHA Rehabilitation High with ADL 0-5 130,526 2.6% 5.6% 15.5 RMA Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 0-5 93,245 1.9% 4.4% 14.1 LE1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 15-16 69,883 1.4% 1.7% 26.8 HE1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 15-16 47,301 1.0% 2.0% 15.7 LD1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 11-14 47,144 1.0% 1.7% 18.6 ES3 Extensive Services Tracheostomy Care and Ventilator/respirator and ADL 2-1 45,256 0.9% 0.8% 39.7 LC1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 6-10 32,257 0.7% 1.3% 16.3 HD1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 11-14 32,081 0.7% 1.8% 12.2 HB1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 2-5 26,705 0.5% 1.4% 13.0 LE2 Special Care Low with Depression and ADL 15-16 26,484 0.5% 0.7% 25.1 Top s Jurisdiction-wide 4,565,525 92.1% 19.7 All s Jurisdiction-wide 4,954,989 100.0% 18.8 * An episode of care (EOC) is defnined as a series of claims from a SNF for a beneficiary where the difference between the "Through Date" of one claim and the "From Date" of the subsequent claim is less than or equal to thirty days. The "From" and "Through" dates in form locator 6 (statement covers period) on the claim identify the span of service dates included in a particular bill; the "From" date is the earliest date of service on the claim. Note: s will display for which there are a total of at least 11 days billed to the respective during the most recent fiscal year. Worksheet: Jurisd. Top s Page: 12

SNFs For Demo Jurisdiction (DMSTR) Jurisdiction Top s for All Episodes of Care* (EOC) w/ 90+ Days, Most Recent 4 Qtrs. In Descending Order by Number of Days Billed Total SNF EOC: 10,676 Code Number of Days Billed % of Days to Total Days % of EOC with the Billed to Total EOC Average Length of Stay By Description RUC Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 11-16 154,646 14.7% 31.7% 45.8 RUB Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 6-10 146,532 13.9% 32.0% 42.8 RVC Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 11-16 84,047 8.0% 25.9% 30.4 RVB Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 6-10 78,021 7.4% 24.9% 29.3 RHC Rehabilitation High with ADL 11-16 68,975 6.6% 21.3% 30.4 RMC Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 11-16 50,234 4.8% 18.2% 25.9 RHB Rehabilitation High with ADL 6-10 48,885 4.6% 17.3% 26.5 LE1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 15-16 43,014 4.1% 8.6% 46.7 RUA Rehabilitation Ultra High with ADL 0-5 38,558 3.7% 11.0% 32.8 RMB Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 6-10 32,113 3.1% 13.1% 23.0 RVA Rehabilitation Very High with ADL 0-5 31,100 3.0% 10.9% 26.7 LD1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 11-14 24,367 2.3% 7.3% 31.3 ES3 Extensive Services Tracheostomy Care and Ventilator/respirator and ADL 2-1 21,955 2.1% 2.6% 79.3 RHA Rehabilitation High with ADL 0-5 21,453 2.0% 7.7% 26.3 HE1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 15-16 19,008 1.8% 5.5% 32.7 RMA Rehabilitation Medium with ADL 0-5 17,182 1.6% 6.4% 25.3 LC1 Special Care Low with No Depression and ADL 6-10 16,153 1.5% 5.4% 28.1 LE2 Special Care Low with Depression and ADL 15-16 15,044 1.4% 3.4% 41.4 HD1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 11-14 11,368 1.1% 4.2% 25.5 HC1 Special Care High with No Depression and ADL 6-10 8,807 0.8% 3.5% 23.8 Top s Jurisdiction-wide 931,462 88.4% 33.5 All s Jurisdiction-wide 1,053,253 100.0% 32.1 * An episode of care (EOC) is defined as a series of claims from a SNF for a beneficiary where the difference between the "Through Date" of one claim and the "From Date" of the subsequent claim is less than or equal to thirty days. The "From" and "Through" dates in form locator 6 (statement covers period) on the claim identify the span of service dates included in a particular bill; the "From" date is the earliest date of service on the claim. Note: s will display for which there are a total of at least 11 days billed to the respective during the most recent fiscal year.