Rejected NGB Proposal

Similar documents
The Rebalance of the Army National Guard

NCNGA FY-17 Federal Legislative Initiatives. Repeal Conversion of National Guard Technicians to Title 5 (Section 1053 of FY-16 NDAA)

UNCLASSIFIED FINAL STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL H STEVEN BLUM CHIEF, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU BEFORE THE

NGAUS LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

FY16 Senate Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

As we close the book on one of America s longest military

FY19 President s Budget Request

FY16 President s Budget Request

FY18 President s Budget Request

Appendix B. If your mission is multifaceted or open-ended, what do you consider your three primary missions in order of importance?

Legislative Report. President s Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2018 OVERVIEW. As of June 8, 2017

FY19 House Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

2014 Army Posture Statement Concept Briefing. This presentation is UNCLASSIFIED

DANGER WARNING CAUTION

TM ARMY STRONG. Army ROTC - A World of Opportunity to START STRONG!

FY19 House National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

Army Total Force Policy

Commanding General s Townhall FY14/15 Priorities and Known Changes

FY17 House Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

Office of the G5 Strategic Plans & Communications ARMY NATIONAL GUARD. Transforming while Conducting the Global War on Terrorism

DOMESTIC SUPPORT OPERATIONS

Aligning USAR Aviation Force Structure for DSCA

Fort Riley, Kansas. Brave, Responsible, and On Point. ONE for the Nation. An Army Community of Excellence

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

STATEMENT OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL MICHAEL W. WOOLEY, U.S. AIR FORCE COMMANDER AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE

February 1, The analysis depends critically on three key factors:

STATEMENT BY GENERAL RICHARD A. CODY VICE CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

Landpower and the Reserve Components

A Ready, Modern Force!

STATEMENT OF GENERAL BRYAN D. BROWN, U.S. ARMY COMMANDER UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

2015 Leaders Summit on Peacekeeping Summary of Member-State Commitments United Nations October 2015

FY16 Senate Defense Appropriations

The forces to deploy will include: 19 Light Brigade Headquarters and Signal Squadron (209) Elements of 845 Naval Air Squadron

Alabama - Adjutant General Mark Bowen

NATIONAL GUARD TITLE 32 HURRICANE RESPONSE

FY18 SAC-D Defense Appropriations Act

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY THE HONORABLE MARK T. ESPER SECRETARY OF THE ARMY AND GENERAL MARK A. MILLEY CHIEF OF STAFF UNITED STATES ARMY BEFORE THE

Defense Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2015; H.R. 4870

arkansas focused, mission ready ACRONYMS executive overview

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

Strategy Research Project

U.S. Army s Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress

NG-J3/7 CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 13 October 2016 DOMESTIC USE OF NATIONAL GUARD UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

LESSON 3: THE U.S. ARMY PART 2 THE RESERVE COMPONENTS

AIR NATIONAL GUARD FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES APPROPRIATION 3850 NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE FEBRUARY 2018

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Statement by. Brigadier General Otis G. Mannon (USAF) Deputy Director, Special Operations, J-3. Joint Staff. Before the 109 th Congress

GAO. FORCE STRUCTURE Capabilities and Cost of Army Modular Force Remain Uncertain

Army Structure Update

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC

NGB-ZC-MEC CNGB Notice 1401 DISTRIBUTION: A 24 February 2012

DOD INSTRUCTION STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (SPP)

Assessing the Effect of Title 32 Active Guard and Reserves on Personal Readiness in the Army National Guard

DIVISION OPERATIONS. October 2014

Concept Plan Modern Army Combatives Program Information Paper As of 6 JUNE 07

National Guard Fact Sheet Army National Guard (FY2005) {posted on 3 May 2006}

America s Army Reserve: An Enduring Operational Force

Army Personnel by Defense Mission Category, FY1962-FY2000

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

A New Approach to Force-Mix Analysis: A Case Study Comparing Air Force Active and Reserve Forces Conducting Cyber Missions

AIR NATIONAL GUARD FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES APPROPRIATION 3850 NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE FEBRUARY 2016

In recent years, the term talent

Four4Four Plan To Avoid ADA Violations. Phil Davidson 3 June 2016 PDI Orlando, FL

CHAPTER 4 : VALUE SYSTEM AND VALUE CHAIN OVERVIEW 4.1 THE VALUE SYSTEM FOR SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE

CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)


Did you know... Did you know...

Capital Offence June www orld.com.cbrnew

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

AIR NATIONAL GUARD FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2001 BUDGET ESTIMATES APPROPIATION 3850 NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL, AIR FORCE

GUARD 101. MinnesotaNationalGuard.org

U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center

CHAPTER 7 MANAGING THE CONSEQUENCES OF DOMESTIC WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION INCIDENTS

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2

Questions are welcome during the session, please type them into the DCS Chat Window

DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL

Joint Task Force. significant. supporting. the event

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Report on DoD-Funded Service Contracts in Forward Areas

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FULL TIME NATIONAL GUARD DUTY COUNTERDRUG

HQDA Army Family Action Plan (AFAP) Conference Report Out. 4 February 2011

STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GAO FORCE STRUCTURE. Army Lacks Units Needed for Extended Contingency Operations. Report to Congressional Committees

LESSON 2: THE U.S. ARMY PART 1 - THE ACTIVE ARMY

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

CHAPTER 2: SERVICE TO THE NATION LESSON 3: THE ARMY RESERVE COMPONENTS

Headline Goal approved by General Affairs and External Relations Council on 17 May 2004 endorsed by the European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

Equipping an Operational Army Reserve

BULLETIN #: FY DATED: 27 October 2017 VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT HANSCOM AFB,

Transcription:

Focus: Readiness Readiness reduced with similar impact to AC NGB BCA Gross turbulence: 17,723 spaces Unprogrammed turbulence cost: $265 million Rejected NGB Proposal Current NG Force Structure = 352K Army BCA 335K Reduced Force Structure 315K 345K End state is an avg. 3% FSA reduction Reduces risk to meet nation s needs End Strength 26 Brigade Combat Teams 22 8 Combat Aviation Brig. 6 6 Attack Aviation 0 Battalions 315K Rebalanced capabilities will require > 5 yrs to regain readiness Gross turbulence: 55,000 spaces Unprogrammed turbulence cost: $1.07B End state is an avg. 8.8% FSA reduction Increases risk to nation s needs Focus: Cost Alone Reduces 4,000 AGRs (28,810 to 24,810) Reduces 1,284 MILTECHs (27,210 to 25,926) Total: 5,284 fulltime $1.7 Billion Decrease $16.2B reduction To $14.5B (BCA) Reduces 2,927 AGRs (28,810 to 25,883) Reduces 2,814 MILTECHs (27,210 to 24,396) Total: 5,741 fulltime

National Guard Myths vs. Facts MYTH: The National Guard plan lowers readiness and converts the force into a strategic reserve. FACT: The National Guard Plan incorporates a system of progressive readiness based on the ARFORGEN cycle that provides ready units as needed, a fiscally responsible choice that retains capability and promotes efficiency. The Army s plan relegates the Guard to a strategic reserve by removing combat arms force structure and creating a 2 nd class force. MYTH: It takes 2 years to mobilize a National Guard unit. FACT: Capabilities are mobilized when needed. Predictability allows for precision in preparing units. Most Guard units are available within 45 days. Our most complex organizations mobilize in 60-100 days. Guard units will be ready before the Army can deploy the majority of its forces, du to airlift and sealift limitations. MYTH: The National Guard is inaccessible. FACT: Congress has provided a full rang of emergency and non-emergency activation authorities. The National Guard has mobilized more than 700,000 troops in the past 12 years and remains ready to meet every request. MYTH: National Guard members are Weekend Warriors. FACT: Since the 1990 s the National Guard has been a globally deployable operational force capable of simultaneously executing combat operations overseas and emergency response at home. Guard members have invaluable civilian skills that are routinely put to use on the battlefield and are not prevalent among active Army personnel. MYTH: National Guard members train 39 days a year. FACT: 39 days is the minimum. The current average is 94.2 training days (includes AGR, ADOS and all training categories) MYTH: The only valuable training is Army training. It s the only training that contributes to readiness. FACT: Guardsmen also benefit from a vast of array of training, education, and work experience gained in the private and public sector at no cost to the military. This experience has been invaluable to America s military success at home and overseas. MYTH: The National Guard cannot effectively operate above company level. FACT: Several National Guard Brigades and Battalions routinely execute collective operations above company level during emergency response, combat, and training exercises. MYTH: The National Guard is a complimentary force and is not interchangeable with active Army units FACT: The National Guard has the same force structure, equipment, and training requirements as the active Army and systematically moves through a progressive readiness cycle prior to deployment.

FY15 Army Budget Request: Proportional Reduction?

Army BCA Effects on the 54 National Guards at a 315K Total Guard Force

Reminder The following slide must be customized by each state to highlight the effects of the Army s Budget Proposal. Delete this reminder slide.

Effects on the [Your State s] National Guard Reduction of ARNG to 335K will equate to: Loss of XXXX+ positions Loss of XXXX+ full-time employees Loss of XXXX helicopters Loss of XXXXX+ vehicles/equipment Signal Transport Aviation Vertical Engineer Reduction of ARNG to 315K will equate to: Loss of XXXXX+ positions Loss of XXX+ full-time employees Loss of XXX helicopters Loss of XXX+ vehicles/equipment Vertical Engineer Military Police Signal Transport Aviation Horizontal Engineer Either plan will result in the loss of key assets to respond to Louisiana domestic emergencies -- Loss of Command and Control assets Loss of Search and Rescue airframes Decreased Commodity Distribution capabilities Inability to support State-wide communications Reduced capacity to provide Road Clearing and Engineering support Decreased capability to support Local Law Enforcement