U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

Similar documents
U.S. Nuclear Planning After the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

The U.S. Nuclear Posture in Korea

U.S. Nuclear Strategy After the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

Nuclear Weapons Status and Options Under a START Follow-On Agreement

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization

Nuclear Disarmament Weapons Stockpiles

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: THE END OF HISTORY?

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012

Nuclear Modernization, Enhanced Military Capabilities, and Strategic Stability

Nuclear Disarmament: Weapons Stockpiles

Défense nationale, July US National Security Strategy and pre-emption. Hans M. KRISTENSEN

V. Chinese nuclear forces

Beyond Trident: A Civil Society Perspective on WMD Proliferation

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Practical Steps towards Transparency of Nuclear Arsenals January Introduction

NUCLEAR MISSION CREEP

NRDC: Nuclear Notebook U.S. nuclear forces, 2006

SEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION. John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration

Issue No. 405 May 12, Summaries of the 1994, 2001, and 2010 Nuclear Posture Reviews

GREAT DECISIONS WEEK 8 NUCLEAR SECURITY

The Need for a Strong U.S. Nuclear Deterrent In the 21 st Century. A White Paper By Franklin C. Miller

THE FUTURE OF U.S.-RUSSIAN ARMS CONTROL

Trends in World Nuclear Forces, 2016

October 2017 SWIM CALL

Why Japan Should Support No First Use

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Triad, Dyad, Monad? Shaping U.S. Nuclear Forces for the Future. Presentation to the Air Force Association Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective

China s Strategic Force Modernization: Issues and Implications

NATO s New Guided Standoff Nuclear Bomb

Montessori Model United Nations. First Committee Disarmament and International Security

Future Russian Strategic Challenges Mark B.Schneider

Banning Ballistic Missiles? Missile Control for a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World

Fact Sheet, 1 Oct. 2014, <

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

StratCom in Context: The Hidden Architecture of U.S. Militarism

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Nuclear Capabilities

From Counterforce to Minimal Deterrence:

A Global History of the Nuclear Arms Race

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Joint Statement for the Record

The B61 Life-Extension Program: Increasing NATO Nuclear Capability and Precision Low-Yield Strikes

U.S. nuclear forces, 2008

Disarmament and International Security: Nuclear Non-Proliferation

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Physics/Global Studies 280: Session 17

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues

Trump review leans toward proposing mini-nuke

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

Nuclear Weapons. and the Future of National Security

Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

How Barack Obama s Vision of a Nuclear-Free World Weakens America s Security: Russia, Deterrence, and Missile Defense

MANAGING NUCLEAR MISSILE COMPETITIONS BETWEEN INDIA, PAKISTAN AND CHINA

Though the size of the US nuclear. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. US nuclear forces, Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S.

THE FUTURE OF U.S. NUCLEAR FORCES: BOOM OR BUST?

Living in the Shadow of Annihilation: Nuclear Weapons and the Cold War. First Soviet A-Bomb detonated First Soviet H-Bomb Detonated

The Strategic Challenge of the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal: AY14 Nuclear Issues Research Group. Edited by: Albert J. Mauroni

***** A GREETING TO ARMS. An interview with the leading Russian arms control expert Alexei Arbatov. By Andrei Lipsky, Novaya Gazeta, June 6, 2018

Modern Arms Control Challenges

U.S. Nuclear Force Levels: Using QDR Goals to Maximize U.S. Security

Considerations for a US Nuclear Force Structure below a 1,000-Warhead Limit

Terms. Administration Outlook. The Setting Massive Retaliation ( ) Eisenhower State of the Union Address (2/53)

The Role of Nuclear Weapons in International Politics Andrew L. Ross University of New Mexico

U.S. Strategic Command Force Structure Studies

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

Chinese Perceptions on Nuclear Weapons, Arms Control, and Nonproliferation

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

Conventional Warheads for Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues for Congress

Italy s Nuclear Anniversary: Fake Reassurance For a King s Ransom

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: The United Kingdom

Nuclear Weapons in U.S. National Security Policy: Past, Present, and Prospects

Less than a year after the first atomic

Nuclear Command and Control for the 21 st Century 1

CRS Report for Congress

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to

A New World. The Cold War - Part 2

CRS Report for Congress

Nuclear Weapons in U.S. National Security Policy: Past, Present, and Prospects

This page left intentionally blank

th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC

SUB Hamburg A/ Nuclear Armament. GREENHAVEN PRESS A part of Gale, Cengage Learning. GALE CENGAGE Learning-

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

Transcription:

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation Presentation by Hans M. Kristensen (consultant, Natural Resources Defense Council) Phone: (202) 513-6249 / 289-6868 Website: http://www.nukestrat.com To the Gensuikin Conference Tokyo, August 1, 2004

Overview World Nuclear Forces US Nuclear Policy US Nuclear Stockpile The NPR and the Future Conclusions

World Nuclear Forces 2004 Status 14 years after the Cold War: Global stockpile is 44% of Cold War peak in 1986 (28580 versus 65000) Eight countries have nuclear weapons All continue to modernize their nuclear arsenals

World Nuclear Forces 2004 United States Russia France China Israel United Kingdom Pakistan India Total Strategic 5474 4400 348 282 <200 185 30-50 30-40 10979 Tactical 680 3400 n.a. 120 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 4200 Total 6154 7800 348 402 <200 185 30-50 30-40 15179 Note: Only operational warheads are counted. The United States has an additional 4204 inactive warheads in reserve for a total stockpile of 10358 warheads. Russia has an additional 9200 non-operational warheads for a total stockpile of approximately 17000. Total world stockpile is estimated at some 28583 warheads. The warhead of Israel, India and Pakistan are thought to be only partly operational.

US Nuclear Policy What hasn t changed? 2001 NPR reaffirms importance of nuclear weapons Potential opponents continue to be Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Syria and n Allied security assurances continue (NATO, Japan, South Korea) Massive retaliation and first strike options retained

US Nuclear Policy What has changed? Less focus on Russia Iraq and Libya are gone China is rising star Preemption is real (new plans) Capability-based vs. threat-based planning Arms control is dormant (for now)

US Nuclear Policy What has changed it? End of Cold War (cuts) Iraq and proliferation 1992 NUWEP 1994 NPR 1997 PDD-60 1999 NUWEP 2001 NPR

US Nuclear Posture How has it affected the posture? Reductions in operational warheads Consolidation of infrastructure and capabilities Modernization of remaining forces to maintain enduring arsenal and maximum targeting flexibility Reduction of targets in war plan but geographic distribution of targets has increased Warplanning overhauled: SIOP is dead (new beast is called OPLAN 8044) and replaced with the Living SIOP (a.k.a. adaptive planning) Strategic role for missile defense and advanced conventional forces increased

US Nuclear Posture Strategic Forces 517 ICBM (500 MM3 / 17 MX) 15 SSBNs (14 from October) 115 bombers (72 PMI) Non-strategic Forces Fighter bombers (US and Europe) Tomahawk (on selected SSNs)

US Nuclear Posture ICBMs 500 Minuteman III 17 MX/Peacekeeper Life-extension programs De-MIRV stopped after one Wing Warhead mix (W87 moves to MM3) Minuteman Elite from 2011 New ICBM in 2018

US Nuclear Posture SSBNs 14 SSBNs (Bangor/Kings Bay) D5/W88 capability in Pacific from 2002 All-D5 force from 2006 Life-extension (through 2042) D5 Live Extension W76 upgrade to W76-1 (new fuze) RV GPS-like accuracy program

US Nuclear Posture Bombers 21 B-2 and 94 B-52 ALCM/ACM (W80-1) B61-7 / B61-11 (B-2 only) / B-83 Adaptive planning upgrade W80-1 modernization (W80-3) B-2 RNEP carrier New bomber under development

US Nuclear Posture Fighter Bombers F-15E / F-16C/D B61-3/4/10 (CONUS / NATO) Joint Strike Fighter nuclear

US Nuclear Posture Tomahawk TLAM/N All stored on land (Bangor and Kings Bay) SSN use, periodic certification Of some 300 missiles, 100 active and 200 inactive Life-extension program W80-0 modification W80-2

The NPR and the Future What the 2001 NPR did: Reaffirmed importance of nuclear weapons in US nuclear policy Reaffirmed need for old Triad Called for new nuclear capabilities Increases capability of nuclear weapons infrastructure Increases role of missile defense and advanced conventional forces

The NPR and the Future The New Triad ICBM Cold War Bombers SLBM Nuclear and conventional strike capabilities ICBM Future Bombers SLBM C2, Intelligence & Planning Defenses Responsive infrastructure

The NPR and the Future Where did NPR Force Level Come From? NPR/SORT: 1700-2200 operationally deployed strategic warheads by 2012 SAC / STRATCOM force structure studies from 1991-1996 NPR/SORT is START III but minus de-mirv of ICBMs minus overhaul warheads minus transparency / irreversibility minus limits on non-strategic weapons

The NPR and the Future New nuclear capabilities pursued under the Advanced Concepts Initiative (ACI): Additional yield flexibility Improved earth penetrating weapons (EPWs) Warheads that reduce collateral damage ACI teams reestablished at LANL, LLNL, SNL, NNSA

The NPR and the Future Advanced Concept warheads currently being studied: Reliability replacement warhead concept (LANL) Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Air-launched cruise missile warhead Agent Defeat warhead

The NPR and the Future Earth-penetrators and low-yield Not the same thing Current EPW is B61-11 (400 kt) Potential options (RNEP) include: B61 (variable yields 0.3-400 kt) B83 (low to 1,200 kt)

The NPR and the Future US Official Yield Definitions very low: less than 1 kiloton low: 1 kiloton to 10 kilotons medium: over 10 kilotons to 50 kilotons high: over 50 kilotons to 500 kilotons very high: over 500 kilotons

The NPR and the Future Current US Warhead Inventory With low-yield capability: Warhead B61-3 B61-4 B61-7 B61-7 W80-0 W80-1 B80-0 B80-1 Total Yields four yields:.3, 1.5, 60, 170 kt four yields:.3, 1.5, 10, 50 kt four yields up to 360 kt four yields:.3, 5, 10, 80 kt 5 to 150 kt 5 to 150 kt low to 1200 kt low to 1200 kt Number 396 412 441 208 304 1827 304 329 4221

The NPR and the Future Stockpile Outlook 2004-2012 2004 2012 Reduction Strategic 8655 5112 3543 Non-strategic 1703 844 859 Total 10358 5956 4402

The NPR and the Future Missile Defense Complements vs. replaces nukes Can never be proven 100% effective Offensive-defensive integration will provide new offensive capabilities Undercuts effectiveness of Russian and Chinese deterrent forces Will trigger countermeasures

The NPR and the Future Missile Defense: Lessons Learned Soviet limited missile defense system triggered creation of massive US nuclear strike plan during Cold War Even limited system could upset effectiveness of other strike plans All facilities were nuclear targets (not just interceptors) Triggered US development of MIRV

The NPR and the Future Soviet Missile Defense System (1968) Source: Hans M. Kristensen, et al., The Protection Paradox, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March/April 2004.

The NPR and the Future Current US Targeting of Russian Missile Defense System (1989 simulation) Source: Hans M. Kristensen, et al., The Protection Paradox, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March/April 2004.

The NPR and the Future Conclusions NPR reaffirms large nuclear posture Living SIOP and adaptive planning will facilitate additional missions against old and new enemies Stockpile reduction is in reserve not deployed arsenal, compared with START III level Large opaque upload capacity will remain in reserve (about 100%) Missile defense will complement not replace nuclear forces and trigger countermeasures Conflict with NPT regime looming