ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Similar documents
DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Wildland Fire Assistance

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM CREDIBLE EVENT FOR HAZARD DIVISION 1.6 EXPLOSIVE ARTICLES?

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Explosives Safety Planner Community Development and Sustainment

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Development of guidelines for field storage of ammunition and explosives during military missions out of area. 1 Introduction. 2 Problem definition

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

United States Air Force Explosives Site Plan Report and Explosives Safety Program Support Initiatives

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Report Documentation Page

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

Information Technology

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A1X1 Medical Materiel

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

at the Missile Defense Agency

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

NORAD CONUS Fighter Basing

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

~ NATO STANDARDIZATION ~ 60 YEARS of NORMATIVE SUCCESS. NATO Standardization Agency

Transcription:

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board 14 July 2010

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JUL 2010 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol -Explosives 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Alexandria, Virginia 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM002313. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Seminar (34th) held in Portland, Oregon on 13-15 July 2010, The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Overview Consequence Tool Introduced in Technical Paper 23 Written in Microsoft Excel 2003 is Based on DoD 6055.09-STD Assists in Determining Explosive Operations Hazards Two Different Worksheets - ECMs and All Other PESs Calculates 6 Establish Zones (IBD is the Outermost Zone) Provides User with Potential Personnel and Building Loss Information with Minimal Input Allows User to Quickly Compare the Consequences from Explosives Hazards for Different Quantities of NEW at a PES 1

Background Presents a tool to standardize the deviation process and provide consequence information for explosives risk decisions Provides decision-makers an understandable and consolidated information package for reducing and managing residual risk 2

Objectives Provide the maximum possible protection to people and property Make informed risk decisions at the appropriate level of leadership Provide standardized information for determining and assessing explosives safety risk 3

ASAP-X Tool Example Map A PES B 760 FT C 300 FT D 280 FT E 600 FT F 940 FT G 1190 FT H 1050 FT I 1320 FT J 615 FT K 1350 FT L 1700 FT 4

ASAP-X Tool PES Input #1 5

ASAP-X Tool PES Output #1 Distance 6

ASAP-X Tool PES Output #1 7

ASAP-X Tool PES Output #1 8

ASAP-X Tool PES Input #2 9

ASAP-X Tool Output #2 Distance 10

ASAP-X Tool Output #2 11

ASAP-X Tool Output #2 12

ASAP-X Output Comparison 40,000 LBS NEWQD 30,000 LBS NEWQD 13

ASAP-X Output Comparison 40,000 LBS NEWQD 20,000 LBS NEWQD 14

ASAP-X Tool ECM Input 15

ASAP-X Tool ECM Output 16

Past and Planned Usage Used by Army in Iraq and Afghanistan Provided to SDDC for Port Assessments Used to evaluate locations in Latvia, Korea, Lithuania, and Alaska during recent DDESB trips Will be used during DDESB Strategic Assessment visits outlined by TP 28 Version 2 upgrade allows for the input of GPS coordinates in determining distances between PES and ESs; Will be released this summer NATO Version 1 based on AASTP-1 criteria going through Beta Testing; Should be released this summer 17

Questions 18