Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

Similar documents
Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

during the EHR reporting period.

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Meaningful Use Stage 1 Guide for 2013

Patient Electronic Access Modified Stage 2: Objective 8

Meaningful Use Stage 2

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Note: Every encounter type must have at least one value designated under the MU Details frame.

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

May 7, Submitted electronically via:

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #5 Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

EHR/Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Roadmap

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Professionals

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Understanding Your Meaningful Use Report

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

HSX Meaningful Use Support of Transitions of Care

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

Meaningful Use Roadmap Stage : Eligible Hospitals

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Using Centricity Electronic Medical Record Meaningful Use Reports Version 9.5 January 2013

Quality Data Model December 2012

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

Oklahoma s Public Health Immunization Reporting Updates. By Brittany Curry of OSDH. An Important Reminder. For audio, you must use your phone:

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Transcription:

Summary of Care Objective Measures Exclusion Table of Contents Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013 The EP who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral. EPs must satisfy both of the following measures in order to meet the objective: Measure 1: The EP who transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals. Measure 2: The EP who transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 10 percent of such transitions and referrals either (a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient or (b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is a NwHIN Exchange participant or in a manner that is consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the NwHIN. Measure 3: An EP must satisfy one of the following criteria: Conducts one or more successful electronic exchanges of a summary of care document, as part of which is counted in "measure 2" (for EPs the measure at 495.6(j)(14)(ii)(B) with a recipient who has EHR technology that was developed designed by a different EHR technology developer than the sender's EHR technology certified to 45 CFR 170.314(b)(2). Conducts one or more successful tests with the CMS designated test EHR during the EHR reporting period. Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period is excluded from all three measures. Definition of Terms Attestation Requirements Additional Information Certification and Standards Criteria Definition of Terms Transition of Care The movement of a patient from one setting of care (hospital, ambulatory primary care practice, ambulatory, specialty care practice, long-term care, home health, rehabilitation facility) to another. At a minimum this includes all transitions of care and referrals that are ordered by the EP. Summary of CareRecord A summary of care record must include the following elements: 1

Patient name. Referring or transitioning provider's name and office contact information (EP only). Procedures. Encounter diagnosis Immunizations. Laboratory test results. Vital signs (height, weight, blood pressure, BMI). Smoking status. Functional status, including activities of daily living, cognitive and disability status Demographic information (preferred language, sex, race, ethnicity, date of birth). Care plan field, including goals and instructions. Care team including the primary care provider of record and any additional known care team members beyond the referring or transitioning provider and the receiving provider. Reason for referral Current problem list (EPs may also include historical problems at their discretion). Current medication list, and Current medication allergy list. Problem List At a minimum a list of current, active and historical diagnoses. We do not limit the EP to just including diagnoses on the problem list. Active/current medication list A list of medications that a given patient is currently taking. Active/current medication allergy list A list of medications to which a given patient has known allergies. Allergy An exaggerated immune response or reaction to substances that are generally not harmful. Care Plan The structure used to define the management actions for the various conditions, problems, or issues. A care plan must include at a minimum the following components: problem (the focus of the care plan), goal (the target outcome) and any instructions that the provider has given to the patient. A goal is a defined target or measure to be achieved in the process of patient care (an expected outcome). Attestation Requirements DENOMINATOR/NUMERATOR/THRESHOLD/EXCLUSION MEASURE 1: DENOMINATOR: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the EHR reporting period for which the EP was the transferring or referring provider. NUMERATOR: The number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was provided. THRESHOLD: The percentage must be more than 50 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. 2

EXLCUSION: Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period is excluded from all three measures. MEASURE 2: DENOMINATOR: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the EHR reporting period for which the EP was the transferring or referring provider. NUMERATOR: The number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient or b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is a NwHIN Exchange participant or in a manner that is consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the nationwide health information network. The organization can be a third-party or the sender's own organization. THRESHOLD: The percentage must be more than 10 percent in order for an EP to meet this measure. EXCLUSION: Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period is excluded from all three measures. MEASURE 3: YES/NO The EP attests YES to one of the two criteria: 1. Conducts one or more successful electronic exchanges of a summary of care document, as part of which is counted in "measure 2" (for EPs the measure at 495.6(j)(14)(ii)(B) with a recipient who has EHR technology that was developed designed by a different EHR technology developer than the sender's EHR technology certified to 45 CFR 170.314(b)(2). or 2. Conducts one or more successful tests with the CMS designated test EHR during the EHR reporting period. EXCLUSION: Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period is excluded from all three measures. Additional Information Only patients whose records are maintained using certified EHR technology mustbe included in the denominator for transitions of care. The EP that transfers or refers the patient to another setting of care or provider should provide the summary of care document. It is for this provider that has the most recent information on the patient that may be crucial to the provider to whom the patient is transferred or referred. The EP can send an electronic or paper copy of the summary care record directly to the next provider or can provide it to the patient to deliver to the next provider, if the patient can reasonably expected to do so and meet Measure 1. 3

If the provider to whom the referral is made or to whom the patient is transitioned to has access to the medical record maintained by the referring provider then the summary of care record would not need to be provided, and that patient mustnot be included in the denominator for transitions of care. To count in the numerator of any measure, the EP must verify these three fields for current problem list, current medication list, and current medication allergy listare not blank and include the most recent information known by the EP or hospital as of the time of generating the summary of care document. To count in the numerator of measure 2, the summary of care record must be received by the provider to whom the sending provider is referring or transferring the patient. To count in the numerator of measure 2, one of the following three transmission approaches must be used: o Use of the transport standard capability required for certification. As required by ONC to meet the CEHRT definition, every EP, eligible hospital, and CAH, must have EHR technology that is capable of electronically transmitting a summary care record for transitions of care and referrals according to the primary Direct Project specification (the Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport). Thus, EPs, eligible hospitals, or CAHs that electronically transmit summary care records using their CEHRT s Direct capability (natively or combined with an intermediary) would be able to count all such electronic transmissions in their numerator. o Use of the SOAP-based optional transport standard capability permitted for certification. As part of certification, ONC permits EHR technology developers to voluntarily seek certification for their EHR technology s capability to perform SOAPbased electronic transmissions. EHR technology developers who take this approach would enable their customers to also use this approach to meet the measure. Thus, EPs, eligible hospitals, or CAHs that electronically transmit summary care records using their CEHRT s SOAP-based capability (natively or combined with an intermediary) would be able to count all of those transmissions in their numerator. o Use of CEHRT to create a summary care record in accordance with the required standard (i.e., Consolidated CDA as specified in 45 CFR 170.314(b)(2)), and the electronic transmission is accomplished through the use of an ehealth Exchange participant who enables the electronic transmission of the summary care record to its intended recipient. Thus, EPs, eligible hospitals, or CAHs who create standardized summary care records using their CEHRT and then use an ehealth Exchange participant to electronically transmit the summary care record would be able to count all of those transmissions in their numerator. See related FAQ. In order to meet this objective and measure, an EP must use the capabilities and standards of CEHRT at 45 CFR 170.314(b)(1), (b)(2), (g)(1), and (g)(2). 4

Certification and Standards Criteria Below is the corresponding certification and standards criteria for electronic health record technology that supports achieving the meaningful use of this objective. Certification Criteria 170.314 (b) (1) Transitions of care receive, display, and incorporate transition of care/referral summaries 170.314(b)(2) Transitions of care create and transmit transition of care/referral summaries (i) Receive. EHR technology must be able to electronically receive transition of care/referral summaries in accordance with: A. The standard specified in 170.202(a). B. Optional. The standards specified in 170.202(a) and (b). C. Optional. The standards specified in 170.202(b) and (c). (ii) Display. EHR technology must be able to electronically display in human readable format the data included in transition of care/referral summaries received and formatted according to any of the following standards (and applicable implementation specifications) specified in: 170.205(a)(1), 170.205(a)(2), and 170.205(a)(3). (iii) Incorporate. Upon receipt of a transition of care/referral summary formatted according to the standard adopted at 170.205(a)(3), EHR technology must be able to: A. Correct patient. Demonstrate that the transition of care/referral summary received is or can be properly matched to the correct patient. B. Data incorporation. Electronically incorporate the following data expressed according to the specified standard(s): Medications. At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(d)(2); Problems. At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(a)(3); Medication allergies. At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(d)(2). Section views. Extract and allow for individual display each additional section or sections (and the accompanying document header information) that were included in a transition of care/referral summary received and formatted in accordance with the standard adopted at 170.205(a)(3). (i) Create. Enable a user to electronically create a transition of care/referral summary formatted according to the standard adopted at 170.205(a)(3) that includes, at a minimum, the Common MU Data Set and the following data expressed, where applicable, according to the specified standard(s): A. Encounter diagnoses. The standard specified in 170.207(i) or, at a minimum, the version of the standard specified 170.207(a)(3); B. Immunizations. The standard specified in 170.207(e)(2); C. Cognitive status; D. Functional status; and E. The reason for referral; and referring or transitioning provider s name and office contact information. (ii) Transmit. Enable a user to electronically transmit the transition of care/referral summary created in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section in accordance with: A. The standard specified in 170.202(a). 5

B. Optional. The standards specified in 170.202(a) and (b). C. Optional. The standards specified in 170.202(b) and (c). *Depending on the type of certification issued to the EHR technology, it will also have been certified to the certification criterion adopted at 45 CFR 170.314 (g)(1), (g)(2), or both, in order to assist in the calculation of this meaningful use measure. Standards Criteria 170.202(a) ONC Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport (incorporated by reference Transport in 170.299). standards 170.202(b) ONC XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging Specification (incorporated by reference in Transport 170.299). standards 170.202(c) ONC Transport and Security Specification (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Transport standards 170.205(a)(1) HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: IHE Health Story Consolidation, (incorporated by reference in 170.299). The use of the unstructured document documentlevel template is prohibited. 170.207(a)(3) IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 (incorporated by reference in Problem List 170.299) and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release (incorporated by reference in 170.299). 170.207(b)(2) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(a)(5). 170.207(b)(3) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(a)(5). 170.207(b)(4) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(a)(5). 170.207(c)(2) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(a)(5). 170.207(c)(2) Laboratory tests 170.207(d)(2) Medications 170.207(e)(2) Immunizations 170.207(f) Race and Ethnicity 170.207(g) Preferred Language Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC ) Database version 2.40, a universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations produced by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (incorporated by reference in 170.299). RxNorm, a standardized nomenclature for clinical drugs produced by the United States National Library of Medicine, August 6, 2012 Release (incorporated by reference in 170.299) HL7 Standard Code Set CVX Vaccines Administered, updates through July 11, 2012. The Office of Management and Budget Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, Statistical Policy Directive No. 15, as revised, October 30, 1997 (see Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards) As specified by the Library of Congress, ISO 639-2 alpha-3 codes limited to those that also have a corresponding alpha-2 code in ISO 639-1. (incorporated by reference in 170.299). 6

Standards Criteria 170.207(h) Smoking Status 170.207(i) Encounter Diagnoses Smoking status must be coded in one of the following SNOMED CT codes: (1) Current every day smoker. 449868002 (2) Current some day smoker. 428041000124106 (3) Former smoker. 8517006 (4) Never smoker. 266919005 (5) Smoker, current status unknown. 77176002 (6) Unknown if ever smoked. 266927001 (7) Heavy tobacco smoker. 428071000124103 (8) Light tobacco smoker. 428061000124105 The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(c)(2) for the indicated conditions. 7