Research Funding in Texas

Similar documents
INFOBRIEF SRS TOP R&D-PERFORMING STATES DISPLAY DIVERSE R&D PATTERNS IN 2000

Richard Dawson, CPA, CIA, CRMA; Interim Chief Audit rrr.ci~

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Student Tuition & Fees

Commercialization Trends and Insights across Academe, Industry, and Federal Labs

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS

Higher Education Fund Summary of Recommendations - Senate

ICUT Annual Statistical Report 2013

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Grant Application Information

Updated Hurricane Harvey s Fiscal Impact on State Agencies PRESENTED TO SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

Vision Funds to Support Tulsa Non-Profit Arts Organizations

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: NOVEMBER 9, 2015

Department of Defense

R E Q U E S T F O R A P P L I C A T I O N S RFA R-12-CFSA-1

President Dennis Assanis

Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

Texas Department of Transportation

TicketCity Bowl. City Council Briefing April 6, 2011

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS RFA R-18.1-RFT

The National Research Council Assessment of The Small Business Innovation Research Program

Industry Partnerships at the University of Cincinnati: Their Role in Research, Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Commercialization

Communications Workers of America Proposals to Stimulate Broadband Investment

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

National Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles

Municipal Court s 3 rd Party Collections Contract. Dallas City Council November 5, 2014

Update on the R&D Enterprise

An ongoing research program at the Real Estate Center. Texas Job Market Outpaces Nation's

UT Horizon Fund Student Investment Competition (UTHF SIC) 2013

Contracts & Grants FY Funding Report

Research Administration Shared Services

Section 1. GAIs, System Offices, Lamars, and TSTCs 2/13/ Base. Biennial Change ($)

Faculty Perspectives on Federal Research Funding

RESILIENCE AND VULNERABILITY The State of the Nonprofit Sector in Los Angeles 2009

INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

The U.S. Federal Budget in Science and Technology

Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences at The University of Texas at Austin

LSC-Kingwood. Institutions Attended, Fall 2009 Academic Students Community and Technical Colleges. LSC-Kingwood

U.S. Research and Development Funding and Performance: Fact Sheet

6,182 fewer prisoners

Roderick D. MacDonald Research Fund at Baylor St. Luke s Medical Center 2016

16% 11% 18% 30% 17% $ Statutory Tuition. $ Fees. $ Contracts & Grants. $ Sales & Services. $.7 - Investment Income

WHY STTR???? Congress designated 4 major goals. SBIR Program. Program Extension until 9/30/2008 Output and Outcome Data

SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) PROGRAM

Competitiveness Scorecard Assessing New York City s Competitiveness as a Home for Human Capital

Ohio Third Frontier Program

December 1999 Report No

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Hurricane Harvey s Fiscal Impact on State Agencies PRESENTED TO HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF

HUB Participation: Historical Analysis

Fiscal Research Center

Business Incentives and Economic Development Expenditures: An Overview of Delaware s Program Investments and Outcomes Summary

Grant Guidelines. for Cultural Facilities. Table of Contents. Florida Department of State

Local Government Economic Development Incentives Survey for FY

Best Practices in Local Public MWBE and SBE Programs. Webinar May 29, 2014

Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program: An Overview

Fiscal Year 2016 Report to Congress on Laboratory Directed Research and Development at the DOE National Laboratories

Fiscal Research Center

University Technology Commercialization

Internal Audit Report Grantee: The University of Texas at Austin

NSF Fiscal Year 1996 Budget Request

TRANSPORTATION DISCUSSION WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL BEN HART, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, GOED

RESEARCH CENTRES AND GROUPS POLICY

Fiscal Research Center

California Institutes for Science and Innovation: A foundation for California s future

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Annual Report on Research FY 2014 FINANCIAL SUMMARY

How Technology-Based Start-Ups Support U.S. Economic Growth

appropriate. The central staff provides additional support for deans by traveling with them to meet with donors both locally and across the country.

Technology Transfer in the US: Present State and Current Issues

Ecosystem Science Center (ESC) Charter

North Dakota State University

Positioning Your Research, Infrastructure, and Education Activities to Take Advantage of the Programs in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

GRANT DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK

North Carolina Needs a Coordinated Strategy to Guide the Changing Landscape of Veterans Programs

CHAPTER House Bill No. 5013

How North Carolina Compares

TITLE IV 21 ST CENTURY SCHOOLS

Copyright 2004 The Trust for Public Land

Diversion and Forensic Capacity: Presentation to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services

The SBIR Partnership

Competitive Program for Science Museums, Planetariums, and NASA Visitor Centers Plus Other Opportunities

MINISTRY OF ENERGY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards...14

Economic Status of the States

Florida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment


Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Biomedical Engineering

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Arizona Higher Education Enterprise Technology and Research Initiative Fund (TRIF) Five-Year Project Plan Summary July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021

NIH and Core Facilities over the Past 2 Years

FY 2014 Appropriation Request to the State of Vermont. UVM General Appropriation and Morgan Horse Farm

BILLION UC-GENERATED ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN CALIFORNIA

Finance & Audit Committee Meeting. First Quarter Fiscal Year 2018 October 25, 2017

Commonwealth Health Research Board ("CHRB") Grant Guidelines for FY 2014/2015

July 21, The Honorable Harry Reid 522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC Dear Senator Reid:

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND RESEARCH COMMITTEE

The Texas A&M University System Internal Audit Department INTERNAL AUDIT ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017

Transcription:

Research Funding in Texas Presentation for the Senate Subcommittee on Higher Education July 23, 2008 1

Research Goal in Closing the Gaps Increase the level of federal science and engineering R&D obligations to Texas universities to 6.5% of all obligations (from 5.5% in 2000) Increase research expenditures by Texas public institutions from $1.45B to $3B by 2015 (~5%/year) THECB 07/08 2

Long-term trends in Research Expenditures show steady improvement over time Source: THECB Research Expenditure s Report, FY 2007 THECB 07/08 3

However, our record on achieving the research goal in Closing the Gaps is mixed Federal science and engineering obligations for research and development increased by $665 million from FY 1998 to FY 2005 Texas percentage of federal obligations has increased overall since FY 1998, but has seen declines in recent years. Despite the increase in total annual dollars, Texas still lags behind other key states in overall federal obligations. THECB 07/08 4

Source: THECB Research Expenditure Report, FY 2007 Where do we stand nationally? Texas has made progress in securing more federal research dollars, but is still well behind key states Federal Obligations (FY05) California New York Pennsylvania Maryland Texas $3.56B $2.05B $1.49B $1.46B $1.40B THECB 07/08 5

However, compared to key peer states Texas has maintained its percentage of Federal obligations State Change in R&D Obligation Share Texas.32% Maryland (.12)% New York (.13)% Pennsylvania (.39)% California (.65)% Source: National Science Foundation/Division of Science Resources Statistics, Survey of Federal Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit Institutions, FY 2005 THECB 07/08 6

Texas funds a higher percentage of research than a key economic and educational competitor California Texas $6.5B Total All institutions, public and private $3.3B Total All institutions, public and private Source: NSF Survey on R&D Expenditures at Universities and THECB 07/08 7 Colleges, FY 2006

How is research funded? The Texas Charter for Public Higher Education (1987), suggested research be funded via a combination of: Research Enhancement Program Advanced Research Program Advanced Technology Program Research Appropriations (special items) Indirect Cost Recovery THECB 07/08 8

Today, Texas invests in a number of initiatives designed to facilitate research Advanced Research Program Research Development Fund Emerging Technology Fund Competitive Knowledge Fund Cancer Prevention and Research Institute Special Item Funding Indirect Cost Recovery Orange = New Program THECB 07/08 9

ARP is a cornerstone for state funded research Advanced Research Program (ARP) focuses on basic research: FY2008-09: $16.4M Competitive, peer reviewed grants Funded 1,520 awards allowing research opportunities for approx. 6,000 graduate and 4,000 undergraduate students. THECB 07/08 10

Research Development Fund (RDF) Texas Excellence Fund and University Research Fund created in 2001 Evolved into RDF in 2003 and began operation in FY2006 RDF supports research capacity at public universities, such as funding laboratories and facilities FY 2008-09: $80.9M THECB 07/08 11

Emerging Technology Fund Fund established in 2005 Supports activities that create high quality jobs or result in scientific breakthroughs Three areas of emphasis: Public and private collaboration Match grants to innovators Attract top research talent to Texas FY 2008-09: $117.3M THECB 07/08 12

Competitive Knowledge Fund Established in 2007 to enhance support of faculty for instructional excellence and research Eligible universities include: Texas A&M University, Texas Tech University, UT Austin, and University of Houston FY 2008-09: $93.2M THECB 07/08 13

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute 80th Texas Legislature authorized creation of Institute tasked with implementing the Texas Cancer Plan Voters authorized constitutional amendment to use general obligation bonds each year up to 10 years, beginning in 2010 Matching grants will be distributed for medical research designed to find cure for cancer Funding: $300 million/fy, up to 10 years ($3 billion) THECB 07/08 14

Special Item Funding Special items are funded at many institutions to support specific research functions or initiatives McDonald Observatory (UT Austin), Wind Energy Research (West Texas A&M), and Water Research Center (UT San Antonio) are examples of specific research projects funded via special item appropriations FY 2008-09: $260.3M THECB 07/08 15

Indirect Cost Recovery Universities were previously allowed to keep only 50% of grant overhead amounts Since 2003, based on recommendations in CTG, the Legislature has allowed universities to keep all overhead funds from grants Including FY2004, that amounts to an estimated $230-290M in additional funding THECB 07/08 16

Strategic planning considerations for Research funding Texas needs to invest in basic research Texas must continue to strengthen research at existing national research institutions to better compete with national peers Texas must invest in targeted research excellence at regional institutions THECB 07/08 17

Funding research in Texas has resulted in a measurable return on investment The most recent analysis of the Advanced Research Program identified very specific economic impacts such as license and royalty revenues and start-up commercial activities The analysis found that the state gained $916 million for its $161 million investment in the program through 2006 a 5.7 to 1 return on investment Source: Bureau of Business Research, IC2 Institute & UT-Austin, Impact Assessment of Advanced Research Program, 2006 THECB 07/08 18