March The Challenges Behind Fixing Provider Directory Data. betterdoctor.com

Similar documents
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT FRESH and HUMAN SERVICES GRANT REVIEW

January 04, Submitted Electronically

CMS-3310-P & CMS-3311-FC,

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE

Frequently Asked Questions: HEDIS Attestations

Top Reasons to Become an AmeriHealth Caritas Virginia Provider. amerihealthcaritas.com

Medi-Cal Value Payments

Frequently Asked Questions: HEDIS Clinical Quality Validation (Previously named HEDIS Attestations)

OPPORTUNITIES FOR DATA INTEGRATION AND BEST PRACTICE INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE CLINICAL AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. Office of Inspector General. Audit Report A-1415BPR-020

Update! Frequently Asked Questions: HEDIS Clincal Quality Validation (previously named HEDIS Attestations)

Preparing Your Infrastructure for New Payment Models

Move the Needle on Difficult Quality Measures: How Health Plans Can Control High Blood Pressure

Using Updox to Succeed with MIPS

At EmblemHealth, we believe in helping people stay healthy, get well and live better.

Creating a Patient-Centered Payment System to Support Higher-Quality, More Affordable Health Care. Harold D. Miller

One Medicine: Incorporating Population Health Principles and Best Practices into Clinical Workflow

COLLABORATING FOR VALUE. A Winning Strategy for Health Plans and Providers in a Shared Risk Environment

EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/04. SUBJECT: Primary Care Nurse Practitioners SECTION: CREDENTIALING POLICY NUMBER: CR-31

MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN NEW JERSEY MANAGED CARE NETWORK ADEQUACY REPORT JULY 2013

PATIENT ATTRIBUTION WHITE PAPER

What Does It Take to Become an Emergency Medical Services Administrator?

A Publication for Hospital and Health System Professionals

DAV Sees Progress, Concerns in Claims System

The groups of individuals that are targeted for enrollment are as follows:

Adopting a Care Coordination Strategy

Department of Health Care Services

California HIPAA Privacy Implementation Survey: Appendix A. Stakeholder Interviews

Patient Payment Check-Up

Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Preparing an Advocacy Strategy. The Consumer Partnership for ehealth

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

EMPI Patient Matching Solution Product Use Cases: Epic Electronic Health Record Integration

Drug Events. Adverse R EDUCING MEDICATION ERRORS. Survey Adapted from Information Developed by HealthInsight, 2000.

Effort Reporting: A Conversation. Christine K Lawless Central Effort Administrator Office of Sponsored Research

Name School. Nurse demonstrates basic understanding of medical knowledge and nursing techniques.

Alternative Managed Care Reimbursement Models

From Free Drug to Paid Prescriptions: PATIENT ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES TO ENSURE ROI. by Jan Nielsen, Division President, SonexusHealth

End-to-end infusion safety. Safely manage infusions from order to administration

PointRight: Your Partner in QAPI

Care coordination functions scoping research

New Providers and New Approaches to Program Integrity

Reducing the Risk of Wrong Site Surgery

Credentialing Are We There Yet? By: Kelly Mattingly

Civic Center Building Grant Audit Table of Contents

A Battelle White Paper. How Do You Turn Hospital Quality Data into Insight?

Employers are essential partners in monitoring the practice

A strategy for building a value-based care program

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

The Patient Centered Medical Home Guidelines: A Tool to Compare National Programs

Patient Engagement in the Population Health Management Era

NCDPI Licensure Review

Audit of Indigent Care Agreement with Shands - #804 Executive Summary

Final Grant Report Executive Summary. U.S. Coast Guard Nonprofit Grant Awarded to the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators

Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) February 2013 Meeting Summary

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

ICD-10: The Good, Bad and Ugly

The Silent M in CMS packs a Big Punch!

ACO Practice Transformation Program

Re: CMS Code 3310-P. May 29, 2015

Prospective Provider Information Form Organizational / Group Behavioral Health and Substance Use Providers

August 25, Dear Ms. Verma:

CMS Issues Final Rules on Hospital Medical Staff Conditions of Participation

CIO Legislative Brief

Leon Medical Centers Health Plans will not accept ICD-10 codes until October 1, 2015.

Texas ACO invests in the Quanum portfolio to improve patient care

The Balancing Incentive Program and Caregivers

FOUR TIPS: THE INVISIBLE IMPACT OF CREDENTIALING

QUALITY MEASURES WHAT S ON THE HORIZON

Staying Connected with Patient-Generated Health Data

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Pay for Performance Updates Jeff Flick Regional Administrator CMS, Region IX February 7, 2006

ICD-10 Advantages to Providers Looking beyond the isolated patient provider encounter

Compliance Program Updated August 2017

EVV Requirements in the 21 st Century Cures Act Pre-Conference Intensive

2018 Medicare Advantage Dual Eligible Special Needs Plan (DSNP) & Model of Care (MOC) Overview

Tools and Resources: Staying Up-To-Date with the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

Delayed Federal Grant Closeout: Issues and Impact

Organizational Effectiveness Program

Inland Empire Health Plan Quality Management Program Description Date: April, 2017

Four Game-Changing Strategies for Transforming the Patient Experience

LEGISLATIVE REPORT NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH TRANSFORMATION CENTER (TRANSFORMATION INNOVATIONS CENTER) PROGRAM DESIGN AND BUDGET PROPOSAL

Chapter 1 Health and Wellness and Nova Scotia Health Authority: Family Doctor Resourcing

Voluntary Alignment Frequently Asked Questions

Mandatory Public Reporting of Hospital Acquired Infections

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Innovation Center New Direction

Population Health. Driving local and population health. Being the trusted partner for doctors and health care systems, we re changing how

Revisions to Hospital Medical Staff Standard MS April 2010

The Changing Role CUSTOM MEDIA

Annual Medicaid Roundtable April 20, 2017 FINAL WITH RESPONSES

Using Data to Yield High Impact Business Intelligence Wednesday, July 25, 2012

State advocacy roadmap: Medicaid access monitoring review plans

Operating Rules, Health Plan Identifier and ICD-10

June 27, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

Improving Resident Care: A look at CMS quality of care initiatives

Collaborative Activation of Resources and Empowerment Services Building Programs to Fit Patients vs. Bending Patients to Fit Programs

June 25, Barriers exist to widespread interoperability

Professional Standards of Practice for School Nurses. LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DATA SYSTEM (FPDS) CONTRACT REPORTING DATA IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Version 1.4

DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL NURSES: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

General Information. Overview. Purpose. Table of Contents

Partnership HealthPlan of California Strategic Plan

Transcription:

000111010 0001110011 11100101111 100011011100 101011001010 0101001011100 1101001011110 0001011000110 010100101111 1110011100110111 1000010110111001100 110010101110011001011 1100110011011110110110 1100100011001010111001 0111001001110000011011 01011110011010100110000 01100000111100000101111 01101100011001100110011 01101100011001000111001 01110000011011100101110 11010100111000001100111 March 2018 betterdoctor.com

Maintaining provider directory data and keeping it up to date is not easy. Health plans and other organizations, such as healthcare exchanges and provider groups, expend significant resources to ensure that data published on their sites is accurate so consumers can find care, billing and contracting runs smoothly, and plans comply with all applicable regulations. BetterDoctor s white paper, The Challenges Behind Fixing Provider, explores the main challenges health plans and providers 1 face as the industry works to improve the quality of provider data. The paper also offers best practices for improving the process of making provider directories more accurate for consumers. In this white paper, you ll learn: Challenges health plans face in keeping provider directory data accurate Challenges providers face in updating their information A summary of provider directory regulations across the country Best practices for keeping provider directories up to date and accurate Background Finding the right doctor shouldn t be difficult. Health plan provider directories, often available in a searchable format online, are an important tool in helping individuals and families find the care they need. With the consumerization of healthcare, the need to find doctors has become paramount to properly delivering any healthcare service. Yet, despite federal and state laws designed to ensure the accuracy of these listings and other industry efforts, key information often is missing or out of date. Individuals who rely on the information in provider directories may be denied care or end up with unexpected medical bills. America s health plans understand the importance of providing accurate provider data, but maintaining upto-date information is not easy. Providers may not give health plans updated information in a timely fashion, and health plans may have a difficult time keeping up with frequent changes. This not only causes problems for individual patients, but also may overstate the adequacy of provider networks. To test different approaches to improving the accuracy of provider directories, America s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) conducted in 2016 a pilot program in three states California, Florida, and Indiana. During the pilot, BetterDoctor reached out to 109,857 providers, out of which over 47.5% provided at least a partial response to validation questions and 18.4% responded to a full set of data validation questions. Today, BetterDoctor has scaled their successful provider data management services nationally. Over 517,700 unique providers work with BetterDoctor every quarter to attest their data and help health plans and other organizations keep their data up to date. 1 Here and throughout, providers refers to physician practices, physician group practices, and independent practicioners. 2

Health Plans Face Challenges in Keeping Provider Accurate Health plans understand the importance of keeping their provider directories up to date to meet applicable state and federal regulations. Though they recognize the difficulty in doing so, they are committed to creating accurate directories that serve their members needs. However, provider information changes quickly, and almost every piece of information contained in provider directories can become problematic. Among providers with whom BetterDoctor has worked, physician rosters and types of insurance that providers accept may change as often as every 90 days. In fact, in January 2018, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the results of their second round of Medicare Advantage (MA) online provider directory audits performed in 2017. The CMS provider directory data audit in question covered 12,780 locations for 55 Medicare Advantage health plans and found that 52.6% of the locations listed on provider directories had at least one inaccuracy. Health plans use various methods for updating provider information. Some do so during the credentialing process, but this happens infrequently, usually every two to three years. Other health plans conduct regular, systematic audits on a random sample of their providers. In addition, contracts between health plans and providers typically require providers to submit regular updates to the data contained in their directories. However, few health plans take action against providers that don t supply this information. Ultimately, any organization with provider data faces three main challenges in updating provider directory data: Updating directories via credentialing is too infrequent and ineffective. Claims data does not give health plans correct provider locations or contact details. High administrative burdens for providers prevent health plans from talking to the right person. 20% of provider directories change each year Providers Have Multiple Responsibilities and Incomplete Understanding of the Process Many clinicians delegate requests for updating directory information to their practice managers or administrative staff. These staff frequently wear many hats and give priority to what they perceive as more urgent, such as ensuring payment for the provider. In fact, some providers report being unclear about their role in maintaining directories. In some practices, more than one person may receive requests to update information, which makes tracking changes difficult. Those providers that do attempt to keep their directory up to date have trouble getting accurate and timely 3

responses from individual practitioners, many of whom may be unaware about (all) their network affiliations. In addition, some providers report confusion about providing the same information, often in different formats, to multiple health plans, health systems, and medical groups. Finally, a vast majority of the over half a million providers who BetterDoctor contacts every quarter overwhelmingly report that they prefer receiving requests for directory updates by email. This preference is also shown in the results: email has the highest conversion rate. 70 percent of providers who receive email outreach, attest to their information in our online portal from one quarter to another. However, BetterDoctor s multimodal outreach approach, which includes phone, fax, and email to direct providers to online forms, recognizes that busy providers need to be able to use dynamic communication strategies best suited to their needs. In addition, because HIPAA rules for protected health information restrict health plans from publishing provider email addresses in their directories, most health plans don t retain this information. BetterDoctor is working to make it easier for providers to update their information via email, while recognizing that email is only one of many strategies that are effective. Regulations Differ Across the Country, States, and by Agency Adding to the difficulty in maintaining accurate provider directories, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, and most states have established regulations governing provider directories. Three states that have passed separate bills focused on provider directories California, Maryland, and Georgia have some of the strictest requirements in the country. They mandate the inclusion of comprehensive information and require multiple updates a year. Other states, such as Florida and Pennsylvania, include strict provider directory requirements as part of broader laws aimed at protecting healthcare consumers. Still other states have yet to offer specific guidance. Federal regulations mandate accurate provider directories for Medicare Advantage plans or policies sold in the federally run health exchange. In the aforementioned CMS audits, the common errors included providers not practicing at the location listed, incorrect phone numbers, closed or wrong practice and providers not accepting new patients when the directory indicated they were. In the light of these results, the agency issued 23 notices of noncompliance (for health plans with an error rate between 10.4% and 38.8%), 19 warning letters (error rate between 40.1% and 58.3%) and 12 warning letters with a request for a business plan to define fix for the issue (error rate between 60.9% and 97.2%). 52.6% of the locations listed on provider directories had at least one inaccuracy 4

Best Practices: Collecting missing data, Multimodal outreach, Effective contacting tools, and Educating the providers Findings from BetterDoctor s provider management and attestation work point to several ways in which organizations can ensure the accuracy of their provider data. They include the following: 1. Collect Missing Attributes Up to 50% of Provider Data Attributes Are Missing. While analyzing data from dozens of health plans we have discovered that improving data is not just about data accuracy and validation, but also about collecting missing data attributes. % of filled attributes 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 40% 50% 60% The most common missing directory data attributes include the following (not all attributes are required by CMS Medicare Advantage): Office Hours Staff Languages Specialities Middle Names Additional Phone Numbers Fax Numbers 68% 70% Directory A Directory B Directory C Directory D Directory E Attributes filled Attributes missing Emails Websites Types of Affiliation ADA Accessibility 2. Multimodal Outreach Campaigns Work Best and Deliver the Highest Response Rate In 2015, BetterDoctor started its large-scale data validation operation by making phone calls, and we quickly learned that providers, practices and provider groups have different communication preferences. During our 2016 AHIP Pilot, we created multimodal outreach processes that use five different communication channels: Email Fax Post mail Phone Voice mail 5

3. Use Online Attestation Tools to Collect Data and Minimize Errors One of the challenges health plans face is reaching out to providers without adding to their workload. Traditionally, most health plans ask for updated directory information by fax or phone. After testing outreach methods, we found that directing providers to an online pre-populated form yields the most accurate information. We are able to reach out to providers via fax, post mail, phone, or email depending on what works best for a particular office. Providers then can easily update their information without having to deal with pesky paper forms and health plans receive updates quickly and efficiently. Today, BetterDoctor receives 96% of the data attestations via online tools optimized to minimize human errors. 4. Educate Providers and Provider Groups To align the provider, provider group and health plans efforts to increase provider directory data quality, it s critical to educate the providers and groups about the benefits of accurate provider data. Providers who understand the health plan provider directory update requirements are much more likely to update and comply with the requirements. It s important to not just communicate with providers and groups that regulations exist, but we also need to underscore the following things: The name and purpose of the regulation Frequency data update requirements The provider benefits of having accurate directory listings Let s Fix Provider Data Together! If all of this sounds like one more responsibility in an already complex healthcare environment, BetterDoctor can help. BetterDoctor works with health insurance companies, health systems, and doctors to improve the quality of doctor databases. Here s how it works: Health plans share their doctor data with BetterDoctor. BetterDoctor validates the data and proactively contacts doctors. Validated doctor data is pushed back in real time to health plans. BetterDoctor notifies health plans of validated changes. Health plans quickly incorporate validated data into their member-facing directories. When accurate information is made available on consumer web platforms, millions of individuals are empowered to make the choices that are best for themselves and their families. To help fulfill the promise of better healthcare for your members, contact BetterDoctor at data@betterdoctor.com today. 6