Roundtable Discussion_Test Utilization_Zhang 7/29/2014

Similar documents
Transforming Health Care with Health IT

HIMSS Nicholas E. Davies Award of Excellence Case Study Nebraska Medicine October 10, 2017

From Big Data to Big Knowledge Optimizing Medication Management

Administrative Update: How to Implement Discharge Pharmacy Services (DPS) Objectives

Patient Care: Case Study in EHR Implementation. With Help From Monkeys, Mice, and Penguins. Tom Goodwin, MHA MIT Medical Cambridge, MA March 2007

1. November RN VACANCY RATE: Overall 2320 RN vacancy rate for areas reported is 12.5%

Corporate Services Employment Report: January Employment by Staff Group. Jan 2018 (Jan 2017 figure: 1,462) Overall 1,

Moving an Enabled Patient to an Engaged Patient Our Patient Portal Experience

Aurora will expand its geographic coverage within Wisconsin to achieve its mission to: Aurora Health Care 1991 Strategic Plan

National Reference Laboratory Quality Dashboard. Quality Improvement Metrics Q4 2016

The New Clinical Research Landscape Incentives, Opportunities and Support Offered by the NIHR

Discharge and Follow-Up Planning. Presented by the Clinical and Quality Team

Overview of a new study to assess the impact of hospice led interventions on acute use. Jonathan Ellis, Director of Policy & Advocacy

Maimonides Medical Center Makes a Quantum Leap with Advanced Computerized Patient Record Technology

HPV Vaccination Quality Improvement: Physician Perspective

Kentucky Sepsis Summit. August 2016

From Implementation to Optimization: Moving Beyond Operations

Transforming Healthcare Delivery, the Challenges for Behavioral Health

1. March RN VACANCY RATE: Overall 2320 RN vacancy rate for areas reported is 13.8%

Electronic Physician Documentation: Increased Satisfaction

Compliance Division Staff Report

Catherine Porto, MPA, RHIA, CHP Executive Director HIM. Madelyn Horn Noble 3M HIM Data Analyst

Departments to Improve. February Chad Faiella RN, Terri Martin RN. 1 Process Excellence

Standardising Acute and Specialised Care Theme 3 Governance and Approach to Hospital Based Services Strategy Overview 28 th July 2017

Leveraging the Attention

Columbus Regional Hospital Pressure Ulcer Prevention

during the EHR reporting period.

Influence of Patient Flow on Quality Care

STATISTICAL PRESS NOTICE MONTHLY CRITICAL CARE BEDS AND CANCELLED URGENT OPERATIONS DATA, ENGLAND March 2018

Information Technology Report to Medical Executive Committee

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

Achieving Operational Excellence with an EHR a CIO s Perspective

PATIENT CARE SERVICES REPORT Submitted to the Joint Conference Committee, August 2016

PATIENT CARE SERVICES REPORT Submitted to the Joint Conference Committee, November 2017

NURSE MONITORING PROGRAM HANDBOOK

UI Health Hospital Dashboard September 7, 2017

Diagnostic Waiting Times

Ontario Shores Journey to EMRAM Stage 7. October 21, 2015

FLORIDA CENTER FOR HEALTH INFORMATION AND TRANSPARENCY

Quality Measure Indicators +Throughput Metrics + Automated Dashboard = Innovation to Improve Quality Goals

Renfrew Victoria Hospital

Hypertension. Collaborating to Control Blood Pressure: Knowing Your Numbers is Just the Beginning

Agenda Item The report triangulates staffing levels against appropriate quality measures. The Report is provided to the Board for:

Greetings from Michelle & Katie QUALITY IMPROVEMENT DIVISION OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

BIOMEDICAL SCIENTIST MEDIA INFORMATION 2017

Enlisted Professional Military Education FY 18 Academic Calendar. Table of Contents COLLEGE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING (CDET):

BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL NOTICE OF CALENDAR YEAR 2018 WORKSHOP SESSIONS, PRE-AGENDA MEETINGS AND REGULAR MEETINGS

UCLA Newborn Screening Symposium 2018

Integrating Quality Into Your CDI Program: The Case for All-Payer Review

UHF Quality Institute. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care New York PROPC-NY. Module 2 Webinar

BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAPER COVER SHEET. Meeting Date: 1 st December 2010

Tina Nelson, MBA, BSN Lisa Stepp, BSN, RN Rebecca Fyffe, BSN, RN Jessica Coughenour, LPN

Improving the Chemotherapy Appointment Experience at the BC Cancer Agency

Influence of Patient Flow on Quality Care

PATIENT CARE SERVICES REPORT Submitted to the Joint Conference Committee, February 2013 Terry Dentoni, RN, MSN, CNL, Interim Chief Nursing Officer

Northern Health - Acute Services. Evidence Based Practice Venous Thromboembolism Prevention

Disability and Work Division. Jobcentre Plus Pathways to Work: Official Statistics

GRANTS.GOV Updates Federal Demonstration Partnership Meeting. Presented by Grants.gov September 7, 2017

PSI-15 Lafayette General Health 2017 Nicholas E. Davies Enterprise Award of Excellence

Meaningful Use: A Practical Approach. CSO HIMSS Spring Conference 2013

Reducing Elective Waits: Delivering 18 week pathways for patients. Programme Director NHS Elect Caroline Dove.

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

How To Make A Good Vascular Access Program Even Better. Thursday, April 14, Welcome to our Webinar: Presenters: Cindy Miller, RN

2013 ANCC National Magnet Conference

Ann Klein, Wound Care Specialist Brenda Mundy, Manager, Skin and Wound Program. Innovative Strategies lead to a Reduction in Pressure Ulcer Incidence

Decreasing the Unplanned Readmission Rate of Patients receiving Outpatient Antibiotic Therapy(OPAT)

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS HOSPITAL & HEALTH SCIENCES SYSTEM HOSPITAL DASHBOARD

2013 ANCC National Magnet Conference

Cultural Transformation and the Road to an ACO Lee Sacks, M.D. CEO Mark Shields, M.D., MBA Senior Medical Director

Leveraging the Accountable Care Unit Model to create a culture of Shared Accountability

Expanding Access to Financing & Telehealth for Rural Health Care Providers: Washington State

Laguna Honda Lean Transformation. Laguna Honda Strategic Performance Management November 2017

Redesign of Front Door

Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Successfully Attests to Stage 1 Meaningful Use

Accountable Care Organizations Creating A Culture Of Engaged Physicians

Aldijana Avdić, BSN, RN, PBMS, CPHQ Assistant Director, Patient Safety and Privacy 1

Driving the value of health care through integration. Kaiser Permanente All Rights Reserved.

Let Hospital Workforce Data Talk

Achieving Consultative Lab Testing Services

JANUARY 2018 (21 work days) FEBRUARY 2018 (19 work days)

Experiential Education

Managing Receivables Through Patient Access Ingenuity

Analysis of Incurred Claims Trend and Provider Payments

Paving the Path toward Improved Specialty Access What it looks like

WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Quality Management Report 2017 Q2

TRUST BOARD MEETING 24 JULY 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT MONTH 3 DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS

Mitzi Cardenas Sr. VP/Strategy, Business Development and Technology Truman Medical Centers

CHC-A Continuity Dashboard. All Sites Continuity - Asthma. 2nd Qtr-03. 2nd Qtr-04. 2nd Qtr-06. 4th Qtr-03. 4th Qtr-06. 3rd Qtr-04.

Colorado Medical-Dental Integration Project (CO MDI)

UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON DAYTON OH ACADEMIC CALENDAR FALL Incoming First Year students move into UD Housing

Health Care Systems - A National Perspective Erica Preston-Roedder, MSPH PhD

CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER:

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Finding Progress on Timely Access Issues

3/14/2016. About Seattle Children s. The national send-outs problem

Webinar Control Panel

Transcription:

Bending Your Financial Curve: Improving Utilization of Send Out Tests with Laboratory Formulary Y. Victoria Zhang, PhD, DABCC Judy Sterry, MS Victoria_Zhang@urmc.rochester.edu Judy_Sterry@urmc.rochester.edu University of Rochester Medical Center Disclosures None related to this presentation 2 1

Learning Objectives List the challenges that are facing the health care system Identify the opportunities to reduce cost in send out testing Discuss the strategic steps to implement laboratory formulary system to improve send out test utilization 3 Outline Example Background healthcare URMC Laboratory formulary development results Tips that may help good Bad 1,25-OH VitD 4 2

BACKGROUND 5 Health Care Costs Keep Increasing Health care cost increasing rate > GDP US has the highest per capita health costs Sisko A et al. Health Aff 2009;28:w346-w357 http://blogs.hbr.org/2009/08/how-to-think-constructively-ab/ 6 3

Laboratory Testing Costs $60 billions/year (~4% total health care costs) Annual growth rate 1999 2006: 6 7% Future: ~6 7%; some suggests 15 25% Molecular testing, whole genome sequencing 2010 accountable care acts 7 How to reduce costs? Annual pressure to reduce the cost to the hospital for laboratory testing Some solutions are to bring tests in-house but not always feasible So what s the next step(s) to monitor and reduce the costs associated with testing? 8 4

University of Rochester Medical Center School of Nursing School of Medicine and Dentistry 1,400 full-time faculty members 650 voluntary clinical faculty members 400 medical students, 550 graduate students, and 600 residents and fellows 32 departments and centers 9 University of Rochester Medical Center Medical center operating budget: $2.49 billion Strong Memorial Hospital 800 beds, 38,421 discharges Golisano Children s Hospital James P. Wilmot Cancer Center Highland hospital 261 beds, 16,140 discharges F. F. Thompson Health System 113 beds New comers: Strong west, Pluta Cancer Center, Interlakes oncology Eastman Institute for Oral Health 10 5

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 932 faculty and staff (56 faculty) 24/7/365 operation Clinical Pathology 2.3 million patient orders 3.5 million specimens received per year 7 million billable tests Anatomic Pathology 114,500 cases > 51,000 surgical pathology cases (89,000 specimens) > 63,500 cytology cases 350,000 specimens pick ups and deliveries per year 11 LABORATORY FORMULARY 12 6

Laboratory Formulary: what is? An approach adapted from pharmacy formulary system. To create a comprehensive menu of laboratory tests offered into different categories not all tests are available to everybody at all times. 13 Laboratory Formulary Transformation III Pre-approval required Test Menu Tier II Specialists Tier I Everybody 14 7

Laboratory Diagnostics Committee 15 Laboratory Diagnostics Committee Functions Define policy. Review recommendations from reference lab (ATOP Report). Review our send-out tests. Compile subcommittee s suggestions for tests clinical utility. Identify restricted and unrestricted referral tests. 16 8

Subcommittee Functions Led by senior clinical faculty members and/or department chairs. Provided insights of test utility in their specialty. Assisted review of restricted tests. 17 Laboratory Diagnostics Committee Top Down Initiation Bottom Up Execution 18 9

Two-Phase Implementation Planning Inpatients and ED Outpatients 2009 9/2011 11/2011 19 Lab Test Consent Forms 20 10

costs ($) Volume (#) By accepting this notice, you confirm the following: If this patient is currently hospitalized: I am the Attending Physician of record or a Consulting Attending caring for the hospitalized patient identified above. I am requesting a laboratory assay that is restricted or not provided by the Clinical Laboratories of Strong Memorial Hospital/Highland Hospital and may require shipment of sample to an outside reference laboratory to perform this assay. I understand that the time required to process, ship, and to receive RESULTS from an outside reference laboratory generally REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS, and that for certain assays, results may not be available for several weeks. In making this request I CERTIFY that the results of the laboratory assay that I have requested are LIKELY TO ALTER MY TREATMENT PLAN DURING THIS PATIENT'S STAY IN THE HOSPITAL UNDER THE CURRENT ADMISSION 21 Inpatient Volumes and Costs $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 0.00% -10.00% -20.00% -30.00% -40.00% -50.00% -60.00% IP Costs and volume IP$ IP# 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 IP Costs and volume % Change IP# IP$ 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 1,500 1,000 500-22 11

Transition between phase I and phase II: inpatient outpatient Data analysis LDC followed up with noncompliant providers Addition of unrestricted tests Additional guidelines implemented (preapproval required) Development of comprehensive data reports 23 11/2011 to now PHASE II: OUTPATIENT 24 12

Strategies Development of Tiered Laboratory Formulary Enhanced LDC membership: Subcommittees Authorized provider listing Support from Lab Sales Team (Outreach) to educate providers Additional website updates Additional training for providers and lab staff Enhanced security access options in EMR 25 Laboratory Formulary Tier I Unrestricted Available to all providers Tier II Restricted Restricted to Board-certified, specialtytrained physicians Who hold medical staff privilege at Strong Memorial or Highland Hospitals Tier III Off-formulary Tests of unclear, controversial, or poorly proven clinical values 26 13

Tier I Tests Examples Total of 1,553 tests All in-house tests Many send out tests 27 Tier II Tests List Total 225 tests http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/urmclabs/clinical/documents/copyofrestrictedtestlistingupdatejuly2013.pdf 11DEC 11 Deoxycortisol 17HCU 17/OH Corticosteroids, Urine 17KU 17 KETOSTEROIDS TOTAL 18HC 18 OH Corticosterone 5MTF 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate, CSF 7DEHC 7-Dehydrocholesterol A1AST Alpha 1 Antitrypsin,Stool ACHRP Acetylcholine Receptor Ab Reflex Panel ACRBL Acetylcholine Rec Blocking AB 28 14

Tier III: not included in Tier I/II Approval Form 29 Laboratory Formulary Memo 30 15

How to order Tier II/III tests? 31 URMC LDC Process Provider orders send out test Tier I Tier I? No Tier II Tier II? No Tier III Providers fill One Time Authorization form and send it to Reference Lab Provider can order test Yes Yes Yes Is the provider authorized to order restricted test? No Reference Lab verifies if the provider board certified, subspecialtytrained provider holding Medical Staff Privileges at Hospital and Affiliates Reference lab informs LDC of their findings Reference Lab verifies if the provider board-certified, subspecialty-trained provider holding Medical Staff Privileges at Hospital Affiliates Reference Lab searches for appropriate testing lab, obtains pricing and sample processing requirements Provider is informed the denial Yes No LDC Approval No Reference lab informs LDC of their findings and sends One Time Authorization form to LDC for approval LDC Approval Yes 16

Costs ($) 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 Volume (#) Outpatient Volumes and Costs $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 OP Costs and volume 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 OP$ OP# 15,000 10,000 5,000-10.00% 0.00% -10.00% -20.00% -30.00% -40.00% OP Costs and volume OP# OP$ 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 33 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Quarterly Volume Change by Tiers Total Volume Percent Volume Change 0% Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 All -10% -20% -30% -40% -50% -60% -70% Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 All 34 17

2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 2011Q1 2011Q2 2011Q3 2011Q4 2012Q1 2012Q2 2012Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 2013Q3 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 Quarterly Cost Change By Tiers $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 Total Cost Change Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 All 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% Percentage Cost Change Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 All 35 Cost per Test By Tier $1,600 $1,400 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 All $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $- 36 18

2009 JAN F EB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S EP OCT NOV D EC 2010 JAN F EB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S EP OCT NOV D EC 2011 JAN F EB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S EP OCT NOV D EC 2012 JAN F EB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S EP OCT NOV D EC 2013 JAN F EB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S EP OCT NOV D EC 2014 JAN F EB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S EP OCT NOV D EC Example Case 1,25 Vitamin D 450 400 350 300 Brought 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D inhouse Became reference lab for affiliate hospital Order Interventions Feb - Apr 2014 1. Targeted provider education 2. Remove test from "Preference Lists" 3. General education to all Medical Staff 4. Convert to "restricted" staus in formulary 5. Drop down test order display changed to show 25 OH before 1,25 250 Ambulatory EMR Go-live 200 150 ARUP Grand Rounds 100 50 0 37 1,25 Vitamin D Case Study Vitamin D, 25-Hydroxy is the appropriate test for routine assessment of vitamin D status. Vitamin D, 1,25-Dihydroxy is indicated for diagnosing patients with certain other conditions, primarily hypercalcemia. If used for diagnosing vitamin D deficiency, the results can be misleading. We decreased 1,25 Dihydroxy, CPOE requests by 60% in 7 months, saving $78,000 in reference costs by minimal order interventions As an academic medical center we have community hospitals using us as a reference lab. As a value add service, we can help them save upwards of $40,000 in reference costs by helping them educate physicians. 38 19

Summary of Laboratory Formulary Both inpatient and outpatient showed significant decrease in test volume and test costs. Later increase seems to be associated with erecord going live and the cost per tests for Tier III. More investigation is underway to ensure the efficiency of the laboratory formulary. 39 Tips that may help your decision and implementation of laboratory formulary WHAT WE LEARNED? 40 20

Key points to a successful implementation High level Hospital Support High level Pathology and Lab Medicine Support Dedicated Lab Faculty Member Physician to lead the team. Effective Communication and Training Increased Reference Lab staffing Utilize Outreach/Sales Team to help communicate message 41 Initial Concerns Many providers unaware of LDC formation and restricted testing policies Approval process took too long. Providers didn t know a test was restricted at time of ordering. Specimens were being collected prior to approval of restricted testing. Providers upset with message to Patients 42 21

Resolutions Enhanced communication Established 24-48 hours response time to restricted test requests. Created a list of restricted tests and added to website. Removed restricted testing from requisitions. Changed policy and educated provides: > Restricted tests would not be collected or tested without preapproval. > Patient communication for testing not collected would be Physician s responsibility. 43 Lessons Learned Timely communication of denials from LDC physician to ordering provider with recommendations for appropriate testing. Understand data requirements of the LDC Provide data reports on a regular basis with means of quickly adjusting data sets. Create a database for electronic submission of off-formulary requests: Better management of pending requests Store supporting documentation for approval or denial of testing. Support future decisions with query options Use as a training tool for residents. 44 22

Communication Laboratory Diagnostic Committee Ordering Physicians Laboratory Supporting Staff 45 An Opportunity for Clinical Labs Beyond maintaining quality and fulfilling test orders. Actively involve in decision making and the appropriate tests to order. 46 23

Thank you for your attention! END 47 24