THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON. October 12, 1990

Similar documents
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea

BANGLADESH. Territorial Waters & Maritime Zones Act No. 26) Ratification of LOS Convention. Maritime Zones Act No. 26. (per Territorial Waters &

THE COMMANDER S HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

Maldives. Introduction. Intemal waters. Archipelagic waters. Territorial sea

Questions & Answers about the Law of the Sea:

Decree No of 5 October 1972 for the Peacetime Regulation of the Passage of Foreign Warships through the Territorial Waters and of their Calls

OPNAVINST G N514 8 Jan Subj: RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. NAVY FORCES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

CRS Report for Congress

NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, R.I. The Development and Operational Impact of. Indonesia's Approved Partial System of Archipelagic Sea Lanes

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Commentary to the HPCR Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare

National Search and Rescue Plan of the United States

BACKGROUNDER. Much has been said in recent years about a race or scramble

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MEETING OF THE COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY NOVEMBER 14, 2001

Capacity-building in ocean affairs as a result of the implementation of article 76 of UNCLOS

San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, 12 June 1994 PART I : GENERAL PROVISIONS

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

FREEDOMS OF THE SEAS, PASSAGE RIGHTS AND GOVERNANCE OF THE OCEANS, 9 th 10 th January 2008, Orchard Hotel, SINGAPORE.

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Safety Zones, Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf in the. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish safety zones

FUTURE U.S. NAVY AND USCG OPERATIONS IN THE ARCTIC

Endorsements for national certificates

The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Naval Vessel Historical Evaluation FINAL DETERMINATION. This evaluation is unclassified

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zones in the Seas in East Asia Moritaka Hayashi. I. Introduction

INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 105

TITLE II--TRANSPORTATION OF ESPECIALLY HAZARDOUS CARGO

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

Chapter 6 The U.S. Freedom of Navigation Program: South China Sea Focus

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

RESOLUTION MSC.255(84) (adopted on 16 May 2008) ADOPTION OF THE CODE OF THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES FOR A SAFETY

LISCR Notes and Advisories by Date

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

PS 4 (b) Director Cooperation

REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION OF MARINE CASUALTIES WHERE THE UNITED STATES IS A SUBSTANTIALLY INTERESTED STATE (SIS)

Marine Protection Rules Part 130B Oil Transfer Site Marine Oil Spill Contingency Plans

LISCR Notes and Advisories by Date

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering

States Pacific Command (USPACOM). Its secondary mission is to transfer the ammunition at sea using the Modular Cargo Delivery System (MCDS).

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

Sea control & maritime power projection for Australia: maritime air power and air warfare

COURSE GUIDE 2018 WORLD-CLASS MARITIME FACILITIES AND TRAINING ON THE DOORSTEP OF THE GREAT BARRIER REEF

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Management of Environmental Compliance at Overseas Installations

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

USN Arctic Roadmap SCICEX SAC meeting. CDR Nick Vincent 21 May 2014

Course Guide World-class maritime facilities and training on the doorstep of the Great Barrier Reef.

Sinai II Accords, Egyptian-Israeli Disengagement Agreement (4 September 1975)

NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, R.I. ARCHIPELAGIC SEA LANES: DESIGNATION FACTORS AND EFFECTS ON OPERATIONAL ART. Mark F. Meyer

MODEL OPERATING PROCEDURES GUIDE FOR COMBINED MARITIME COUNTER DRUG OPERATIONS

Incumbents may perform one or more of these functions in support of a wide range of equivalent marine engineering activities.

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

Scouting, Signaling, and Gatekeeping

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Signals, Noise & Swans in a Changing Arctic Environment

A Warming Arctic and National Security

Subj: COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE CONDUCT OF NAVAL EXERCISES OR TRAINING AT SEA

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

arine MNews Salvage & Spill Response: Unresolved Issues Hamper Progress Maritime Security Workboats: Stack Emissions: Pollution Response:

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

Title Global Chokepoints

RANGE OF MILITARY OPERATIONS

JOINT STATEMENT OF 15 FEBRUARY 1990 RE-ESTABLISHING DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BETWEEN BRITAIN AND ARGENTINA

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA: U.S. COAST GUARD PERSPECTIVES

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGNS IN RIYADH AND CARIBBEAN MOU

Expert Group Meeting on Improving Maritime Transport Safety in the ESCAP Region, Bangkok,2 September 2016

(unofficial translation)

Große Straße Bodenwerder Tel: Mobil: Web:

REGION III REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM GUIDANCE FOR LIMITED JONES ACT WAIVERS DURING POLLUTION RESPONSE ACTIONS

Small Entity Compliance Guide. Standards for Living Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters

Maritime Operational Zones

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port of New Orleans (COTP New. Orleans), under the authority of the Magnuson Act,, established

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Republic of the Marshall Islands

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Infrastructure Program

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

ISM COMPLIANCE MATRIX

Vessel Traffic Service Act (623/2005)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Security Investment Program

Checklist of requirements for licensing under Section 31 of the Trade Regulation Code (GewO)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

Electro-technical Officer (ETO)

INTERNATIONAL NAVAL SHIPS DECEMBER 2014

Forty-first Annual Conference of the Center for Oceans Law & Policy. Yogyakarta, Indonesia May 16-19, 2017

The Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation. Hearing on. Port Security

Recapitalizing Canada s Fleets. What is next for Canada s Shipbuilding Strategy?

Make your Career Choice. Become a Merchant Shipping Officer! Cyprus Maritime Academy

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. No. R.. GG. (RG..).. MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT, 1951 (ACT No. 57 OF 1951)

Office of Coast Survey. Nautical Charting of Artificial Reefs

Transcription:

UNIARttltU, CONF IDEII'l' Ii's:L THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 20527 October 12, 1990 NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTIVE 49 MEMORANDUM FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION THE CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE PRESIDENT THE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF SUBJECT: Freedom of Navigation Program United States security and commerce depend upon the internationally recognized freedoms of navigation and overflight of the seas. Since 1979, the United States has successfully conducted a Freedom of Navigation (FON) Program to protect U.S. navigation, overflight, and related interests on, under, and over the seas against excessive maritime claims. The purpose of the FON program is to preserve the global mobility of U.S. forces by avoiding acquiescence in excessive maritime claims of other nations. This directive provides organization of the FON Decision Directive 265. Policy current program -K( guidance for the management and and supersedes National Security While not a signatory to the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention), the United States considers the Convention to accurately reflect the customary rules of international law concerning maritime navigation and overflight freedoms. General U.S. policy on the Law of the Sea is contained in NSDD-83 (U.S. Oceans Policy, Law of the Sea, and Exclusive Economic Zone) and the President's Oceans Policy statement of March 10, 1983. (~ This policy provides that the United States will respect those maritime claims that are consistent with the navigational CONFIDEN'I'IAL Declassify on: OADR UM~UFIED

UNilrASSifiED G0NE IDENTIAL 2 provisions of the LOS Convention. Additionally, the United States will exercise and assert its navigation and overflight rights on a worldwide basis in a manner consistent with the LOS Convention. The United States will not acquiesce in unilateral acts of other states designed to restrict the rights and freedoms of the international community in navigation and overflight and other traditional uses of the high seas. The Freedom of Navigation Program combines diplomatic action and operational assertions of our navigation and overflight rights to encourage modification of, and to demonstrate nonacquiescence in, maritime claims that are inconsistent with the customary rules of international law pertaining to maritime navigation and overflight freedoms. Categories of Excessive Maritime Claims U.S. interests are to be protected against the following categories of excessive maritime claims: 1. Historic bay/historic water claims not recognized by the United States. 2. Territorial sea baseline claims not drawn in conformance with the customary international law reflected in the LOS Convention. 3. Territorial sea claims not exceeding twelve nautical miles in breadth that: a. overlap straits used for international navigation and do not permit transit passage in conformance with the customary international law reflected in the LOS Convention, including submerged transit of submarines, overflight of military aircraft, and surface transit of warships/naval auxiliaries, without prior notification or authorization, and including transit in a manner of deployment consistent with the security of the forces involved; or b. contain requirements for advance notification or authorization for innocent passage of all vessels, including warships/naval auxiliaries, or apply discriminatory requirements to such vessels; or c. apply special requirements, international law, for innocent propulsion, armament, or cargo. not recognized by passage based on means of CQWFHlEWTIA;b UNlM&IFIEO

UNGL.IFIEO eomf Il'l'EN'fiAL 3 4. Territorial sea claims in excess of twelve nautical miles. 5. Other claims to jurisdiction over maritime areas in excess of twelve nautical miles, such as security zones, that purport to restrict non-resource related high seas freedoms. 6. Archipelagic claims that either: a. do not permit archipelagic sea lanes passage in conformance with customary international law reflected in the LOS Convention, including submerged passage of submarines, overflight of military aircraft, and surface transit of warships/naval auxiliaries, without prior notification or authorization, and including transit in a manner of deployment consistent with the security of the forces involved; or b. are otherwise not in conformance with customary international law reflected in the LOS Convention. Program Guidance 1, The Department of State shall act assertively to preserve U.S. navigation and overflight rights under international law. The Department of State shall use its facilities, here and abroad, to encourage each state with excessive maritime claims to conform its laws and/or conduct with customary international law concerning maritime navigation and overflight freedoms. The Department of State shall protest excessive maritime claims to avoid legal acquiescence. ~ 2. The Department of Defense will plan and administer the operational assertion portion of the FON Program under the following procedures: UNI~SSIFIED

UNiftSStFIEO CONF'IDI':NTIAL 4 Criteria for the selection of an excessive maritime claim for the annual list will include, but are not limited to, the following:.~,-paories excessive coordination include: unrecognized historic bay/historic water claims (paragraph 1, above); excessive straight baseline claims (paragraph 2, above); territorial sea claims (of 12 nautical miles or less) ~ that include: unlawful restrictions or requirements relating to innocent passage (paragraph 3b, above); or that apply unlawful discriminatory restrictions or requirements based on means of propulsion, armament, or cargo (paragraph 3c, above);./,b) (Cl to jurisdiction maritime areas in excess of nautical miles, as security zones, that purport to restrict non-resour seas freedoms f. 5') (0- UN8hffSStFIEO

UN~'tfA~ltltU j, -j(q) I" (j}) will use international straits 6a, 7. Military ships and aircraft will routinely assert U.S. rights against territorial sea claims and other claims to jurisdiction over maritime areas in excess of twelve nautical miles that purport to restrict nonresource related high seas freedoms, and archipelagic claims not in conformance with the LOS Convention above). ) -<-( cl '._) / '"CONF IDE~lT HI. UNetMSJFIED

f'ohpibem IIAL 6 11. The Department of Defense will provide to the Department of State and the National Security Advisor a semiannual list of operational assertions conducted under the FON Program. The Department of State shall, when appropriate, use the semiannual list of operational assertions in its diplomatic efforts to preserve United States navigation and overflight rights under international law. The Department of State will publish an annual unclassified summary of the diplomatic activities under the FON Program. 12. On an annual basis, the Department of Defense will incorporate into an a~ready existing report an unclassified listing of FON operational assertions conducted during the previous year. The listing will specify the country and excessive claim, but not the date or frequency of the assertion. Assertions specified in the annual list will become unclassified upon incorporation into the report. / /) COHPIBEWTIU UNGtttSSifiEO