Annual General Meeting 2016/2017: Executive Director s Report. to the Contact Hamilton Board of Directors September

Similar documents
Welcome. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

BRANT CASE RESOLUTION PROTOCOL

Policy Directives for Service Agencies Regarding the Host Family Program

Community Services Coordination Network. 2017/2018 Board of Directors

Child and Family Development and Support Services

Developmental Services Housing Task Force EXPRESSION OF INTEREST: INNOVATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS

Looking Back and Looking Forward. A Sneak Peek for the 2018/19 Home Care quality improvement plans (QIPs)

Ministry of Community and Social Services

Livewell (Care & Support) Ltd - West Midlands

Outcome and Process Evaluation Report: Crisis Residential Programs

Contact Hamilton 140 King St. E. Ste. 4 Hamilton, ON L8N 1B2 T: (905) F: (905)

NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS)

OPHA s Resolution on the Public Health Response to the Truth and Reconciliation's Calls to Action

BRAIN INJURY COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY (NIAGARA) INC. RESPITE PACKAGE

Developmental Services Ontario. DSO Central East Region

TITLE 17. PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION 2. HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY CHAPTER 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCHAPTER 24. ENHANCED BEHAVIORAL SUPPORTS HOMES

MSAA AMENDING AGREEMENT. THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made as of the 1 st day of April, 2017

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. Services for Persons with Disabilities

6.5. 1:30 p.m. Tuesday, January. 18, 2016 Council Chamber Hamilton City. Chair. Also REPORT Cleaning. Supply, completed.

Health Center Staff Documents Checklist

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP): 2015/16 Progress Report

Prepared by: Program Policy Implementation Branch Ministry of Community and Social Services March 23, 2017 Version 1.0

Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund Request for Proposals Introduction

Developmental Service (DS) Compliance Inspections: Indicator List. For ADULT DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

Disability Support Services. Tier Three Service Specification Facility Based Respite 16 years or Younger

Standards of Excellence

Woodbridge House. Aitch Care Homes (London) Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Good

DIVISION CIRCULAR #8 (N.J.A.C. 10:46C) DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

Part I: A History and Overview of the OACCAC s ehealth Assets

Georgia Department of Behavioral Health & Developmental Disabilities FOR. Effective Date: January 1, 2018 (Posted: December 1, 2017)

Quality Management and Improvement 2016 Year-end Report

DRAFT CONTINUING HEALTHCARE (CHC) CHOICE & EQUITY POLICY. Version 2

Innovative and Outcome-Driven Practices and Systems Meaningful Prevention and Early Intervention Wellness, Recovery, & Resilience Focus

MODEL MONITORING TOOL FOR TITLE III-B/TITLE VII-A OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM

Complex Needs Working Group Report. Improving Home Care and Community Services for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Complex Care Needs

Respite Care DEFINITION

Meadow Restoration, Assessment and Restoration

CONTINUING HEALTHCARE (CHC) CHOICE & EQUITY POLICY

A Guide to HNHB LHIN HOME & COMMUNITY CARE

Mental Health & Addiction Services

Department of Behavioral Health

NBA Mission and Ministry Grants Overview and Frequently Asked Questions

Port Pirie Community Health. Port Pirie ASO2

North East Behavioural Supports Ontario Sustainability Plan

Accreditation Report

2017/18 PERSONAL SUPPORT WORKER (PSW) TRAINING FUND FOR HOME AND COMMUNITY CARE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

2016 REPORT Community Care for the Elderly (CCE) Client Satisfaction Survey

Criteria and Procedure for Rehousing on Health and Medical Grounds

Toronto Central LHIN 2016/2017 QIP Snapshot Report. Health Quality Ontario The provincial advisor on the quality of health care in Ontario

Caregiver Training Needs Survey: Results

Workplace Violence Prevention in the 2018/19 Hospital Quality Improvement Plans

The Public Health Chief Nursing Officer Initiative: Building Capacity in the Public Health Nursing Workforce in Ontario

Disability Support Services. Tier Two Service Specification. Facility Based Respite

Figure 1: Average Direct Care Hours by Ownership Type in BC Health Authorities

2006 Strategy Evaluation

MANAGED CARE READINESS

Instructions for Completing the State Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Reporting Form for The National Ombudsman Reporting System (NORS)

Striving for Clinical Excellence: The Use of Data in Supervision 2017 CMHO Conference

FY17 Special Conditions for Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Grants

I. General Instructions

ST. JOSEPH S VILLA STRATEGIC PLAN

Children s Services. School Health

Crisis Response and Information Services

Hamilton Community Health Working Group (HCHWG) Anchor Table Project Charter FINAL (September 18 th, 2017)

I. General Instructions

Family Peer Advocate (FPA) Credential Information for Applicants FAQ

2014/2015 Mississauga Halton CCAC Quality Improvement Plan

Ab o r i g i n a l Operational a n d. Revised

Schedule 3. Services Schedule. Social Work

MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE

National Quality Accountability Dashboard

Home care clients with complex needs who received personal support service within five days

The Way Forward. Towards Recovery: The Mental Health and Addictions Action Plan for Newfoundland and Labrador

Table of Contents. Centralized Intake Unit...3. Adult Protective Services Home Support Services.. 5. Options for Independent Living...

Approved Executive Compensation Policy and Framework Feb. 28, 2018 Executive Compensation Policy and Framework WOODSTOCK HOSPITAL

GATEWAY ASSESSMENT SERVICE: SERVICE SPECIFICATION

Job Description Alternative Care Worker

(Area Agency Name) B. Requirements of Section 287, Florida Statutes: These requirements are herein incorporated by reference.

Northern College Business Plan

Mr. Tim Manning Board Chair Provincial Health Services Authority Burrard St. Vancouver BC V6Z 2H3. Dear Mr. Manning:

Patient and Family. Advisory Program

Family Services FIXED RATE CONTRACT REVIEW OF TEMPORARY STAFFING PHASE ONE REPORT ON EMERGENCY PLACEMENT RESOURCES

HRI Properties. Request for Proposals. For Community Services Program Contract Manager (CSSP-CM)

Job posting for the week of June 10, 2013

E m e rgency Health S e r v i c e s Syste m M o d e r n i zation

NBA Mission and Ministry Grants Overview and Frequently Asked Questions

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015

Release Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 Deadline for Submissions: Friday, April 14, 2017

Hospital Improvement Plan Niagara Health System

Ryan White Part A. Quality Management

Solent. NHS Trust. Patient Experience Strategy Ensuring patients are at the forefront of all we do

ARRCS POSITION DESCRIPTION

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Procedure for Monitoring of Delayed Transfers of Care

Welcome. PPG Conference North and South Norfolk CCGs June 14 th 2018

2018 Corn Research and Education Request for Proposals

Q I. Quality Improvement Work Plan FY

1. Working as a primary health care NP Please complete the entire questionnaire

Youth AOD Worker - Outreach Box Hill

COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE BOARD

Sample Request for Proposal

Transcription:

Annual General Meeting 2016/2017: Executive Director s Report to the Contact Hamilton Board of Directors September 21 2017 Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 1

Message from the Executive Director It has been my pleasure to be part of Contact Hamilton for the past 17 years, since it first opened its doors in June 2000 first in the capacity as Manager of Client Services and then in 2010 as its Executive Director. Contact Hamilton s program and services have grown over the past 17 years. Throughout all of this time and some changes and additions along the way, our primary goal continues to be to provide the best possible access to and coordination of services and supports for children and youth living in Hamilton presenting with mental health, developmental and autism concerns and for adults with developmental disabilities living in the communities of Hamilton, Brant, Niagara, Haldimand, Norfolk, Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation and Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation. Over these 17 years our agency and our sectors have seen tremendous change. While we have seen growth in some of our programs (for which we are grateful as this assists us with addressing the needs of our consumers), we have also been challenged to maintain our responsiveness within tightening resources and growing expectations. How do we deliver the best services we can with the resources we have? What is most important to our consumers? The answer lies in our relationship with our stakeholders. This year we have recommitted ourselves to deeper, meaningful stakeholder engagement. We can only do our best work if it is informed by our consumers, our staff and key community stakeholders. Each of our programs will be reaching out to our consumers, staff and community stakeholders to seek input and support. Beginning this year our organization is also committing itself to enhancing its understanding and relationships with our Indigenous people and to developing approaches that increase our responsiveness to the diversity of our communities. Diversity is our strength. We look forward to the future and to our renewed commitment to meaningful engagement. My thanks always go first and foremost to our consumers, their families and support networks. We are privileged to work alongside people in their time of need and are humbled by their strength and perseverance. Our goal is to rise to the challenge and provide the meaningful support people need and expect from us. To this end, I wish to acknowledge and thank our compassionate staff who chose to work at Contact Hamilton and to dedicate themselves to assisting people and their families. I am honoured to work side by side with them. With great thanks, Lea Pollard Executive Director September 22 2017 Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 2

Contact Hamilton for Chldren's and Developmental Services Children's Services DSO HNR Passport TSF Fund Hamilton Hamilton-Niagara Hamilton-Niagara Hamilton-Niagara 0-18 years 16+ years 18+ years 18+ years Mental health, developmental, autism Confirmed devleopmental disability Confirmed developmental disability Adult Developmental Services Contact Hamilton Staffing Organizational Children's Services DSO HNR HN Regional Passport Executive Director (1.0 FTE) Executive Assistant/Manager of Administration (1.0 FTE) Administrative Assistants (2.0 FTE) Junior Administrative Assistant (1.0 FTE contract) Receptionist (1.0 FTE) Policy Support (casual) Finance (contract) Children's Supervisor (1.0 FTE) Intake and Resource Coordinators (7.6 FTE) Coordinated Service Planner (1.0 FTE) Administrative Assistant (1.0 FTE) Manager (1.0 FTE) Assessor Supervisor (1.0 FTE) Intake and Access Coordinators (16.0 FTE)) / Urgent Response Coordinator Administrative Assistant (2.0 FTE) Manager (1.0 FTE) Passport Administrator (1.0 FTE) Outreach Workers (2.0 FTE) Claims Processors (3.0 FTE) Administrative Assistant (1.0 FTE) Junior Administration (1.0 FTE, 1.0 FTE contract) Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 3

Contact Hamilton Programs: Key Functions Children's Services DSO HNR HN Regional Passport TSF Fund Administration Coordinated Information Coordinated Information Determine level of support and corresponding funding level Tracking of fund approvals and confirmation of available funding Eligibility Confirmation Eligibility Confirmation Management of new Passport Funding allocations Paying invoices Intake/Re-intake, Service Recommendations, Prioritization, Referrals, Referral Tracking Application; Service Recommendation; Service Navigation Administrationof Passport funding contracts Monthly and ad hoc reporting to community tables and MCSS regarding fund balance RPAC (Residential Placement Advisory Committee) Linkage with External Prioritization Process Claims processing and reimbursement Service Resolution process; Complex Needs process; Transitional Aged Youth Protocol; VTRA Community of Practice Service Matching and Linking (referrals, referral tracking, vacancy management) Outreach and support Coordinated Service Planning Linkage with and facilitation of Urgent Response Process Facilitaton of Regional Urgent Response Community of Practice Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 4

Spotlight on Key Activities in 2016-2017 DSO HNR Preparation for launch of DSCIS v6 (provincial database) notably data migration and staff training Implementation of o Enhanced functionality through DSCIS notably updating application information o Provincial partnership with ODSP office regarding enhancement to eligibility process Provincial activities through the DSO Provincial Network notably relationship with MCSS, provincial consistency, communications, development of various protocols, DSO functional assessment Refresh of website focus on enhanced /easier access and navigation Hamilton Niagara Regional Passport Program Provincial activities through the Ontario Passport Agency Network notably Passport Modernization o Contact Hamilton is a co-chair Management of Passport allocations Review of Passport program policies and procedures with resulting recommendations for efficiencies Refresh of website focus on enhanced /easier access and navigation Children s Services Implementation of new database / information system: EMHware Lead Agency / Moving on Mental Health implementation (various work groups) Implementation of Coordinated Service Planning program including facilitation of community leadership and implementation tables and initiation of consumer advisory process o Development and approval of community Policies and Procedures specific to Coordinated Service Planning o Approval in principle of community Memorandum of Understanding Internal team review and identification of team priorities Temporary Supports to Family Fund Administration Fund Administration ($621,900) and reconciliation Organizational Launch of organizational priority: Stakeholder Engagement o Meeting with consumers o Stakeholder Engagement launch with staff o Development of key engagement plans for each Contact Hamilton program Launch of organizational priority: Diversity o Registration for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion course Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 5

Contact Hamilton Programs: Key Activity Measures Consumer Satisfaction Children s Access Services At the conclusion of the intake process, youth and families are provided with a link to a confidential e-survey (youth and families that request a paper copy are provided one with a postage paid return envelope). Once the survey is completed, the software program calculates the results. Contact Hamilton is able to generate reports from this data. Where respondents requested follow up and provided their contact information, the Supervisor connected with them. Management receives quarterly reports regarding consumer satisfaction. Reports are reviewed, analysed and opportunities to address issues are developed. Survey Results: Maximum number of responders: 92 (not every question was answered by every respondent) Area Measured Agree Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree It was easy for me to find out about Contact Hamilton 76 17 7 Greater understanding of Contact Hamilton services 86 9 6 I felt listened to by the Contact Hamilton staff 97 0 3 I felt that was important to me was understood by Contact 96 1 3 Hamilton staff I now have a greater awareness of community services 80 13 7 available to me I felt Contact Hamilton staff provided me with clear and 89 7 4 helpful information related to my situation I would call Contact Hamilton again 95 2 3 I feel the next steps in getting service are clear to me 89 4 7 I felt Contact Hamilton was flexible in my meeting time 81 15 3 Overall I am satisfied with the help that Contact Hamilton has provided me 92 2 6 Average 88 7 5 Areas of Strength: - Consumer experience - Overall high levels of satisfaction across measured domains Areas for Improvement: - Lack of awareness in community about Contact Hamilton - While 80 of respondents felt they had a greater awareness of services after involvement with Contact Hamilton, there is room for improvement here - While 81 of consumers felt satisfied with the flexibility they had in choosing their appointment time, there is room for improvement here - Low response rate (query survey fatigue) - Children s Team continues to implement and explore new strategies to address areas for improvement; team will use stakeholder engagement as a vehicle for support to identify strategies/opportunities Analysis of Narrative Comments: - A total of 49 people provided comments Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 6

o 46 comments were positive staff qualities, helpful process, general thanks o 9 comments identified system level issues (was not aware of Contact Hamilton sooner; long wait lists for services) o 9 comments identified issues with the consumer s experience with Contact Hamilton (long wait for intake appointment, frustrations with connecting with Contact Hamilton) o 2 comments identified suggestions for consideration Consumer Satisfaction Survey Coordinated Service Planning Coordinated Service Planning is a community-wide initiative. Contact Hamilton plays a central, primary role in coordinating agency implementation with respect to Coordinated Service Planning. In addition Contact Hamilton directly provides Coordinated Service Planning at various levels (Consultation, Enhanced Consultation and Direct/Focused Coordinated Service Planning). The evaluation of Coordinated Service Planning is a community responsibility; however Contact Hamilton is responsible for ensuring that this process is developed. Specific feedback / consumer survey processes were in development in 2016-2017. The consumer satisfaction processes will not only measure satisfaction with Contact Hamilton s Coordinated Service Planning Process but also with the community delivery of coordinated service planning. Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 7

Consumer Satisfaction DSO HNR The DSO HNR provides consumers with the opportunity to provide feedback to the following services: - Satisfaction with the application process - Satisfaction with community presentations Application Process At the conclusion of the application process, individuals and families are provided with a link to a confidential e-survey (individuals and families that request a paper copy are provided one with a postage paid return envelope). Once the survey is completed, the software program calculates the results. Contact Hamilton is able to generate reports from this data. Where respondents requested follow up and provided their contact information, the Manager connected with them. Management receives quarterly reports regarding consumer satisfaction. Reports are reviewed, analysed and opportunities to address issues are developed. Survey Results: Maximum number of responders: 72 (not every question was answered by every respondent) Area Measured Agree Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree It was easy for me to find out about DSO HNR 79 17 4 Now that I have talked to a DSO HNR staff I have greater 90 4 6 understanding of what services the DSO HNR provides I felt listened to by the DSO HNR staff 92 4 4 I felt that was important to me was understood by DSO 92 4 4 HNR staff I now have a greater awareness of community services 87 9 4 available to me I felt DSO HNR staff provided me with clear and helpful 93 3 4 information related to my situation I would call DSO HNR again 92 6 3 I feel the next steps in getting service are clear to me 90 7 3 I felt DOS HNR was flexible in my meeting time 94 3 3 Overall I am satisfied with the help that DSO HNR has provided me 94 3 3 Average 90 6 4 Areas of Strength: - Consumer experience, customer service - Overall very high levels of satisfaction across measured domains Areas for Improvement: - Ease of access to DSO HNR (lack of awareness in community about DSO HNR) - Explore ways of increasing response rates - The DSO HNR team continues to implement and explore new strategies to address areas for improvement; team will use stakeholder engagement as a vehicle for support to identify strategies/opportunities Analysis of Narrative Comments: - A total of 36 people provided comments Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 8

o All comments were positive (positive staff qualities, helpful/informative process, general thanks) o 2 comments identified suggestions for consideration Community Presentations Note: evaluation forms were not distributed at all presentation events - 6 presentations occurred where evaluation forms were distributed in Brant, Hamilton and Niagara - 69 people provided feedback through the evaluation form. Survey results: Evaluation Element Strongly Agree / Agree Neutral Gain a better understanding of DS Transformation 97 3 0 Gain a better understanding of DSO HNR 97 3 0 Gain a better understanding of the DSO eligibility process 93 6 2 Strongly Disagree / Disagree Gain a better understanding to access to services as it relates to 94 4 2 transitional aged youth Presentation was valuable 97 3 0 Presenter was well prepared and answered questions effectively 99 2 0 There were sufficient opportunities to interact with the facilitator and other participants in the form of questions, discussion and group exercises 97 3 0 Average 96 3 1 Participants where asked what they liked most about the presentation: - 48 people provided comments to this question o Informative, discussion/dialogue, staff qualities Participants were asked what they liked least about the presentation: - 17 people provided comments to this question o Presentation related (7 people) o No negative comments to make / general appreciation (6 people) o Not enough time (3 people) o Too much information (1 person) Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 9

Consumer Satisfaction Passport Program The Passport Program provides consumers with the opportunity to provide feedback to the following services: - Satisfaction with the Claims Process - Satisfaction with the Outreach Worker Program - Community Presentations Annually for the Claims Process and at the conclusion of an Outreach intervention, individuals and families are provided with a link to a confidential e-survey or a paper copy of the survey with a postage paid return envelope. Once the survey is completed, the software program calculates the results. Contact Hamilton is able to generate reports from this data. Where respondents requested follow up and provided their contact information, the Manager connected with them. Claims Process Survey Results: Maximum number of respondents: 340 (not every question was answered by every respondent) Question Strongly Agree/Agree Neutral Strongly Disagree/Disagree Overall, I feel that my claim(s) have been well managed. 98 1 1 I have a greater understanding about making claims and what 89 8 2 my funds can/cannot be used for. I felt listened to and understood by the Passport staff. 92 5 3 My phone calls were responded to in a timely manner. 93 6 2 I was treated respectfully/courteously by Passport staff. 94 4 2 I understand the claims reimbursement process. 92 6 3 I received my claim reimbursement money in a timely 95 3 2 manner. I received a clear explanation for any partial/whole claim that 89 9 2 was paid. Overall, I am satisfied with the help that the Passport claims program has provided me. 93 5 2 Average 93 5 2 Areas of Strength: - The survey results reflect a very high level of satisfaction across all domains. Areas for Improvement: - While satisfaction results are high, the Passport Program will continue its focussed efforts in these two primary areas: o Ensuring Passport recipients understand what Passport funding can and cannot be used for through the sharing of promotional material, enhancing information on the website and provision of information sessions o Ensuring Passport recipients understand why a claim may not have been approved in part/full by providing fulsome explanations - The Passport Program continues to implement and explore new strategies to address areas for improvement; team will use stakeholder engagement as a vehicle for support to identify strategies/opportunities Analysis of Narrative Comments: - A total of 194 people provided comments Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 10

- Comments were categorized in the following way: o Good process, general thanks, positive staff attributes 147 specific comments o Suggestions for consideration / improvement 21 specific comments o Issues experienced with the claims process 22 specific comments Outreach Services Survey Results: Maximum number of responders: 12 (not every question was answered by every respondent) Question Strongly Agree/Agree Neutral Strongly Disagree/Disagree I was connected to a Passport Outreach Worker in a timely 83 8 8 manner I felt listened to by the Outreach Worker. 100 0 0 The Outreach Worker was professional, courteous and 100 0 0 respectful The Outreach Worker provided me with clear and helpful 100 0 0 information related to my situation or questions My phone calls were responded to in a timely manner 100 0 0 With the help I received from the Outreach Worker, I now 91 0 9 have a better plan for using my Passport funding Now that I have talked to or met with an Outreach Worker, I 91 9 0 feel that my questions and concerns have been addressed Overall, I am satisfied with the help that the Passport 100 0 0 Outreach provided me I would call the Passport office again if I had any questions or concerns 100 0 0 Average 96 2 2 Areas of Strength - Very high levels of satisfaction among recipients and their support networks for the work of the Outreach Workers. Areas for Improvement - Low response rate, although many individuals and families also receive the annual claims process survey; query survey fatigue. Analysis of Narrative Comments - A total of 8 people provided comments o All comments were positive (positive staff qualities and helpful process, general thanks) o 1 comment identified suggestions for consideration / improvement Community Presentations Note: evaluation forms were not distributed at all presentation events Survey Results - 4 presentations occurred o Presentations occurred in the following communities (where evaluation forms were distributed): Brant (2); Niagara (1); Hamilton (1) Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 11

o 43 people provided feedback through the evaluation form. Evaluation Item Strongly Agree / Agree Gain a better understanding of the Passport Program (e.g. what the program is for) Neutral 95 0 5 Strongly Disagree / Disagree Gain a better understanding of the Passport funding options 95 0 5 Met my need for helpful information about the Passport program 93 2 5 I know how to apply for Passport funding 92 8 0 Presenter was well prepared, knowledgeable and answered 93 2 5 questions effectively Presenter was professional and approachable 95 0 5 Any handouts that were provided were informative, easy to read and understand 91 5 (marked as n/a) 5 There was plenty of time to ask the presenter questions and to have 92 3 5 a discussion The time and location of the presentation was suitable 87 8 5 If this was a presentation to AGENCY staff: I understand my agency s 95 5 0 responsibilities with respect to supporting people with Passport funding Average 93 3 5 Participants were asked what they liked most about the presentations (22 people provided feedback): - Staff qualities, informative, discussion/dialogue, general thank you Participants were asked what they liked least about the presentations (11 people responded): - No negative comments to make (7 people) - More information needed (2 people) - Too much information (1 person) - Need more funding (1 person) Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 12

Service Statistics - Children s Services (Hamilton): Individuals served - 4,328 children and youth 329 children and youth with dual diagnosis 3609 children and youth presenting with mental health needs 390 children and youth presenting with developmental disabilities Residential Placement Advisory Committee (RPAC) meetings - We facilitated 21 RPAC meetings. Referrals - 2424 referrals were made to MCYS and MCSS funded children s services on behalf of 1777 unique children - NB: only referrals to MCYS and MCSS children s services agencies are recorded. Service recommendations for non MCYS and MCSS funded services (referred to as redirects ) represent a significant number of service recommendations made to youth and families, however they are not recorded in the same manner and therefore not counted in a way from which we can generate reports (they are recorded in a text field but not in a field that can generate reports). A general operating principle is the consideration of the least intrusive, nonspecialized services FIRST where this is appropriate. Many redirects are made, either in addition to or instead of a specialized MCYS or MCSS service. - Further, there are a finite number of MCYS and MCSS referrals than can be made (in children s services for instance, many of the services are niche-specific and therefore only one referral can be made whereas in developmental services, multiple agencies may provide similar types of services). Much of the work involves service coordination, re-prioritizing need, following up with referrals that have been made and engaging the Service Resolution process where required. Service Statistics - DSO HNR: Eligibility Confirmations (from DSCIS) DSO HNR received 756 NEW requests for adult developmental services on behalf of people not already registered with the DSO HNR: - People confirmed eligible: 333 (44) - People confirmed ineligible: 202 (27) - People in process: 221 (29) Eligibility Reviews (from DSCIS) People deemed ineligible are advised of and have the right to seek a review of their eligibility decision should they feel that the process was not fair or did not consider all information. The review process consists of up to 3 stages. According to DSCIS, of the 202 people deemed ineligible in 2016-2017: - Stage 1 o 2 reviews in process at March 31/17 o 3 review decisions upheld o 2 review decisions overturned Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 13

- Stage 2 o 1 review in process at March 31/17 o 1 review decision upheld o 0 review decisions overturned - Stage 3 o 0 reviews in process at March 31/17 o 0 review decisions upheld o 0 review decisions overturned Application Assessments and Reassessments (from DSCIS) A total of 1,073 applications for adult developmental services and supports were completed. - 31 of all completed assessments (or applications) were on behalf of NEW people (not in-service) - 28 of all assessments were completed on behalf of people currently in-service needing more or different and for whom there was no previous application. - Therefore a total of 59 of all completed applications were on behalf of people who did not have an application done previously - 41 of all assessments completed were REASSESSMENTS, meaning that the person had an assessment in the past but required it to be fully updated given significant changes. Urgent Response Mechanism - DSO HNR managed 126 requests for an Urgent Response meeting, on behalf of 85 unique individuals. o 85 of meetings resulted in the endorsement of the Temporary Supports to Families Fund o The fund was largely used to provide respite / day supports for people in highly urgent/crisis situations Service Statistics - Passport Program: Waiting for Passport Funding 1805 people were waiting for Passport funding as of April 30/17 (new applicants and applicants with some Passport funding that require more). It would cost $18M to address this need. Receiving Passport Funding 2861 people were receiving Passport funding as of April 30/17 (full amount or partial amount), for a total of $29.7M. Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 14

Looking Ahead 2017-2018 fiscal year will bring continued growth, development and opportunity to Contact Hamilton and the children, youth, families and adults with developmental disabilities that it supports. Key areas of focus: - Consumer and Stakeholder Engagement implementation of program specific strategies to actively involve our consumers and stakeholders in helping us provide the best service possible - Internal organizational priorities: o Diversity, Equity and Inclusion enhancing our organizational and staff capacity to be welcoming and responsive to our diverse populations o Truth, Reconciliation and Hope appreciating and understanding our need for meaningful relationship with our Indigenous peoples o Vicarious Trauma / Compassion Fatigue assisting our staff with the realities of their work o Supervision and Coaching providing our staff with the support and tools they need to do their best work possible - Enhancement of Service Navigation within the DSO HNR - Enhancement of Coordinated Service Planning within the Children s Services program o Implementation of Youth and Family Advisory Council o Community implementation of coordinated service planning - Continued review of our Children s Services program to enhance our responsiveness and community presence - Implementation of the revised Child, Youth and Family Services Act, notably revisions specific to child welfare and age of protection - Passport Modernization and shifting our focus to more direct consumer engagement, outreach and support Thank You Our work is inspired by: - Our consumers and their families, support networks and advocates - Our community partners - Our funding Ministries - Our Board of Directors - Our compassionate, dedicated staff Contact Hamilton 2016-2017 Executive Director s AGM Report PUBLIC (Sept 2017) Page 15