Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) ACSF Symposium. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: ASAP Stakeholders By: Inspector Randolph McDonald

Similar documents
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. DoD Commercial Air Transportation Quality and Safety Review Program

Regulations, Policy, and Guidance. What s changing? Federal Aviation Administration

Emergency Response Preparedness. Don Rickerhauser Manager, Safety and Security

Creating a Highly Reliable Health System: the Leadership Challenge. 6 th Annual Patient Safety Symposium Rick Foster, MD

DOD INSTRUCTION AVIATION HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS (AHIRAPS)

AMT 101 Mechanic Certificate. Chapter 13

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER DOWNED AIRPLANES SUBJECT

FAA Initiatives and Regulatory Update

Introduction - General

UTAH CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION

ALASKA AIR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION FAMILY ASSISTANCE PLAN Required Update Due: October 2,200O ADDENDUM

VOLUME 5 AIRMAN CERTIFICATION CHAPTER 5 TITLE 14 CFR PART 65 AIRMEN OTHER THAN FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS. Section 8 Renew a Part 65 Inspection Authorization

Inspector Training System

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERODROMES AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES. Foreword

SI STAFF INSTRUCTION ORGANIZATION, USE AND REVISION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

FLIGHT ATTENDANT TRAINING MANUAL

ON JANUARY 27, 2015, THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION ADOPTED THE BELOW RULES WITH PREAMBLE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE TEXAS REGISTER.

Pensacola Fire Department. FY 2016 Budget Workshop

National Security Agency

High Reliability Organizations Healing Without Harm by 2014

Cooperative Development of Operational Safety Continuing Airworthiness Programme. COSCAP-Gulf States. Training Course on Part VI _ DOC 8335

Aviation Maintenance Management

Session 6. Accident Prevention Measures

City of Pembroke Pines, Florida

USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop

Types of Errors 3/29/12. Approaches of other industries: To err is human, to forgive is divine... Human errors vs. Medical errors vs.

WIOA Guidance Notice No Workforce Development Boards

Highway Patrol Division

Accident/Incident Investigation Plan

14167F ASSIGNMENT Occupational standards. 2. Naval standards. 3. Tradition. 4. Law

United States Senate. Committee on. Health, Education, Labor & Pensions

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-CE-004-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Lunch Keynote Speaker FAA s Pilot Training Initiatives and Flight Standard s Reorganization

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Titling and Indexing Subjects of Criminal Investigations in the Department of Defense

Tulsa County CDBG Urban County

JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTHCARE

Business Safety Leadership. Part 2: Incident and Root Cause Analysis

From Value to High-Reliability Organization

Advisory Circular. Date: 9/28/05 Initiated by: AFS-305. Subject: Aviation Maintenance Technician Awards Program. AC No: 65-25C

A Model for Port State Control of LNG Ships

49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Improv DARPA-BAA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) as of 4/6/16

GAO MEDICAL DEVICES. Status of FDA s Program for Inspections by Accredited Organizations. Report to Congressional Committees

Safety Best Practices Manual

Adjudication prioritisation

Injury and Work-Related Illness Prevention Program

INVESTIGATIONS. Division of Investigations and Law Enforcement

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Continue to Face Challenges in Tracking Contractor Personnel and Contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan

Guide for the Incident Investigation Form (Incident Investigation Report)

NALC Guide to Safety and Health A Basic Reference for NALC Local Safety and Health Activists

DOD MANUAL DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP)

INCIDENT INVESTIGATION & REPORTING BEST PRACTICES

Design Considerations for a Patient Safety Improvement Reporting System

Carrying Out a State Regulatory Program

MANDATORY DRUG TESTING OF MERCHANT MARINE PERSONNEL. By Walter J. Brudzinski INTRODUCTION

Defense Security Service Intelligence Oversight Awareness Training Course Transcript for CI

2. This SA does not apply if the entity does not have an internal audit function. (Ref: Para. A2)

OSHA 29CFR 1960 Basic Program Elements for Federal Employee Occupational Safety and Health Programs and Related Matters

Local Grievance # Did management violate Section 271.g of the M-39 Handbook via Article 19 and

Quality Assessment and Assurance. Guidance Training (F520) (o)

Topics 6/28/2017. U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General (OIG) OIG Audits Impact DOT Oversight. Heads Up on Future Issues

Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme Continuous Monitoring Manual

Best Practices for Review and Prevention of Deadly Incidents in High-Hazard Professions: Lessons for Police

Incident Management June 2018

INCIDENT INVESTIGATION AND REPORT PROGRAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CIRCOR AEROSPACE INC.

Notice of Privacy Practices

Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. General Order Vehicle Pursuits

Selected Aspects of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program. Department of Transportation

April, 2007 QUESTIONABLE PRACTICES BY HOSPICES AND NURSING HOMES UNDER HEALTH CARE FRAUD AND ABUSE RULES

STRONG LICENSING: NARA s CALL TO ACTION

NHS Vacancy Statistics. England, February 2015 to October 2015 Provisional experimental statistics

Incident reporting, investigation and follow-up

ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this general order is to establish basic operational guidelines for members of the patrol division.

If you have any new ideas for articles and you would like to see them in this newsletter, please send your ideas to

Automated Passport Control (APC) Kiosks

Work of Internal Auditors

The purpose of this lesson is for students to describe how CAP is organized from the Board of Governors down to the individual member.

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Risk Management Self Assessment Tool. The first few questions concern the general characteristics of your facility.

Opinion No 13/2016. Technical records

Comparison of Health IT Provisions in H.R. 6 (21 st Century Cures Act) and S (Improving Health Information Technology Act)

State Government General Records Retention Schedule (SGGRRS) Version 6.0 (June 2016)

Opening: Social Worker Family & Children Services Department: Human Services

Florida A&M University Audit Committee Meeting

10_TABS CURRENT Page 3 10:08 AM 5/20/03 Pr epar Preparedness edness

Donald Mancuso Deputy Inspector General Department of Defense

Street Address City State Zip

GAO IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. DOD, State, and USAID Face Continued Challenges in Tracking Contracts, Assistance Instruments, and Associated Personnel

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

DOD DIRECTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS (ATSD(PA))

National Standards for the Conduct of Reviews of Patient Safety Incidents

Tel.: +1 (514) ext Ref.: AN 12/51-07/74 7 December 2007

Rational Approach to Compliance with New FAA/EASA MAG 5 Change 5 Requirements. DERS Group Svc LLC, INDIANA

Root Cause Analysis Without Tears

MEMORANDUM. Page Number , A.-1 through 6.A , A.-1 through 6.A

July 7, Dear Mr. Patel:

Jefferson County International Airport. AWOS Installation Project

An Integrated Approach for Improving Occupational Health and Safety Management: The Voluntary Protection Program in Taiwan

Transcription:

Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) ACSF Symposium Presented to: ASAP Stakeholders By: Inspector Randolph McDonald Date: January March 2016 2013 2014

Aviation Safety Accident Statistics 2015 was the safest year ever The Aviation Safety Network released the preliminary 2015 airlines accident statistics showing a record low total of 16 fatal airlines accidents, resulting in 560 fatalities. ASAP January Training January 2013 Program 2012 2

The Goal of ASAP The goal of ASAP is to encourage air carrier and repair station employees to voluntarily report safety information that may be critical to identifying potential precursors to accidents Decrease accidents, incidents & violations Better identify risks to public safety Implement risk reduction strategies based on ASAP data Track the effectiveness of these strategies Training Program January 2013 3

Purpose of ASAP Improve Aviation Safety: Gather and analyze safety-related concerns or events that may otherwise go unreported Identify root cause(s) of safety-related events Determine and communicate corrective action(s) and/or recommendation(s) Track completion and evaluate effectiveness of corrective action(s) and/or recommendation(s) Communicate ASAP successes in reducing threats to safety by reporting Build trust and confidence in the program to encourage a reporting/safety culture Educate persons to preclude recurrence of safety problems and alleged violations Training Program January 2013 4

Enforcement-Related Incentives Purpose is to encourage certificate holder employees to participate in an ASAP Limited to what is needed to achieve the desired goal and results of the program No FAA enforcement action will be used to address certain apparent violations of the regulations This incentive only applies to ERC-accepted reports Training Program January 2013 5

The Foundation of ASAP Participation in voluntary programs requires a level of trust among the regulator, the organization and employees labor organization or third party facilitator Definition of Partnership A cooperative relationship between people or groups who agree to share responsibility for achieving some specific goal Safety Training Program January 2013 6

ASAP Partnership FAA is committed to partnership Enforcement-related incentive to VSP participants FAA s oversight effectiveness using existing resources is greatly enhanced through partnership FAA gains a clearer, more accurate view of the safety of airlines operations Broader compliance through corrective actions Training Program January 2013 7

ASAP Partnership The cornerstone of ASAP is the trust and cooperation Common purpose improves the relationships existing between parties All parties agree the objective of the ASAP program is accident prevention and, collectively, we achieve results that were previously unattainable through traditional methods Training Program January 2013 8

ASAP Partnership If leaders want to drive trust levels higher They must focus on openness, transparency and involving employees Shared responsibility for success is a key characteristic of high trust organizations Employees will be committed to a common goal and eager to participate Openly rewarding employees for their contribution to safety (Linda Stewart, Interactionassociates.com) Training Program January 2013 9

Does ASAP Work? Program Status - 2015 As of January 2016: 430 active programs Approximately 89% of reports have been solesource 11% are classified as non-sole source Less than 1% were excluded from the program 20% identified as regulatory violations The program has enabled participants to identify risks and implement corrective action for both individual and systemic issues Audit SW Region Review ASAP Results Audit Overview January 24 May 2016 2006 10

Program Status Audit SW Region Review ASAP Results Audit Overview January 24 May 2016 2006 11

New Initiative Introduced-2012-2015 Air Charter Safety Foundation 35 Operators with active MOU s 18 Part 135 17 Part 91 A total of 120 employee groups participating in the program Audit SW Region Review ASAP Results Audit Overview January 24 May 2016 2006 12

Employee Groups Represented Audit SW Region Review ASAP Results Audit Overview January 24 May 2016 2006 13

ASAP Reporting Audit SW Region Review ASAP Results Audit Overview January 24 May 2016 2006 14

ASAP Reporting Submissions 2009-2015 *"Others" includes Pilot Mgmt, Maint Supvrs, 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Ramp Dispatchers Flight Attendants Flight Followers Load Planners Mechanics Others * Pilots 2009 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Approximately 100,000 ASAPs reported last year Audit SW Region ASAP Audit Overview Review 24 May Results 2006 January 2016 15

Submissions by Employee Groups Employee Group 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Dispatchers 1,088 1,706 1,768 2,439 3,334 2,669 3,186 Flight Attendants 1,152 1,437 2,634 2,435 3,717 6,122 8,275 Flight Followers 3 3 6 16 9 16 33 Load Planners 40 176 328 195 149 164 54 Mechanics 1,917 1,718 2,197 2,413 2,458 3,064 3,562 Others * 17 4 52 89 27 14 16 Pilots 36,196 49,166 52,865 65,086 77,120 75,972 83,618 Ramp 1,852 3,111 3,063 1,983 1,613 1,217 2,878 Audit SW Region ASAP Audit Overview Review 24 May Results 2006 January 2016 16

MOU s by Region Active MOU's per Region-2015 140 130 120 100 80 60 58 70 40 37 30 39 38 28 20 0 AL CE EA GL NM SO SW WP Note: This count includes all employee groups. Some operators have as many as 5 different employee groups on their MOU while several smaller operators have 1 or 2 employee groups. Audit SW Region Review ASAP Results Audit Overview January 24 May 2016 2006 17

Safety - Identify Safety Events/Risk What are the top five reported categories/events? Pilot 1.Altitude deviation 2.Course deviation 3.Company procedure deviations 4.Maintenance operations 5.Manuals/logbook paperwork Disp 1.Company procedure deviation 2.Dispatch operations 3.Load planning/ MX operations 4.Manuals/logbook paperwork 5.Weather MX 1.Company procedure deviations 2.Manuals/logbook paperwork 3.Maintenance operations 4.FAR deviations 5.Ramp Safety Inflight/Onboard 1.Exit Row 2.Jump seat 3.Manuals 4.Safety Procedures and Policies 5.Slides Training Program January 2013 18

The END (Randy.McDonald@faa.gov) 650-619-7595 Questions? Training Program January 2013 19