Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Briefing for Industry

MQ-8B FIRE SCOUT. Operational Scenario. MQ-8B Fire Scout Air Vehicle Specifications United States Navy

Armed Unmanned Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

F-35 Lightning II A New Generation of Fighter

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft Acquisition Planning: Requirements Development and Maturation

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Joint Test and Evaluation Program

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

NORAD and USNORTHCOM J8 Science & Technology

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Unmanned Combat Air Veh(UCAV) Adv Cp/Proto Dev. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium

Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

U.S. Air Force Electronic Systems Center

Naval Aviation Enterprise Science and Technology Objectives. Naval Air Systems Command. Director, Air Warfare Division. Apm ~8

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UAV s And Homeland Defense Now More Critical Than Ever. LCDR Troy Beshears UAV Platform Manager United States Coast Guard

Unmanned Systems and Mine Warfare RADM Matthew Klunder Chief of Naval Research November 5, 2014

UNCLASSIFIED FY Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: C2ISR Tactical Data Link FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Dr. Mike Francis Director Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems: The Have Blue of the 21 st Century

Freedom Variant (LCS 1) Littoral Combat Ship Launch and Handling System Lessons Learned November 2012

Mr. James Hondo Geurts Deputy Director for Acquisition United States Special Operations Command

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY Due to the number of efforts in this PE, the programs described herein are representative of the work included in this PE.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

The Western UAS Symposium

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

First Announcement/Call For Papers

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Navy & Marine Corps Vertical Lift: Past and Future

Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

Experimenting into the future Mr Ed Gough Deputy Commander Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO


UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #71

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Air Defense System Solutions.

Capability Integration

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Transcription:

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321

UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based Tactical Airpower Force Enabler - Preemptive/Reactive SEAD Provide Persistent All Weather Deep Strike and Surveillance New CONOPS for High Risk or High Payoff Missions ❶ New Paradigm in Aircraft Affordability Reduced Acquisition Costs (<1/3 JSF) Dramatically Lower O&S Cost (>50% Reduction) ❶ Augment Naval Force Structure E-2 National Assets Prosecution of Advanced IADS & Time Critical Targets P3 Deep Target Surveillance High Survivable Design For First Day Operations Link AT3 Legacy Threat Ring UCAV-N Threat Ring

System Concept AWACS National Assets Airborne Imagery JSTARS Design Trades Impact the Entire System of Systems

System Themes Network Centric Warfare Revolutionary Mission Control System Potential Operators at the center of information Intelligent decision aids Teams control swarms Revolutionary Air Vehicle Potential End-node of a lethal system High degree of on-board intelligence Product of latest design/manufacturing tools Tailored yet robust capabilities Minimal maintenance/high sortie rate All Technologies Buy Their Way onto the System Lowest Mission Cost per Target Kill

UCAV & UCAV-N Acquisition Plan FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 Phase I Studies, Analyses, & Preliminary Design Downselect First Flight #1 FF #2 Phase II Detail Design, Fab & Flight Test DARPA/Air Force Effort DARPA/Navy Effort Boeing Naval UCAV NGC Naval UCAV Studies, Analyses, & Prelim Design Risk Reduction & Ops Evals Decision EMD Downselect Naval UCAV Adv Tech Demos

Program Philosophy Partnership to Demonstrate Technical Feasibility Exploit Design Freedom Think Out of the Box Mission Focus but Not a Point Solution Exploit UCAV ATD Focus on Naval Unique Environment/Issues Advanced Technology NOT an Acquisition Program Seamless Path to EMD Decision Provide Focus for S&T

Goal & Objectives Demonstrate the technical feasibility for a UCAV system to effectively and affordably prosecute persistent, sea-based 21st century SEAD/Strike/Surveillance missions within the emerging global command and control architecture. Develop A low life-cycle cost, mission effective sea-based design for a SEAD/Strike/Surveillance unmanned air vehicle A reconfigurable control system for multi-vehicle operations in Naval environments Robust/secure command, control & communications, including line-of-sight and over-thehorizon Evaluate Human computer function allocation, dynamic mission planning & management approaches Off-board/on-board sensor integration, weapon targeting & loadouts Demonstrate Naval operations including ship launch and recovery, deck handling and storage, maintenance and training, and interoperability with other Naval aviation systems and operations Human-in-the-loop, detection, identification, location, real-time targeting, weapons authorization, weapons delivery and target damage indication

Program Approach UOS Focuses SMP Analyze High Payoff Missions Naval UCAV Operational System (UOS-N) Effective & affordable weapon system for post 2010 missions Product of multi-dimensional / optimized trade studies Designed to identify the critical technologies, processes & System Attributes (TPSAs) System Maturation Plan (SMP) Complete roadmap of TPSA risk reduction activities including cost and schedule to achieve UOS-N vision Naval UCAV Demonstrator System (UDS-N) is fundamental component of the SMP Maintains direct legacy to UOS-N Focused by UOS to address critical TPSAs, explore CONOPS design space & validate UOS key assumptions Technologies Processes & System Attributes (TPSAs) Shipboard Integration Command / Control / Communications (C 3 ) Targeting / Weapons Delivery Supportability/Health Mgmt Human-Systems Interaction Signature Air Vehicle

UCAV-N Technical Challenges Focus on Naval unique technology and integration issues Leverage DARPA / USAF UCAV Program Ship Suitable UCAV Design Size, weight, costs for ship design Speed, stability and control of LO design Cat/Trap vs. alternatives (e.g. V/STOL) Maritime environment issues Safety Mission Control Integration Autonomous launch & recovery Integrated deck operations Shipboard interfaces Integration With Navy C4ISR assets EMI/EMC environment Naval CONOPS SEAD / Deep Strike / Surveillance Affordable Naval Operations & Support Storage transport Training Rapid turnaround, maintenance

Phase I Products ❶ Trade Study Results ❶ Alternative CONOPS Analysis ❶ UCAV-N Operational System Design (UOS-N) ❶ UOS-N Effectiveness & Affordability Analysis ❶ System Maturation Assessment (SMA) ❶ UCAV Demonstration System (UDS-N) Requirements Naval Focus Goal is to Demonstrate That Proceeding into Phase II is Justified and can be Accomplished within Cost & Schedule

Phase II Wide range of options Full scale advanced technology demo like UCAV ATD Conduct Naval unique aspects of SMP Anywhere in-between Continue to refine effectiveness/affordability projections Provide best value to the government Additional information available with MS 2 feedback RR&OE Program Approach Organization Focus shifts to operational utility & military value Completes seamless path to EMD

Program Approach Technology Readiness Level Perspective Technology Readiness Level 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Phase I ATP Phase II RR&OE Year EMD Technology Readiness Levels 9 Flight Proven through successful mission objectives 8 Flight Qualified through test & demonstration 7 Prototype demonstration in an operational environment 6 System/Prototype demo in a relevant environment 5 Component validation in relevant environment 4 Component validation in laboratory environment 3 Analytical, experimental or characteristic proof of concept 2 Technology concept/ application formulated 1 Basic principles reported

Management Structure Program Manager (DARPA/TTO) Deputy Program Manager (ONR) Industry Teams Chief, UCAV Tech Support Team NAVAIR CONOPS Team N88 C2 Weapons Ship Human Systems Air Vehicle UCAV ATD Team, NRO Constructive Analysis Team ASC/ENM Special Projects ONR SETA Support Team

Summary Naval UCAV program Meets high priority Naval needs Technology and program opportunities exist Potential revolutionary payoffs Phase I underway Boeing and Northrop Grumman selected Phase II Funding identified Execution contingent on successful Phase I outcome Draft solicitation out to industry for comment