FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT IDAHO FALLS TRAINING SITE BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO

Similar documents
FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT AIRPORT TRAINING AREA BOISE, IDAHO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT CENTENNIAL TRAINING SITE COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SNAKE CREEK TRAINING SITE MIRAMAR, FLORIDA

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT WALLY EAGLE DROP ZONE LOVELAND, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE - SMYRNA SMYRNA, TENNESSEE

April Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VAIL TREE FARM LOCAL TRAINING AREA CENTRALIA, WASHINGTON

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT LIEUTENANT COLONEL HERNAN G

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SAN JUAN NATIONAL FOREST TRAINING AREA DOLORES, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT RAMEY LOCAL TRAINING AREA AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

March Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report

July Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

Managing Range Condition Assessments: The Army s Operational Range Qualitative Assessment Program

Range Environmental Vulnerability Assessment

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION. No Further Action AIR FORCE MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM MUNITIONS RESPONSE SITE CHARACTERIZATION

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

Environmental Baseline Survey for Naval Weapons Station Concord

FINAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) LAND USE CONTROLS FORT BLISS, TX MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM

New Draft Section 408 Policy Document EC

The Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure. - An Overview - JSEM US Army Installation Geospatial. US Air Force GeoBase

SITE SURVEY SUMMARY SHEET FOR DERP-FUDS SITE NO. J09CAO84400

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

GIS Mapping of Army Real Property Land Data

Tri-Service Environmental Risk Assessment Working Group

YUROK TRIBE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

News and Updates. Presenter: Edie Zagona RiverWare User Group Meeting February 3, 2015

WRP Natural Resources Committee s Southeastern Arizona/New Mexico (SoAZ/NM Project)

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

ROCKY MOUNTAINS COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT FIVE TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

SECTION 2 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

PACIFIC NORTHWEST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT FOUR TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

U^J. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prepared by the U.S. Army Environmental Center March 1999

REPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016

FY2016 SIEVERS-SANDBERG USARC

Restoration Advisory Board. Tonight s Agenda

City of Oakland Park

The DEP has four main regulations that relate to pipeline construction.

Proposal for Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment in Support of Large-Scale MAGTF Live Fire and Maneuver Training

HYDROGRAPHER II Range B55/B75 BOD 07/25/18

JOB SUMMARY: Challenge Yourself - Be an Army Civilian - Go Army!

Cleanup Successes and Challenges. James D. Werner Director, Air & Waste Management Division

Western Regional Partnership Overview

FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT

AUG JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia

Leading Louisiana Baton Rouge G.I.S.

Idaho Water Resources Research Institute

Create an account to get started build your profile, create or upload resumes and apply for jobs.

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

FIRE SUPPORT AND AIRSPACE COORDINATION FORMAL COORDINATION The FSCOORD establishes fire support and airspace coordination, with input from his ALO

Preliminary Review and. Reference Guide Sections 4.2 and 4.3

Final RANGE CONDITION ASSESSMENT (RCA) DECISION POINT 1 RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

US Army Corps of Engineers. Section 408 Overview. Regulatory Workshop July 22, Kim Leonard/Kevin Lee BUILDING STRONG

In God We Trust, All Others Must Bring Data. Installation Geospatial Information and Services in DoD

WHO'S IN AND WHO'S OUT

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

References. AR 15-6, (Boards, Commissions and Committee Procedures for Investigating officers and Boards of Officers)

Record of Decision Group 3 Del Rey Oaks / Monterey, Laguna Seca Parking, and Military Operations in Urban Terrain Site Munitions Response Areas

TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE MODERNIZATION

Naval Support Facility. Indian Head. Supporting Our Military and Our Nation INSTALLATION OVERVIEW JULY 2010 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

United States Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District Regulatory Program. Westmoreland County 2014 Engineers Workshop. March 20 th & 21 st, 2014

DoD Handbook for Perchlorate Sampling and Testing

National Guard (States) Geospatial Systems Program and 2014 Strategic Imperatives

NORTH ATLANTIC COAST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT AMENDMENT FIVE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. between

DOD INSTRUCTION THE READINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INTEGRATION (REPI) PROGRAM AND ENCROACHMENT MANAGEMENT

4Cultural Resources. Promote mission-supporting re-use of historic properties. Manage and maintain cultural resources in a sustainable manor

Overview of Groundwater Sustainability Plans & Alternatives Regulations. Butte County Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee April 17, 2017

NG-J37 CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 19 October 2015

The attached is updated text for incorporation into the subject document. Replace current text pages with the change text pages as described below:

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY OFFICE DOCUMENT ID: TITLE: Environmental Justice Public Participation Policy EFFECTIVE

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

Homeland Security Infrastructure Program

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

4.6 NOISE Impact Methodology Factors Considered for Impact Analysis. 4.6 Noise

FREEWAT modeling platform: software architecture and state of development Iacopo Borsi TEA SISTEMI SpA

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES LAND USE CONTROLS TO RESTRICT USE OF GROUNDWATER. For

Community Relations Plan

U.S. ARMY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD. and TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDANCE

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

REVIEW PLAN. Savannah Harbor DMCA 12A Dike Raising

ROCKY MOUNTAINS COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT FOUR TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

WARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY

Wildland Firefighting

Safety Process For Navy Gun and Ammunition Systems

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH STREET SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GA

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Stakeholders Meeting February 8, 2018

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

2017 Nationwide Permit Reissuance

Kansas AAP, KS Conveyance Progress Report

Planning Commission Public Hearing Exhibits. Powers Ready Mix Plant Oldcastle SW Group, Inc.

Pennsylvania s Act 13 of SRBC Water Quality Advisory Committee Meeting May 21, 2012

Transcription:

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT IDAHO FALLS TRAINING SITE BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO MARCH 2008 Prepared for: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT P.O. Box 1715 Baltimore, Maryland 21203 and UNITED STATES ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMAND Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010 Prepared by: MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. 300 E. Lombard Street, Suite 610 Baltimore, Maryland 21202

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States (U.S.) Army is conducting qualitative assessments at operational ranges to meet the requirements of Department of Defense policy and to support the U.S. Army Sustainable Range Program. The operational range qualitative assessment (hereinafter referred to as Phase I Assessment) is the first phase of the U.S. Army Operational Range Assessment Program. This Phase I Assessment evaluates the operational area at Idaho Falls Training Site to assess whether further investigation is needed to determine if potential munitions constituents of concern (MCOC) are or could be migrating off-range at levels that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. In conducting the Phase I Assessment, MCOC sources, potential off-range migration pathways, and potential off-range human and ecological receptors are evaluated as appropriate. The 1099.1-acre Idaho Falls Training Site is located in east-central Idaho approximately six miles northwest of Idaho Falls in Bonneville County, Idaho. The installation is located along U.S. Highway 20, which transects the southwestern corner of the installation. The State of Idaho Military Division obtained use of the Idaho Falls Training Site by presidential executive order. This property remains public land but has been removed from the public domain for use by the Idaho Army National Guard (ARNG) and is administered by the Bureau of Land Management. The primary mission of Idaho Falls Training Site is to serve as a training area for the ARNG. An Operational Range Inventory Sustainment update was submitted to the U.S. Army Environmental Command in May 2006 (ARID-GEO [2006]). ARID-GEO (2006) identified six operational ranges encompassing a total of 1099.1 acres. There is no other than operational area at Idaho Falls Training Site. Two types of training activities are authorized at Idaho Falls Training Site: live-fire weapons training (on four small arms ranges and a medium caliber range) and heavy maneuver/training exercises (on one maneuver/training area). A review of available records and background data, as well as interviews with Idaho ARNG personnel, indicates that Idaho Falls Training Site has limited training opportunities for units and has not been used since approximately 1994. According to interviews with the Idaho ARNG, the site historically was used primarily during training weekends and, occasionally, for extended periods. Currently, the site is undeveloped, but trespassers use it periodically for small arms target practice. The six operational ranges at Idaho Falls Training Site are categorized as Unlikely. Unlikely Five-Year Review Six ranges at Idaho Falls Training Site are categorized as Unlikely, totaling 1,099.1 acres. These ranges consist of four small arms ranges (18.6 acres), a medium caliber range (16.3 acres), and a maneuver/training area (1064.2 acres). Ranges where, based upon a review of readily available information, there is sufficient evidence to show that there are no known releases or source-receptor interactions on ranges that could present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment are categorized as Unlikely. Ranges categorized as Unlikely are required to be re-evaluated at least every five years. Re-evaluation may occur sooner if significant changes (e.g., change in range operations or site conditions, regulatory changes) occur that affect determinations made during this Phase I Assessment. Table ES-1 summarizes the Phase I Assessment findings. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. ES - 1

Idaho Falls Training Site, Idaho Table ES-1: Summary of Findings and Conclusions for Idaho Falls Training Site Category Unlikely Total Number of Ranges and Acreage Three operational ranges; 15.6 acres Three operational ranges; 1083.5 acres Source(s) Pathway(s) Human Receptors Small arms firing No source limited or no military munitions use No pathways present Ecological Receptors Not evaluated (no pathway was identified) Not evaluated (no source was identified) Conclusions and Rationale Re-evaluate during the fiveyear review. No pathway was identified. Re-evaluate during the fiveyear review. No source was identified. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. ES - 2

ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS amsl ARID-GEO ARNG CSM DoD DODI E EMO ESRP GIS GW H INEL LS M MCOC mph NG ORAP PU RFMSS SW TFCC U.S. USACE USACHPPM USAEC USEPA USGS o F Above Mean Sea Level Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase Army National Guard Conceptual Site Model Department of Defense Department of Defense Instruction Ecological receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes E designation.) Environmental Management Office Eastern Snake River Plain Geographic Information System Groundwater pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes GW designation.) Human receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes H designation.) Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Limited Source Munitions used. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes applicable pathway.) Munitions Constituents of Concern Miles per Hour Nitroglycerin Operational Range Assessment Program Pathway unlikely or incomplete. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes PU designation.) Range Facility Management Support System Surface water pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes SW designation.) Twin Falls Canal Company United States United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine United States Army Environmental Command United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Geological Survey degrees Fahrenheit Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. iv

G:\ORAP\Installations\Idaho\ID NG\Idaho Falls Training Site\GIS\MXDs\Figure_1-1.mxd ³ ^_ 15 20 Snake River 20 Police Range Idaho Falls Training Site 26 Gun Club Fanning Field Noise Park Raceway Skyline Gun Club Idaho Falls Installation Installation Boundary Operational Area Local Road Hydrology Stream/River (Perennial) Stream (Intermittent) Canal/Ditch Water Body 0 1.5 Miles Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Figure 1-1 General Location of Idaho Falls Training Site Data Sources: AEC, ARID-GEO, June 2006 ESRI, StreetMap USA, 2005 Date:...March 2008 Prepared By:... Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Prepared For:... U.S. Army Contract:... W912DR-05-D-0004