Health Information Technology use in Iowa Radiology Facilities: A Study for Iowa e-health

Similar documents
Health Information Technology use in Iowa Long- Term Care Facilities: A Study for Iowa e-health

Health Information Technology use in Iowa Medical Laboratories: A Study for Iowa e-health

Iowa Health Information Technology and Meaningful Use Landscape in 2015

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

Medicaid and HIT: EHR s s for Medicaid Providers

The Journey to Meaningful Use: Where we were, where we are, and where we may be going

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians February 2013

Background and Context:

1. What are the requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH Act for CPOE to qualify for incentive payments?

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

First Look at Iowa's Medicaid Expansion: How Well Did Members Transition to the Iowa Health & Wellness Plan from IowaCare

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Streamlining Medical Image Sharing For Continuity of Care

SHIN-NY 2020 Roadmap Extended Presentation. Val Grey Executive Director July 25, 2017

Staff Training. Understanding Healthix Patient Consent

A strategy for building a value-based care program

The Future of. Health Informatics. in Hong Kong. Dr N.T. Cheung Chief Medical Informatics Officer Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Tuesday, 16 June 2009

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Provider Perspectives on Patient Information: Results of 2017 Survey. October 19, 2017

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Behavioral Health Information Network of Arizona

YOUR HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE

2004 HIMSS NATIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEY. July 21, 2004

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Blue Button Use to Access and Share Health Record Information

The results will also be used for public reporting for MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

The Hawai i Health Information Exchange Improving the quality of care, increasing efficiency, and reducing costs through effective use of electronic

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Health Information Exchange 101. Your Introduction to HIE and It s Relevance to Senior Living

DENOMINATOR: All final reports for patients, regardless of age, undergoing a CT procedure

Meaningful Use Stage 2

HIE and Meaningful Use Stage 2 Matrix

Request for Information NJ Health Information Network. State of New Jersey. New Jersey HIT Coordinators Office. Request for Information

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

ONC Cooperative Agreement HIE Program Update. Arizona Rural & Public Health Policy Forum January 19, 2012

s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California: Use Among Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities

Tools for Providers. Clinical Care and Practice AdvancementElectronic Health Records (EHR)

Using Quality Reporting and Health Information Technology to Improve Patient Care. Thursday, April 21, 2016 David Smith Acumentra Health

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

WV MEDICAID PROVIDER WORKSHOPS & TRAINING SESSIONS. Amber Nary Business Development Manager

HIE & Interoperability: Roadmap to Continuum of Care Michael McPherson MU Coordinator KDHE

The Updated Gartner CPR Generation Criteria

U.S. Healthcare Problem

Practice Tools for Safe Drug Therapy

Virtua/CHOP Virtua and The Children s Hospital Of Philadelphia: An Example Case Study for Seamless Data Integration

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

OHA s Technology Strategic Initiative

AMIA Public Policy and Government Relations Update

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

North Dakota Health Information Network (NDHIN) April 2015

HITECH Act. Overview and Estimated Timeline

Health Information Technology and Coordinating Care in Ohio

Calibrating your tablet allows you to ensure accuracy as you handwrite on the screen and/or select items on the screen. Prime Clinical Systems, Inc 1

ehealth Report for Ed Clark November 10, 2016 My Background and Context:

Marrying Your Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) and Your Health Information Exchange (HIE)

Health Information Exchange. Anne Dobbins, RN Operations Director Minnesota Health Information Exchange (MN HIE)

Connecticut Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

NH CHI HIT HIE Work Group Scenarios

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

WHO SHARES? A look at the status of HIT and HIE in Arkansas

Illinois HIE Strategic & Operational Plan

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Results will be used for public reporting by MDH and MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

The Holyoke Medical Center (HMC) Patient Portal User Guide

Medical Case Management

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Sharing health information electronically eliminates the need for faxing, copying and handcarrying your health record from provider to provider.

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Delaware Health Information Network Town Hall Wednesday, July 13, :00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.

ABC COMPANY CARE CONNEX EMPLOYEE GUIDE

Introduction FUJITSU APPROACH FOR TACKLING THE TECHNICAL CHALLENGES RELATED TO THE MANAGEMENT OF EHR

Improving Care Coordination Through Health Information Exchange

Overview of Hospital Information Systems

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Kaiser Permanente: A leader in Health I.T.

Hospital information systems: experience at the fully digitized Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

HIT and HIE at the Visiting Nurse Service of New York. Discussion with CHCANYS Region II Conference. Thomas Check, CIO at VNSNY.

Use of Information Technology in Physician Practices

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Methodology. Methods

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Medical Practitioner Reimbursement

2018 Spring Medical Research Application

PCMH 2014 Recognition Checklist

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

2018 Fall Medical Research Application

HEALTHCARE TRENDS IN NORTH AMERICA ANDY TIPPET SR. MARKETING MANAGER HEALTHCARE, AMERICAS. ScanSource Smart VAR Conference August 21, 2014

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Measuring Digital Maturity. John Rayner Regional Director 8 th June 2016 Amsterdam

Transcription:

Health Policy 11-1-2010 Health Information Technology use in Iowa Radiology Facilities: A Study for Iowa e-health Damiano C. Peter Ki Park Kristi Law Copyright 2010 Public Policy Center, The Hosted by Iowa Research Online. For more information please contact: lib-ir@uiowa.edu.

Less than half of radiology facilities sent either reports or images to other providers electronically A study for Iowa e- Health Background Iowa e-health is a public and private collaboration that seeks to improve health care quality, safety and efficiency through the use of health information technology (HIT). This includes electronic health records (EHRs) to collect and store patient health information, and a statewide health information exchange (HIE) to share health records across the boundaries of individual care settings. To better understand HIT use by a variety of health care provider types, Iowa e- Health, in collaboration with the University of Iowa Public Policy Center (UI PPC), conducted an assessment of HIT issues November 2010 Health Information Technology use in Iowa Radiology Facilities facing health care providers in Iowa. The current effort included five health provider settings: 1) home health, 2) longterm care, 3) pharmacies, 4) laboratories, and 5) radiology centers. This Brief presents information about the Radiology Facility Assessment. The assessments gathered information about a range of HIT topics including: 1) provider health IT capabilities and preparedness to participate in a statewide HIE; 2) preferences for types of high value clinical data exchange or HIE services; and 3) benefits and barriers to HIT adoption. Methodology An on-line survey assessment was used to evaluate the use of HIT in Iowa radiology facilities. The survey instrument was developed in collaboration with radiology content experts from the e-health Assessment Subcommittee then pilot tested with several Iowa radiology facilities. A comprehensive list of Iowa radiology facilities was compiled based on lists from the IDAS and American College of Radiologists. On-line resources were then used to identify contact information for the radiology facilities and to obtain the email address for the person most knowledgeable about HIT in the facility. The on-line survey process itself included: 1) An e-vite from IDPH Director Tom Newton requesting participation in the assessment survey (including a link to the website for completion of the survey), 2) A follow-up email from UI PPC requesting participation 3) Telephone follow-up calls to nonrespondents from the UI Social Science Research Center to identify that the email reached the most appropriate person, 4) Closing of the survey process after about 6 weeks. The data were then cleaned and the analyses began Participation Rates Of the 125 radiology facilities identified in Iowa, 34 completed a usable survey, for a 27% participation rate. While the participating facilities were well distributed around the state, they are likely to be biased toward those more interested in the topic of HIT (not necessarily more likely to have electronic systems). Thus, we suggest the results from this assessment be used to evaluate potential trends rather than focusing on the exact percentages for any particular questions.

Radiology Assessment Page 2 of 4 Storage of new reports by radiology facilities Radiology facilities could store their reports in multiple ways: using a Radiology Information System (RIS), an Electronic Health Record (EHR), a Hospital Information System (HIS) and/or a Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS). The system used for storing new reports is shown in Table 1. Some facilities used multiple systems. Table 1. System used for storing new reports Radiology facilities store information in multiple ways, including RIS, EHR, HIS and/or PACS RIS 15 50% HER 15 50% HIS 23 77% PACS 26 87% Sending reports to providers by radiology facilities The most common way for radiology facilities to send reports to providers is via fax. Less than half sent reports electronically (Table 2). 87% of those that did send them electronically used HL7. Table 2. Format for sending radiology reports to providers Radiology results, images and orders, along with lab results and eligibility verification were among the types of information deemed most valuable for sharing by radiology facilities Paper copy 17 50% Fax 28 82% Electronic report sent to provider to be downloaded into EHR, HIS or RIS Electronic report available through web-based portal 15 44% 12 35% Other 0 Sending images to providers by radiology facilities The most common way for radiology facilities to send images to providers is either through a CD/external media or a physician portal. Physicians were the most frequent provider to whom they were sending images (Table 3). Table 3. Format for sending radiology images to providers Hard copy or print film/images 3 20% CD or other external media 14 93% Electronically inserted into EHR 1 7% Physician portal 12 80% Other 0

Radiology Assessment Page 3 of 4 Sending and receiving radiology orders electronically Very few radiology facilities received orders electronically from providers A few more received reports/images from providers electronically: Labs Physicians Hospitals Perceived benefits of electronic systems Three of seven radiology facilities without a RIS/EHR were planning to invest in one in the next two years Storing and sharing reports: Timely availability of test data Less staff time to process test orders Accuracy of test orders and results Facility efficiency Storing and sharing images: Timely availability of test data Less staff time to process test orders Accuracy of test orders and results Facility efficiency Most valuable information for sharing electronically: Radiology results Radiology images Radiology image orders Clinical history Allergies or contraindications Lab results Eligibility verification Future uses of a HIT in radiology facilities Among those without a RIS/EHR 3 of the 7 without a RIS/EHR were planning to invest in one in the next two years The main concerns were: Initial cost of installation Ongoing operational cost Barriers to installing a electronic system included initial cost of installation and ongoing operational costs Among those with an EHR 2/3rds were very likely to invest in their system in next two years Cost was the main concern

Radiology Assessment Page 4 of 4 HIE and Iowa radiology facilities Interest in participating in a Health Information Exchange (HIE) 88% were very interested (47%) or somewhat interested (41%) in participating in a HIE (Table 4) Table 4. Radiology facilities interest in participating in a HIE Valid percent Very interested 16 47% Somewhat interested 14 41% Not at all interested 2 6% Don't know yet 2 6% Total 34 100% Major concerns with participating in a HIE For more information on this topic contact: Peter C. Damiano Director Public Policy Center 209 South Quadrangle Iowa City, IA 52242 peter-damiano@uiowa.edu Phone: 319.335.6800 Fax: 319.335.6801 Initial cost of product/installation Potential liability Client privacy Summary Text here The e-health Report The e-health Report is the result of collaboration between the Public Policy Center, the Iowa Medicaid Enterprise, and the Iowa e-health Executive Committee & Advisory Council. Other research reports are available for download on our Website: http://ppc.uiowa.edu For more information, contact: Iowa e-health Email: ehealth@idph.state.ia.us Website: www.iowaehealth.org Toll-Free Number: 866-924-4636 Iowa Department of Public Health, Office of Health IT About these policy briefs The 's Public Policy Center s Policy Briefs are designed to provide our research findings in a succinct and accessible format. The nature of the Briefs does not allow for extensive explanation regarding the methods used in our research. More information about specific methodologies used in any particular study can be obtained by contacting researchers at the Center and/or by downloading reports from our website. We hope you find these policy briefs helpful to your discourse on some of the most challenging societal issues. About the Public Policy Center The 's Public Policy Center s mission is to provide policymakers with information that can make our lives and communities thrive in sustainable ways through academic research. The vibrant Center that brings together researchers from a variety of fields and disciplines to impact policy at the local, state and national level through sound academic scholarship.