Meaningful Use: Is Your Practice Ready? E L I Z A B E T H W O O D C O C K

Similar documents
HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Provide an understanding of what comprises "meaningful use" of EHR technology

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Betsy L. Thompson, MD, DrPH EHR Summit October 4, 2010

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians February 2013

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

MEANINGFUL USE FOR THE OB/GYN. Steven L. Zielke, MD 6/13/2014

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians Offices March 2014

Topic. Level. Meaningful Use. Monday, November 12 3:00PM to 4:15PM

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT HIMSS Meeting April 25, 2013

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medical Assistance Provider Incentive Repository

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Meaningful Use May, 2012

Russell B Leftwich, MD

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Eligible Professionals: NH Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program. Eve Fralick Project Director, NH DHHS Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

CMS Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Final Rule Overview

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

New Mexico Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Payment Program

A Lawyer s Take on Meaningful Use. By Steven J. Fox & Vadim Schick

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

Connecticut Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Flexibility Checklist for Eligible Professionals for Meaningful Use Last Revision: May 27, 2015

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

AHLA. G. Meaningful Use Stage 3 Coming, Stages 1 and 2 Compliance

EHR/Meaningful Use

Eligible Professional s Guide to the Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Legal Issues in Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Programss

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Health Care IT Advisor. Meaningful Use. Adjusting to a New Normal. Naomi Levinthal. Future of Healthcare in Washington Bellevue, WA April 2, 2014

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

EHR Incentives. Profit by using LOGO a certified EHR. EHR vs. EMR. PQRI Incentives. Incentives available

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Alaska Medicaid Program

Clinical Quality Measures Barbara Connors, DO, MPH Chief Medical Officer CMS Region III

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

Things You Need to Know about the Meaningful Use

Medicaid Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use. Lisa Reuland, Program Manager October 15, 2015

Frequently Asked Questions

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Emerging Healthcare Issues:

NEW HAMPSHIRE MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM

HHS to Delay Stage 2 of Meaningful Use. A. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

On demand webinars are best heard through a headset or earphones (ipod for example) that can be plugged into your laptop or desktop.

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

Health Care IT Advisor. Meaningful Use 101. What You Need to Know August 26, Naomi Levinthal, MA, MS, CPHIMS Consultant, Health Care IT Advisor

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Meaningful Use FAQs for Public Health

An Overview of Eligibility, Registration, and Attestation for the Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Eligible Professionals

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

2015 MU Reporting Overview of Requirements/Tasks

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Medical Assistant Credentialing Requirements for Your Client Practices. Eric Christensen Director of Client Services Healthcare Compliance Pros, Inc.

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Basics

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Stage 1. Meaningful Use 2014 Edition User Manual

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Frequently Asked Questions

Meaningful Use. UERMMMC Medical Alumni Association Meeting July 17, David Nilasena, M.D., Chief Medical Officer CMS Region VI

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

Meaningful Use Audits Strategy for Success!

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Frequently Asked Questions

Proposed Meaningful Use Content and Comment Period. What the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Means to Medical Practices

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Hot Topic: Meaningful Use

The History of Meaningful Use

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Transcription:

Meaningful Use: Is Your Practice Ready? E L I Z A B E T H W O O D C O C K

Is Your Practice Ready? Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC

Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Speaker, Author, Trainer www.elizabethwoodcock.com MBA, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania BA, Duke University Fellow, American College of Medical Practice Executives Certified Professional Coder Author, 12 textbooks and more than 500 Articles Founder and Principal, Woodcock & Associates Former Consultant, Medical Group Management Association; Group Practice Services Administrator, University of Virginia Health Services Foundation ; Former Senior Associate, Health Care Advisory Board 3

Background Stage Two Medicare Payment Adjustments Q&A Session To all participants: Please note that this presentation is focused on eligible professionals, not eligible hospitals or critical access hospitals. 4

EHR Incentive Program February 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act TITLE XIII HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HITECH Act Eligible professionals will be paid for demonstrating use of a qualified electronic health record in a meaningful manner. 5

Medicare Doctors of medicine or osteopathy Doctors of dental surgery or medicine Doctors of podiatric medicine Doctors of optometry Chiropractors Medicaid Physicians Dentists Certified nurse midwives Nurse practitioners Physician assistants who are practicing in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or rural health clinics (RHCs) led by a physician assistant 6

Hospital-Based Physicians Must fund the acquisition, implementation, maintenance of CEHRT Must not be reimbursed by a hospital Application process CEHRT = certified electronic health record technology 7

Medicaid Patient Volume in Medicaid 20% if you are a pediatrician, but only eligible for two-thirds of the bonus payment! 8

* Medicaid Patient Volume Inclusion of Title XXI-funded Medicaid expansion encounters (CHIP) Inclusion of all encounters in which Medicaid is a payer (but doesn t necessarily pay) Reporting period of 90 days during 12 months prior to attestation CHIP: children s health insurance program 9

Medicaid Adopting, Implementing or Upgrading (A/I/U) is acceptable for initial year bonus (!!) A/I/U is not Meaningful Use, however. Participants will be subject to the Medicare penalties. 10

Stage One Stage Two Meaningful Use Stage Three September 4, 2012 Federal Register 21050 Final Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 2 11

1st Year Stage of Meaningful Use December 6, 2013 Stage 2 extended through 2016 Stage 3 begins in 2017 for EPs who have completed two years of Stage 2 2011 2012 2013 2015 2016 2017 2011 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 2012 1 1 2 2 2 3 2013 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 2015 1 1 2 2016 1 1 2017 Year One: 90 Days 1 Subsequent Years: 365 Days 12

If you attested to MU in 2011 or 2012 13

1st Meaningful Use Annual Incentive Payments Year 2011 2012 2013 2015 2016 [.] TOTAL 2011 MCR $18,000 $12,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $44,000 MCD $21,250 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $0 $63,750 2012 MCR $18,000 $12,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 $44,000 MCD $21,250 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $63,750 2013 MCR $15,000 $12,000 $8,000 $4,000 $0 $39,000 MCD $21,250 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $17,000 $63,750 MCR $12,000 $8,000 $4,000 $0 $24,000 MCD $21,250 $8,500 $8,500 $25,500 $63,750 2015 MCR $0 $0 $0 $0 MCD $21,250 $8,500 $34,000 $63,750 2016 MCR $0 $0 $0 MCD $21,250 $ 42,500 $63,750 MCR = Medicare; MCD = Medicaid. MCD participants must begin participation by 2016. 14

Key Points about the Payment Process Reduced by 2% for sequestration (now through 2024) Taxable Paid 6 to 8 weeks after attestation, after you meet the cap (75% of total allowed charges) For example, if you are due $12,000, you must have total allowed Medicare Part B charges of $16,000 Subject to pre- and post-payment audit, conducted by NJbased Figliozzi and Company May also be sent from EHR Meaningful Use Audit Team More about audits 15

Key Points about the Audit Process [ aka Mistakes to Avoid ] Transmitted via e-mail Review the audit request complete? limited (to one measure)? Retain documentation for 6 years Confirm that the system is tracking what you re doing If you plan to declare an exclusion, don t use the element even once during the reporting period Start tracking before you plan to report (if 90 days) Track MU reports every week www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EHR _SupportingDocumentation_Audits.pdf 16

Key Points about the Audit Process Make and retain screen shots Print and store reports with date Capture physician signature, where required, on attestation Perform and document security risk analysis Maintain confirmation that your state can t accept submissions (for registries, if applicable) http://www.healthit.gov/providersprofessionals/security-risk-assessment 17

Computerized Provider Order Entry Medical Assistants can perform the ordering process but CMS: Any licensed healthcare professional can enter orders... If a staff member is appropriately credentialed... Whether a staff member carries the title of medical assistant or another job title, he or she must be credentialed to perform the medical assistant services by an organization other than the employing organization. Sources: CMS EHR Incentive Program - FAQ7693, FAQ10134, FAQ7709 17

3-month reporting period First-time Stage Two First-year Stage One Second-year Stage One 19

Medicare Quarter 1 January 1 March 31 Quarter 2 April 1 June 30 Quarter 3 July 1 September 31 Quarter 4 October 1 December 31 20

Maintain core-menu structure 17 core objectives 3 of 6 menu Retain exclusions, but can t use them to disqualify 9 clinical quality measures (CQMs) No longer one of the criteria Considered part and parcel of MU 21

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 15 Core Measures 5 Menu Measures 6 MU CQMs* Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Meaningful Use 17 Core Measures 3 Menu Measures 9 MU CQMs Meaningful Use *One of the core measures ; CQM: clinical quality measure 22

Criteria Old (MU1) Threshold New (MU2) Threshold CPOE 30% (med) 60% (med); 30% (lab/rad) erx 40% 50% Demographic info 50% 80% Vitals 50% 80% Smoking status 50% 80% Clinical summaries 50% (3 days) 50% (1 day) Patient education 10% (menu) 10% (core) CPOE: Computerized Provider Order Entry 23

In addition to higher measure thresholds Completely new criteria Stage One menu-based criteria now core Multi-layer criteria Appendix: List of 17 Core and 6 Menu-based Criteria 24

http://www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Download s/stage2_toolkit_ehr_0313.pdf 25

Sample Core Criterion Objective: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP 26

Objective: Provide patients the ability to view online, download and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP Sample Core Criterion Measure: (1) >50% of all unique patients are provided timely online access (4 business days) to their health information; and (2) >5% of all unique patients (or authorized representative) view, download, or transmit to a third party their health information* *for both measures, only patients seen by the eligible professional (EP) during the reporting period 27

Sample Core Criterion Objective: Use electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information 28

Sample Core Criterion Objective: Use electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information Measure: A secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT by >5% of unique patients (or their authorized representatives) seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period CEHRT: certified electronic health record technology 29

Sample Core Criterion Patient-driven No definition of relevant health information Can t count requests for general information or appointments Staff could also respond to the patient No requirements for a response, but quality of care and risk management dictate 30

Sample Core Criterion Many commenters voiced objections to the concept of providers being held accountable for patient actions we believe that EPs are in a unique position to strongly influence the technologies patients use to improve their own care -CMS 31

Clinical quality measures 9 measures out of 64 None are required but some are recommended Electronic submission available Alignment with existing quality programs PQRS Shared Savings Program (ACOs) NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition PQRS: Physician Quality Reporting System; ACO: accountable care organization; NCQA: National Committee for Quality Assurance CMS: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 32

CQM Domains Patient and family engagement Patient safety Care coordination Population and public health Efficient use of healthcare resources Clinical processes/effectiveness 9 required measures must come from at least three different domains 33

Payment Adjustments (based on Medicare reimbursement) Year Penalty 2015 1% 2016 2% 2017 3% Beyond 4% to 5% Note: Exceptions will be made on a case-by-case basis for significant hardships (e.g., rural practices without sufficient Internet access) or 33

Payment Adjustments (based on Medicare reimbursement) Year Penalty 2015 1% 2016 2% 2017 3% Beyond 4% to 5% Note: Exceptions will be made on a case-by-case basis for significant hardships (e.g., rural practices without sufficient Internet access) No Medicaid Adjustments 34

Criteria for Exclusion Infrastructure: Lack Internet/broadband access New eligible professional (2 years) Unforeseen circumstances (e.g., natural disasters) Scope of practice; limited interaction with patients Lack of control of EHR access Unforeseen Circumstances = EHR Loses Certification Source: 8/15/13 CMS Provider Call, Speaker Travis Broome, Team Lead, CMS Policy & Oversight of HIT Initiatives March 10, Guidance - http://www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/CEHRT_HEGuidance_EPs.pdf Ineligible Appendix 35

Important The impact is to eligible professionals individually, not the practice Adjustments will be applied to all Medicare reimbursement Medicaid participants need to demonstrate meaningful use to avoid Medicare adjustments Eligible professionals must continue to demonstrate meaningful use 36

Year erx PQRS EHR VBM Sequestration Total 2012-1.0% - - - -1.0% 2013-1.5% - - - -2.0%+ -3.5% -2.0% - - - -2.0% -4.0% 2015 - -1.5% -1.0% -1.0%^ -2.0% -5.5% 2016 - -2.0% -2.0% -2.0%^ -2.0% -8.0% 2017 - -2.0% -3.0% -2.0%* -2.0% -9.0% 2018 - -2.0% up to -5% -2.0%* -2.0% up to -11% 2019 - -2.0% up to -5% -2.0%* -2.0% up to -11% +As of April 1, 2013. ^Only groups with 100+ eligible professionals in 2015; CMS is proposing to add groups of 10 to 99 EPs in 2016 although they would not be subject to the payment adjustment of -2.0%. *Assumed by speaker based on 2015 final rule and 2016 proposal by CMS as published in the July 19 2013 Federal Register. Applied to all Medicare reimbursement 38

39

September 4, 2012 Federal Register 21050 Final Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 2 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr-2012-09- 04/pdf/2012-21050.pdf 40

Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Woodcock & Associates Speaker, Trainer, Author Atlanta, Georgia 404.373.6195 elizabeth@elizabethwoodcock.com www.elizabethwoodcock.com These handouts may not be reproduced without the written consent of the speaker. 41