CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Similar documents
Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

during the EHR reporting period.

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

HIE and Meaningful Use Stage 2 Matrix

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

EHR/Meaningful Use

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Meaningful Use Roadmap Stage : Eligible Hospitals

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Strategies. Presented by: C. Johnson, BS-HSA

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Part 3: NCQA PCMH 2014 Standards

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Alaska Medicaid Program

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Meaningful Use Roadmap

in partnership with EHR Meaningful Use Guide for HITECH Attestation

Community Health Centers. May 6, 2010

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Iatric Systems Supports the Achievement of Meaningful Use

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Transcription:

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures Stage 2 MU Objectives and Measures for EHs - Core More than 60 percent of medication, 1. Use CPOE for medication, laboratory, and laboratory, and radiology More than 60 percent of medication, 30 radiology orders orders entered by any licensed percent of laboratory, and 30 percent of created by authorized We believe the threshold is more healthcare professional who radiology orders created by the EP or providers of the appropriately set at 50 percent with can enter orders into the authorized providers of the eligible hospital's hospital s inpatient or the denominator of patients with at medical record per State, local, or CAH's inpatient or emergency department emergency department least one type of order. and professional guidelines to (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting (POS 21 or 23) during create the first record of the period are recorded using CPOE. +0 the EHR reporting order. period are recorded using CPOE. 2. Record all of the following demographics: (A) Preferred language; (B) Gender; (C) Race; (D) Ethnicity; (E) Date of birth; and (F) Date and preliminary cause of death in the event of mortality in the hospital. More than 80 percent of all unique patients admitted to the hospital s inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period have demographics recorded as structured data. We believe the additional questions of disability, gender identity and sexual orientation would be problematic. More than 80 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period have demographics recorded as structured data. +1 1

3. Record and chart changes in the following vital signs: (A) Height/Length; (B) Weight; (C) Blood pressure (ages 3 and over); (D) Calculate and display BMI; (E) Plot and display growth charts for patients 0-20 years, including BMI. 4. Record smoking status for patients 13 years old or older. More than 80 percent of all unique patients admitted to the hospital s inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period have blood pressure (for patients age 3 and over only) and height/length and weight (for all ages) recorded as structured data. More than 80 percent of all unique patients 13 years old or older admitted to the hospital s inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period have smoking status recorded as structured data. We have no comments or concerns regarding this measure. We have no comments or concerns regarding this measure. More than 80 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period have blood pressure (for patients age 3 and over only) and height/length and weight (for all ages) recorded as structured data. +1 More than 80 percent of all unique patients 13 years old or older seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency departments (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period have smoking status recorded as structured data. +1 2

5. Use clinical decision support to improve performance on high priority health conditions. (A) Implement five clinical decision support interventions related to five or more clinical quality measures, if applicable, at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period; and (B) The hospital has enabled the functionality for drug-drug and drugallergy interaction checks for the duration of the EHR reporting period. We are largely in support of this proposed objective and measure and believe it strikes an appropriate balance between giving flexibility to the provider and urging integration with clinical quality measures. 1. Implement five clinical decision support interventions related to four or more clinical quality measures at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period. Absent four clinical quality measures related to an EP, eligible hospital or CAH's scope of practice or patient population, the clinical decision support interventions must be related to high-priority health conditions. It is suggested that one of the five clinical decision support interventions be related to improving healthcare efficiency. 2. The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period. +1 3

6. Incorporate clinical lab-test results into CEHRT as structured data. More than 55 percent of all clinical lab tests results ordered by authorized providers of the hospital for patients admitted to its inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period whose results are either in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in CEHRT as structured data. While we have no concerns regarding this proposed hospital measure, we wish to take this opportunity to note that it would probably never be possible to expect that anything approaching 100 percent of the relevant clinical lab test results could be incorporated as structured data due to the fact that some, relatively rare tests performed by reference labs would not lend themselves to such incorporation. More than 55 percent of all clinical lab tests results ordered by the EP or by authorized providers of the eligible hospital or CAH for patients admitted to its inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period whose results are either in a positive/negative affirmation or numerical format are incorporated in Certified EHR Technology as structured data. +1 7. Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research or outreach. Generate at least one report listing patients of the hospital with a specific condition. We urge CMS to maintain its single list policy for this objective, as an increase in the required number of lists will not do more than create extra boxes to check. Further, we presume that EPs would retain the flexibility of deciding what specific lists should be generated, taking into account their individual patient care goals and circumstances. Generate at least one report listing patients of the EP, eligible hospital or CAH with a specific condition. +1 4

8. Provide patients the ability to view online, download and transmit information about a hospital admission. (A) More than 50 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department of the hospital have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge; and (B) More than 10 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department of a hospital view, download or transmit to a third party their information during the EHR reporting period. 1. We believe giant strides in patient engagement can begin by making online access of information available to the patient, within 4 business days. 2. We oppose measure (B) because we believe it is premature, at best, to adopt measures not completely under the control of EPs. 3. If CMS is confident that download and transmit options are widely used by patients, we believe measure (B) could simply require the capability for patients to view online, download and transmit their health information, but not make providers liable for patient use of these capabilities. 4. The exclusion relating to broadband availability needs to be revised to account for situations where a specific EP s office location does not have such access. 1. More than 50 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge 2. More than 5 percent of all patients (or their authorized representatives) who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH view, download or transmit to a third party their information during the reporting period. Therefore, after consideration of the public comments received, we are finalizing the broadband exclusion as proposed. Pg. 274 (access defined 268) +1 5

9. Use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient. More than 10 percent of all unique patients admitted to the hospital s inpatient or emergency department are provided patientspecific education resources identified by CEHRT. Largely support this objective and add, in response to CMS invitation for comment, we do not believe that patient-specific education resources at appropriate literacy levels and with appropriate cultural competencies could be successfully identified at this time through the use of CEHRT. Patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for more than 10 percent of all unique patients with office visits seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period. More than 10 percent of all unique patients admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency departments (POS 21 or 23) are provided patient- specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology. +1 6

10. The hospital that receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation. The hospital performs medication reconciliation for more than 65 percent of transitions of care in which the patient is admitted to the hospital s inpatient or emergency department. While we support moving this measure to the core set for Stage 2, we do not support the proposed 65 percent threshold. We believe it would be more reasonable to leave the threshold at 50 percent. The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 50 percent of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23). +1 11. The hospital that transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their (A) The hospital that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or In terms of measure (A), we note that the expectation is that the summary care record would be formatted according to the content (Preamble 187-204) 1. The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another 7

patient to another provider of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral. provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 65 percent of transitions of care and referrals; and (B) The hospital that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care electronically transmits using CEHRT to a recipient with no organizational affiliation and using a different CEHRT vendor than the sender a summary of care record for more than 10 percent of transitions of care and referrals. exchange standard Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (CDA), not the Continuity of Care Document (CCD). 1. We believe the 65 percent threshold in measure (A) is too ambitious and should be reduced to 50 percent. 2. We oppose measure (B) based on potential workflow issues, patient safety issues and a general question of feasibility. 3. We believe a simpler approach would allow EPs to voluntarily report when they experience interoperability problems when attempting to send a summary care record for transition of care. 4. We believe that short of striking the measure in its entirety, an alternative approach would be to make measure (B) a menu option wherein EPs would be allowed to attest to having captured the requisite information. setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals. +1 2. The EP, eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 10% of such transitions and referrals either-- (a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient or (b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is a NwHIN Exchange participant or in a manner that is consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the nationwide health information network. +1 3. An EP, eligible hospital or CAH must satisfy one of the two following criteria: (A) Conducts one or more successful electronic exchanges of a summary of care document, as part of which is counted in "measure 2" (for EPs the measure at 495.6(j)(14)(ii)(B) and for eligible hospitals and CAHs the measure at 495.6(l)(11)(ii)(B)) with a recipient who has EHR technology that was developed designed by a different EHR technology developer than the sender's EHR technology certified to 45 CFR 170.314(b)(2); 8

12. Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries or immunization information systems except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. 13. Capability to submit electronic reportable laboratory results to public health agencies, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Successful ongoing submission of electronic immunization data from CEHRT to an immunization registry or immunization information system for the entire EHR reporting period. Successful ongoing submission of electronic reportable laboratory results from CEHRT to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period as authorized, and in accordance with applicable State law and practice. The final rule needs to address this issue and make clear that an EH would be eligible for the above exclusions if all local jurisdictions (i.e. city, county or State) were not capable of receiving electronic immunization data from EHs. CDC s capabilities should not be a factor. The final rule needs to address this issue and make clear that an EH would be eligible for the above exclusions if all local jurisdictions (i.e. city, county or State) were not capable of receiving electronic immunization data from EHs. CDC s capabilities should not be a factor. or (B) Conducts one or more successful tests with the CMS designated test EHR during the EHR reporting period. Successful ongoing submission of electronic immunization data from Certified EHR Technology to an immunization registry or immunization information system for the entire EHR reporting period. +1 Successful ongoing submission of electronic reportable laboratory results from Certified EHR Technology to public health agencies for the entire EHR reporting period. +1 9

14. Capability to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Successful ongoing submission of electronic syndromic surveillance data from CEHRT to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period. The final rule needs to address this issue and make clear that an EH would be eligible for the above exclusions if all local jurisdictions (i.e. city, county or State) were not capable of receiving electronic immunization data from EHs. CDC s capabilities should not be a factor. Successful ongoing submission of electronic syndromic surveillance data from Certified EHR Technology to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period. +1 10

15. Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the CEHRT through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities. Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including addressing the encryption/security of data at rest in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the hospital s risk management process. We believe this measure should be simplified to refer only to compliance with applicable HIPAA privacy and security rules. Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including addressing the encryption/security of data stored in CEHRT in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR 164.312 (a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the provider's risk management process. +0 11

16. Automatically track medications from order to administration using assistive technologies in conjunction with an electronic medical administration record (emar). emar is implemented and in use for the entire EHR reporting period in at least one ward/unit of the hospital. [regulation text] We strongly support the addition of this new objective and measure to the core set. More than 10 percent of medication orders created by authorized providers of the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period for which all doses are tracked using emar. +1 Stage 2 MU Objectives and Measures for EHs - Menu 12

1. Record whether a patient 65 years old or older has an advance directive. 2. Imaging results and information are accessible through CEHRT. More than 50 percent of all unique patients 65 years old or older admitted to the hospital s inpatient department (POS 21) during the EHR reporting period have an indication of an advance directive status recorded as structured data. More than 40 percent of all scans and tests whose result is an image ordered by an authorized provider of the hospital for patients admitted to its inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period are accessible through CEHRT. We support CMS in its decision to keep this part of the menu set. We are concerned that the proposed measure wording is ambiguous and that the measure, as proposed, would be impossible to meet. More than 50 percent of all unique patients 65 years old or older admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient department (POS 21) during the EHR reporting period have an indication of an advance directive status recorded as structured data +1 More than 10 percent of all tests whose result is one or more images ordered by the EP or by an authorized provider of the eligible hospital or CAH for patients admitted to its inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 and 23) during the EHR reporting period are accessible through Certified EHR Technology. 0 13

3. Record patient family health history as structured data. More than 20 percent of all unique patients admitted to the hospital s inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period have a structured data entry for one or more firstdegree relatives. We do not believe that available standards that would allow for the collection of structured data for this measure are sufficiently mature. Finally, even if hospitals could meet this measure, we are not persuaded that this would be a meaningful exercise. More than 20 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) during the EHR reporting period have a structured data entry for one or more first-degree relatives. 0 4. Generate and transmit permissible discharge prescriptions electronically (erx). More than 10 percent of hospital discharge medication orders for permissible prescriptions (for new or changed prescriptions) are compared against at least one drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. This measure is reasonable as a menu set item. However, even as a menu set item, the proposed percentage threshold should not be increased for stage 2. More than 10 percent of hospital discharge medication orders for permissible prescriptions (for new, changed, and refilled prescriptions) are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology. +1 14

Record electronic notes in patient records New Menu Item New Menu Item Enter at least one electronic progress note created, edited and signed by an eligible professional for more than 30 percent of unique patients with at least one office visit during the EHR reporting period. Enter at least one electronic progress note created, edited and signed by an authorized provider of the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) for more than 30 percent of unique patients admitted to the eligible hospital or CAH's inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period. Electronic progress notes must be text-searchable. Nonsearchable notes do not qualify, but this does not mean that all of the content has to be character text. Drawings and other content can be included with searchable text notes under this measure. +1 Provide structured electronic lab results to ambulatory providers New Menu Item New Menu Item Hospital labs send structured electronic clinical lab results to the ordering provider for more than 20 percent of electronic lab orders received. +1 Grand Total = 19 / 28 = 68% (September 2012) 15