Meeting Minutes Thursday January 17, 2013 Stanislaus County Probation Department Training Room

Similar documents
Meeting Minutes Thursday December 18, 2014 Stanislaus County Probation Department Training Room

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

CCP Executive Retreat May 29, 2014

Merced County. Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT. Data Collection Efforts

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEP ARTME Serving Courts Protecting Our Community Changing Lives

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

Probation Department BUDGET WORKSHOP. Alan M. Crogan, Chief Probation Officer

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, :30 pm

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PROGRAM MONTHLY STATUS REPORT

PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENTIN ORANGECOUNTY

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

Urgent Routine AGENDA DATE March 2011

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, November 10, :30 pm

Community Corrections Partnership Meeting Minutes March 2, 2015, 2:00 PM

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL FOR INTERSTATE ADULT OFFENDER SUPERVISION. Minutes June 15, 2016

Nevada County Mental Health Court. Policies and Procedures Table of Contents

The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. May 2016 Report No.

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, February 8, :30 p.m.

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Realignment Implementation Planning Workgroup

Skagit County Law & Justice Council

County of Riverside Public Safety Realignment & Post-release Community Supervision Implementation Plan October 6, 2015

September 2011 Report No

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

Chairman Wolf, Ranking Member Fattah and Members of the Subcommittee,

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, November 9, :30 pm

ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS

DISTRICT COURT. Judges (not County positions) Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3. Family Court POS/FTE 39/36.5 CASA POS/FTE 20/12.38

6,182 fewer prisoners

Community Transition Center: A Collaborative Approach to Offender Reentry

Incarceration Prevention and Reduction Task Force Triage Facility Subcommittee DRAFT Meeting Summary for June 16, 2016

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

RE: Grand Jury Report: AB109/AB117 Realignment: Is Santa Clara County Ready for Prison Reform?

TechShare.Juvenile. Frequently Asked Questions:

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

Professional Probation Services. Sarasota County Quarterly Report 1st Quarter, 2017

ALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

CALIFORNIA S URBAN CRIME INCREASE IN 2012: IS REALIGNMENT TO BLAME?

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

[CCP STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX]

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

My Family Member Has Been Arrested What Do I Do?

Meeting of the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) and its Executive Committee (CCPEC)

FY2017 Appropriations for the Department of Justice Grant Programs

New Directions --- A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

STANDING ORDERS ACTION AGENDA

Specialized Training: Investigating Sexual Abuse in Correctional Settings Notification of Curriculum Utilization December 2013

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

St. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report

KERN COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATHAM COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH-CHATHAM COUNTY DRUG COURT CONTRACT

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Stanislaus County Jail Needs Assessment Update 2013

Criminal Justice Review & Status Report

40 February 7, 2018 SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SPECIAL MEETING

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

Rod Underhill, District Attorney

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

ASSISTED OUTPATIENT TREATMENT (W&I CODE 5345) (AB 1421) LAURA S LAW JUNE 13, The Nevada County Experience

COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONDS TO INCREASED GANG ACTIVITY

Drug Court Mental Health Court Veterans Court

REVIEW OF THE ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY OFFICE. Report to the Mayor and Commission OF PROBATION SERVICES. October Prepared by:

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures (210.03) Authority: Effective Date: Page 1 of Bryson/Ward 07/15/15 5

2012 Budget Presentation

III. September 15, 2016 Minutes Mr. Solomon asked for any additions, corrections, or deletions to the September 15, 2016 minutes.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

AGENDA. Requested Action

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

JANUARY 2013 REPORT FINDINGS AND INTERIM RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS. Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Forum October 4, 2013

Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Fresno County Sheriff s Department Fresno County Probation Department

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

ADC Annex Conversion 11/17/15

Domestic and Sexual Violence Resources for Henrico County Residents

2/18/2014. Trudy Raymundo, Director, San Bernardino County Department of Public Health

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP COVER PAGE

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

PROPOSAL FAMILY VIOLENCE COURT

FY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program

Rod Underhill, District Attorney

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, November 18, :30 pm

Department of Public Safety Division of Juvenile Justice March 20, 2013

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Transcription:

STANISLAUS COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP Meeting Minutes Thursday January 17, 2013 Stanislaus County Probation Department Training Room MEMBERS/DESIGNEES PRESENT JILL SILVA, Chief Probation Officer, Probation Department ADAM CHRISTIANSON, Sheriff BIRGIT FLADAGER, District Attorney TIMOTHY P. BAZAR, Public Defender MIKE TOZZI, Superior Court GALEN CARROLL, Chief of Police, Modesto Police Department MARIA DE ANDA for Patrice Dietrich, Community Services Agency MADELYN SCHLAEPFER, Behavioral Health & Recovery Services DORIS FOSTER, CEO s Office CINDY DUENAS, Center for Human Services MIKE WILSON, Behavioral Health & Recovery Services MIKE HAMASAKI, Assistant Chief Probation Officer, Probation Department KAREN CURCI, Administrative Services Manager, Probation Department LT. RON LLOYD, Sheriff s Department GAY MCDANIEL, District Attorney s Office MARK FERRIERA, Supervising Probation Officer, Probation Department DAVE CHAPMAN, Supervising Probation Officer, Probation Department MARCI ROGERS, Supervising Probation Officer, Probation Department ERIC MCLOUGHLIN, IT Manager, Probation Department KELLY YEH, Crime Analyst, Probation Department MEMBERS ABSENT WILLIAM O BRIEN, Board of Supervisors THOMAS CHAGNON, Stanislaus County Office of Education GUESTS PRESENT DANE HELDING, Nirvana MIKE BAGLEY, Nirvana 1. CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS The meeting was called to order at 11:35 a.m. by Chief Probation Officer Jill Silva. Members of the group introduced themselves. Representatives from Nirvana, Dane Helding and Mike Bagley, were present. Chief Silva distributed a list of definitions of the terms and acronyms used in reports and discussions at this meeting. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT No members of the public were present. 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 7, 2012 MEETING A correction will be made noting that at the December meeting, Stephanie Kennedy attended for Mike Tozzi, Superior Court. MOTION: Sheriff Adam Christianson. SECOND: Mike Tozzi. The corrected version of the minutes of the December 7, 2012 meeting were approved unanimously.

4. CCP PLAN STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND STATISTICS / PROJECTIONS The following is an update on the CCP programs: a. Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) and Intensive Supervision Unit (ISU): Dave Chapman, Supervising Probation Officer, reported on December 2012 statistics: In December, 46 new cases were added and 30 were projected from the State. The projected State totals through December 2012 were 715 and to date, there have been 934 actual releases to this County. Currently, there are 86 PRCS warrants. 19-20 offenders are assigned to the Integrated Forensics Team (IFT), with 5 pending acceptance into the program. BHRS will update this information in their report to this committee. Supervisor Chapman noted that there has been an increase in the number of PRCS cases needing enhanced outpatient services. He commended the BHRS team for their assistance in assessing these individuals and obtaining the required services. 24 flash incarcerations were utilized in December for a total of 221 flash incarcerations to date. Since October 2011, there have been 160 PRCS offenders successfully discharged from supervision. 44 PRCS offenders are on GPS and 17 of these are sex offenders. SPO Chapman noted that he and SPO Marci Rogers met with the State Parole office staff regarding a small population of parole cases who were existing parolees and have received new charges that make them eligible for PRCS supervision. They have had approximately 4 to 5 of these cases over the last six months. They have also had a couple of cases that are known as traditional court walk-overs. SPO Chapman explained that these individuals were previously on parole (they were not PRCS eligible), they have committed new crimes, and are in custody. Based on the amount of time they have been in custody and their newest conviction, they are a paper commitment because they have done time served and will report to parole but their current conviction makes them eligible for PRCS. Therefore, they will report to parole for an assessment evaluation and then they are sent to Probation for supervision. He noted they are working with parole to streamline this process. Chief Silva questioned if there has been any communication from CDCR regarding these cases and the legality of these cases. SPO Chapman noted that there was training conducted last June where guidelines were provided for screening these cases. This screening was to be done at the Parole regional unit level and while these guidelines have been used by PRCS, they have never been formally adopted. Parole regional headquarters put the responsibility back on the field units to assess these cases and the field units are struggling with screening these cases to refer them to Probation. The State has provided very little direction and since parole staff is impacted, SPO Chapman contacted Parole in order to work with the few cases that are affected. Chief Silva and Sheriff Christianson will follow-up with CPOC, the Sheriff s Association and Police Chiefs Association to address this problem along with recommendations based on the solutions utilized to date. Chief Silva commented that this is the highest number of bench warrants experienced to date; however, according to the statewide dashboard available from CPOC, the percentage of warrants outstanding indicates that this county is one of the lowest in the Central Valley. Probation does a good job of apprehending those on warrants and the RAT operations also help in keeping this number low. Marci Rogers, Supervising Probation Officer, reported that a RAT operation is scheduled for January 25 th with the Modesto Police Department. In addition, a RAT operation will be scheduled for February in the Patterson-Newman area and for March in Oakdale and Riverbank. Page 2 of 5

SPO Chapman advised that, effective January 29 th, an on-call after-hours PRCS officer will be available for phone calls from local law enforcement. DPO s will work in seven-day shifts on-call. An information sheet and procedures is being developed for implementation on January 29 th. The Sheriff will disperse this information to the LEX group. Chief Silva explained that during after hours, in order to do flash incarcerations for the PRCS offenders, DPO approval is required. Before the on-call agreement, DPO s were only available during regular business hours to approve the booking. b. Day Reporting Center (DRC): Mark Ferriera, Supervising Probation Officer, reported several meetings have occurred with the CEO s office and the Sheriff regarding the relocation of the DRC to the Adult Probation office in downtown Modesto on/about March 4 th. The DRC will be occupying the 3 rd floor for programming and staff will be housed on the 4 th floor. DRC staff will provide security on the 3 rd floor when programming has been scheduled. Contracts have been signed with the providers for the programming. Some classes have started and some classes will start in the next few weeks. Supervisor Ferriera reported that his unit has had 620 1170(h) cases sentenced locally since implementation of AB109: 527 have a split sentence with a combination of jail and supervision tail 93 cases were sentenced to no supervision tail and jail time only Of the 527 with a split sentence, 171 are currently being supervised by Probation. 21 of the 171 released to Probation supervision are currently on warrant status. c. Bed Space: Lt. Ron Lloyd, Sheriff s Department, reported the following numbers for the month of December: 3056 (State parole violators): 108 in custody, with approximately half of these as holdsonly and half with sentences. 3455: Total of 30 in custody. 3454: Currently have 6 in custody. For 1170(h), there are 164 in the facilities with another 122 on AWP or home detention. Flash incarcerations: Early-release procedures have been changed and are applied to flash incarcerations. Currently a 10-day flash incarceration will probably do three days. d. Integrated Forensics Team: Mike Wilson, BHRS, reported that there are 20 clients in the PRCS IFT program. He explained that discrepancies in numbers occur because BHRS will usually hold onto individuals past their term. Past experience with the MIOCR grant has shown that these individuals generally need longer than a year in order to avoid having them end up in the hospital or back in custody. Of the 20 individuals in the program, one is homeless and resistant to help, 11 are in assisted living, and 8 are independent and living with family. Only one has been hospitalized in December. Referrals have increased for December with 9 referrals. Two have been assessed with one being admitted. To help with referrals, BHRS is in the process of hiring more staff with two candidates in the background process and two have been offered positions which should allow for an increase in the capacity of the IFT program. In the DRC, currently there are 11 clients in the substance abuse treatment program with two more scheduled to start next week. There are 6 to 7 clients who have graduated from the Destination Recovery program and one more scheduled for graduation. The assessment process has been improved with a walk-in period that overlaps with screenings and more successful screening results have been experienced. Page 3 of 5

e. CSA: Maria De Anda, Manager, reported that only four applicants for services have been seen by the two CSA staff members located with BHRS at the Adult Probation office. It is suspected that this is the result of unfamiliarity with the referral process since this is a new program. SPO Rogers advised that Danielle Cardwell, the Family Services Specialist, has been introduced to Probation staff in order to increase the number of referrals. In addition, when the DRC has moved to the Adult Probation location, more offenders will be available to the Family Services Specialist for assistance. 5. INVOICING/BUDGET UPDATE Karen Curci, Administrative Services Manager, Probation Department, reported that $4.6 million has been spent to date with approximately $1.2 million spent by Probation and the remainder by the Sheriff s Department. She advised that the contracts at the DRC and with CSA and BHRS are just getting started and money will be dispersed to these services. Chief Silva advised that meetings have been held with representatives from the area, including Senator Canella and Kristin Olsen, and they have been informed that fund balances are the result of hiring difficulties in both the public safety agencies and mental health. Chief Silva distributed the Governor s proposed budget for the realignment estimates (attached to original copy of minutes) noting that the Community Corrections subaccount has $842.9 million statewide for 2012-13 to fund realignment. In September, approximately $77 million in growth funding is scheduled to be distributed statewide. CSAC determined the formula utilized for the base allocation and the growth allocation disbursement will be determined by the Department of Finance. Efforts have been made to educate the Department of Finance regarding the negative impact of the base allocation funding formula to the Central Valley counties. The growth funding is just one-time funding. Chief Silva noted that the 2013-14 funding is projected to go up, but the 2014-15 funding is scheduled to decrease because it is expected that population numbers will decrease. Chief Silva reported that the Central region CPO s, Sheriffs and CEO s are working together to fix the base allocation funding formula.. 6. MODIFICATIONS TO PHASE II CCP PLAN Chief Silva reviewed that in the Phase II CCP Plan, the CCP Executive Committee, with Board approval, recommended that $1 million be set aside to purchase portable buildings for the Day Reporting Center and BHRS medication annex to be temporarily located at the Public Safety Center (PSC). This plan has been changed because of the new construction plans going on at the PSC. Since the Courts and Department of Child Support Services are vacating their space at the Adult Division Probation building, it has been determined that this space could be re-configured for the DRC to temporarily utilize. The medication annex, where BHRS will place a team to assess PRCS offenders for the medications they were using in prison, will be located in a building next to the jail in an existing portable building. The modifications for the DRC and lease for the medication annex will cost approximately $300,000. The Executive Committee of the CCP must evaluate and approve this change in the CCP Plan and then later this month, an agenda item will be presented to the Board of Supervisors. MOTION: Mike Tozzi. SECOND: Sheriff Adam Christianson. The Executive Committee members of the CCP unanimously approve modifying the Phase II CCP Plan to reduce the $1 million allocation to $300,000 for costs associated with the temporary relocation of the Day Reporting Center to the Adult Division Probation Department building along with the necessary modifications to the space there, and the lease to relocate the BHRS medication annex to an existing portable building located near the downtown jail facility. Chief Silva stated that the remaining $700,000 will become part of the AB109 fund balance. She also advised that the SB678 funding will be drastically reduced next year from $130 million to $35 million. The group discussed the probation population being served by these programs. Page 4 of 5

7. TOP TEN QUESTIONS PRESENTATION FROM SECOND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Chief Silva introduced Kelly Yeh, Crime Analyst, who was hired by the Probation Department and started on January 14 th. This position will assist the CCP in determining their effectiveness and impact in working with the AB109 population. At last month s meeting, Chief Silva mentioned a presentation given by Joan Petersilia, Stanford Law School, which offered ten questions that every CCP should be addressing about realignment. The ten questions were distributed (attached to original copy of minutes) along with an outline of proposed report data developed by Ms. Yeh to address these questions. Chief Silva requested that the group review the proposed reports to determine if any other areas that should be evaluated are missing. This information will be shared with the Law Enforcement Executive (LEX) group for their input. Each question was reviewed regarding how to address these issues both within the County and the State. Comments included the following: a. Question 2: Impact on victim safety and victim rights: Include tracking of restitution payments. b. Question 4: Compare Stanislaus County to other counties of the same size and type and/or with similar funding. The suggestion was made to research historical data to determine if patterns have been established in the counties. The group emphasized that when researching this area, the data should address what is relevant to this county in comparison to similar counties. c. Question 6: Impact on police, prosecution, defense, judges: The suggestion was made to possibly study a sampling of AB109 offenders to assess over a determined time period. Chief Silva requested that the group examine these proposals with their staff members and offer input and suggestions either by e-mail or for discussion at next month s meeting. 8. COMMENTS. No comments made. 9. MEETING SCHEDULE The next meeting will be held on Thursday, February 28 th, 2013 at 11:30 a.m.in the Probation Department. The meeting adjourned at 12:40 p.m. Page 5 of 5