Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Similar documents
Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

NATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Wildland Fire Assistance

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Department of Defense Section 1207 Security and Stabilization Assistance: A Fact Sheet

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

How to Improve the Gender Balance Within the National Armed Forces

NATO Common Funds Burdensharing: Background and Current Issues

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter Covering the period July 1 September 30

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Report Documentation Page

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Report Documentation Page

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Iraq Casualties: U.S. Military Forces and Iraqi Civilians, Police, and Security Forces

Force protection is a contentious issue. Who s Responsible? Understanding Force Protection. By THOMAS W. MURREY, JR.

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

GAO. FEDERAL RECOVERY COORDINATION PROGRAM Enrollment, Staffing, and Care Coordination Pose Significant Challenges

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Experience and Consequences on the Deployments of the Medical Services of the German Army in Foreign Countries Surgical Aspects

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Personnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat. Report by the Director General

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED Releasable to Afghanistan, Australia, Japan, Jordan, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates. 15 November 2017 IMSM

Advance Notification of forthcoming Market Survey APMS

Financial Management

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Fact sheet on elections and membership

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

The NATO Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Transcription:

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians Susan G. Chesser Information Research Specialist April 12, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41084 c11173008

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 12 APR 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Congressional Research Service,Library of Congress,101 Independence Ave, SE,Washington,DC,20540-7500 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 5 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Summary This report collects statistics from a variety of sources on casualties sustained during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), which began on October 7, 2001, and is ongoing. OEF actions take place primarily in Afghanistan; however, OEF casualties also includes American casualties in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Yemen. Casualty data of U.S. military forces are compiled by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), as tallied from the agency s press releases. Also included are statistics on those wounded but not killed. Statistics may be revised as circumstances are investigated and as records are processed through the U.S. military s casualty system. More frequent updates are available at DOD s website at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/ under Casualty Update. A detailed casualty summary of U.S. military forces that includes data on deaths by cause, as well as statistics on soldiers wounded in action, is available at the following DOD website: http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/casualty/castop.htm. NATO s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) does not post casualty statistics of the military forces of partner countries on the ISAF website at http://www.isaf.nato.int/. ISAF press releases state that it is ISAF policy to defer to the relevant national authorities to provide notice of any fatality. For this reason, this report uses fatality data of coalition forces as compiled by CNN.com and posted online at http://www.cnn.com/specials/2004/oef.casualties/index.html. Casualty data of Afghan civilians are reported quarterly by the United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan (UNAMA). Deaths of Afghan National Police and Afghan National Army personnel are reported by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction in the quarterly reports to Congress that are required as part of P.L. 110-181. Because the estimates of Afghan casualties contained in this report are based on varying time periods and have been created using different methodologies, readers should exercise caution when using them and should look to them as guideposts rather than as statements of fact. This report will be updated as needed. Congressional Research Service

T he following tables present data on U.S. military casualties in Operation Enduring Freedom, deaths of coalition partners in Afghanistan, and Afghan civilian casualties, respectively. Table 1. Operation Enduring Freedom, U.S. Fatalities and Wounded as of April 9, 2010, 10 a.m. EDT from October 7, 2001 Fatalities In and Around Afghanistan a Fatalities in Other Locations b Total Fatalities Wounded in Action Hostile c 744 8 752 Non-Hostile d 207 69 276 Returned to Duty within 72 Hours Not Returned to Duty within 72 Hours Total 951 77 1,028 Total 5,510 Source: http://www.defense.gov/news/casualty.pdf a. Fatalities in and around Afghanistan include casualties that occurred in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan. b. Other locations includes casualties that occurred in Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Yemen. c. According to the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, as amended through 31 August 2005, a hostile casualty is a victim of a terrorist activity or a casualty as the result of combat or attack by any force against U.S. forces, available at http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ada43918. d. The above-named reference defines a nonhostile casualty as a casualty that is not directly attributable to hostile action or terrorist activity, such as casualties due to the elements, self-inflicted wounds, or combat fatigue. Table 2. Deaths of Coalition Partners in Afghanistan Country # of Deaths Country # of Deaths Australia 11 Lithuania 1 Belgium 1 Netherlands 21 Canada 141 Norway 5 Czech Republic 3 Poland 16 Denmark 29 Portugal 2 Estonia 7 Romania 12 Finland 1 South Korea 1 France 40 Spain 28 Germany 39 Sweden 4 Hungary 2 Turkey 2 Italy 22 United Kingdom 281 Latvia 3 Total Non-U.S. Coalition Fatalities 672 Source: CNN U.S. and Coalition Casualties, http://www.cnn.com/specials/2004/oef.casualties/2010.02.html as viewed on April 12, 2010, 9:30 a.m., EDT. 2,386 3,124 Congressional Research Service 1

Table 3. Afghan Casualties Group Period # of Deaths Note Afghan Civilians Afghan National Army Afghan National Police 2009 2,412 killed 3,566 injured a 2008 2,118 b 2007 1,523 c January-December 27, 2009 465 d 2007-2008 537 e January-December 27, 2009 794 f 2007-2008 1,412 g 67% of civilian deaths were attributed to actions of anti- Government elements (78% of these deaths were caused by improvised explosive devices and suicide attacks). 25% of civilian deaths were attributed to pro-government forces. 8% of civilian deaths were the result of cross-fire or improperly detonated ordnance. Sources: Compiled by the Congressional Research Service from noted sources. a. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2009, January 2010, p. I, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/unama/ human%20rights/protection%20of%20civilian%202009%20report%20english.pdf. b. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2008, January 2009, p. 12, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/UNAMA_09february-Annual%20Report_PoC%202008_FINAL_11Feb09.pdf. c. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2008, Human Rights Unit, January 2009, p. 12, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/unama/ human%20rights/unama_09february-annual%20report_poc%202008_final_11feb09.pdf. d. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 55. http://www.sigar.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf; Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, October 30, 2009, p. 62, http://www.sigar.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/ Oct09/pdf/SIGAROct2009Web.pdf; and Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, January 30, 2010, p. 64, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/ jan2010/pdf/sigar_jan2010.pdf. e. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 55, http://www.sigar.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf f. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 60, http://www.sigar.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf; Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, October 30, 2009, p. 66, http://www.sigar.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/ Oct09/pdf/SIGAROct2009Web.pdf; and Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, January 30, 2010, p. 69, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/ jan2010/pdf/sigar_jan2010.pdf. g. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 60, http://www.sigar.mil/reports/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf. Congressional Research Service 2

Author Contact Information Susan G. Chesser Information Research Specialist schesser@crs.loc.gov, 7-9547 Congressional Research Service 3