References for the 58 guidelines

Similar documents
Reviewing the literature

Realist Synthesis Methodology 101

A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth

Healthcare Improvement in Nursing - NU3661 (2014/2015)

Systematic reviews - a resource list

University of Toronto Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing

Course specification STAFFING RATIONALE SYNOPSIS OBJECTIVES. The University of Southern Queensland. Academic group: Academic org:

Course Specification

Qualitative Evidence for Practice: Why Not! Barbara Patterson, PhD, RN, ANEF Lehigh Valley Health Network Research Day 2016 October 28, 2016

Rigour in phenomenological research: reflections of a novice nurse researcher

Meets progression requirements for entry to Year 3.

MCGILL DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY COURSE OUTLINE. GEOG 503 ADVANCED TOPICS IN HEALTH GEOGRAPHY Fall Professor Mylene Riva and Professor Nancy Ross

The influence of workplace culture on nurses learning experiences: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

The Effect of Nurse Coordinated Transitional Care on Unplanned Readmission for Patients with Heart Failure: A Critical Literature Review LP LAI

Contemporary enrolled nursing practice: Opportunities and issues

Assessing competence during professional experience placements for undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review

This article is Part 1 of a two-part series designed. Evidenced-Based Case Management Practice, Part 1. The Systematic Review

School of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Dundee Researchers Information

34 Systematic Review in Evidence-Based Nursing

A meta-ethnography of patients' experience of chronic non-malignant pain. Francine Toye

THE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Resilience of Aged Care Workers Providing Care to People Living with Dementia

ECLEPS CEL Workshop July 16, 2008 Evidence Based Practice (EBP)

Text-based Document. Theory-Practice Gap: Perceptions of Nurse Faculty, Nursing Students, and Clinicians in Ghana. Salifu, David Abdulai

4-C THIRD. Enhancing Care for Cardiac Patients with Diabetes Through Telehealth: Development of a Cross Cultural Intervention

Public Health Skills and Career Framework Multidisciplinary/multi-agency/multi-professional. April 2008 (updated March 2009)

The Rx for Change database: a first-in-class tool for optimal prescribing and medicines use

Using Iterative Cycles of Discovery Within a. Glaserian Grounded Theory of Socialization

Moving Towards Inclusion:

The benefit of focus groups: The experience of critical care nurses who participated in a needs assessment.

Relevant Courses and academic requirements. Requirements: NURS 900 NURS 901 NURS 902 NURS NURS 906

Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique to identify the theory-practice connection in nurse education

2. Collins Paperback Dictionary. New Edition. England: HarperCollins Publishers, 1995.

Application Information

Qualitative Research Methods In Nursing READ ONLINE

Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

Doctor of Public Health Health Behavior Department of Prevention and Community Health. Program Director

Systematic Review. Request for Proposal. Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN

Understanding change process

Winona State University

PhD Institute of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, England.

Perspectives on chronic illness care in the Southern region. Fiona Doolan-Noble, Robin Gauld; Debra Waters & Sophia Leon de la Barra.

Support Workers in Community Rehabilitation

Final Accreditation Report

A Systematic Review of the Liaison Nurse Role on Patient s Outcomes after Intensive Care Unit Discharge

Health Sciences Department or equivalent Division of Health Services Research and Management UK credits 15 ECTS 7.5 Level 7

School of Health & Social Care. Module Guide. Specialist District Nursing Practice Project. Academic Level: level 6

The role of end. shift verbal handover. of-shift

Preparing Students to Become Extraordinary Nurses: Perspectives From Nurse Employers

Guideline: Expanded practice for Registered Nurses

Evidence Based Guidelines for

Evidence-Based Practice Pulling the pieces together. Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI March 2017

Nursing Science and Evidence-Based Practice

October 2015 TEACHING STANDARDS FRAMEWORK FOR NURSING & MIDWIFERY. Final Report

Lost without Translation Practice Leaders as Code Breakers

Specialist Community Public Health Nursing Health Visiting / School Nursing

Protocol. Process evaluation of a nursing intervention to develop a research culture among orthopaedic nurses A triangulation convergence model

What is the effectiveness of the support worker role for people with dementia and their carers? A systematic review

A workshop for nurse mentors

Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment Toolkit A Tool for State Migrant Directors. Summer 2012

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS. Health Sciences. Part-time. Total UK credits 180 Total ECTS 90 PROGRAMME SUMMARY

Nursing and Related Serials at UMD Library (Please check the titles in UMD Journal Locator to see if electronic full-text access is available.

The use of clinical audit in

Nursing Science (NUR SCI)

Unit 2 Theoretical Foundations of Caring, Spirituality, Spiritual Well Being, Grief and Loss

Knowledge Translation: Cochrane Strategy to disseminate evidence

Australian Medical Council Limited

International Medical Informatics Association Working Group Technology Assessment & Quality Development Date: June 2016

TITLE: Pill Splitting: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

This is a repository copy of Patient experience of cardiac surgery and nursing care: A narrative review.

Effect of DNP & MSN Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Courses on Nursing Students Use of EBP

Using PROMs in clinical practice: rational, evidence and implementation framework

Rural and Remote Continuing Nursing Education: An Integrative Literature Review. Michelle Pavloff, BSN, MN, PhD(c), RN 1

Building a community of practice in critical care nursing

UNIV FED SAO PAULO, DEPT ENFERMAGEN, RUA NAPOLEAO DE BARROS, 754 VILA CLEMENTINO, SAO PAULO, BRAZIL, CEP AP

Audits in hospital care: Which factors determine the effectiveness of audits?

Flexible respite for carers of people living with dementia

Programme name MSC Advanced Nurse Practitioner-Child/Adult (Advanced Practice in Health and Social Care)

An Action Research Study of Nurses Provision of the Health Information and Advice Aspects of Telehealth Nursing in Ireland

Text-based Document. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on the Research Literacy of Post-Registration Nurses: A Systematic Review

Ambitious new standards to shape the future of nursing and midwifery for future generations

COMPUS Procedure Evidence-Based Best Practice Recommendations

Final Accreditation Report

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews: An expanding resource

Evaluating Integrated Care: learning from international experience by Hubertus J.M. Vrijhoef

CINAHL with Full Text Database Coverage List

Grants and Grant Writing. Eric Potsdam Fiona Mc Laughlin

Newborn bloodspot screening

Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

Producing and utilising research: Barriers for a nursing faculty in

INTRODUCTION TO THE UK PUBLIC HEALTH REGISTER ROUTE TO REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS

9 th National Conference on Cancer Nursing Research February 8 10, 2007 Hollywood, California. General Information

Competencies for the Registered Nurse Scope of Practice Approved by the Council: June 2005

Evidence-Based Practices in Vocational Rehabilitation: Results of a National Delphi Study

Fatigue and the Obstetrician Gynaecologist

A Delphi study to determine nursing research priorities in. the North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust and the corresponding evidence base

Sacred Valley Health: A Global Organization with a Local Impact. Keri Lynn Baker, BSN, MSc, RN Executive Director and Co-Founder

Implementation and Evaluation Making a difference in your health service

SBAR Report phase 1 Maternity, Gynaecology & Neonatal services

Author. Published. Journal Title. Copyright Statement. Downloaded from. Link to published version. Griffith Research Online

Transcription:

References for the 58 guidelines Guidelines retained by SAP1 Medicine and epidemiology BMJ (2011). Resources for authors. BMJ. Retrieved : January 26, 2013, from http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors. Boulton, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Swinburn, C. (1996). Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2(3), 171-179. Canadian Family Physician (2011). Guidelines for Articles. Canadian Family Physician. Retrieved January 26, 2013, from http://www.cfp.ca/site/authors/guidelines.xhtml. Elder, N. C., & Miller, W. L. (1995). Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies. Journal of Family Practice, 41(3), 279-285. Giacomini, M. K., & Cook, D. J. (2000). Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(3), 357-362. Giacomini, M. K., & Cook, D. J. (2000). Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(4), 478-482. Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ, 315(7110), 740-743. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7110.740. Kitto, S. C., Chesters, J., & Grbich, C. (2008). Quality in qualitative research: Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 188(4), 243-246. Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, 687-692. Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet, 358(9280), 483-488. Lane, S., & Arnold, E. (2011). Qualitative research: A valuable tool for transfusion medicine. Transfusion, 51(6), 1150-1153. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ, 311, 109-112. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320, 50-52. Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1998). Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(35), 32-37.

Rowan, M., & Huston, P. (1997). Qualitative research articles: Information for authors and peer reviewers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157(10), 1442-1446. Thomson, O. P., Petty, N. J., Ramage, C. M., & Moore, A. P. (2011). Qualitative research: Exploring the multiple perspectives of osteopathy. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 14(3), 116-124. Treloar, C., Champness, S., Simpson, P. L., & Higginbotham, N. (2000). Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 67(5), 347-351. Guidelines retained by SAP2 Nursing and health education Beck, C. T. (2009). Critiquing qualitative research. AORN Journal, 90(4), 543-554. Cesario, S., Morin, K., & Santa-Donato, A. (2002). Evaluating the level of evidence of qualitative research. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 31(6), 708-714. Cobb, A. N., & Hagemaster, J. N. (1987). Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals. Journal of Nursing Education, 26(4), 138-143. Côté, L., & Turgeon, J. (2005). Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 71-75. Forchuk, C., & Roberts, J. (1993). How to critique qualitative research articles. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 25(4), 47-56. Health Care Practice R&D Unit. (2002). Evaluation Tool for Qualitative Studies (Univ Salford). Kneale, J., & Santy, J. (1999). Critiquing qualitative research. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 3(1), 24-32. Morse, J. M. (2003). A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 833-851. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being (2008). Instructions for authors. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t741771154~tab=submit~mode=pa per_submission_instructions. Rice-Lively, M. L. (1995). Research proposal evaluation form qualitative methodology. UT School of Information. Retrieved January 26, 2013, from https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~marylynn/qreval.html Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence based Nursing, 6(2), 36-40. Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738-744.

Stige, B., Malterud, K., & Midtgarden, T. (2009). Toward an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(10), 1504-1516. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2006). Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery, 22(2), 108-119. Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537. Whittemore, R. (2005). Combining evidence in nursing research: Methods and implications. Nursing Research, 54(1), 56-62. Guidelines retained by SAP3 Social sciences and public health Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 56(4), 671 684. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), Public Health Resource Unit (2006). 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) - Medev. Retrieved February 1, 2013, from http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_951541699e9edc71ce66c9bac4734c69.pdf Devers, K. J. (1999). How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 35(5 Pt 2), 1153-1188. Dixon-Woods M., Shaw, R. L., Agarwal, S., & Smith, J. A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 223-225. Greenhalgh, T., & Wengraf, T. (2008). Collecting stories: is it research? Is it good research? Preliminary guidance based on a Delphi study. Medical Education, 42(3), 242-247. Long, A. (2006). Some methodological challenges in undertaking reviews in social care. In J. Popay (Ed.), Moving beyond effectiveness in evidence synthesis: Methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence (pp. 41-50). London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Methodology checklist: qualitative studies. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Retrieved November 10, 2010, from http://mande.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/2009-methodology-checklistqualitative-studies-nice.pdf O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(2), 92 98. Progress in Community Health Partnerships (2008). Instructions for authors. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved January 26, 2013, from http://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/progress_in_community_health_partnerships/guidelines.html

Rogers, A., Popay, J., Williams, G., & Latham, M. (1997). Part II: Setting standards for qualitative research: The development of markers. In Inequalities in health and health promotion: Insights from the qualitative research literature (pp. 35-52). London: Health Education Authority. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & De Konig, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technology Assessment, 5(23), 43-50. Guidelines retained by SAP4 Psychology/psychiatry, research methods and organization Creswell, J. W. (2003). Qualitative Procedures. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed., pp. 179-197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215-229. Flick, U. (2006). Quality Criteria in Qualitative Research. An Introduction to Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 367-389). London: Sage Publications. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732. Letts, L., Wilkins, S., Law, M., Stewart, D., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (2007). Critical review form - Qualitative studies (Version 2.0). School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University. Retrieved January 26, 2013, from http://www.canchild.ca/en/canchildresources/resources/qualguide.pdf Long, A. F., & Godfrey, M. (2004). An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(2), 181-196. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Defending the value and logic of qualitative research. In Designing qualitative research (pp. 144-153). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Meyrick, J. (2006). What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(5), 799-808. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Drawing and verifying conclusions. In Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed., pp. 277-280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Plochg, T., & Van Zwieten, M. (Eds.). (2002). Guidelines for quality assurance in health and health care research: Qualitative research. Amsterdam, NL: Qualitative Research Network AMC- UvA. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Appraising reports of qualitative studies. In Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research (pp. 75-101). New York: Springer. Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Quality in Qualitative Research. In Doing Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Guide (pp. 257-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Evaluating qualitative research. In Doing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide (pp. 277-296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 235-251). London: Sage Publications.