GEORGETOWN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Similar documents
HEMPSTEAD LIVABLE CENTERS STUDY VALUES WORKSHOP

Downtown Revitalization. Strategic Action Plan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

District of 100 Mile House. Business Façade Improvement Program Guidelines

Objective 1. Research current housing issues in Avon to gain a deeper understanding of the housing market Type: Program Priority: 1 Cost: Medium

Town of the Blue Mountains Community Improvement Plan

California Main Street Four Point Approach

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Town of Williamston Request for Proposals Mustang Alley Feasibility Study

Economic Development Matrix

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4425) Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report

PHASE 4 Deliberating. Drafting the plan and launching a vision.

Wednesday, March 23, :00 p.m. City Council Chambers, 125 E. Avenue B, Hutchinson, Kansas

SILVERTHORNE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX A - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT

7/23/2013. Downtown Greenville s Success. Downtown Greenville s Success

Community Improvement Plan (CIP)

City of Portsmouth Economic Development Commission 2011 Action Plan

What we ll cover tonight

The Redevelopment Area could benefit from a public plaza, such as this one in southern California. CHAPTER IV: ACTION PLAN

CITY OF ANN ARBOR ECONOMIC COLLABORATIVE TASK FORCE REPORT

City of Nampa Strategic Plan. Adopted December 19, 2011

DEALING WITH BLIGHTED AND FORECLOSED PROPERTIES

Draft CRA Plan Amendment. Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board September 23, CRA Plan Amendment

A GROWTH PLAN FOR JENA, LOuISIANA Adopted JAnuAry 26, MAKING IT HAPPEN Making it Happen

Land Development Code Update

Governor s Healthy Community Award 2017 Guidelines

Westside TAD Neighborhoods Strategic Implementation Plan for the neighborhoods of Vine City and English Avenue. Summary

Team DCG Corplan. February 21, DCG Corplan Consulting LLC Norman E. Taylor & Associates, LLC D H & Associates Consulting, LLC

Williamsburg Tourism Zone and Culinary Arts & Tourism District

PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION

Upper Darby Township 100 Garrett Rd. Upper Darby, PA 19082

223 W Wisconsin Ave. P.O. Box 131 Tomahawk, WI Operating Plan For the Tomahawk Downtown Business Improvement District 2019

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

Request for Letter of Interest & Qualifications Proposed Rose District Mixed Use Development

Your Input Our Recommendations Comments/Feedback Next Steps

+! % / 0/ 1 2, 2 2, 3 1 ",, 4 +! % # ! 2, $

Neighborhood Revitalization. Fiscal Year 2017 State Revitalization Programs Application. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: Friday, July 15, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.

City Plan Commission Work Session

Local Economy Directions Paper

PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Portland, Oregon RESOLUTION NO. 6784

2014 Cultural District Annual Report

Economic Development and Employment Element

City of Terrace Economic Development Strategy

Downtown Whitby Community Improvement Plan

Hagerstown s Sustainable Community Action Plan

Dupont Diebold Economic Development Area Plan

Downtown Clinton Business, Investment, and Incentives Information

Commercial Water & Sewer Impact Fee Assistance

Building our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update November 12, 2013

Meeting Agenda Irondale On The Move Action Committee 1/17/2017

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY

Downtown Brantford Revitalized. Incentives supporting a vibrant business community

Downtown Prosser Community Planning Assistance Program

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY

NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

STRATEGIC PLAN

Fitchburg Development Assistance Guide. A guide to technical support and incentives for business and housing development in Fitchburg.

Downtown Shoulder Area Community Improvement Plan. Investing in our Community

634 NORTH PARK AVENUE

Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083

Minutes of City Council Workshop 2015 Downtown Action Plan Monday, May 4, :15 P.M. City Council Chambers

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

U.S. Route 202 Analysis. New Castle County Department of Land Use May 4, 2018

2016 Uptown Westerville Façade Improvement Program Guidelines

METHODOLOGY - Scope of Work

City of Niagara Falls May Niagara Street. Informational Brochure

Request for Redevelopment Proposal 102 N. Broadway, City of De Pere

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN. Adopted by the Riverbank City Council March 2011

City of Stockton. Legislation Text APPROVE NEW STOREFRONT BEAUTIFICATION MICRO GRANT PROGRAM FOR EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES

FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM

The Downtown Revitalization Collaborative

City of Richmond Project Clean Up

City of Ypsilanti Economic Development Action Plan Presented to City Council: June 2014

Honorable Mayor Shaw and Members of the City Council

The SoNo Collection Norwalk, CT

Business Façade Improvement Program Available

City of Coral Springs Community Redevelopment Agency BUSINESS PLAN. Fiscal Year Downtown Coral Springs

Final Report - Community Profile & Asset Inventory

Wilmington Downtown Incorporated. Facade Improvement Program POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Updated 8/30/17

Shockoe Economic Revitalization Strategy

City Council Study Session Retail Market Analysis

Downtown Waukesha Façade, Sign and Awning Matching Grant Program

Request for Proposals

City of Deerfield Beach Public Involvement: SWOT Summary and Resident Survey

Dane County Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Goals & Objectives HED Work Group July 7, 2006

Economic Development Element of the Arroyo Grande General Plan. Prepared by the City of Arroyo Grande Community Development Department

Chapter 3. PLANNING PROCESS 3.1 OVERVIEW 3.2 WORK PROGRAM SCHEDULE

PROGRAM GUIDE. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS To be eligible to apply to the program:

DISTRICT OF KITIMAT. Business Façade Improvement Program 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)

FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

STRATEGIC PLAN for Integrated Community Development

Gateway to the Northeast United States

FAÇADE RENOVATION GRANT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30TH, 2016

Anticipate future needs. Get the big stuff right (avoid paying 3x s-install, undo, re-install)

Canby Façade Improvement Program

Request for Qualifications/Proposals Alameda County Redevelopment Agency Economic Development Strategic Plan

City of Coral Springs Community Redevelopment Agency BUSINESS PLAN. Fiscal Year 2017 Final August 22, 2016

Request for Proposals # P12-044A. Pre-Qualification - Purchase and. Development of Bloomfield Property

Transcription:

GEORGETOWN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Joint Workshop Town Council & Planning Commission 04/13/2016

INTRODUCTIONS PROJECT OVERVIEW PLANNING PROCESS DISTRICT BOUNDARY TODAY S AGENDA PLAN REVIEW NEXT STEPS

INTRODUCTIONS TASK FORCE MEMBERS Melody Booker-Wilkins, Sussex County Linda Dennis, Property Owner Karen Duffield, Chamber of Commerce Gene Dvornick, Town of Georgetown Greg Fisher, Georgetown Square Kevin Gilmore, Habitat for Humanity Jocelyn Godwin, Town of Georgetown Carolyn Green, Property Owner Mary Haller, Property Owner John Rishko, Rental Property Owner Tania Roblero, Downtown Business Owner Pat Ryan, Local Business Owner Harrison Saunders, Local Business Owner Gary Tonge, Planning Commission Michael Vasilikos, Georgetown Square Evelio Velasquez, Property Owner Chris Washington Bruce Wright, First State Community Action Agency George Bendler, Kyle Gulbronson and Amy Mendelson, AECOM

PROJECT OVERVIEW

PROJECT OVERVIEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACT Program Highlights: District must include a traditional mixed-use downtown area Offset 20% of capital construction costs for private developers 10 Year District designation with potential for two 5-year extensions Limited number of Districts to 15 at one time Approved 3 Districts to date: Dover, Seaford and Wilmington

PROJECT OVERVIEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACT 3 Application Components Need and Impact of the District designation (50%) Quality of the District Plan (30%) Quality of the Local Incentives offered (20%) Adopted Town Resolution

PROJECT OVERVIEW NBBF APPLICATION Of the initial allocation, up to $350,000 shall be allocated to support or reimburse local governments for the development of neighborhood-specific or city-wide strategic plans, comprehensive plans, or other plans focused on economic development, crime reduction, residential development or other similar revitalization efforts. Of such funds, priority shall be given to requests by cities, towns, and unincorporated areas for reimbursement of the costs of generating applications for DDD designation. Awarded in 2015 a Neighborhood Building Blocks Fund Grant $45,000 to be used to develop a Downtown District Plan

PLANNING PROCESS

PLANNING PROCESS Task Force Role Selected to represent the many interests of the Town 6 Task Force Meetings: Kick-Off, Visioning, Goals & Strategies, Incentives, Draft Plan Review, Finalizing Incentives Homework Assignments: SWOT Analysis, Goals, Objectives & Strategies Worksheet, and Incentives

DISTRICT BOUNDARY

DISTRICT BOUNDARY

PLAN REVIEW

PLAN REVIEW Section 2. Introduction Purpose & Need Town has invested in planning studies, made public investments in downtown, but still faces many challenges Creating right mix of uses and promoting day and night economic activities Competing with commercial retail along Route 113 Improving physical walking environment Reduce amount/perception of crime; Parking; Gateways; Maintaining character Benefits of DDD Designation Market and stimulate economic activity Promote and incentivize infill development Make strategic sites market-ready and attractive

PLAN REVIEW Section 2. Introduction DDD Planning Process Task Force Role Stakeholders & Partnerships Community Outreach Existing Documents, Activities & Organizations Comprehensive Plan Historic District Study Committee, Report of Findings & Recommendations State Strategies Zoning Regulations & Design Standards Greater Georgetown Area Comprehensive Market Analysis Economic Development & Business Organizations Community Events

PLAN REVIEW Downtown Survey Highlights 356 Responses 15% shop downtown once a week; 29% shop once every few months; Route 113 Corridor most popular Most common time to shop downtown: Monday Friday before 5 pm Advantage of downtown: supporting local businesses, small town character and convenient location Disadvantage of downtown: lack of variety of goods and services People would like to see downtown: 1-stop shopping, after 5 pm shopping, commercial & specialty retail, personal services, locally owned restaurants, specialty food, outdoor concerts, seasonal/holiday festivals and food festivals Improve downtown: greater variety of stores, improved appearance, improved parking

PLAN REVIEW Section 3. District Conditions & Analysis Demographics for District can be found in this Section Land Use, Zoning and Development Potential

PLAN REVIEW Section 3. District Conditions & Analysis Connectivity and Walkability District is pedestrian friendly - compact, high connectivity, grid street network, block lengths are short District has over 3 miles of sidewalks and crosswalks generally in good condition and well maintained, a few areas in need of improvements Alleys less traveled by cars are ideal for walking and biking Only 35% say pedestrian convenience is a strength of downtown (from survey) Providing safe and convenient pedestrian environment can be a competitive advantage over highway commercial areas Gateways, Streetscape and Public Spaces The Circle along with brick architecture and sidewalks creates a strong sense of place Defined streetscape buildings with distinguishable architectural features and ground retail floors with attractive window displays, street amenities Residential homes converted to offices and retail stores Eastern District boundary lacks sense of arrival/place

PLAN REVIEW Section 3. District Conditions & Analysis Parking Total parking area, including driveways and driving aisles, is approx. 12 acres or 14% of total District Parking Options: Situated on same lot as building, shared/satellite parking areas, on-street Several vacant or underutilized parking areas need improvements or infill development There is a perception that parking is an issue Residents/ Visitors: convenient, safe and improved parking Businesses: complying with on-site requirements Solutions: parking inventory, construction of parking structure, signage program Economic and Retail Development Great imbalance between number of people employed within the District who live outside the area vs. number of people who live within the District and employed outside the area Downtown Survey used to analyze shopping habits Marketing, promotion and additional downtown branding will be needed

PLAN REVIEW Section 4. Downtown Vision Georgetown is well-rounded. The downtown is a meeting place and the center of community activities with a mix of shopping, restaurants, cultural and recreation spaces. It offers an aesthetic blend of green space, natural elements and pedestrian amenities with an historic and small town flavor. Not only is it a niche destination place where specialty retail stores and restaurants attract visitors from the greater area, but it is also a place where local residents and employees from locally owned stores, offices and businesses run personal errands, shop, dine and patron other establishments in the downtown.

PLAN REVIEW Section 5. Goals, Objectives & Strategies Housing Economic & Retail Development Land Use, Zoning and Development Potential Natural & Cultural Resources Connectivity and Walkability Gateways, Streetscape and Public Spaces Parking Community Events

PLAN REVIEW Section 6. Implementation Plan Implementation Schedule Summarizes strategies Lists agencies and partners to coordinate with Prioritizes strategies Example from Implementation Schedule Connectivity & Walkability Recommendation Potential Partners & Coordinating Agency Priority Level Potential Technical & Financial Assistance Conduct a sidewalk and crosswalk inventory that identifies gaps and sections in need of repair, and add the necessary improvements in the capital improvement budget DelDOT Medium Municipal Street Aid Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)

PLAN REVIEW Section 6. Implementation Plan Local Incentives Existing Realty Transfer Tax Exemption 1 st Time Homebuyer Façade, Sign and Awning Improvement Grant Program

PROPOSED INCENTIVES Incentive In effect since Geographic Area Ten (10) year property tax increase phase in (on improvements) Impact Fee (Water & Sewer) Reduction: Commercial Structure 20% Mixed Use 35% 1 initial EDU; Additional EDU s calculated at end of first 12 months in operation Within 90 days of designation Within 90 days of designation DDD Designated Area DDD Designated Area Business License Fee Waiver (5 years) New Businesses Within 90 days of designation DDD Designated Area Accelerated Development Review Process (Administrative Approval) Within 90 days of designation DDD Designated Area Building Permit Fee Reduction (Sliding Scale 15% to 75%) Within 90 days of designation DDD Designated Area Emergency Services and Georgetown Recreation, Education and Arts Trust Reduction (50%) Within 90 days of designation DDD Designated Area Adopt Form-Based Code for Designated District Within 90 days of designation DDD Designated Area

Many of the Incentives will be accomplished through Form-Based Code FORM-BASED CODE

NEXT STEPS UPCOMING DATES Friday, April 15 th Submit to OSPC for Review OSPC needs 15 days to review plan as part of grant agreement Wednesday, May 11 th To Town Council for Adoption Application and Plan must be submitted by June 1 st

Project Point of Contact: Kyle Gulbronson kyle.gulbronson@aecom.com 302-933-0200 ext. 101