Recapitalizing the Navy s Battle-Line

Similar documents
Executing our Maritime Strategy

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL VERN CLARK, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Meeting the Challenge of a New Era

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

CRS Report for Congress

The Maritime Strategy

1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL JOHN J. DONNELLY COMMANDER NAVAL SUBMARINE FORCES

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

U.S. Pacific Command NDIA Science & Engineering Technology Conference

NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1

The Ship Acquisition Process: Status and Opportunities. NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference 24 October 07

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

TODAY S NAVY UNCLASSIFIED 1

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

Assessment of Naval Core Capabilities

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

CRS Report for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Navy Affairs Committee Minutes BOD Meeting - 23 May 2008

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL MICHAEL G. MULLEN CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 01 MARCH 2006

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

William Schneider, Jr.,

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

FORWARD, READY, NOW!

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL TERRY J. MOULTON, MSC, USN DEPUTY SURGEON GENERAL OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY PERSONNEL OF THE

Su S rface Force Strategy Return to Sea Control

OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012

Army Structure Update

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OPNAVINST DNS-3 22 Dec Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

U.S. Environmental Security: An Emerging Enabling Concept For Mission Success Jeremey Alcorn George Mason University May 6, 2009

CNRMC PSSRA Brief. Mr. Kevin Taylor May 19, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Michael Brown ECJ4-EN May Elizabeth Powell TetraTech,EMI May This briefing is classified: UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Doing Business With The Navy. VADM David Architzel, USN Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy December 3, 2007

The Competition for Access and Influence. Seabasing

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

GREGORY A. SCOVEL. Work Experience Bent Creek Terrace Leesburg, VA (703)

ARMY G-8

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

MINE WARFARE ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE 2007 Mine Warfare Challenges in the Littorals

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM

US Marine Corps Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Strategy Update Briefing to NDIA Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Conference 2 February 2009

Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation

WikiLeaks Document Release

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium

Navy Force Structure: A Bigger Fleet? Background and Issues for Congress

CRS Report for Congress

New Directions for Defense Programs Pacific Overview

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL GARY ROUGHEAD CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

GAO. OVERSEAS PRESENCE More Data and Analysis Needed to Determine Whether Cost-Effective Alternatives Exist. Report to Congressional Committees

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE

CHAPTER 2. Sea Power 21 began the process. Bridging Vision and Program Decisions SEA POWER FOR A NEW ERA. of translating theory into practice

CNO s. Navigation Plan WARFIGHTING FIRST

OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

US Navy Ships. Surface Warfare Officer First Tours

The Joint Staff Directorate of Logistics (J4) BGen Henry Taylor, VJ4. Force Projection Symposium

Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer Surface Navy Association Annual Symposium Banquet Washington, DC 11 January 2017

CHAPTER 1 Defending Freedom in an Unstable World

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION

A Call to Action for the Navy Reserve

Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum:

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Lieutenant Commander, thank you so much. And thank you all for being here today. I

COLUMBIA Class Submarine Program

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

STATEMENT OF RONALD O ROURKE SPECIALIST IN NATIONAL DEFENSE CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

Innovations in elearning Symposium. Integrating Engineering and the SEA Warrior Process. Greg Maxwell NAVSEA 03 7 JUNE 2005

Gun and Missile Systems An Integrated Warfare Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND WELCOME UNCLASSIFIED

Transcription:

Recapitalizing Navy s Battle-Line Brief to National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Conference CDR Greg Gombert Deputy, Shipbuilding Mgr Warfare Integration Division (OPNAV N8F1) 25 October 2006

A Maritime Nation at War: 230 Years of Courage Under Fire Sea Power in a New Era: A 1,000 ship Navy leveraging allied and coalition Naval Forces A Balanced Force: Right Size, Right Mix, Right Capabilities, Right Cost NAVY STORY 2

The Navy Today Global War on Terrorism A Direct Navy Issue! Over 28,000 Marines and ~19,500 Navy (ground/shipboard) personnel engaged in CENTCOM AOR in support of GWOT Naval medical personnel deployed to Iraq in support of Marine forces CSG and ESG provide continuous on station CENTCOM AOR operational & combat support Indirect Navy commitment Global engagement and partner nation support Stability operations in Philippines and elsewhere Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief throughout world Maritime Presence, Domain Awareness and Supremacy Navy s core competencies! Worldwide presence with a purpose deterrent shield against major combat operations across globe Transitioning from legacy to revolutionary platforms World Class people Heavy investment in transformational technology Platforms and people postured for short duration high intensity conflicts We We must must remain remain prepared, prepared, strong, strong, and and ready ready to to meet meet challenges challenges of of future future. SECNAV JAN 06. SECNAV JAN 06 3

GWOT What we are up Against Al-Qaida and associated groups will constitute dominate threat in Maritime environment for foreseeable future. - Interagency Maritime Threat Working Group 4

Force Demand PACOM CVN/CVW SOUTHCOM SSN EUCOM/CENTCOM CVN/CVW PACOM SSN/SSGN EUCOM SSN EUCOM MPSRON DDG LCS EUCOM/CENTCOM Amphibious Ships (ESG) CENTCOM SSN/SSGN PACOM Amphibious Ships (ESG) Guam MPF(F) Squadron West Africa GWOT Shaping Force SOUTHCOM GWOT Shaping Force SOUTHCOM LCS STANAVFORLANT DDG Diego Garcia MPSRON 5 th Fleet CG DDG DDX LCS * GWOT Shaping Force: DDG/LCS/JHSV Souast Asia GWOT Shaping Force 7 th Fleet CG DDG DDX LCS 5 5

Analytic Basis Joint Planning Construct Supporting Analysis Ship Sourcing Global Deterrence Homeland Defense War on Terror/ Irregular Warfare Transnational Deterrence Regional Deterrence Conventional Campaign(s) OA-06 BSP N81 NMD Study OA-06 BSP N6/N7 FSA N6/N7 FSA OA-06 (MCO2) OA-04 (MCO3) OSD SSN Study OSD JFEO Study CFFC CLF Study CV Count FRP Surge FDNF/Presence/FRP Surge FDNF/Presence/FRP Surge SSN Count Surf Comb t Count Amphib Count Aux Count ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ Total Ship Count All All platform types analyzed in in common, integrated frame of of reference 6

Future Force Structure Affordability Capabilities Specific Numbers of Ships Stability Generally Generally accepted accepted by by all all analytic analytic bodies bodies (CBO, (CBO, CSBA, CSBA, PA&E, PA&E, etc.) etc.) Appropriate Appropriate force force content content for for anticipated anticipated threat threat Issues Issues are are not not with with force force content content Rar, Rar, y y are are about about affording affording this this force force level level Ship Type Today 2006 2013 PB07 2020 Force Structure CV/CVN 12 10 11 CG 22 22 19 DDG 49 62 62 DD(X) 0 2 7 FFG 30 20 0 LCS 0 27 55 Dedicated MIW 16 14 0 SSBN 14 14 14 SSGN 4 4 4 SSN 55 55 48 Expeditionary 33 32 31 MPF(F) 0 4 12 CLF 30 30 30 Command & Support* 16 21 20 Total 281 317 313 *Includes T-AGOS,T-ARS, AS, T-ATF, LCC, AGF 7

Fiscal Environment Can t do do everything tradeoffs and and risk risk mitigation required Resources Requirements 8

Shipbuilding Affordability Historical figures indicate Navy has invested ~$11B annually (FY05$) in new ship construction Only supports ~260 ship Navy over long term Warfighting requirement for capacity and capability is 313 ships This requires ~$13.4B(FY05$) in new construction shipbuilding Affording Navy s future is cornerstone of forward presence We must specify our requirements and justify investment Commitment to number of ships, build plan, and investment strategy is critical Stability will assist in meeting affordability goals CY05 $B 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 CVN Procurement 1982 1982 1984 1984 Historic SCN Investment 1986 1986 1988 1988 1990 1990 1992 1992 ~$11.0B 1994 1994 1996 1996 1998 1998 2000 2000 SCN Investment Avg SCN 2002 2002 2004 2006 Ship Count 2004 2006 2008 2008 2010 FY35 ~260 Ships 2010 Specificity Specificity Stability Stability Affordability Affordability 9

Tradespace Cost Low cost, low capability, high quantity, high presence High Low Presence Capability Low High cost, high capability, low quantity, low presence Quantity Med cost, med capability, med quantity, med presence High Goals: Achieve balance between resources and requirements Fill any gaps in What it Takes to Win Prioritize Navy around CONPLAN 7500 Don t give away an MCO But, assume more risk where appropriate Risk priority: CONPLAN 7500 MCO2 MCO1 MCO3 Options Options for for recapitalization recapitalization are are limited limited by by need need for for relevancy, relevancy, capability capability and and capacity capacity --maintaining maintaining balance balance between between quantity quantity and and quality quality is is challenge challenge in in today s today s Navy Navy 10

Affordability Low Risk/Unaffordable ~350 Ship Navy Acceptable Risk $13.4B ~313 Ship Navy Unacceptable Risk ~286 Ship Navy Capability impact (2020) Stabilizes @ ~313 ships Satisfies warfighting requirement Provides necessary capabilities Industry Impact Stabilizes shipbuilding account Requires concerted modernization effort to achieve full service life Aligned with with risks accepted in in QDR 11

Recapitalizing Navy s Battle-Line Brief to National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Conference CDR Greg Gombert Deputy, Shipbuilding Mgr Warfare Integration Division (OPNAV N8F1) 25 October 2006