HIT Standards Committee Clinical Quality Workgroup and Vocabulary Task Force

Similar documents
Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

Overview of Current and Future Coding. PSTAC May 18, 2010 Presentation Prepared by: Shelly Spiro

emeasures: Everything You Want To Know

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

Quality Data Model December 2012

Our Journey In Health IT And Health Information Exchange Working Towards Ubiquitous, Computable Care. Review Data Systems For Monitoring HIV Care

Consolidated Health Informatics (CHI) Briefing to HITSP Panel

Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Terminology in Healthcare and

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Vendor Plan Share, Panel Discussion: Clinical Data Exchange by leveraging the EHR

EHR and Meaningful Use: How it Impacts the Coder. What you get may not be what you expect Patricia S. Wilson, RT (R), CPC, PMP

May 7, Submitted electronically via:

Hitting a Grand Slam. The Four Trends. Today s Objectives 3/20/ Trends that Streamline Clinical Operations & Save Financial Resources

Challenges for National Large Laboratories to Ensure Implementation of ELR Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Stage 1 Guide for 2013

Section B. Terminology in Use Today

May 7, Re: Document ID RIN 0991-AB82. Dear Dr. Mostashari:

Carolinas Collaborative Data Dictionary

Via Electronic Submission to:

Test Procedure for (c) Maintain up-to-date problem list

Guide 2: Updated August 2011

MN E-HEALTH REPORT: 2011 Minnesota Clinical Laboratory Survey of Readiness and Needs for Electronic Health Information Exchange

Ministry of Health Shared Services (SPMS)

Trillium Bridge: An update

HIPAA and EMR Synergies

Jason C. Goldwater, MA, MPA Senior Director

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Engaging Staff in EHR Implementation and Reducing Risk: Making Your Laboratory Data SAFER

Controlled Medical Vocabulary Supporting the Interoperability Decision Support at the Point-of-Care

2015 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

Measure #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Decision Support Project Team. Fall 2010

SNOMED CT AND 3M HDD: THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity Electronic Medical Record

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Meaningful Use Key Dates

Where s the Quality in EHRs? A Collaborative Model to Promote Data Sharing and Quality Reporting

Measure #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Note: Every encounter type must have at least one value designated under the MU Details frame.

The Joint Commission's Performance Measurement Journey

Health Level Seven International Unlocking the Power of Health Information

NCVHS - HIPAA Transactions and the National Health Information Infrastructure

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CODING AND BILLING WITH APPLIED PCS LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Veterans Health Administration Enterprise Terminology Project & Mapping issues

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Medication Reconciliation and Standards Overview

The Right Information, to the Right Place, at the Right Time. Jim Daley, Chairman, Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange

Health IT 2020 Supporting the ARRA Stimulus Goals through Collaboration and IT Solutions

Agenda. New 42 CFR Part 2 Regulations and Information Sharing. Presented by: Christina Grijalva, RHIA, CHC OCHIN Compliance Specialist 4/28/2016

3. ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF MEASURING QUALITY WITH CLAIMS DATA

Relevance of Meaningful Use Requirements for Pathologists and Laboratories Pathology Informatics 2011 October 5, 2011

Proposed Meaningful Use Content and Comment Period. What the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Means to Medical Practices

IMPROVING MEDICATION RECONCILIATION WITH STANDARDS

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Informatics Essentials

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar

HIT Glossary and Acronym List

Pilot Results. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) Massachusetts ehealth Collaborative (MAeHC)

Quality ID #137 (NQF 0650): Melanoma: Continuity of Care Recall System National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Mapping the Finnish National EHR to the LOINC

What Will Stage I Mean for Consumers and Purchasers

Public Health Data Standards Consortium.

Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel

Clinical LOINC Meeting - Salt Lake City, UT USA. Updates on LOINC. Daniel J. Vreeman, PT, DPT, MSc

ICD 10 CM. Knowledge is powerful. IT is everywhere. Compliance is everything.

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data Capture: Hopes, Fears, and Dreams

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

Achieving health equity:

American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analytics Data Dictionary

Town Hall Meeting on Health

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Electronic Clinical Quality Measures (ecqms) for Hospitals: What You Need to Know

Behavioral Pediatric Screening

Role of e-prescribing in Preventing Opioid Abuse

The new semester for this Certificate will begin Fall 2018

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

TCS FAQ s. How will the implementation of national standard code sets reduce burden on the health care industry?

TEHDI CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR AUDIOLOGISTS

The PHDSC Quarterly Standard E-Newsletter

Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use - A Year in Review

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

RE: Request for Comments Regarding Meaningful Use Stage 2

Lessons Learned: Indiana

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

HL7 standards pave the way to meaningful use

Nursing Informatics at the Forefront of Nursing April 12, 2015

HL7 Version Implementation Guide: Syndromic Surveillance, Release 1 - US Realm. May HL7 STU Ballot V251_IG_SYNDROM_SURV_R1_D1_2018MAY

Results will be used for public reporting by MDH and MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

Completeness, Timeliness, and Validity

Presented by AIRA June 21 st, 2011

Transcription:

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Quality Workgroup and Vocabulary Task Force Wednesday, August 17, 2011 Jim Walker and Jamie Ferguson, Chairs Karen Kmetik and Betsy Humphreys, Co- Chairs

Vocabulary Task Force Chair: Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente Co-Chair: Betsy Humphreys National Library of Medicine Members Donald Bechtel Accredited Standards Organization X12 Lisa Carnehan NIST Christopher Chute Mayo Clinic Bob Dolin HL7 Floyd Eisenberg National Quality Forum Patricia Greim Veterans Affairs John Halamka Harvard Medical School Stan Huff Intermountain Healthcare John Klimek NCPDP Clem McDonald National Library of Medicine Stuart Nelson National Library of Medicine Marc Overhage Regenstrief Institute Marjorie Rallins American Medical Association Dan Vreeman Regenstrief Institute Jim Walker Geisinger Andrew Wiesenthal IHTSDO (SNOMED) Federal Ex Officio Chris Brancato HHS/ONC Greg Downing HHS

Clinical Quality Measures Workgroup Chair: Jim Walker Geisinger Health System Co-Chair: Karen Kmetik American Medical Association Members David Baker Northwestern University Anne Castro BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Christopher Chute Mayo Clinic John Derr Golden Living, LLC Bob Dolin HL7 Floyd Eisenberg NQF Rosemary Kennedy Thomas Jefferson University David Lansky Pacific Business Group on Health Gene Nelson Dartmouth University Eva Powell National Partnership Philip Renner Kaiser Permanente Danny Rosenthal Inova Health System Joachim Roski Brookings Institution Federal Ex Officio Jon White, AHRQ Aneel Advani, Indian Health Service, HHS Patrice Holtz, CMS, HHS

Project Scope Assign minimum necessary vocabulary standards to the fundamental concepts in the NQF s Quality Data Model v3.0 (QDM) to enable effective expression of quality measures and interoperable electronic health record data elements

Foundation Concepts 1. Measures Development Limit code sets used for measures. Use of the code set may be limited to partial depth (e.g., a subset of ISO 639-2 for preferred language). Future purpose-specific subsets of code sets will be needed. 2. HIT Certification Certified HIT shall be able to process all legal codes in the code set for a given concept (e.g., Adverse Effect). 3. Meaningful Use (reimbursable) Only code sets required in HIT certification shall be required for Meaningful Use reimbursement. 4. Interim Transition Plans End state targets are recommended for measure purposes. Some transition plans will be needed, are yet to be developed and will be presented to HITSC (more on this later)

Adverse Drug Effect (allergy or non-allergy) RxNorm for Medications (inactive ingredients to be added) SNOMED CT for non-medication substances for Adverse Effect 6

Patient Characteristics ISO 639-2 for the patient s Preferred Language CDC PHIN-VADS (HL7) for Administrative Gender CDC PHIN-VADS Race and Ethnicity LOINC for assessment instruments (including tobacco use) for appropriate responses to instruments (including patient preferences and behaviors) Socio-economic Status - referred to CMS for clarification of request (in the absence of widely accepted typologies) Payer Typology of the Public Health Data Standards Consortium 7

Communication Condition/Diagnosis/Problem (active and inactive) Device Non-laboratory Diagnostic Study LOINC for specific study name for appropriate findings UCUM for specific units of measure Encounter Patient-Professional Interaction (not limited to billable events) 8

[Patient] Experience LOINC for assessment instruments for appropriate responses Family History LOINC for assessment instruments for appropriate responses Functional status ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health) for categories of function LOINC for assessment tools for appropriate responses 9

Health Record Components (element of a health IT application) LOINC for naming of the components and their relationships HL7 for messaging among systems Intervention (forms one end of a spectrum with Procedures) LOINC for interactions that produce an assessment or measurable results for appropriate results and interventions that do not produce measurable results (e.g., counseling) Adverse Effect other than Allergy (intolerance) RxNorm for medications and inert ingredients for Non-medication substances 10

Laboratory tests LOINC for test name and its results for appropriate results UCUM for units of Measure Medication (including vaccines) RxNorm for medications CVX for vaccinations as standard vocabulary (in some contexts vaccinations are treated as medications, in others they are treated separately) Physical Exam LOINC for assessment instrument for appropriate responses 11

[Patient] Preference LOINC for assessment instruments for appropriate responses Procedure Risk Evaluation LOINC for evaluation instruments for appropriate responses Substance 12

Symptom System resources LOINC for staffing resources HL7 for EHR functions for equipment Transfer

Action Accept the recommended code sets for QDM concepts

Next Steps Transition Plans to be presented at September 28 th HITSC meeting, will address: Interim use of code sets currently employed in quality measures 6 concepts have code sets required in MU Stage 1 (3 of these would change with recommended sets e.g., using ICD, CPT, HCPCS) Transition time required for: Testing of recommended code sets Measure developers to incorporate new recommendations into exiting, retooled, and de novo measures Incorporation into certification criteria