Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Similar documents
Benchmark Data Sources

Practice Implications for Accountable Care Organizations

3/29/2013. Effective ACO Compliance. Objectives THE HEALTH CARE DILEMMA: ARE ACOS THE ANSWER? HCCA Compliance Institute April 21, 2013

ACO Information Required to be Published on ACO Website per CMS Regulations

Accountable Care and the Laboratory Value Proposition. Les Duncan Director of Operations Highmark Health - Home and Community Services

Shared Savings Program ACO Public Reporting Instructions. with Pre-Populated Template

Quality Measurement and Reporting Kickoff

United Medical ACO Participation Criteria

ACO Name and Location. ACO Primary Contact. Organizational Information

ACO GPRO 2016 Ready to Report Basics GPRO ACO Random Sample Reporting January 17, 2017 to March 17, 2017

ACO Name and Location. ACO Primary Contact. Organizational Information

ACO Name and Location ACO Primary Contact

Accelerating the Impact of Performance Measures: Role of Core Measures

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

Improving Clinical Outcomes

Shared Savings Program ACO Public Report

Meaningful Use: a Primer

=======================================================================

ACO Name and Location. ACO Primary Contact. Organizational Information. Page 1 of 8

How Does This Fit into the Provisions of the Affordable Care Act? The goals are aligned

Quality Measurement, Population Health and Payment Reform

ACO Name and Location. ACO Primary Contact. Organizational Information

ACO Name and Location. ACO Primary Contact. Organizational Information

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule. Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009

Shared Savings Program ACO Public Reporting Instructions. with Pre-Populated Template

Erin Page

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Maximizing the Financial Performance of Employed Physicians

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

St. Vincent s Health Partners

Medicare & Medicaid. William Kassler, MD Chief Medical Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Boston, MA

Proposed 2015 PFS: Quality Updates

Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration

Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule. Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009

2015 Updates to the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) & the Value-based Payment Modifier

ACO Update. LVHN Scholarly Works. Lehigh Valley Health Network. Lehigh Valley Health Network. Spring 2017

Slide 1. Slide 2 Rural Princeton. Slide 3 Agenda Rural ACO RURAL ACOS CAN WORK AND LEAD THE WAY

Financial Models for Clinical Pharmacy Integration

Proposed CMMI Rural Shared Savings Demonstration Project: Frontier/Rural Community Care Organizations

2013 EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM MANUAL

MIPS Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

Falcon Quality Payment Program Checklist- 2017

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Session 10: Integrating Data and Analytics into Provider Workflows Improves ACO Quality and Financial Performance

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Improving Care for the Chronically Ill. Linda Magno Director, Medicare Demonstrations

Meaningful Use of EHR in Dental School Clinics: How to Benefit from the U.S. HITECH Act s Financial and Quality Improvement Incentives

1.01 Government Programs: CMS and Pay for Performance: Current Issues. CMS Regional Administrator March 2009

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity Electronic Medical Record

Harmony Healthcare International, Inc.

Richard E. Wild, MD,JD,MBA, FACEP

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Medicine Institute Outcomes

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Policy CHCS. Brief. Leveraging the Medicaid Primary Care Rate Increase: The Role of Performance Measurement. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc.

Practices for Improving Population Health

2017 Quality Reporting: Claims and Administrative Data-Based Quality Measures For Medicare Shared Savings Program and Next Generation ACO Model ACOs

The Incentive Roadmap

Getting Ready for the Maryland Primary Care Program

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Through the 2009 HITECH (Health Information

CMS Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative and. The Southern New England Practice Transformation Network (SNE PTN)

Enhancing Outcomes with Quality Improvement (QI) October 29, 2015

HEALTH CARE REFORM IN THE U.S.

South Dakota Health Homes Care Coordination Innovation

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

ACO Name and Location: Central US ACO, LLC 901 W. Commercial Street Kennett, MO ACO Primary Contact:

Measuring High Performers and Assessing Readiness to Change Looking Beyond the Lamppost

Oregon's Health System Transformation

Accountable Care Organizations Under Medicare Shared Savings Program PROPOSED RULE

Understanding PQRS and the Value-Based Modifier: CMS Plan to Achieve High Value Care through Transforming Payment Systems

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

2017 CMS Web Interface Quality Reporting. Questions & Answers January 2018

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

What Have we Learned from the Pioneer ACO Model?

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW

Framing Rural Health Value Webinar Series

Managing Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Advancing Primary Care Delivery

How ACO s Are Thinking of Home Care: the Atrius Health Experience

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

Cleveland Clinic Implementing Value-Based Care

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

The Evolving Landscape of Healthcare Payment: Incentive Programs and ACO Model Optimization. Quality Forum August 19, 2015

Health Plan with Health Insurance Exchange Measures, Version 1.3

Meaningful Use Certification Details

Goals & Challenges for Outpatient Quality Directors. Quality HealthCare Consulting, LLC CEO: Jennifer O'Donnell, MHA, PCMH-CCE

A. DIABETES AND HEART/STROKE Data Detail

Quality Reporting: PQRS, CQM, GIQuIC. Erin Dettrey Product Manager, Analytics Sylvia Cohen gadvisor Team Lead Laurie Parker GIQuIC Executive Director

Advancing Care Coordination Proposed Rule

Audio Title: Revised and Clarified Place of Service (POS) Coding Instructions Audio Date: 6/3/2015 Run Time: 16:03 Minutes ICN:

Updated 2017 Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Requirements For Eligible Providers (EP)

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

2015 Annual Convention

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: FACT SHEET Overview http://www.cms.gov/sharedsavingsprogram On October 20, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (), an agency within the Department of & Human Services (HHS), finalized new rules under the Affordable Care Act to help doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers better coordinate care for Medicare patients through (ACOs). ACOs create incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings including doctor s offices, hospitals, and long-term care facilities. The Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program) will reward ACOs that lower their growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting patients first. Provider participation in an ACO is purely voluntary. In developing this final rule, worked closely with agencies across the Federal government to ensure a coordinated and aligned inter- and intra-agency effort to facilitate implementation of the Shared Savings Program. encourages all interested providers and suppliers to review this final rule and consider participating in the Shared Savings Program. This fact sheet describes the quality measures and the method for scoring an ACO s performance for purposes of meeting the quality performance standard under the Shared Savings Program. ACO Final Quality Measures and Performance Scoring Methodology Quality Measures: The final rule adopts 33 individual measures of quality performance that will be used to determine if an ACO qualifies for shared savings. These 33 measures span four quality domains: Patient of Care, Care, Preventive, and At-Risk Population. The list of measures is included as an appendix to this fact sheet. ICN 907407 October 2011 1

The ACO quality measures align with those used in other quality programs, such as the Physician Quality Reporting System and the Electronic Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. The ACO quality measures also align with the National Quality Strategy and other HHS priorities, such as the Million Hearts Initiative. In developing the final rule, listened to industry concerns about focusing more on outcomes and considered a broad array of measures that would help to assess an ACO s success in delivering high-quality health care at both the individual and population levels. also sought to address comments that supported adopting fewer total measures that reflect processes and outcomes, and aligning the measures with those used in other quality reporting programs, such as the Physician Quality Reporting System. Reporting: The measures will be reported through a combination of a web interface designed for clinical quality measure reporting and patient experience of care surveys. In addition, claims and administrative data will be used to calculate other measures in order to reduce administrative burden. will also administer and pay for the patient experience of care survey for the first 2 years of the Shared Savings Program, 2012 and 2013. ACOs will be responsible for selecting and paying for a -certified vendor to administer the patient survey beginning in 2014. While an ACO s first performance year for shared savings purposes would be 18 or 21 months, depending on the start date, quality data will be collected on a calendar year basis, beginning with the reporting period ending December 31, 2012. Quality Performance Scoring: As required by the Affordable Care Act, before an ACO can share in any savings created, it must demonstrate that it met the quality performance standard for that year. For the first performance year, is defining the quality performance standard at the level of complete and accurate reporting for all quality measures. During subsequent performance years, the quality performance standard will be phased in such that ACOs must continue to report all measures but will eventually be assessed on performance. Pay for performance will be phased in over the ACO s first agreement period as follows: Year 1: Pay for reporting applies to all 33 measures. Year 2: Pay for performance applies to 25 measures. Pay for reporting applies to eight measures. Year 3: Pay for performance applies to 32 measures. Pay for reporting applies to one measure that is a survey measure of functional status. will keep the measure in pay for reporting status for the entire agreement period. This will allow ACOs to gain experience with the measure and will provide important information to them on improving the outcomes of their patient populations. intends to establish national benchmarks for ACO quality measures and will release benchmark data at the start of the second performance year when the pay for performance phase-in begins. For pay for performance measures, the minimum attainment level will be set at a national 30 percent or the national 30 th percentile of the performance benchmark. Performance benchmarks will be 2

national and established using national Fee-For-Service (FFS) claims data, national Medicare Advantage (MA) quality reporting rates, or a flat national percentage for measures where MA or FFS claims data is not available. Performance equal to or greater than the minimum attainment level for a measure will receive points on a sliding scale based on the level of performance. Performance at or above 90 percent or the 90 th percentile of the performance benchmark will earn the maximum points available for the measure. The diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) composite measures will each receive the maximum available points if all criteria are met and zero points if one or more of the criteria are not met. The EHR Incentive Programs participation measure will be double-weighted in order to encourage EHR adoption. will add the points earned for the individual measures within each domain and divide by the total points available for the domain to determine each of the four domain scores. The domains will be weighted equally and scores averaged to determine the ACO s overall quality performance score and sharing rate. ACOs would need to achieve the minimum attainment level on at least 70 percent of the measures in each domain to avoid being placed on a corrective action plan. In addition to the measures used for the quality performance standards for shared savings eligibility, will also use certain measures for monitoring purposes, to ensure ACOs are not avoiding at-risk patients or engaging in overuse, underuse, or misuse of health care services. Incorporation of the Physician Quality Reporting System into the Shared Savings Program: The Affordable Care Act allows to incorporate the Physician Quality Reporting System reporting requirements and incentive payments into the Shared Savings Program. ACO participants that include providers/suppliers who are also eligible professionals for purposes of the Physician Quality Reporting System will earn the Physician Quality Reporting System incentive as a group practice under the Shared Savings Program, by reporting required clinical quality measures through the ACO Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) web interface, in each calendar year reporting period the ACO fully and completely reports the ACO GPRO measures. Resources The Shared Savings Program final rule can be downloaded at http://www.ofr.gov/inspection.aspx on the Internet. It will appear in the November 2, 2011, issue of the Federal Register. The Shared Savings Program will be established January 1, 2012. For information about applying to participate in the Shared Savings Program, visit http://www.cms.gov/sharedsavingsprogram on the website. 3

Appendix Quality Measures for Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Domain Measure Title NQF Measure #/Measure Steward Method of Data Submission Pay for Performance Phase In R = Reporting P = Performance Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 AIM: Better Care for Individuals 1. Patient/ CAHPS: Getting Timely Care, Appointments, and Information, Survey 2. Patient/ CAHPS: How Well Your Doctors Communicate Survey 3. Patient/ CAHPS: Patients Rating of Doctor Survey 4. Patient/ CAHPS: Access to Specialists Survey 5. Patient/ CAHPS: Promotion and Education Survey 6. Patient/ CAHPS: Shared Decision Making Survey 7. Patient/ CAHPS: Status/ Functional Status NQF #6 Survey R R R 8. Care Risk-Standardized, All Condition Readmission 1 NQF #TBD Claims 9. Care Ambulatory Sensitive Conditions Admissions: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease NQF #275 Claims ( Prevention Quality Indicator (PQI) #5) 1 We note that this measure has been under development and that finalization of this measure is contingent upon the availability of measures specifications before the establishment of the Shared Savings Program on January 1, 2012. 4

Domain Measure Title NQF Measure #/Measure Steward Method of Data Submission Pay for Performance Phase In R = Reporting P = Performance Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 10. Care Ambulatory Sensitive Conditions Admissions: Congestive Heart Failure NQF #277 Claims ( Prevention Quality Indicator (PQI) #8) 11. Care Percent of PCPs who Successfully Qualify for an EHR Incentive Program Payment EHR Incentive Program Reporting 12. Care Medication Reconciliation: Reconciliation After Discharge from an Inpatient Facility NQF #97 / 13. Care Falls: Screening for Fall Risk NQF #101 AIM: Better for Populations 14. Preventive Influenza Immunization NQF #41 15. Preventive Pneumococcal Vaccination NQF #43 16. Preventive Adult Weight Screening and Follow-up NQF #421 17. Preventive Tobacco Use Assessment and Tobacco Cessation Intervention NQF #28 18. Preventive Depression Screening NQF #418 19. Preventive Colorectal Cancer Screening NQF #34 20. Preventive Mammography Screening NQF #31 5

Domain Measure Title NQF Measure #/Measure Steward Method of Data Submission Pay for Performance Phase In R = Reporting P = Performance Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 21. Preventive Proportion of Adults 18+ who had their Blood Pressure Measured within the preceding 2 years 22. At Risk Composite (All Hemoglobin A1c Control (<8 percent) 23. At Risk Composite (All Low Density Lipoprotein (<100) 24. At Risk Composite (All Blood Pressure <140/90 25. At Risk Composite (All Tobacco Non Use 26. At Risk Composite (All Aspirin Use 27. At Risk Mellitus: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control (>9 percent) 9 28. At Risk Hypertension Hypertension (HTN): Blood Pressure Control NQF #18 29. At Risk Ischemic Vascular Disease Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Complete Lipid Profile and LDL Control <100 mg/dl NQF #75 6

Domain Measure Title NQF Measure #/Measure Steward Method of Data Submission Pay for Performance Phase In R = Reporting P = Performance Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 30. At Risk Ischemic Vascular Disease Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Use of Aspirin or Another Antithrombotic NQF #68 31. At Risk Heart Failure Heart Failure: Beta- Blocker Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) NQF #83 32. At Risk Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Composite: All or Nothing Scoring: Drug Therapy for Lowering LDL- Cholesterol NQF #74 (composite) / (individual component) 33. At Risk Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Composite: All or Nothing Scoring: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Therapy for Patients with CAD and and/or Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) NQF # 66 (composite) / (individual component) 7

R Official Information for Medicare Fee-For-Service Providers This fact sheet was current at the time it was published or uploaded onto the web. Medicare policy changes frequently so links to the source documents have been provided within the document for your reference. This fact sheet was prepared as a service to the public and is not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. This fact sheet may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents. The Medicare Learning Network (MLN), a registered trademark of, is the brand name for official educational products and information for Medicare Fee-For-Service Providers. For additional information, visit the MLN s web page at http://www.cms.gov/mlngeninfo on the website. Your feedback is important to us and we use your suggestions to help us improve our educational products, services and activities and to develop products, services and activities that better meet your educational needs. To evaluate Medicare Learning Network (MLN) products, services and activities you have participated in, received, or downloaded, please go to http://www.cms.gov/mlnproducts and click on the link called MLN Opinion Page in the left-hand menu and follow the instructions. Please send your suggestions related to MLN product topics or formats to MLN@cms.hhs.gov. 8