RESPONDING TO COMPOSITE FIRES: FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING MODULE

Similar documents
AIRFIELD DAMAGE REPAIR THE FUTURE NOW

Wildland Fire Assistance

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

PREPRINT MAGNETIC UXO RECOVERY SYSTEM (MURS) (BRIEFING SLIDES)

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

The Effects of Outsourcing on C2

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

AMCOM Corrosion Program

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

at the Missile Defense Agency

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

ý Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DT3083 Total Eye Examination Automated Module (TEAM) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Colonel Francis L.

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Report Documentation Page

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

Information Technology

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

HQ AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent


Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Chemical Weapons Improved Response Program

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

United States Air Force 423 SCMS Hydraulic Actuator Chrome Replacement

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

THE TEXAS MEDICAL RANGERS AND THOUSANDS OF PATIENTS e. Sergeant First Class Brenda Benner, TXARNG

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

Technical Considerations for Alamo Lake Operation

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

UNCLASSIFIED. Stephen Beaudoin

Transcription:

AFRL-ML-TY-TP-2005-4529 RESPONDING TO COMPOSITE FIRES: FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING MODULE Jennifer Kiel, Douglas Dierdorf Applied Research Associates P.O. Box 40128 Tyndall AFB, FL 32403 D. McBride, T. Harmon University of Maryland Maryland Fire & Rescue Institute College Park MD 20742 S. Yarlagadda, C.H. Newton, J.W. Gillespie, Jr. Center for Composite Materials University of Delaware Newark DE 19716 Interim Technical Paper, May 2005 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release, distribution unlimited. Air Force Research Laboratory Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Airbase Technologies Division 139 Barnes Drive, Suite 2 Tyndall AFB, FL 32403-5323

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 31-MAY-2005 Interim Technical Paper 01-OCT-2003 -- 31-MAY-2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Responding to Composite Fires: First Responder Training Module 5b. GRANT NUMBER FA8651-04-C-0303 6. AUTHOR(S) Jennifer Kiel, Douglas Dierdorf, D. McBride, T. Harmon, S. Yarlagadda, C. H. Newton, and J. W. Gillespie Jr. 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Applied Research Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 40128 Tyndall AFB, FL 32403 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) Air Force Research Laboratory Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Tyndall AFB, FL 32403-5323 Air Force Materials Command United States Air Force 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Ref AFRL/MLQ Public Affairs Case # 05-015. 14. ABSTRACT 62102F 4915 D2 4915D24C AFRL/MLQD 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) AFRL-ML-TY-TP-2005-4529 The important and growing use of composite materials in civilian and military applications, such as in aircraft, motor vehicles, mass transit and marine industry creates new and often unrecognized hazards for firefighters and the general public. Researchers in the US and overseas have identified that: composites are combustible materials, ignition can occur in as little as four seconds in a Cone Calorimeter, heat release rates exceed those for kiln dried pine lumber, and composites produce "deep-seated" fires. Firefighting research has not yet addressed the impact of these new materials, which in many cases replace noncombustible metals. The Air Force and NASA have committed major efforts over the past 30 years to understanding the post fire hazards related to dispersed fibers and combustion products. This research resulted in the recent publication of First Responder PPE and operating requirements as part of the Hazardous Aerospace Materials Mishap Emergency Response (HAMMER) integrated product team. A training module is under development that incorporates these requirements and other relevant materials for first responders. The purpose of this training module is to provide civilian and military firefighters and first responders with the methodologies they need to assure rapid and safe extinguishment of composite materials fires. 15. SUBJECT TERMS composite materials, graphite composites, aircraft, mass transit 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT U U U UU 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Virgil Carr 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) Reset Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

ABSTRACT The important and growing use of composite materials in civilian and military applications, such as in aircraft, motor vehicles, mass transit and marine industry creates new and often unrecognized hazards for firefighters and the general public. Researchers in the US and overseas have identified that: composites are combustible materials, ignition can occur in as little as four seconds in a Cone Calorimeter, heat release rates exceed those for kiln dried pine lumber and composites produce deep-seated fires. Firefighting research has not yet addressed the impact of these new materials, which in many cases replace noncombustible metals. The Air Force and NASA have committed major efforts over the past 30 years to understanding the post fire hazards related to dispersed fibers and combustion products. This research resulted in the recent publication of First Responder PPE and operating requirements as part of the Hazardous Aerospace Materials Mishap Emergency Response (HAMMER) integrated product team. A training module is under development that incorporates these requirements and other relevant materials for first responders. The purpose of this training module is to provide civilian and military firefighters and first responders with the methodologies they need to assure rapid and safe extinguishment of composite material fires. iii

1. BACKGROUND The increased risk of composite deep-seated fires and potential health issues for firefighters resulted in a growing concern identified by the Air Force Research Laboratory s Fire Research Group. Advanced composite materials are showing up in huge numbers in both Air Force and civilian new aircraft, increasing strength, decreasing weight and increasing hazard risk. Aircraft mishaps involving advanced composite materials present unique safety, environmental and potential health hazards. In October of 2002 the first Composite Fire Safety Initiative meeting was held in Washington, D. C. to discuss the increased use of composites in Air Force, DoD, and civilian technologies because of the emerging fire safety issues related to these materials. The program is dedicated to developing an understanding of composite combustion processes and to providing civilian and military firefighters with the education, methodologies and technologies needed to safely extinguish composite material fires. A key concern of the initiative involves providing firefighters with proper support and training to effectively combat these hazards. In FY04 the Composite Fire Safety Initiative was sponsored by the Strengthening the Mid-Atlantic Region for Tomorrow (SMART) congressional caucus. Under this initiative, scientists and engineers from the Air Force Research laboratory s Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Fire Research Group (AFRL/MLQD) began working cooperatively with experts from the University of Delaware, the University of Maryland, and the firefighting community. The Composite Material Fire Safety training program is a direct deliverable of this initiative aimed at improving the safety and effectiveness of military and civilian firefighters. The result is a three day fire fighting training course taught in six sections that introduces the basics of composite materials, reviews hazardous material response procedures, provides information on composite materials burns and firefighting tactics to be utilized in combating composite material fires, and covers techniques for overhauling the hazard after the fire. Students will take a practical exam on the last day. The USAF publishes a Technical Order (TO), TO 00-105E-9 that is currently available to military and civilian firefighters and the general public 1. This valuable resource contains a major section (Chapter 3) on Mishap Composite Awareness. A main deliverable of the Composite Fire Safety Course is communication of the pertinent information contained in the TO relating to combating composite material fires. Efforts to create a lighter, faster, more efficient aircraft, motor vehicles and mass transit led to the increased use of composite materials. For example, 24% of the airframe for the next generation fighter, the F/A-22, is composite material, creating a new level of need for the information in this TO to be taught at the beginning of a firefighter s career. In the civil aviation scenario, 1. The Technical Order is publicly available online at http://www.robins.af.mil/logistics/lgeda/documents/to00-105e-9.htm 1

the need is equally pressing as the new Airbus 380 and 350, as well as the Boeing 7E7 have targeted at least 50% of the aircraft to be composite materials. Composite materials begin to degrade structurally approximately ten seconds after exposed to flame. Thus, fire department response to a fire on or near an aircraft must be in seconds to prevent irreversible damage. TO 00-105E-9 provides guidance on fire response to aircraft containing composite materials. Training the fire properties of composites to determine proper fire response will reduce injuries and mission time, increasing the possibility of saving lives without additional risk to the firefighter, while decreasing both the damage to aircraft and property loss. The courses stresses handling composite materials incidents with caution, using proper personal protective equipment, proper decontamination of responders, and is expected to reduce injuries and deaths related to complications firefighters encounter when responding to composite material fires. The course provides the student with a better understanding of composite materials, including how they are constructed, used, and where firefighters can expect to encounter them. Finally, students review firefighting tactics and learn the agents applications that work best when combating fires involving composites. More than 10,000 DoD firefighters, first respondents and hundreds of thousands of civilian firefighters are expected to receive and benefit from the program. The completed program was demonstrated in February 2005 and delivered April 2005 to the DoD s Louis F. Garland Fire Academy at Goodfellow AFB, San Angelo, Texas. It will also be available through the Maryland Fire and Rescue Institute. 2. COURSE OUTLINE This Training Course is designed to provide civilian, military firefighters, as well as first responders with the education, and methodologies they need to assure rapid and safe extinguishment of composite material fires. This course will present the importance of handling Composite Material Incidents with Caution. The importance of the proper use of Personal Protective Equipment and proper decontamination of responders will be stressed and explained. It is very important that Emergency Responders realize that composites are everywhere in our world today, anywhere strength is required, and reduced weight is a necessity. This course will illustrate that even though composites are prevalent in the aviation industry, they are present everywhere in today s environment. The outline of the course is as follows: Session 1 Introduction to Composite Materials Objective: The student shall have a better understanding on how composite materials are constructed, used, and where the firefighter should expect to encounter prevalent composite materials. Session 1 Overview: o Introduction & Administrative Duties 2

Course Overview o Introduction to Composite Materials, Definition Uses, and Locations History Locations Prevalent Materials Session 1 Enabling Objectives (EO): 1. EO-1-1 List the reasons that Composite Materials are utilized in today s manufacturing world 2. EO-1-2 List the locations a firefighter should suspect that Composites are located. 3. EO-1-3 List the most prevalent materials used in manufacturing. 4. EO-1-4 Identify the definition of a composite material Session 2 Hazardous Material Response and Mitigation Refresher Objective: The student shall review procedures learned in Hazardous Material Courses, how composite material releases compare, and the proper decontamination procedures to be utilized following every incident involving composite materials. Session 2 Overview: o Hazardous Material Refresher Recognition & Identification / Information Personal Protective Equipment Detection Risk Assessment Decontamination Decontamination Procedures Session 2 Enabling Objectives: 1. EO-2-1 List the proper processes utilized to safely mitigate a Hazardous Material Incident. 2. EO-2-2 Identify the Health Effects that Hazardous Materials present. 3. EO-2-3 Identify the difference between exposure and contamination 4. EO-2-4 Identify the routes that a hazardous material may enter the human body 3

5. EO-2-5 List the proper terminology utilized when describing a hazardous material 6. EO-2-6 List the steps for proper decontamination of anyone that may be contaminated at an Incident scene Session 3 Composite Material Incident Hazards and Life Safety Objective: The student shall understand what happens when composite materials burn and aircraft systems are subjected to failure and a catastrophic fire situation both in testing as well as actual emergency situations Session 3 Overview: o Composite Material Dangers Faced by Firefighting Crews o Incident Case Studies F-117 Crash UH-60 Helicopter Boat Storage Facility Fire o Composite Burn Tests Mojave Test Center Session 3 Enabling Objectives: 1. EO 3-1 Identify the dangers posed by Composite Materials after an incident. 2. EO 3-2 Identify the areas of concern, based on actual incident case studies. 3. EO 3-3 List the burn observations observed during the test burns 4. EO 3-4 Identify the key points found in each incidents conclusion Session 4 Composite Material Fire Behavior, Strategies and Tactics Objective: The student shall have an understanding of Composite Material Fire Behavior, and the Firefighting tactics to be utilized in combating fires involving composite materials. Session 4 Overview: o Composite Material Fire Behavior o Firefighting Tactics o Mishap Risk Control Guidelines Session 4 Enabling Objectives: 1. EO-4-1 Identify the behavior that is be expected when composite materials are subjected to, and become involved in fire. 4

2. EO-4-2 Identify the heat generated, and by-products emitted by the burning composite materials. 3. EO-4-3 List the Strategies and Tactics that should be utilized when combating a fire involving composite materials. 4. EO-4-4 Identify the proper Personal Protective Equipment that should be utilized in each tactic involved in the mitigation of the incident. 5. EO-4-5 List the Mishap Risk Control Guidelines for Composite Material Incident response. Session 5 Proper Extinguishing Agents and Fixants for Composite Materials Objective: The student shall understand which agents and applications work best for combating fires involving composite materials. The student shall also understand the proper steps to take in overhauling after fire involving composite materials, and the use, and type of fixants to be utilized during overhaul. Session 5 Overview: o Firefighting Agents & Application o Composite Material Fire Overhaul o Composite Material Fixants & applications Session 5 Enabling Objectives: 1. EO-5-1 Identify the preferred agents utilized in combating composite material fires. 2. EO-5-2 Identify the proper agent application utilized in combating composite material fires. 3. EO-5-3 List the steps utilized in overhaul in combating composite material fires. 4. EO-5-4 Identify the fixants utilized during overhaul of a composite material incident. 5. EO-5-5 Identify the proper application methods of fixants on composite materials. Session 6 Practical Evolutions and Written Examination Objective: The student shall observe and fully understand all information received during the course by participating in an actual practical evolution. Session 6 Overview: o Simulated Composite Material Test Burn Preparation 5

Test Burn Overhaul Remediation o Course Review o Written Examination Session 6 Enabling Objectives: 1. EO-6-1 Demonstrate the proper tactics utilized to mitigate a composite material incident. 2. EO-6-2 Demonstrate proficiency in the proper selection, donning, and use of Personal Protective Equipment utilized in mitigating a composite material incident. 3. EO-6-3 Demonstrate proficiency in the operation of the proper respiratory protection utilized in the mitigation of a composite material incident. 4. EO-6-4 Demonstrate the proper tactics utilized in handling a hazardous material COURSE STATUS One of the main goals of the Fire Safety Composite Initiative is to provide military firefighters with the education, methodologies, and technologies needed to safety respond to composite material fires. Over the last year AFRL, the University of Delaware, and the University of Maryland have constructed a training course, based on TO 00-105E-9, entitled Composite Fire Safety to be delivered to the DoD Fire Academy. The Dover AFB Fire Department agreed to host the pilot version of the three day course from Feb 7 to Feb 9, 2005 and provide constructive feedback for the purpose of fine tuning the course before finalizing it. The course took two full days to deliver, including a hazardous material practice response. The exam for future classes will be given in the morning of the third day. The participants included 24 firefighters from Dover AFB Fire Department, the Delaware Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserves. The participants were extremely responsive to the training. A recommendation to consider is marketing or combining this training with a simulated hazmat response exercise so that firefighters can accomplish their 8-hour HAZWOPER refresher in conjunction with this program. The firefighters at Dover suggested and accomplished this during the pilot course. Feedback from the pilot version is currently being incorporated into the course, along with feedback from representatives of AFCESA (Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency). After completion, the first official course delivery is planned in April 2005 at the DoD Fire Academy at Goodfellow AFB, Texas. Steps are being taken to obtain 6

course accreditation and implement the course into the regular training curriculum for First Responders and Emergency Personnel. CONCLUSIONS A three day fire fighting training course has been developed to educate and train First Responders and Emergency Personnel on handling Composite Materials incidents and fires. It taught in six sections that introduces the basics of composite materials, reviews hazardous material response procedures, provides information on composite materials burns and firefighting tactics to be utilized in combating composite material fires, and covers techniques for overhauling the hazard after the fire. Students will take a practical exam on the last day. Pilot delivery of the course at Dover AFB was received with enthusiasm and provided feedback for modifications to the course. First official delivery is planned at the DoD Fire Academy in April 2005, followed by steps to obtain accreditation and implementation into the regular curriculum. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are grateful to the SMART Team for providing the support to fund this initiative, to AFCESA, FAA, NIST, AFRL HQ, The Louis F. Garland Fire Academy, and the Dover AFB Fire Department for continued support and constructive feedback during the course development. This research was sponsored by the Department of Air Force, AFRL-MLQD and was accomplished under the Composite Fire Safety Initiative, agreement number FA8651-04-C-0303. 7