Counting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Similar documents
Counting for Dollars: Sedgwick County, Kansas

Counting for Dollars: Polk County, Florida

Counting for Dollars: Broward County, Florida

Counting for Dollars: Syracuse, NY

Counting for Dollars: Fresno County, California

Counting for Dollars: Sonoma County, California

Counting for Dollars: Jefferson County, Alabama

Counting for Dollars: Tulare County, California

Counting for Dollars: Washoe County, Nevada

Counting for Dollars: Pinal County, Arizona

Counting for Dollars: Boise City, ID

Counting for Dollars: Atlanta, GA

Counting for Dollars: South Dakota

Counting for Dollars: Mercer County, New Jersey

Counting for Dollars: The Role of the Decennial Census in the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds

GAQC Summary of 2017 Compliance Supplement PROPOSED Revisions

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) (Technical Assistance Program)

Connecticut s Reliance on Federal Funds

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

Government Auditing Standards Report

State $ Billion (23%) Federal $717.1 Billion (77%)

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)

Federal Grant Programs Year ended June 30, 2013

FORMULA GRANTS 5307 Urbanized Area 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Board of Directors Committee Meeting

FEDERAL SPENDING AND REVENUES IN ALASKA

Questions & Answers. Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009

PART 5 CLUSTERS OF PROGRAMS

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

The Money Issue: Financing and Funding Tribal Transit. Community Transportation EXPO Tampa, Florida June 3, 2015

This page intentionally left blank

Comparison of Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Programs and other Federal Assistance to Disadvantaged Communities in EPA Region 4

Federal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Review of Federal Expenditures to Florida In Fiscal Year September Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations

Resources for Grantseekers

Overview of Presentation

University of Minnesota

COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MONITORING HANDBOOK. Departmental Staff and Program Participants HANDBOOK REV-6

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Housing HOME Program HUD $2.25 billion To be used for capital investments in Assure HPRP program staff

COSCDA Federal Advocacy Priorities for Fiscal Year 2008

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Single Audit Reporting Package

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

California s Share of Federal Formula Grants:

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

2017 STATUS REPORT on

RURAL ACTION BRIEF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND RURAL ASSET-BUILDING PROGRAMS PRESIDENT BUSH S FY 2006 BUDGET CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY. ACTIVITY RECOMMENDATION FORM for CAPITAL PROJECTS LOCAL FISCAL YEAR 2017

DRAFT American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (HR 1/S 1)

COMMUNITY SERVICE BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) DRAFT PLAN FFY

An Analysis of USDA Farm Program Payments and Rural Development Funding In Low Population Growth Rural Counties

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Federal Grants-in-Aid Administration: A Primer

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

MID-WEST NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2015

Preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Washington Association of School Business Officials Small Schools Committee

DRAFT JARC FUNDING APPLICATION January 29, 2013

Education Appropriations

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND (a Component Unit of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations)

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA. Single Audit Report December 31, 2016

Office of Community & Economic Development Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Presentation

CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT: Fiscal Year 2009

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 71 Public Transportation. (a) Applicability. The United States Congress revised 49

CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS

Chapter 3 Preparing Grant Applications and Grants Administration

Alameda County Housing and Community Development Department

Horry County Community Development 1515 Fourth Avenue Conway, SC 29526

Selected Human Needs Programs: Shrinking Funding Since 2010

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Testimony Robert E. O Connor, MD, MPH House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform June 22, 2007

Information about how the county is pursuing its mission and goals is available in the county s Strategic Plan at ramseycounty.

LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

DRAFT FUNDING APPLICATION October 20, 2010

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Economic Development Element

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK REPORT REQUIRED BY THE SINGLE AUDIT ACT DECEMBER 31, 2013

The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (NAHASDA): Background and Funding

Continuing Certain Medicaid Options Will Increase Costs, But Benefit Recipients and the State

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) AGENCY FUNDING REPORT PROGRAM YEAR 2014

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Financing Issues

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic

Federal Economic Stimulus Package

Grants Information for Constituents

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS June 11, 2018

Serving the Community Well:

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

RURAL BRIEF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS. Department of Agriculture

retirees. On average, fourteen percent of total employment in rural communities is attributed to the health sector. 9

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District Of Oregon

Community Development Block Grant Frequently Asked Questions

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

Appendix B. FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria

Transcription:

Counting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma Federal Assistance Programs that Distributed Funds in Tulsa County, Oklahoma on the Basis of Census-Related Statistics, Fiscal Year 2008 This table lists federal assistance programs that relied on census-related statistics to distribute grants, direct payments, and loans in Tulsa County, Oklahoma in Fiscal Year 2008. For an in-depth analysis of the use of census-related statistics in federal funds distribution, please see Counting for Dollars: The Role of the Decennial Census in the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds at www.brookings.edu/metro/countingfordollars. Tables for the nation, states, the 100 largest metros, and the 200 largest counties are available as well. Total Program Expenditures: $492,683,945 Per Capita Expenditures: $832.26 OMB Budget Function Summary Budget Function Expenditures Share of Total 300 - Natural Resources and Environment $16,303 0.0% 370 - Commerce and Housing Credit $17,429,643 3.5% 400 - Transportation $101,465,387 20.6% 450 - Community and Regional $5,161,580 1.0% 500 - Education, Training, Employment, and Social $50,914,285 10.3% 550 - Health $253,228,647 51.4% 600 - Income Security $64,283,540 13.0% 999 - Multiple Functions $184,560 0.0% Page 1 of 5

300 - Natural Resources and Environment Total Expenditures: $16,303 10.923 Emergency Watershed Protection Program Department of Agriculture $16,303 370 - Commerce and Housing Credit Total Expenditures: $17,429,643 10.410 Very Low to Moderate Income Housing Loans Department of Agriculture $15,586,535 14.197 Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act (Mark to Market) $1,307,992 14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $463,675 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons With Disabilities $54,976 10.447 The Rural (RD) Multi-Family Housing Revitalization Demonstration Program (MPR) 10.417 Very Low-Income Housing Repair Loans and Grants Department of Agriculture $9,000 Department of Agriculture $7,465 400 - Transportation Total Expenditures: $101,465,387 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction (Federal-Aid Highway Program) Department of Transportation $100,448,593 20.521 New Freedom Program Department of Transportation $325,188 20.509 Formula Grants for Other Than Urbanized Areas Department of Transportation $257,836 20.500 Federal Transit_Capital Investment Grants Department of Transportation $245,000 (Fixed Guideway Modernization Bus and Bus Facilities New Starts) 20.507 Federal Transit_Formula Grants Department of Transportation $153,934 20.516 Job Access_Reverse Commute Department of Transportation $34,836 450 - Community and Regional Total Expenditures: $5,161,580 14.218 Community Block Grants/Entitlement Grants $3,786,580 10.768 Business and Industry Loans Department of Agriculture $600,000 11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance Department of Commerce $500,000 Page 2 of 5

11.302 Economic - Support for Planning Department of Commerce $275,000 Organizations 500 - Education, Training, Employment, and Social Total Expenditures: $50,914,285 84.027 Special Education Grants to States Department of Education $18,064,724 84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Department of Education $12,039,124 93.600 Head Start Department of Health and Human $9,978,924 84.126 Rehabilitation _Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States Department of Education $6,983,262 93.667 Social Block Grant Department of Health and Human $3,233,832 84.364 Literacy through School Libraries Department of Education $456,373 93.623 Basic Center Grant Department of Health and Human $72,198 84.358 Rural Education Department of Education $55,348 84.240 Program of Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights Department of Education $30,500 550 - Health Total Expenditures: $253,228,647 93.778 Medical Assistance Program Department of Health and Human $238,230,004 93.767 State Children's Insurance Program Department of Health and Human $8,465,536 93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Department of Health and Human $5,529,863 93.241 State Rural Hospital Flexibility Program Department of Health and Human 93.301 Small Rural Hospital Improvement Grant Program Department of Health and Human $557,090 $523,096 93.913 Grants to States for Operation of Offices of Rural Health Department of Health and Human ($76,942) Page 3 of 5

600 - Income Security Total Expenditures: $64,283,540 14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $23,395,062 10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC Program) Department of Agriculture $12,918,882 14.850 Public and Indian Housing $8,661,026 14.195 Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program (Project-based Section 8) $6,665,158 14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund 14.239 HOME Investment Partnerships Program 14.231 Emergency Shelter Grants Program 93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Department of Health and Human $4,222,189 $3,446,352 $2,206,038 $1,872,564 14.856 Lower Income Housing Assistance Program_Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation $637,837 97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Department of Homeland Security $258,432 999 - Multiple Functions Total Expenditures: $184,560 97.044 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Department of Homeland Security $184,560 Page 4 of 5

Notes: This table was prepared for the Counting for Dollars Project at the Brookings Institution s Metropolitan Policy Program (www.brookings.edu/metro/countingfordollars). It was generated by a database of federal domestic assistance programs that used census-related datasets in Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 to: determine the eligibility of applicants, recipients, or beneficiaries geographically allocate all or some program funds by formula and/or score applications for project funding Census-related datasets include: the Census Bureau s Census 2000, annual Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Current Population Survey, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, and list of Urbanized Areas Per Capita Income (Bureau of Economic Analysis), Area Median Income and Fair Market Rents ( ), Local Area Unemployment Statistics (Bureau of Labor Statistics), and statistical area delineations (Office of Management and Budget) Programs that rely on census-related data were identified through a review of the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (www.cfda.gov), federal law and regulation, administrative materials, and, as necessary, communication with program personnel. The distribution of funds by geography was drawn from the Census Bureau s Consolidated Federal Funds Report (CFFR) (www.census.gov/govs/cffr/). Programs were assigned to OMB budget function codes on the basis of information found in Appendix III of the CFDA print edition. FY2008 is the latest year for which CFFR data are available. At times, program funds were deobligated for a given geography if, for example, program costs were less than were anticipated. If a program had a net deobligation in FY2008, expenditures for that program appear as negative. Negative numbers appear in parentheses. Cautions: For each program listed in the table, the dollar amount is the total expenditure as provided by the (CFFR). Spending figures on only that portion distributed on the basis of census-related data are not available. Hence, figures from the table should be cited with care and clarity. (Note: Nationally, at least 90 percent of funds spent by census-guided programs were in fact distributed on the basis of censusrelated data.) Data for a county with a state capital are likely to include distributions intended for pass-through from the state government to recipients across the state. While the Census Bureau estimates the geographic distribution of pass-throughs for larger grant programs (e.g., Medicaid, Highway Planning and Construction), it does not do so for smaller ones. Instead, funds for such programs are attributed to the county of the state capital. A per capita expenditure estimate is provided only to allow comparisons among geographic areas. It is not intended to suggest that the funding total will increase by the per capita estimate for each additional person counted in the census. Page 5 of 5