Information Security Oversight Office

Similar documents
16 Department of the Air Force Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Homeland Security

2005 REPORT to THE PRESIDENT INFORMATION SECURITY OVERSIGHT OFFICE

16 Department of the Air Force Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Homeland Security

The Best Places to Work

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information

WHO'S IN AND WHO'S OUT

The Best Places to Work

DoD SBIR/STTR. Overview NDIA. Sept 24, 2015 Springfield, VA. Steve Sullivan, Acting Program Administrator

REPORT to the PRESIDENT. NATIONAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, DC

Thrift Savings Plan (TSP): Required minimum distribution and investment advice:

CIVILIAN MANPOWER STATISTICS

Course Project: SBIR PROPOSALS

FSO Role in the NISP. Student Guide. Lesson 1: Course Introduction. Course Information. Course Overview

Homeland Security Infrastructure Program

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON I DC

GSA OASIS and the DoD 4 th Estate

NATIONAL RESPONSE PLAN

DoD M-S-I FEBRUARY FUND CODE Supplement MILSBILLS. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE e of THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (Comptroller)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

How Current Government-wide Initiatives Will Shape DoD in the Future. Presented to ASMC PDI May 29, 2015

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Small Business Contracting Trends & Outlook. Kevin Plexico Vice President, Research Deltek, Inc.

DOMESTIC SUPPORT OPERATIONS

Defense Acquisition Workforce Key Information OVERALL As of FY17Q2 (31 March 2017)

Scientific Integrity Report Card

DoD Conference Guidance

DOD INSTRUCTION INVESTIGATIONS BY DOD COMPONENTS

Federal Trade Promotion & the National Export Initiative

OSTP and U.S. Federal Science and Technology Policy

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY September 16, 1994

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM - 2

Confrontation or Collaboration?

U.S. Embassy in Iraq

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Defense Acquisition Workforce Key Information Contracting As of FY18Q2 (31 March 2018)

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR FY 2005

PROJECTS / GRANTS / BOARD OF REGENTS REPORTING

Federal Knowledge Management Community

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET ESTIMATES - FY 2004

INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

REPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005

U.S. Embassy in Iraq

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DoD Mentor Protégé Program. Shannon C. Jackson, Program Manager DoD Office of Small Business Programs

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Defense Acquisition Workforce Key Information Contracting As of FY17 (30 Sept 2017)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PROGRAM OPERATING MANUAL

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Report No. D July 30, Status of the Defense Emergency Response Fund in Support of the Global War on Terror

Federal Contracting 101 (The Art of the Process) Moderated by: Dan F. Sturdivant, II DHS, OSDBU

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Behind the Scenes of Intelligence Resourcing

The Executive Branch

OSTP and U.S. Federal Science and Technology Policy

For Immediate Release October 7, 2011 EXECUTIVE ORDER

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. DoD Treaty Inspection Readiness Program (DTIRP)

Department of Defense MANUAL. DoD Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Program

THE NATIONAL DECLASSIFICATION. Releasing What We Can, Protecting What We Must

MANAGER S TOOLKIT FOR A SUCCESSFUL FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT

Appendix. Websites & Electronic Newsletters

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information to the Public

Defense Security Service Academy OCA Desk Reference Guide

R&D in the FY 2017 Budget

GAO INDUSTRIAL SECURITY. DOD Cannot Provide Adequate Assurances That Its Oversight Ensures the Protection of Classified Information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Mahendra Jain

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Secretary of the Senate Office of Public Records 232 Hart Building Washington, DC

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. Excepted Service. SUMMARY: This notice identifies Schedule A, B, and C appointing authorities applicable to a

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 5000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Plain Writing Act Compliance Report April 12, 2013

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P))

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is revising its procedures

CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS

FY 2011 CONTINUING RESOLUTION REDUCTIONS

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

Declassification Options and Requirements

TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKING GROUP. Perry Pederson Infrastructure Protection Subgroup

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent (EA) for the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Transcription:

Information Security Oversight Office National Archives and Records Administration 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20408 November 30, 2004 The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: In the March 25, 2003, amendment to Executive Order 12958, "Classified National Security Infonnation," (the Order) you called for a renewed commitment by the Executive branch to the orderly declassification of historically valuable pennanent classified records that are 25-years-old or older. Based upon a recently completed assessment of agency actions, the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) believes, for the most part, that the Executive branch is progressing toward fulfilling its responsibilities for these records by the initial deadline of December 31, 2006. Nonetheless, a significant number of agencies remain at risk of not meeting the deadline. Enclosed is a report providing the details of this assessment.

REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF DECLASSIFICATION IN THE EECUTIVE BRANCH November 30, 2004 In the March 25, 2003, amendment to Executive Order 12958, Classified National Security Information, (the Order) you called for a renewed commitment by the Executive branch to the concept of declassification tied to specific deadlines, referred to in the Order as automatic declassification. This concept ensures that all 25-year old and older historically valuable permanent records containing classified national security information are declassified, exempted, referred to other interested agencies, or appropriately delayed by December 31, 2006. Settings deadlines for declassification increases the potential release of formerly classified information to the general public and researchers, enhancing our knowledge of our democratic institutions and our history, while at the same time ensuring that information which can cause damage to national security continues to be protected. An agency s failure to fully implement the automatic declassification provisions of your Order undermines its ability to achieve these dual objectives. In order to assess Executive branch progress toward fulfilling the above commitment, we requested that all agencies provide information about their declassification programs to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) for review and evaluation. The request was sent to those agencies that are original classifiers and/or derivative classifiers, as well as to those that are solely consumers or holders of classified national security information. This is our first major analysis of declassification data since implementation of the Order, and it establishes a baseline from which we can monitor future activity. In accordance with the provisions of section 5.2(b)(8) of the Order, we are advising you of our findings. Based on this year s initial data, as of December 31, 2003, we estimate that there are 260 million pages of classified national security information that must be declassified, exempted, or referred to other agencies by December 31, 2006. This figure is in addition to the 982 million pages declassified in the prior 8 years that automatic declassification has been in effect. We believe, for the most part, that the Executive branch is progressing toward fulfilling its responsibilities for these records by the initial deadline, although a significant number of agencies remain at risk of not meeting it.

Specifically, of the 74 agencies * that responded to ISOO s data call for declassification information, we confirmed that 28 do not currently possess any 25-year old and older historically valuable permanent classified records and thus did not need to submit a declassification plan at this time. The remaining 46 agencies were required to submit plans, which we confirmed through on-site visits. Based upon the information available to us at this time, we are confident that 25 of those agencies required to submit plans will be prepared for the implementation of the automatic declassification program on December 31, 2006 (although two of those agencies need to make minor modifications to their current program). Collectively, these 25 agencies account for 45 percent of the total number of pages subject to automatic declassification by December 31, 2006. In addition, there is some concern that 2 agencies, which together account for 33 percent of the total, will not be prepared. Both agencies have strong declassification programs, but require additional resources to guarantee that they will meet the deadline. There is significant risk that 4 agencies, which collectively account for 16 percent of the total, will not be prepared. Finally, 15 agencies did not provide enough Baseline Assessment Percentage of Pages to be Declassified by December 31, 2006 Significant Risk (4 Agencies) 16% Some Risk ( 2 Agencies) 33% Not Enough Information ( 15 Agencies) 6% Yes/ Most Likely ( 25 Agencies) 45% * Percentage based on estimated total of 260 million pages. information upon which we could base an assessment; we estimate that they account for at least 6 percent of the total. We are working to ensure that these agencies will provide sufficient information in future declassification plans. Many of the nearly 260 million pages of classified national security information subject to automatic declassification by December 31, 2006, contain information of interest to other agencies. This means that the original agency must not only review the classified information for declassification, but it must then refer the document to any other agency that has an interest in the classified information. While agencies have developed strategies to reduce the cost and time required, the referral of documents remains one of the most costly and lengthy components of the declassification review process. This is one reason why the recent amendment to the Order allowed agencies to delay the automatic declassification of classified records referred to them by other agencies for an additional three years. While classified records that fall into this category must be * A listing of all Executive branch agencies which ISOO monitors is included in Attachment A and in Attachment B. This is a baseline assessment of whether or not the agencies will reach the December 31, 2006, deadline for automatic declassification. It should be noted that the initial declassification review for the papers of each president and vice-president is conducted at their respective presidential library. This process is described in the Office of Presidential Libraries (NL) section of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Declassification Plan. NARA and NL will work with the National Security Council (NSC) to ensure that these materials are appropriately reviewed for declassification. The other entities of the Executive Office of the President (EOP) submitted individual responses.

referred to agencies of interest no later than December 31, 2006, these records will not be subject to automatic declassification until December 31, 2009. Based on the data provided, we estimate that 65 million pages (25 percent of the total) must be referred to and acted upon by other agencies by the extended date. In addition to the 260 millions pages, 87 million pages of special media, such as motion pictures or audio tapes, (regardless of media we report volume in number of pages) will need to be declassified, exempted, or referred to other interested agencies by December 31, 2011, based upon the 5 additional years allotted by the recent amendment to the Order for information contained in special media. Based on our review, we believe that the Executive branch will, for the most part, fulfill its responsibilities under the automatic declassification program by December 31, 2006. However, we remain concerned that many of the agencies will have trouble reaching the 2009 and 2011 deadlines reflected above. We will continue to monitor the situation closely. There are a number of highly effective business practices with respect to the implementation of the automatic declassification program that warrant special mention. Several agencies have established an organizational structure that ensures close coordination between their declassification, Freedom of Information Act, and records management programs. This is a noteworthy best practice that ensures both increased efficiency and consistency. We are especially pleased with a number of agencies who are playing leading roles in initiatives such as the Interagency Referral Center housed in the National Archives and Records Administration. We will continue to work with all agencies and offer what assistance we can to keep the process moving forward. We have emphasized to each agency head that automatic declassification is an ongoing program that begins, not ends, on December 31, 2006, and thus requires the personal commitment of each agency head, as you called for in the Order.

Attachment A LISTING OF EECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES AND ENTITIES FOR WHICH ISOO HAS OVERSIGHT Air Force: Department of the Air Force Army: Department of the Army CEA: Council of Economic Advisers CIA: Central Intelligence Agency Commerce: Department of Commerce DARPA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency DCAA: Defense Contract Audit Agency DCMA: Defense Contract Management Agency DeCA: Defense Commissary Agency DFAS: Defense Finance and Accounting Service DHS: Department of Homeland Security DIA: Defense Intelligence Agency DISA: Defense Information Systems Agency DLA: Defense Logistics Agency DOE: Department of Energy DOT: Department of Transportation DSS: Defense Security Service DTRA: Defense Threat Reduction Agency ED: Department of Education EPA: Environmental Protection Agency EIMBANK: Export-Import Bank of the United States FCC: Federal Communications Commission FMC: Federal Maritime Commission FRS: Federal Reserve System GSA: General Services Administration HHS: Department of Health and Human Services HUD: Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior: Department of the Interior JCS: Joint Chiefs of Staff Justice: Department of Justice (Includes FBI and DEA) Labor: Department of Labor MDA: Missile Defense Agency MMC: Marine Mammal Commission MSPB: Merit Systems Protection Board NARA: National Archives and Records Administration NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Navy: Department of the Navy NGA: National Geospatial Intelligence Agency NRC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRO: National Reconnaissance Office NSA: National Security Agency NSC: National Security Council NSF: National Science Foundation OA, EOP: Office of Administration, Executive Office of the President OIG, DOD: Office of the Inspector General, Department of Defense

OMB: ONDCP: OPIC: OPM: OVP: OSD: OSTP: PC: PFIAB: SBA: SEC: SSS: State: Treasury: TVA: USAID: USDA: USITC: USPS: USTR: VA: Office of Management and Budget Office of National Drug Control Policy Overseas Private Investment Corporation Office of Personnel Management Office of Vice President (individual plan not required) Office of the Secretary of Defense (plus 9 Combatant Commands) Office of Science and Technology Policy Peace Corps President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board Small Business Administration Securities and Exchange Commission Selective Service System Department of State Department of the Treasury Tennessee Valley Authority United States Agency for International Development United States Department of Agriculture United States International Trade Commission United States Postal Service Office of the United States Trade Representative Department of Veterans Affairs

Attachment B Agency Air Force Army CEA CIA Commerce DARPA DCAA DCMA DeCA DFAS DHS DIA DISA DLA DOE DOT DSS DTRA ED EPA Ex-Im Bank FCC FMC FRS GSA HHS HUD Interior JCS Justice Labor MDA MMC MSPB NARA NASA Navy NGA NRC NRO NSA NSC NSF OA, EOP DoD IG Non Applicable YES MOST LIKELY SOME RISK SIGNIFICANT RISK NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION

OMB ONDCP OPIC OPM OSD OSTP PC PFIAB SBA SEC SSS State Treasury TVA USAID USDA USITC USPS USTR VA Combatant Commands (9) TOTALS 28 23 2 2 4 15