PART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS

Similar documents
PART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS

Marina Strategy: Section A Request for Proposal. 1. Request for Proposal. 2. Communication. 3. Key Contacts

PhD Scholarship Guidelines

Outside Studies Program (OSP) Funding Rules 2018

Request for Information and Qualifications RFIQ No Facility Asset Management Consulting Services

Avant Quality Improvement Grants Program Terms and conditions

Collaborative Research Infrastructure Scheme (CRIS)

CANCER COUNCIL SA BEAT CANCER PROJECT PRINCIPAL CANCER RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP PACKAGES FUNDING GUIDELINES

TAURANGA S HEART OF THE CITY

MARKET OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS FOR THE OCEAN TECHNOLOGY SECTOR IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

International Work Experience Grant Terms and Conditions

The Request for Proposal consists of the following documents, and should be read in conjunction with any Addenda issued:

Postdoctoral Fellowship

Indigenous Australians Health Programme Service Maintenance Program. Grant Opportunity. Grant Opportunity. Grant Opportunity number: GO236

Movember Clinician Scientist Award (CSA)

General Contractor Services - Small Projects

Research Equipment Grants 2018 Scheme 2018 Guidelines for Applicants Open to members of Translational Cancer Research Centres

Nesta is a global innovation foundation, based in the UK. We back new ideas to tackle the big challenges of our time.

Career Development Fellowships 2018 Guidelines for Applicants. Applications close 12 noon 05 April 2018

Addendum 1 Compliance indicators for the Australian Privacy Principles


Innovation and Improvement Fund

Indigenous Leadership Scholarship

The Try, Test and Learn Fund: At-risk young people aged and receiving income support

Community Child Care Fund - Restricted non-competitive grant opportunity (for specified services) Guidelines

Small Business Advisory Services program

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Services

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST. STARplex Café Operation. Issue Date: 1 October Closing time: 2pm 10 November 2014

VU RESEARCH OFFICE FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For East Bay Community Energy Technical Energy Evaluation Services

Farm Co-operatives and Collaboration Pilot Program Farmer Group Projects Funding Guidelines

COMMONWEALTH BANK STAFF COMMUNITY FUND COMMUNITY GRANTS GRANT GUIDELINES.

SECTION 2 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS (IB)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

APPLICATION FOR ASSESSMENT AS A MEDICAL PHYSICIST FOR MIGRATION PURPOSES

Incubator Support initiative. An element of the Entrepreneurs Programme

STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS POLICY AND PROCEDURE

TASMANIAN HEALTH ASSISTANCE PACKAGE: BETTER ACCESS TO PALLIATIVE CARE IN TASMANIA PROGRAM INVITATION TO APPLY FOR FUNDING ITA No.

Course Related Work Experience Vice-Chancellor's Directive

Guidelines for Peer Assessors

STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT FUND

Agreement. Between: The Research Foundation, Cerebral Palsy Alliance. And: (Name of Institution) Project: (Name of project)

Role Profile Medical Officer- Medical Devices

terms of business Client Details Client name:... Billing name:... Address:... address:... NZBN/NZCN:... Contact name:... Phone number:...

TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONSULTANCY FOR ADVANCING PALESTINIAN WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS PROJECT TERMS OF REFERENCE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP No IBM Software Subscription and Support Renewal

yes Optus Community Grants Program 2015: Application Process, Guidelines and Terms and Conditions [ ]

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP# CAFTB

Client name:... Billing name:... Address:... address:... ABN/ACN:... Contact name:... Phone number:... Cost register (office use):...

M P STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (A Govt. of M.P Undertaking) Tender No: MPSEDC/TRIBAL/VC/DCGM/2018/374 Dated

Client name:... Billing name:... Address:... address:... ABN/ACN:... Contact name:... Phone number:... Cost register (office use):...

Stage 2 Application BioMedTech Horizons

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Practice Accreditation Committee - list of approved accreditation assessors

CERTIFIED PRACTISING ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANT

Palliative Care Research Masters/ PhD Scholarship 2015

Accreditation Guidelines

ABN AINSE Post-Graduate Research Awards Conditions and Guidelines CONDITIONS

New Zealand Scholarship Conditions

Ontario College of Trades

Small Business Entrepreneur Grants Program

Dakota County Technical College. Pod 6 AHU Replacement

NHMRC TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE (TRIP) FELLOWSHIPS FUNDING POLICY

Research Training Program Scholarship Policy

GENERAL TENDER CONDITIONS

Request for Proposals (RFP)

CANCER COUNCIL SA BEAT CANCER PROJECT TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH PACKAGES FUNDING GUIDELINES

National Advance Care Planning Prevalence Study Application Guidelines

IAF Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC Guide 61:1996

City of Coquitlam. Request for Expressions of Interest RFEI No Workforce Scheduling Software

DEMENTIA GRANTS PROGRAM DEMENTIA AUSTRALIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION PROJECT GRANTS AND TRAINING FELLOWSHIPS

POLICY ON THE CONTROL OF ASBESTOS AT WORK

ACI AIRPORT SERVICE QUALITY (ASQ) SURVEY SERVICES

EY Corporate Finance Woman of the Year Terms and Conditions 14 July 2017

Professional Development and Training Services

Prime Minister s Scholarships. Programme Guide for: Coach Scholarships (Individual & Group)

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 553 of 2015 PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF IRELAND (CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT) RULES 2015

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP No IBM Software Subscription and Support Renewal

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS G ELLUCIAN (Datatel) COLLEAGUE CONVERSION TO MS SQL AND RELATED UPGRADES PROJECT

Round 8 Guidelines. Overview & Objective

SACU/012/2018/O. Consultancy for the provision of Website Revamping, Hosting and Maintenance Services for the Southern African Customs Union (SACU)

I have attached one of the following forms of identification to confirm these details (please specify)

Business Events Bid Fund Program - Prospectus. Financial Year 2018/19

Request for Quotations. Annotated Bibliography on Gender Sensitive Child Protection

NATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY PROGRAMS LEADING TO REGISTRATION AND ENDORSEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

RAH RESEARCH COMMITTEE 2018 FLOREY FELLOWSHIP

Terms and Conditions of studentship funding

City of Grande Prairie Community Social Development

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 11 th August, A Strategy for the Atlantic Canadian Aerospace and Defence Sector for a Long-term Development Plan

VICTORIAN INDUSTRY PARTICIPATION POLICY (VIPP) SUPPLIER GUIDELINES

Local Government Management Association of BC

Terms & Conditions of Award

STANDARD REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS (SRQ) (CONSULTANCY AND DESIGN)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) AND GENERAL INSTRUCTION TO SERVICE PROVIDERS BID DATA SHEET (BDS)

National Certificate in Health, Disability, and Aged Support (Foundation Skills) (Level 2)

AGSVA SERVICE LEVEL CHARTER FOR DEFENCE INDUSTRY Australian Government Security Vetting Agency and Defence Industry

Request for Proposal. Study on Economic Impact of Calgary s Post-Secondary Sector. Reference Number:

HOLSWORTH WILDLIFE RESEARCH FUND

CITY OF PITTSBURGH Office of Management & Budget

Application for registration within a vocational scope of practice

National Accreditation Guidelines: Nursing and Midwifery Education Programs

Transcription:

PART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS Services Requested: Development and Delivery of Elective Modules (Work Package 2) Contact Person: Ms Maria Zollo, ARMS Chief Operating Officer Proposal Closing Date: 5 October 2015. Proposal Validity and Assessment: 6 week assessment period Proposal Delivery Method: Email proposals to ARMS_CEO@researchmanagement.org.au Enquiries to: ARMS_CEO@researchmanagement.org.au 2

PART B: PROPOSAL CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PRELIMINARY 1.1. Definitions 2. BACKGROUND 2.1. Foundation Level Accreditation Program 2.2. Professional Level Accreditation Program 3. DESCRIPTION OF WORK PACKAGE 2 3.1. Proposal Price 4. FORM AND METHOD OF PROPOSAL 4.1. Request for Proposal 4.2. Format and Contents of Proposal 4.3. Completeness of Proposal 4.4. Presentation by the Applicants 4.5. Contact Person 4.6. Method of Lodgement 5. PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT 5.1. Proposal Assessment Criteria 5.2. Proposal Validity and Assessment Period 5.3. Clarification 5.4. Acceptance of Proposal and Proposal Negotiations 5.5. Short-Listing and Interview 5.6. Best and Final Offer 5.7. Confidentiality 5.8. Intellectual Property 5.9. Contract Arrangements 5.10. Cost and Preparation of Proposal ANNEXURE A: ARMS PROPOSAL FORM. 3

1. PRELIMINARY 1.1. Definitions In this request for Proposal, unless it is stated to the contrary; Addendum means a notice issued by ARMS that amends any of the Proposal Conditions; Business Day means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or Public holiday in South Australia; Contact Person means the contact person described in the Proposal Details; Process means the Request for Proposal process; Applicant means a person submitting a Proposal in response to this Request for Proposal or as the context may require, a person who has been given this Request for Proposal; Proposal means a proposal lodged in accordance with this Request for Proposal; Proposal Closing Date means the proposal closing date and time (being AEST) set out in the Proposal Details; Proposal Form means the Proposal Form set out in Annexure A; ARMS means the Australasian Research Management Society ABN 57 334 849 485 The Society means the Australasian Research Management Society ABN 57 334 849 485 The ARMS Executive means the governing body of ARMS which is responsible for the control and direction of the Society including it committees and publications; Request for Proposal means this Request for Proposal comprising Part A: Proposal Detail Part B: Proposal Conditions Annexure A: Proposal Form 4

2. BACKGROUND The Australasian Research Management Society (ARMS) is an international organisation dedicated to the professional development of research managers and administrators, the promotion of the profession of research management and the enhancement of the research enterprise. The Society values a stronger, vibrant research sector in the region, high standards of research governance including the protection of integrity and ethics of research, and the profession of research management as integral to the research endeavour. ARMS is a member of the International Network of Research Management Societies (INORMS) and through this network, has established strong links with other international research management societies including: Association of Research Managers and Administrators (ARMA, UK) European Association of Research Managers and Administrators (EARMA, Europe) National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA, USA) Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI, USA) Southern African Research & Innovation Management Association (SARIMA, South Africa) ARMS comprises over 2000 members from universities, medical research institutes, Commonwealth research agencies, State and federal government departments. It is structured into a number of Chapters, mainly based around Australian States but also includes New Zealand and Singapore. It has Special Interest Groups convened around communities of specific research management issues. It is governed by an Executive with each Chapter also having local leadership groups see the About Us tab at http://researchmanagement.org.au/# for a full listing of Chapters, Committees and Special Interest Groups as well as details of governance and the ARMS strategic plan. In fulfilling its aim of enhancing the research management profession, ARMS runs a successful annual conference supplemented by a number of local Chapter events each year. 2.1. Foundation Level Accreditation Program An additional important element in the ARMS Professional Development program has been the introduction of a Foundation level accreditation program comprising 10 modules of leaning with another two Singapore specific modules about to be introduced. These modules are designed for: (a) Persons new to research management, ie 1-3 years experience; (b) Those with longer experience but wishing to refresh their knowledge; and (c) Those who may have specialised in one specific area of research management but wish to broaden their knowledge in other areas. Further details of the modules are given under the Accreditation tab at http://researchmanagement.org.au/# In order to achieve Foundation level accreditation candidates are required to complete and pass three compulsory and two elective modules (5 modules in total) and are then invited to complete a case study based on scenarios that may confront a practicing research manager. Since the introduction of the Foundation level accreditation program in September, 2013 there 5

have been approximately 1100 unit registrations in the ten modules, with approximately 80 persons having completed all requirements and being accredited as Accredited Research Managers (Foundation) or ARM(F). The quality and standards of the Foundation Level Accreditation Program are overseen by an arms-length Accreditation Council chaired by Professor Jim Piper, retired Deputy Vice Chancellor (Research) at Macquarie University and comprising senior representatives from government agencies, university research offices and ARMS. 2.2. Professional Level Accreditation Program Following the successful introduction of the Foundation Level Accreditation Program, ARMS now wishes to introduce a Professional Level Accreditation Program aimed at enhancing the leadership, management and content skills of senior research managers. Following consultation with the ARMS membership, the ARMS Executive has agreed to a model which comprises multiple elements as follows: Core modules focussing on leadership, management and strategic thinking skills (20 hours)- Details are described in separate proposal document for Work Package 1; Two, one day electives focussing on deep, relevant content knowledge. Currently there are five electives planned for the Professional Level Accreditation Program Understanding international research funding programs; Evidence based analysis of research performance; Assessing the societal benefits of research; Development of institutional research talent and Research governance (16 hours) Details are described in separate proposal document for Work Package 2; Participation in on-going group learning activities (18 hours) participation in a 90 minute teleconference/skype activity per month over a 12 month period. The purpose of these moderated discussions is to enable participants to discuss their workplace assignments in a group context and/or to discuss institutional strategies to emerging hot topic issues Details are described in separate proposal document for Work Package 3; A workplace activity based on core and elective modules This will be a substantial piece of written work which may focus on some aspect of workplace change, development and implementation of an institutional strategy etc - (24 hours) Work Package 4 (currently not available for tender); and Professional mentoring/coaching activity (12 hours) based on one hour per month over a 12 month period. This element will be flexible in operation and tailored to the candidate s needs. The candidate may suggest a mentor, or may request that one be provided for them. Mentoring will include workplace shadowing and other activities that expose the candidate to input from senior managers. The mentoring component may also be an assessed component of the program Work Package 5 (currently not available for tender). Total content will be 90 hours over a 12 month period and it is expected that candidates will spend another 90 hours in self-guided learning through selected readings and preparation for the program activities. ARMS is currently calling for Proposals to cover Work Packages, 1, 2 and 3 only. At the conclusion of the Professional level program it is envisaged that candidates will receive a qualification currently ARMS is looking at two options: 6

(a) A continuation of self-accreditation status, ie graduates receive a designation of Accredited Research Manager (Professional); or (b) A postgraduate qualification such as a Graduate Certificate or Graduate Diploma. Both options may be made available to candidates. Successful Applicants will be expected to develop the content for their work package for delivery by March, 2016. This timeline should include at least one month for the ARMS Accreditation Council to assess and approve the content. Successful Applicants will be granted sole delivery rights for their work package for a period of three years, subject to satisfactory performance. Payment will be made as modules are delivered, not in advance during the development phase Applicants should consider this in developing their own financial models. Applicants will be responsible for developing assessment criteria for their work package, but will not be responsible for conducting the assessment. Assessment will be conducted via the ARMS Executive Office with the Accreditation Council providing quality assurance and oversight of assessment processes, standards and results. Further detail of the agreed model for this program is available in a Preferred Model for Professional Level Accreditation paper available from the ARMS Chief Operating Officer upon request. 3. DESCRIPTION OF WORK PACKAGE 2 Elective elements of the Professional level accreditation program reflect the range of activities currently undertaken by senior research management personnel and should elicit a deeper understanding of issues from participants. Exposure to national and international perspectives will be essential to gain this understanding. Most ARMS members are based in Australia. However, ARMS does have active Chapters in New Zealand and Singapore. We anticipate that the face-to-face components of the program will be delivered in mainland Australia. Nevertheless, Applicants should be aware that each cohort may include candidates from New Zealand and/or Singapore and we would expect successful Applicants to demonstrate that they are able to tailor their materials accordingly. It is anticipated that each elective will take approximately one day to complete. The agreed commencing set of electives are: Understanding international research funding programs (Horizon 2020, National Institute of Health, US etc) and management of international programs. This should include an overview of international funding programs available to ARMS membership institutions, current priorities of international funding Councils, essential information for ARMS membership applicants and conditions of award or sub-contracts; Evidence based analysis of research performance, including bibliometric analysis of publication data, strategic management of research performance, national and international ranking schemes; Assessing the societal benefit of research, i.e. research impact an understanding of international trends in identifying and assessing research impact, identification of institutional impact, tracking and assessing impact, communicating the benefits of publically funded research; 7

Development of institutional research talent developing Higher Degree Research (HDR) and Early Career Research (ECR) programs, supporting institutional training programs. This module is not intended to be a training package for HDRs and ECRs but rather a session on how to develop such training frameworks. It should demonstrate a knowledge of existing Australian and international researcher training programs rather than represent one training product ; and Research governance, focussing more on medical research institutes and research conducted in hospital, incorporating Responsible Conduct of Research Codes, managing clinical trials, harmonisation of multi-ethics centre applications etc. 3.1. Proposal Price ARMS will pay the successful Applicant an upper limit of $4000 for the development and delivery of each of the five modules above. Successful bidders will be granted exclusive delivery rights for the agreed module(s) for a period of three years, subject to satisfactory performance. Payment will be made upon delivery of the module(s) to a cohort of participants. It is anticipated that each module will be delivered to approximately one or two cohorts each year. Applicants may bid to deliver one or several of the above elective modules. 4. FORM AND METHOD OF PROPOSAL 4.1. Request for Proposal ARMS invites the Applicant to submit a proposal to undertake the services set out in the Proposal Conditions. 4.2. Format and Contents of Proposal Applicants (which may include Groups), submitting a proposal for this work package should provide a written application addressing the following: Full trading name, address and contact details; A minimum of five years demonstrated specialist knowledge and expertise relevant to the development of the work package; Previous experience developing and/or delivering topics in the work package area; The proposed methodology and timeline for developing content in the work package area; A description of the training methodologies to be used in delivery of the program; An understanding of the needs of the research management community and how the topic area will be tailored to this community; Details of past service to the ARMS community and/or expected future service to the ARMS community; Names and contact details of two referees who may be contacted by ARMS; and The Proposal shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements. The Proposal shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: Proposal must be in English; All prices quoted must be in Australian currency; All prices quoted must be GST inclusive; Proposals with alterations, measures or prices not clearly and legibly stated, may be excluded from consideration; 8

Any alternations must be initialled by the same person who signs the Proposal and the Applicant; and Proposals must be a maximum of 10, A4 pages, including Proposal Form. 4.3. Completeness of Proposal If the Proposal does not include all of the information in the format required by the Request for Proposal or is incomplete in any way, that Proposal may not be considered or may be assessed solely on the information received. 4.4. Presentation by the Applicants The ARMS Executive may request an Applicant to make a presentation of its Proposal but may not make the same request to all Applicants. 4.5. Contact Person The only person authorised by ARMS to communicate with the Applicant is the Contact Person or President of the Society. Therefore, the Applicant cannot rely on communication with any other person. Any communication with the Contact Person must be in writing (including email) and addressed to the Contact Person (refer to Part A for details). 4.6. Method of Lodgement All Proposals are to be submitted by the Proposal Closing Date stipulated in Part A. Applications are to be submitted via email in PDF to the ARMS Contact Person Maria Zollo, ARMS COO, email ARMS_CEO@researchmanagement.org.au Late Proposals will be regarded as non-complying Proposals and may not be accepted by the Society (although ARMS reserves the right, in its absolute discretion, to accept a late Proposal). 5. PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT Applications will be assessed by a working party comprising members of the ARMS Accreditation Council and the ARMS Professional Development and Accreditation Committee. 5.1. Proposal Assessment Criteria Based on the information in Section 3, a proposal is required which: Provides demonstrated understanding of the needs of ARMS; Demonstrates the appropriateness of the delivery the Applicant proposes; Provides a detailed breakdown of costings, including estimations of expenses Provides details of any subcontractors to be involved; Provides a detailed timing schedule; Details the staff and other resources to be made available; Details the type of information that the Applicant would require ARMS to provide; and Details any other matter of relevance. 9

The table below details the Proposal Assessment Criteria: Criteria Comment Proposed Weight Capability Ability to deliver work package, track 30% record of Applicant. Assessed against strength of provision of case studies, referees and response to Proposal Assessment Criteria. Reputation Reputation of Applicant and track 30% record illustrated by impact of past activities through citation of examples Timeliness and Ability to meet timeframes and 20% Approach approach to the work packages. Assessed by response to Proposal Assessment Criteria. Cost Competitiveness of cost. Assessed by response to Proposal Assessment Criteria. 20% ARMS reserves the right to conduct referee checks for any shortlisted proposals. 5.2. Proposal Validity and Assessment Period Proposals may be kept open for consideration during the Proposal Validity and Assessment Period. Proposals may only be withdrawn during the Proposal Validity Period with the consent of ARMS; The Proposal Validity and Assessment Period may be extended by mutual agreement between ARMS and Applicant; and ARMS will assess each Proposal within the Proposal Validity and Assessment Period. 5.3. Clarification Where matters of significance make it necessary to amend any part of this Request for Proposal prior to the Proposal Closing Date, the amendments shall be advised as an Addendum forwarded by (or on behalf of) ARMS to Applicants, such Addendum may result in a change to the Proposal Closing Date as advised by ARMS. 5.4. Acceptance of Proposal and Proposal Negotiations ARMS is not obliged to accept any Proposal. If ARMS does accept a Proposal, it is not obliged to accept the lowest price Proposal. 10

ARMS may consider or accept, At ARMS sole discretion, any Proposal including without limitation a late Proposal or an Applicant who has failed to submit a Proposal in accordance with these Conditions. No acceptance of a Proposal nor any invitation to negotiate or to make an offer will be effective to constitute a contract or to create any legitimate expectation on the part of the Applicant, unless a formal written agreement is entered into between the selected applicant and ARMS. Negotiations with a selected Applicant, it may, in its absolute discretion, decide to suspend, discontinue or terminate at any time. ARMS will notify unsuccessful Applicants when a successful Applicant has been selected; and ARMS is not obliged to give any reasons for its selection or abandonment of this Process. 5.5. Short-Listing and Interview The ARMS Executive will review all Proposals received by the Proposal Closing Date as stipulated in Part A. It will then determine which Applicants it may wish to invite to conduct a formal interview to determine which proposal is best fit against the evaluation criteria and within the fee structure of the Society. 5.6. Best and Final Offer Short-listed Applicants may be invited, as part of the process, to submit a best and final offer in relation to all or certain aspects of the Proposal. If ARMS chooses to provide Applicants the opportunity to submit a best and final offer, it is under no obligation to provide notification before the proposal Closing Date that such opportunity will be given. 5.7. Confidentiality Information supplied by or on behalf of ARMS is confidential to ARMS and Applicants are requested to maintain its confidentiality. Conversely, ARMS also understands the need to keep aspects of the Applicant proposal confidential, but reserves the right to disclose some of the contents only for the purpose of evaluation of that Proposal. 5.8. Intellectual Property ARMS owns the Intellectual Property Rights in this Request for Proposal and any other documents provided in connection with this process. ARMS also owns the Intellectual Property for all training materials developed in relation to the delivery of this work package. 5.9. Contract Arrangements Successful Applicants will be required to enter into a contract with ARMS agreeing the proposal price, deliverables and delivery timeline. Successful Applicants will be granted exclusive rights to deliver the work package, subject to satisfactory performance, for a period of three years. 5.10. Cost and Preparation of Proposal Each Applicant is responsible for the cost of preparing and submitting its Proposal and all other costs arising out of this process, including travel costs associated with attending an interview, if required. ANNEXURE A: ARMS PROPOSAL FORM 11