U.S. Army Installation Management Command Centralized Geospatial Data Collection Effort Update

Similar documents
U.S. Army Installation Management Command Centralized Geospatial Data Collection Effort Update

Army Utilities Privatization Program

IMCOM G9 Atlantic Region

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Contracting Support to the Warfighter

Duty Title Unit Location

Duty Title Unit Location

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

Wildland Fire Assistance

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Army Privatization Update

Capability Planning for Today and Tomorrow Installation Status Report

Using GIS to Measure the Impacts of Encroachment on Training & Testing for the US Army

Chemical Agent Monitor Simulator (CAMSIM)

GIS Mapping of Army Real Property Land Data

ACC Contracting Command Update

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

BAH Analysis: Impact to RCI

COL Scott A. Campbell. AMCOM Contracting Center

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

ODASA Privatization and Partnerships Overview

General/Flag Officer Quarters (GFOQ) and Executive Housing (EH)

Streamlining U.S. Army Military Installation Map (MIM) Production

Joint Basing/BRAC/Transformation Update Industry Day Brief

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Transformational Change at the Top. Sustainability Institutionalized by Army Leadership

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

DOD's Industrial Modernization Incentive Program (IMIP)

Impact of Corrosion on Ground Vehicles: Program Review, Issues and Solutions

United States Army Sustainment Command Rock Island Arsenal Advance Planning Briefings for Industry (APBI)

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

Installation Status Report Natural Infrastructure ISR-NI

Army Sustainment Command. Requirements for ASC

National Guard and Army Reserve Readiness and Operations Support

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

at the Missile Defense Agency

IMPLEMENTING INSTRUCTIONS TRANSITION OF RESERVE COMPONENT SOLDIERS FROM PARTIAL MOBILIZATION TO MEDICAL RETENTION PROCESSING

Army Compatible Use Buffer Program

If.,, GATEWAY TO CARE MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS SERIES S73 DATABASE PROJECT AD-A (TCSDP) 9 CR MAY 1994

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012

Program Management Office, Medical Support Systems

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

Defense Travel Management Office

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND CORROSION PROGRAM

From the onset of the global war on

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Information Technology

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

Transcription:

U.S. Army nstallation Management Command Centralized Geospatial Data Collection Effort Update Francis Boylan, AGESS Environmental, nc. US Army Environmental Command Range & Technology Division 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 francis.boylan@us.army.mil Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 1 of 16 17APR2009

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for nformation Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE MAY 2009 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009 4. TTLE AND SUBTTLE U.S. Army nstallation Management Command Centralized Geospatial Data Collection Effort Update 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNT NUMBER 7. PERFORMNG ORGANZATON NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) US Army Environmental Command,Range & Technology Division,Aberdeen Proving Ground,MD,21010 8. PERFORMNG ORGANZATON REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORNG/MONTORNG AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONTOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DSTRBUTON/AVALABLTY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONTOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the NDA Environment, Energy Security & Sustainability (E2S2) Symposium & Exhibition held 4-7 May 2009 in Denver, CO. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURTY CLASSFCATON OF: 17. LMTATON OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 16 19a. NAME OF RESPONSBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANS Std Z39-18

Agenda Overview of CGDCE Current status and lessons learned Future plans Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 2 of 16 17APR2009

Army nstallation Geospatial nformation & Services Army G&S supports many missions including emergency response planning, force protection, training support, facilities management, and natural resources conservation To support these missions, installation geospatial information must be accurate and must meet Federal, DoD, and Army spatial data standards Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 3 of 16 17APR2009

Army G&S Proponency, Common nstallation Picture, and Quality Assurance Plan Memo 15 Aug 08 Dual signature (ACSM and Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7) Assigns a HQ level and installation level proponent to geospatial data layers; proponent responsible for creation and maintenance of geospatial data Requires all Army installations to maintain geospatial CP data and metadata for their sites HQ data proponents are responsible for developing and maintaining QAPs Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 4 of 16 17APR2009

Centralized Geospatial Data Collection Effort A way for HQDA, regions, and installations to fund the central collection of geospatial data Enables coordination of multiple efforts, reduces project management costs, and minimizes impacts on the installations End state of a centralized data collection effort is standardized installation geospatial data that: meet proponent requirements are approved and validated by the Garrisons become part of the Garrison s database of record and will be sustained and maintained by the Garrison in accordance with standards and policy Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 5 of 16 17APR2009

Paid for with FY08 funds 13 environmental data layers at 45 installations First Cycle of CGDCE 1 FAUNA CRTCAL HABTAT 2 FAUNA THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECES 3 FLORA CRTCAL HABTAT 4 FLORA THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECES 5 WETLANDS 6 LAKES, RESERVORS, PONDS 7 & 8 9 RVERS & STREAMS RESTRCTED ARCHAEOLOGCAL STES 10 VEGETATON COVER 11 LANDFLLS 12 SOLS 13 ELEVATON CONTOURS Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 6 of 16 17APR2009

Northeast Region nstallation List Southeast Region West Region ABERDEEN PROVNG GROUND FORT A P HLL FORT BELVOR FORT DRUM FORT EUSTS FORT GEORGE G MEADE FORT LEE FORT MONMOUTH FORT MONROE PCATNNY ARSENAL WEST PONT MLTARY RESERVATON FORT LEONARD WOOD ROCK SLAND ARSENAL FORT MCCOY FORT DX FORT BENNNG FORT BRAGG FORT CAMPBELL FORT GORDON FORT JACKSON FORT KNOX FORT MCPHERSON FORT RUCKER FORT STEWART REDSTONE ARSENAL FORT POLK Pacific Region FORT GREELY FORT RCHARDSON FORT SHAFTER FORT WANWRGHT SCHOFELD BARRACKS DUGWAY PROVNG GROUND FORT CARSON FORT LEAVENWORTH FORT LEWS FORT RLEY FORT BLSS FORT HOOD FORT HUACHUCA FORT SAM HOUSTON FORT SLL NATONAL TRANNG CENTER AND FORT RWN WHTE SANDS MSSLE RANGE YUMA PROVNG GROUND COMBAT SUPPORT TRANNG CENTER AND CAMP PARKS Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 7 of 16 17APR2009

Process and Coordination Execution Order (EXORD) 08-024, MCOM Centralized Geospatial Data Collection defines process, roles and responsibilities of all parties involved Fragment Order (FRAGO) 01 lays out installations and data layers USAEC coordinates with MCOM Region G&S Coordinators (Plans) to reach installations Main POC at installation is G&S Coordinator, typically found in the Plans, Analysis, and ntegration Office Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 8 of 16 17APR2009

Other Key Players Data steward The subject matter expert for a data layer s responsible for ensuring the quality and availability of data acquired, developed, and maintained for the layer Data custodian The person that creates and maintains geospatial data; this person is likely to be a CADD or GS professional that may be located in the same office as the data steward Garrison Commander Signature authority for all garrison datasets Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 9 of 16 17APR2009

USAEC field team obtains existing installation geospatial data Field team compares existi ng data layers to OAPs to identify shortfalls Timeline for CGDCE Field team performs site visit All work completed and work yet to be completed is documented Reject Reject nstallation SME reviews data at end of site vi sit and signs off on data documentation -------------------------- ~-- ~-J ~ ~ Field team completes work on installation data layers --------------- ~-- ~-- ~-- ~-- ~--~-1 ~ ~ i l Approve Data entered into l Army Mapper [ ACSM On-site EXORD coordi - issued nation mtg + Field team Data coll ection submits data,, site visit to USAEC for technical,,,, Approved Data sent to GC approval data nstallation for submitted to review Site visit outbri ef review Army Mapper PHASE : PHASE l PHASE ll ii PHASE V! ------'~=-=~=------' ----------------- '--------------------------------------------------------------' Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 10 of 16 17APR2009

Northeast Region Sites Visited as of May Southeast Region West Region ABERDEEN PROVNG GROUND FORT A P HLL FORT BELVOR FORT DRUM FORT EUSTS FORT GEORGE G MEADE FORT LEE FORT MONMOUTH FORT MONROE PCATNNY ARSENAL WEST PONT MLTARY RESERVATON FORT LEONARD WOOD ROCK SLAND ARSENAL FORT MCCOY FORT DX FORT BENNNG FORT BRAGG FORT CAMPBELL FORT GORDON FORT JACKSON FORT KNOX FORT MCPHERSON FORT RUCKER FORT STEWART REDSTONE ARSENAL FORT POLK Pacific Region FORT GREELY FORT RCHARDSON FORT WANWRGHT FORT SHAFTER SCHOFELD BARRACKS DUGWAY PROVNG GROUND FORT CARSON FORT LEAVENWORTH FORT LEWS FORT RLEY FORT BLSS FORT HOOD FORT HUACHUCA FORT SAM HOUSTON FORT SLL NATONAL TRANNG CENTER AND FORT RWN WHTE SANDS MSSLE RANGE YUMA PROVNG GROUND COMBAT SUPPORT TRANNG CENTER AND CAMP PARKS Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 11 of 16 17APR2009

CGDCE Stats Total number of on-site coordination meetings performed: 19 Total number of data collection site visits performed: 4 Total number of installation datasets reviewed by USAEC: 1 Total number of installation datasets validated by installation staff: 0 Total number of installation datasets loaded into Army Mapper: 0 Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 12 of 16 17APR2009

Preliminary Findings People G&S staff levels vary across Army installations Most environmental GS staff are civilians GS is not their primary responsibility Geospatial Data 62% of geospatial data layers were not previously in Army Mapper 28 % of geospatial data evaluated in first cycle do not meet Federal, DoD, or Army standards Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 13 of 16 17APR2009

Lessons Learned Communication is critical at all levels nstallations welcome the CGDCE once they understand how it benefits their G&S program Every installation has required some level of work to bring data to standard (SDSFE and/or Army G&S metadata standard) nstallations are hesitant to release T&E species data and cultural resources data Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 14 of 16 17APR2009

Future Plans Additional centralized data collection efforts to be executed through EXORD / FRAGO Buildings and roads data collection to take place at 15 installations (FRAGO 02) Encroachment data collection and analysis an FY09 UFR Mr. Francis T. Boylan / MAE-RT / 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 /francis.boylan@us.army.mil 15 of 16 17APR2009

Questions Francis Boylan, AGESS Environmental, nc. US Army Environmental Command Range & Technology Division 410-436-2873 / DSN 584-2873 francis.boylan@us.army.mil Leading Change for nstallation Excellence Ms. Nicole J. Miller / MAE-RT / 410-436-2727 / DSN 584-2727 / niki.miller1@us.army.mil 16 of 9 031700RSEP2008