Workflow template description. Review Update

Similar documents
Workflow template description. Review Development

1. Archie 4.3 new features and webinars (22/23 January and 23/24 January)

Guidelines for Special Issue Guest Editors

The Python Papers Source Codes

NIHR COCHRANE COLLABORATION PROGRAMME GRANT SCHEME

UNIVERSITY OF BATH SABBATICAL LEAVE SCHEME Call for Applications

COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure

Editorial Manager Instructions for Editor-in-Chief

Grants Module Guide. Table of Contents

Integration - editors

Adis Rapid Publishing Service

ALICE Policy for Publications and Presentations

Appendix 3 to AO/1-7094/12/NL/CO Page 1

Presenter procedures... 6 Business and Corporate proposals... 6 Presenter Guidelines... 7

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Journal

Allergy & Rhinology. Manuscript Submission Guidelines. Table of Contents:

Annex 4.3 Notes of session 1

Framework Contract for the Provision of Non-Code User Pays Services Schedule 2 Services Schedule Change Procedure UPCO003 IAD Transactional Charging

The Python Papers Source Codes

Navigate to the Application

Guidelines for Peer Assessors

Performance audit report. Department of Internal Affairs: Administration of two grant schemes

FP7 SESAM FORCE. Reporting Tools. Access through the Participant Portal

Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing

Methods: National Clinical Policies

Proposal for a CG Educational Content Online Submission and Reviewing System

CMDv/BPG/002. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Decentralised Procedure (DCP)

Instructions for Submission: Research Grant Applications National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2018

Manual for Annual Meeting Session Organizers

Building a Common REMS Platform: Use Case Guide for Prescriber Certification

Final Accreditation Report

DEMYSTIFYING THE PUBLICATION PROCESS. Peter Harries, PhD Professor of Geosciences and Assistant Dean, USF Office of Graduate Studies

PHMPapers.org The PHM Society s paper submission, review, and distribution portal Conference Submission Instructions for Authors

The meeting was held in St. Julian s, Malta,and hosted by the Planning Authority of Malta

COURSE SYLLABUS NURS 620 NURSE EDUCATOR IV: ROLE OF A NURSE EDUCATOR

British Society for Surgery of the Hand. (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical

Review Editor Guidelines

REPORTING and PAYMENT (in practice)

OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE

Systematic Review. Request for Proposal. Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN

Guideline on the Role of Directors of Area Addiction Services Appointed under the Substance Addiction (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017

Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation

Professional Experience Placement Risk Management Procedure

APPLICATION FORM FOR FUNDING ARTS ORGANISATION: 1 st April 2016 to 31 st March 2017

Workforce Development Innovation Fund 2018/19

JSWC EDITORIAL POLICY

PEER REVIEW (AN OVERVIEW)

Knowledge Exchange and Dissemination Scheme

ATTACHMENT 1 - RESEARCH PROPOSAL FORM

Submission Guidelines for IPMA Project Achievement Awards International Level 2017

Instructions for Submission: Pilot Grant Applications National Multiple Sclerosis Society 2018

Each completed Linking Learning to Practice exercise earns you two Mainpro-C credits and two bonus Mainpro-M1 credits.

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

CEN Technical Committees Mode of operations

AHSC AFP Innovation Fund

Getting Started: Creating a New Account and Logging In

Medicine Reconciliation FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS NATIONAL MEDICATION SAFETY PROGRAMME

Value: $15,000 for a period of 12 months. There are no automatic renewals for a second year.

Choice of Accommodation Protocol for In-Patients requiring Placement in Residential or Nursing Home

If the journal is online, this information may not be circumvented by the reader bypassing a location containing this information.

2016 RECYCLING BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT GRANTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS N.C.

Gilead UK & Ireland Corporate Contributions Grant FAQs

Scientific Technical and Medical (STM) journal publishing industry overview

PACFA REQUEST FOR TENDERS FOR RESEARCH SEED GRANTS

20 STEPS FROM STUDY IDEA INCEPTION TO PUBLISHING RESEARCH/ Evidence-Based Practice

INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY COORDINATION PROGRAM

Tips for Writing Successful Grant Proposals During Surgical Residency. Pamela Derish Scientific Publications Office UCSF Department of Surgery

Non Executive Director. Named Professional for Safeguarding and Welfare of Children. Interim Chief Executive Officer

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews: An expanding resource

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HUNT POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP 1. The Wenner Gren Foundation receives over 100 Hunt Postdoctoral Fellowship applications

IRINS. Indian Research Information Network System. Kannan P, Scientist C (LS) INFLIBNET Centre

CIRSE Fellowship Information and Application

National Cervical Screening Programme Policies and Standards. Section 2: Providing National Cervical Screening Programme Register Services

Scientific Advice and Protocol Assistance at the EMEA

Call for Participants: ITIL Update October 2009

Overview of Authorisation Process in Ireland

Goucher Environmental Sustainability Advisory Council (GESAC) Green Fund Handbook. Updated November 2014

AZA Species Survival Plan Program Handbook

RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS GUIDE TO APPLICANTS/CONDITIONS OF AWARD Funding to commence in 2019

PCORI s Authorizing Law and Mandates

The AICPA Peer Review Board appreciates your cooperation and efforts in making the peer review program a success.

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COMMITTEE

Guide to Assessment and Rating for Services

PROCESSING DOD ISSUANCES

Marina Strategy: Section A Request for Proposal. 1. Request for Proposal. 2. Communication. 3. Key Contacts

ECU s Equality Charters Guide to processes. January 2018

Introduction to Call for FFU Proposals, Information meetings for applicants April-May 2014 Dar es Salaam, Kathmandu, Accra and Copenhagen

Deadline extended to Friday, June 1, 2018 Competitive Grant Program in Migraine Research

Unofficial copy not valid

HOW TO UPDATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS IN COURSELEAF

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES. CITY OF BIDDEFORD, MAINE September 13, 2018

SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NURSING GUIDELINES FOR THE CULMINATING EXPERIENCE

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS Provide professional social services supervision as a field educator

re-credentialling APPliCATion PACKAge Credentialled infection Control Professional (CiCP) Application Number:

Guidelines for Telemedicine Scheduling and Patient Care Co-ordination

Applying for postgraduate study

SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) Project Execution Guidelines for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research 2016

Internal Use TBIMS National Database Notification

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY EXPERT TERMS OF REFERENCE

HELLO HEALTH TRAINING MANUAL

Transcription:

Workflow template description Review Update Template version: 1.4

Milestones A. Draft review submitted for editorial approval B. Internal CRG check completed Legend Standard task assigned to an individual C. Refereeing completed Decision task D. Revised review submitted E. Revised review approved by Sign-off Editor F. Copy edit completed Tasks involving group roles (such as Referee). When workflow is running, there will be a set of task for each person with the role. G. Approval for publication received from authors H. Review marked for publication X. Workflow completed Role colour coding Trials Search Coordinator Contact Editor, CRG Advisor, Sign-off Editor Referee, Copy Edit Support, Copy Editor Contact Person

A1. Agree with Contact Person on search date 7 days A. Draft review submitted for editorial approval A2. Pause 90 days A3. Update literature searches Trials Search Co-ordinator, 14 days A4. Submit draft review for editorial approval Contact Person, 90 days A1 A2 A3 A4 Remind the Contact Person that a draft of their updated review is due at the editorial office by [specify a date], and agree on the date when updated searches will be run. Set the due date of Task A2 ('Pause') to the search date agreed. Workflow is paused (consider editing this field to record the reason for the pause). Update the literature searches from the original review. Forward the results to the Contact Person and/or incorporate directly into the review via Archie in accordance with CRG policy. Check the draft review into Archie using the submit for editorial approval option. Contact your Review Group s editorial office for assistance if you are unable to do this. Auto-completes. A. Draft review submitted for editorial approval

A. Draft review submitted for editorial approval B. Internal CRG check completed B1. Draft ready for internal CRG check? 3 days B2. Resolve issues B1 B2 B3 Determine whether the draft review is ready for an internal CRG check. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. Inform all authors of the need to complete/revise Conflicts of Interest forms and specify the date by which the forms are required. B4 Identify people to conduct an internal check of the draft review in accordance with CRG policy (e.g., ME, Contact Editor, other Editors, TSC, other members of the editorial base), and assign each the Workflow Role 'CRG Advisor'. B3. Request Conflicts of Interest forms B5. Confirm receipt of Conflicts of Interest forms 69 days B4. Identify CRG Advisors 7 days Internal CRG check subflow: B8 to B17 58 days (next page) B6. Identify Sign-off Editor 70 days B7. Determine 'type' of update 7 days B5 B6 Confirm receipt of completed/revised Conflicts of Interest forms from all authors. Auto-completes. Identify the person who will be responsible for formally approving the draft review before copy editing (e.g., the review's Contact Editor or the CRG's Co-ordinating Editor), and assign this person the Workflow Role 'Sign-off Editor'. Auto-completes: if role assigned to other than Workflow Manager. B. Internal CRG check completed B7 Make a preliminary decision about whether the draft represents a new citation version, with conclusions changed or not; see Section 3.2.3 of the Handbook. Confirm that the appropriate Events have been added under 'What's new'.

B9. Review and comment on draft review CRG Advisor, 14 days B11. Prepare comments for presentation to authors Contact Editor, 14 days need to send B8. Make draft review available to CRG Advisor B10. Send comments to Contact Editor 2 days B12. Comments ready for authors? 2 days B14. Send comments to Contact Person B16. Does revised Review reflect comments? 3 days B13. Resolve Issues B15. Submit revised review for editorial approval Contact Person, 21 days B17. Resolve Issues Internal CRG check subflow (part of B.) B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 B17 Confirm that the Write Phase is set to Editorial. Make the draft available to the CRG Advisor and specify the date by which comments should be returned. If accessing via Archie, confirm that any Document Role required has been assigned. Review the draft review, prepare comments, and submit these to the Review Group's editorial office by the date requested. Collect and organize comments from all CRG Advisors in accordance with CRG policy, and send comments to the Contact Editor for review and further processing. Evaluate the CRG Advisors' comments and prepare them for presentation to the authors in accordance with CRG policy. Confer with the Co-ordinating Editor or others as needed to resolve any significant disagreements among CRG Advisors. Confirm that the CRG Advisors' comments have been prepared for presentation to the authors in accordance with CRG policy, and that all significant disagreements have been resolved. Use need to send option if draft is suitable to go to referees. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. Send the CRG Advisors' comments to the Contact Person, and ask the Contact Person to prepare and submit a revised version of the review. Set Write Phase in Archie to Authoring. Check the revised review into Archie using the 'submit for editorial approval' option. Contact your Review Group's editorial office for assistance if you are unable to do this. Auto-completes. Determine whether the revised review responds adequately to the CRG Advisors' comments. Confer with Contact Editor and/or others, as needed. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues.

B. Internal CRG check completed C1. External peer review needed? Editorial base, 1 day Tasks C1 and following will then become active for the new Referee. C5. Identify another potential Referee 7 days C1 C. Refereeing completed Determine whether the changes introduced in the updated version are significant enough to require external peer review; for guidance, see Section 3.4.7 of the Handbook (www.cochrane-handbook.org). C2. Identify potential Referees 7 day C3. Invite potential Referee to participate C4. Agree to serve as Referee? Referee, 7 days, Response C2 C3 C4 Identify individuals to be invited to serve as Referees of the draft review in accordance with CRG policy, and assign each the Workflow Role 'Referee'. Invite the potential Referee to participate, and specify the date by which a reply is requested. Indicate whether you agree to serve as a Referee of the specified draft review. If no response is received by the date of reply requested, staff at the Review Group editorial office may enter ' response'. C7. Review and comment on draft review Referee, 21 days Response C6. Make draft review available to Referee C5 C6 Identify another potential Referee and assign them the Workflow Role 'Referee. Invite them to participate, and specify the date by which a reply is requested. Confirm that the Write Phase is set to Editorial. Make the draft available to the Referee and specify the date by which comments should be returned. If accessing via Archie, confirm that any Document Role required has been assigned. To E3: Make revised review available to Sign-off Editor C8. Comments clear and complete? Editorial base, 2 days C9. Resolve issues C7 C8 C9 Review the draft review, prepare comments, and submit these to the Review Group's editorial office by the date requested. Determine whether the Referee's comments are clear and complete, or require clarification or expansion, or no response was received. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. C. Refereeing completed

C. Refereeing completed D1. Send comments to Contact Editor 2 days D1 D. Revised review submitted Collect and organize comments from all Referees in accordance with CRG policy, and send comments to the Contact Editor for review and further processing. D2.Prepare comments for presentation to authors Contact Editor, 14 days D2 Evaluate the Referees' comments and prepare them for presentation to the authors in accordance with CRG policy. Confer with the Co-ordinating Editor or others as needed to resolve any significant disagreements among Referees. D3. Comments ready for authors? 2 days D5. Send comments to Contact Person D4. Resolve issues D6. Submit revised review for editorial approval Contact Person, 21 days D3 D4 D5 D6 Confirm that the Referees' comments have been prepared for presentation to the authors in accordance with CRG policy, and that all significant disagreements have been resolved. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. Send the Referees' comments to the Contact Person, and ask the Contact Person to prepare and submit a revised version of the review. Set Write Phase in Archie to Authoring. Check the revised review into Archie using the 'submit for editorial approval' option. Contact your Review Group's editorial office for assistance if you are unable to do this. Auto-completes. D. Revised review submitted

From C1: External peer review needed? D. Revised review submitted E. Revised review approved by Sign-off Editor E1. Does revised review reflect comments? 2 days E2. Resolve issues E1 E2 E3 Determine whether the revised review responds adequately to the Referees' comments. Confer with Contact Editor and/or others, as needed. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. Confirm that the Write Phase is set to Editorial. Make the revised review available to the Sign-off Editor and specify the date by which a response is requested. If accessing via Archie, confirm that any Document Role required has been assigned. E4. Review ready for final copy editing? Sign-off Editor, 14 days, Conditional E3. Make revised review available to Sign-off Editor E4 E5 Decide whether the review is ready for final copy editing (''), or requires further revision ('' if you want to re-approve the revised version, 'Conditional ' if not). Send comments describing suggested changes to the CRG editorial office. Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. E5. Resolve issues E. Revised review approved by Sign-off Editor

E: Revised review approved by Sign-off Editor F. Copy edit completed F1. Copy edit through Wiley? 1 day Task # F1 Description Decide whether to request formal Copy Edit Support through Wiley or to copy edit the review within the CRG. F2 Assign a Wiley Copy Editor to the review and inform the CRG editorial office of the Copy Editor s identity. F3. Assign Copy Editor Roles F2. Assign Wiley Copy Editor Copy Edit Support, 1 day F3 Confirm that the Workflow and Document Roles 'Copy Editor' have been assigned to the person designated by Wiley Copy Edit Support, or to the person within the CRG who will copy edit the review. F4. Make review available to Copy Editor F6. Check copy editing 3 days F5. Copy edit review Copy Editor, 14 days F4 F5 F6 Confirm that the Write Phase is set to Editorial. tify the Copy Editor that the review is available in Archie for check-out and copy editing. Specify the date by which copy editing should be completed. Copy edit the review in accordance with the Cochrane Style Guide. When finished, check the review into Archie using the 'submit for editorial approval' option. Include a check-in message to the CRG, if appropriate te: Check-in message available only if checking in from RevMan. Review and accept or reject any copy edits, and complete a final pre-publication check of the review. Consult with Sign-off Editor if needed. F. Copy edit completed

G. Approval for publication received from authors F. Copy edit completed G1. Send copy-edited draft to Contact Person G1 G2 Send the copy-edited draft (and/or a version comparison) to the Contact Person by email for final review and approval. Specify the date by which a response is requested. Ask the Contact Person to consult with other authors as appropriate before replying. Indicate whether you and your co-authors approve the final draft of the review for publication. If '', send comments describing any changes needed before publication to the Review Group's editorial office. G2. Approve final draft for publication? Contact Person, 7 days G3 Insert workflow tasks as required or take direct action to resolve issues. G3. Resolve issues G. Approval for publication received from authors

G: Approval for publication received from authors H. Review marked for publication (and X) H1. Mark review for publication H2. Confirm that LfP forms have been sent to authors Task # H1 H2 X1 Description Mark the review for publication in Archie, and return the Write Phase to Authoring. Check the Licence for Publication Report to confirm that all authors have Archie user accounts and have been sent the relevant information about Licence for Publication (LfP) forms. Auto-completes (only when LfP forms are required). When all LfP forms have been submitted, Archie releases the review for publication and sends the Contact Person an automatic email with the publication date and information on how to activate/manage their complimentary subscription. Auto-completes (only if forms are required). H. Review marked for publication X.1 tify Contact Person about publication 7 days X. Workflow completed